logo
Two in court following care home smash

Two in court following care home smash

Rhyl Journal5 days ago
Sam Asgari-Tabar, of no fixed address, and Reece Parish, of Fordham Road, Sunderland, appeared separately at Newcastle Magistrates' Court following the crash on Wednesday night at Highcliffe Care Home, Witherwack, Sunderland.
A blue BMW 3-series which was reported stolen was being pursued by police when it crashed into a wall of the care home, causing extensive structural damage which meant that the building had to be evacuated.
Initially, Northumbria Police said eight residents required hospital treatment.
On Friday, the force said a woman in her 90s and a woman in her 80s, neither of whom were in the eight taken to hospital, had died.
Police inquiries into their deaths continue.
Asgari-Tabar appeared before the court charged with causing serious injury by dangerous driving, said to be a resident who suffered spinal fractures.
He was also charged with robbery of the BMW 3-series, which he was allegedly test-driving, and kidnap of the woman who was taking him out in the vehicle.
No pleas were entered and Asgari-Tabar was remanded in custody to appear before Newcastle Crown Court on August 11.
Parish, who had several supporters in the public gallery, faced two charges, robbery of the car and kidnap.
Magistrates said the case was so serious that it had to be dealt with at the crown court and he was also remanded in custody to appear on the same date as his co-accused.
As he was taken down to the cells, supporters shouted: 'We are all with you.
'Take care of yourself, we all love you mate.'
Previously, police said the car was reported as being stolen in the Fenham area of Newcastle at around 9.25pm and was seen in Sunderland 15 minutes later when a pursuit was authorised.
Following the police pursuit, a mandatory referral has been made to the Independent Office for Police Conduct, officers said.
Alternative accommodation has been found for the residents.
On Friday, a spokeswoman for Avery Healthcare, which runs the care home, said: 'We are deeply saddened by the incident at our home in Sunderland and our thoughts are with all those affected.
'We are committed to supporting our residents, their families, and our dedicated staff during this incredibly difficult time.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cost of Sycamore Gap tree vandals' drunken stunt revealed as pair jailed
Cost of Sycamore Gap tree vandals' drunken stunt revealed as pair jailed

Daily Record

time10 hours ago

  • Daily Record

Cost of Sycamore Gap tree vandals' drunken stunt revealed as pair jailed

Daniel Graham, 39, and Adam Carruthers, 32, were both sentenced to four years and three months in prison for their 'moronic' act of chopping down the Sycamore Gap tree The reckless act that led to the destruction of the 'irreplaceable' Sycamore Gap tree will cost taxpayers nearly £1m, it has been disclosed. ‌ The 'moronic' pair, Daniel Graham and Adam Carruthers, were accused of felling the tree for a senseless 'thrill', and then basking in the media attention, as heard by Newcastle crown court. Both men received prison sentences of four years and three months. ‌ The tree's worth was debated in court, with the prosecution estimating its value at around £458,000, down from an initial estimate of £622,000; Graham's defence argued it should be valued at about £150,000. ‌ The court was informed that the tree's value was approximately £500,000 when considering the impact on tourism and local visitors, though the exact valuation did not significantly affect the sentencing. At their final court appearance, prosecutors described their "moronic mission" to cut down the landmark, with the pair revelling in the outrage in the aftermath. The damage caused to Hadrian's Wall, a UNESCO World Heritage site, as the tree fell was estimated to be over £7,000. The initial operation to secure the site and manage the tree's felling cost £30,000, reports the Mirror. The National Trust reported spending £55,000, funds drawn from their charitable donations. An additional £25,000 was spent last year dealing with the aftermath and the significant public response. Andrew Poad, National Trust manager for Northumberland where the tree was located, stated in a court impact statement that the tree's value was 'incalculable' as it was 'irreplaceable'. He said: "More than £30,000 of our revenue was taken dealing with the incident. "Another £25,000 was spent in 2025, all from National Trust charitable funds. We worked to mitigate the environmental degradation. It would be almost impossible to quantify the number of hours spent and the staffing costs. The impact has been felt every day, every hour since, staff have been working around the clock." ‌ The fortnight-long trial and exhaustive 18-month police probe is expected to burden taxpayers with costs exceeding £250,000. Graham, 39, from near Carlisle, and Carruthers, 32, of Wigton, both Cumbria, eventually confessed to being behind the crime that stunned the globe. Carruthers acknowledged operating the chainsaw whilst Graham recorded him on his mobile device, according to admissions made to probation officers ahead of their sentencing at Newcastle Crown Court this week. By that point, their 10-day trial had accumulated court expenses of approximately £3,500 daily. ‌ Three officers were assigned to the 19-month police investigation leading up to the trial. The detective leading the inquiry, DI Calum Meikle, maintained that Northumbria Police's resource allocation was justified. Legal aid costs for Graham and Carruthers are anticipated to reach £18,674.28, based on a Freedom of Information request. The duo will serve a minimum of 40 per cent of their sentence; the annual cost of their imprisonment totals £44,460. ‌ They will each serve a minimum of 20 months behind bars if they complete the minimum 40 percent of their sentences, adding another £150,000 to the combined cost of their imprisonment. Hairy Biker Si King, 58, from Northumberland, revealed to the Mirror that the financial expense paled in comparison to the emotional toll. "I just cannot get my head around it, even now the question is why did they do it? ," he said. "There is no closure because we still do not have an answer to that. It is simply madness; it was a totem somewhere between the celestial world, and the earth. It was so shocking to have that taken away." ‌ Sentencing the two former workmates, Judge Mrs Justice Lambert said: "I am confident that a major factor in your offending was sheer bravado. Felling the tree in the middle of the night and in the middle of a storm gave you some sort of thrill, as did the media coverage of your crimes over the following days. "You revelled in the coverage, taking evident pride in what you had done, knowing that you were responsible for the crime which so many were talking about. Whether bravado and thrill-seeking provide the complete explanation for what you did, I do not know. ‌ "However, as I say, I am quite sure that you are both equally culpable for the destruction of the tree and for the damage to the wall." Adam Cormack, head of campaigning at the Woodland Trust, has highlighted the public outcry over a recent crime against nature, emphasising the need for stronger legal safeguards for our 'most special and important trees'. Following a Tree Council and Forest Research review published in April, he stated: "We urge the Government to take forward the recommendations of this report. "The sentence sends a clear message that gratuitous damage and destruction of trees is unacceptable. The consequences of the felling of this iconic tree are tragic for nature, for our cultural heritage and for these two men and their families." ‌ Sycamore Gap cost breakdown £500,000 valuation of tree itself, covering loss in tourism, local visitors, cost to the UK and North east economy £7,000 damage to Hadrian's Wall Unesco World Heritage site ‌ £55,000 National Trust bill (all charitable donations) £250,000 police/courts: £200,00 police probe, £35,000 crown court costs, collection of evidence, cell site analysis. Legal aid bill so far: £18,674. £150,000 prison costs for Graham and Carruthers, based on serving 40 percent of sentence.

Sycamore Gap 'drunken stunt' cost to taxypayer revealed as 'moronic' duo jailed
Sycamore Gap 'drunken stunt' cost to taxypayer revealed as 'moronic' duo jailed

Daily Mirror

time15 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Sycamore Gap 'drunken stunt' cost to taxypayer revealed as 'moronic' duo jailed

Daniel Graham and Adam Carruthers chopped down the tree for a mindless 'thrill' and then revelled in media coverage. Both were jailed for four years and three months. The drunken stunt that destroyed the 'irreplaceable' Sycamore Gap tree will cost taxpayers almost £1m, it has been revealed. ‌ "Moronic' duo Daniel Graham and Adam Carruthers chopped down the tree for a mindless 'thrill' and then revelled in the media coverage, Newcastle crown court heard. They were both locked up for four years and three months. The value of the tree was disputed in court with the prosecution saying it was worth about £458,000 after an initial estimate of £622,000; Graham's team claimed it should only be valued about £150,000. The court heard its value was around £500,000 when the impact on tourism and visitors to the local area were taken into account. ‌ ‌ The exact value did not unduly influence sentencing. The damage to Hadrian's Wall as the tree fell, a world Unesco heritage site, was valued at more than £7,000. The initial operation to secure the site and deal with the felling of the tree was £30,000. The National Trust calculated that they had spent £55,000, all money taken out of their charitable donations. Another £25,000 was spent last year on the aftermath as they dealt with the huge public reaction. ‌ Andrew Poad, National Trust manager for Northumberland where the tree stood, said in an impact statement to the court that the value of three was 'incalculable' because it was 'irreplaceable'. He said: "More than £30,000 of our revenue was taken dealing with the incident. "Another £25,000 was spent in 2025, all from National Trust charitable funds. We worked to mitigate the environmental degradation. It would be almost impossible to quantify the number of hours spent and the staffing costs. The impact has been felt every day, every hour since, staff have been working around the clock." The two week trial and extensive 18-month police investigation is likely to cost the taxpayer in excess of £250,000. Graham, 39, from near Carlisle, and Carruthers, 32, of Wigton, both Cumbria, finally admitted that they were responsible for the crime which shocked the world. ‌ Carruthers admitted wielding the chainsaw as Graham filmed him on his own mobile phone in confessions to probation officers before they were sentenced at Newcastle crown court this week. By then, their 10-day trial had racked up court costs of around £3,500 per day. There were three officers working on the inquiry for the 19 month police inquiry prior to the trial. The man in charge of the investigation, DI Calum Meikle, insisted that the use of Northumbria Police time was appropriate. ‌ The legal aid bill for Graham and Carruthers is expected to hit £18,674.28, according to a FoI request. The pair are going to serve at least 40 percent of their sentence; the cost of keeping them behind bars for a year is £44,460. They will each spend at least 20 months in prison if they serve the minimum of 40 percent of their sentences, bringing the combined bill for their incarceration to another £150,000. Hairy Biker Si King, 58, a native of Northumberland, told the Mirror that the financial bill was outweighed by the emotional cost. ‌ "I just cannot get my head around it, even now the question is why did they do it?," he said. "There is no closure because we still do not have an answer to that. It is simply madness; it was a totem somewhere between the celestial world, and the earth. It was so shocking to have that taken away." Sentencing the two former workmates, Judge Mrs Justice Lambert said: "I am confident that a major factor in your offending was sheer bravado. Felling the tree in the middle of the night and in the middle of a storm gave you some sort of thrill, as did the media coverage of your crimes over the following days. ‌ "You revelled in the coverage, taking evident pride in what you had done, knowing that you were responsible for the crime which so many were talking about. Whether bravado and thrill-seeking provide the complete explanation for what you did, I do not know. "However, as I say, I am quite sure that you are both equally culpable for the destruction of the tree and for the damage to the wall." ‌ Adam Cormack, the head of campaigning for the Woodland Trust, said the public response to the crime showed that we have to improve legal protections for our 'most special and important trees' A Tree Council and Forest Research review of that protection was published in April. He added: "We urge the Government to take forward the recommendations of this report. "The sentence sends a clear message that gratuitous damage and destruction of trees is unacceptable. The consequences of the felling of this iconic tree are tragic for nature, for our cultural heritage and for these two men and their families." Sycamore Gap cost breakdown £500,000 valuation of tree itself, covering loss in tourism, local visitors, cost to the UK and North east economy ‌ £7,000 damage to Hadrian's Wall Unesco World Heritage site £55,000 National Trust bill (all charitable donations) £250,000 police/courts: £200,00 police probe, £35,000 crown court costs, collection of evidence, cell site analysis. Legal aid bill so far: £18,674. £150,000 prison costs for Graham and Carruthers, based on serving 40 percent of sentence. Total: £980,674.

Northumbria Police participation in Newcastle pride 'unlawful'
Northumbria Police participation in Newcastle pride 'unlawful'

BBC News

time17 hours ago

  • BBC News

Northumbria Police participation in Newcastle pride 'unlawful'

A chief constable's decision to allow uniformed police officers to take part in a Pride march was unlawful, a judge has ruled.A case was brought against Northumbria Police Chief Constable Vanessa Jardine by Lindsey Smith, from Newcastle, who describes herself as "gender critical".Ms Smith argued Mrs Jardine and her officers' participation in Newcastle Pride last year meant they would have been unable to remain impartial if a dispute between those with similar beliefs and trans rights supporters had force said it would work through the ruling to understand the implications but would remain true to its values of "fairness, visibility, and support for all". In a judgement issued on Wednesday after a High Court hearing in Leeds earlier this month, Mr Justice Linden said it was "irrational" for Mrs Jardine to think officers could take part in the Smith said she was "delighted" with the court's judgement, feeling the force had "abandoned their duty of impartiality and embraced a highly controversial political cause"."Their participation in the Pride march clearly shows where their sympathies lie," she said. "My hope is Northumbria Police change their ways and follow this ruling. If they do, they will be policing the community for everyone." In her claim, Ms Smith described how a "contingent of uniformed officers" led by the chief constable marched behind a trade union banner during last year's march. She said Mrs Jardine had associated herself with placards, chanting and the Progress Flag, which represents the wider LGBTQ+ the march, officers carried a Police Pride flag and flags in the Pride colours, and wore uniforms with the word "police" written in rainbow colours. A police van was also painted in the same colours. Northumbria Police defended its decision to participate in the event but told the court only off-duty police officers would be permitted to take part in 2025 and would not be allowed to wear force stall would be staffed by uniformed officers who would not be allowed to exhibit Pride insignia, it said. The force said participating in Pride allowed it to be visible in the LGBT community. It said the chief constable believed the its participation in Pride was one way to demonstrate "the stigma which has traditionally afflicted members of the LGBT+ community will not be reflected" in the community's interactions with aim during events was to keep people safe but they provided an "opportunity to engage with people including those who may have less confidence in policing", it said."That is why we felt it important to challenge the case which was brought against us and which has implications for wider policing." Chief Constable Gavin Stephens, who chairs the National Police Chiefs' Council, said it would ensure the legal decision was communicated to other forces and was working with the College of Policing on broader guidance. Ms Smith previously threatened to sue Newcastle United when she was banned from St James' Park after the football club received complaints that some tweets she had made online were derogatory towards trans people. Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store