Former Nicaragua president Violeta Chamorro dead at 95
Chamorro, who ruled the poor Central American country from 1990 to 1997, "died in peace, surrounded by the affection and love of her children," said a statement issued by her four children.
As president, Chamorro managed to bring to an end a civil war that had raged for much of the 1980s as US-backed rebels known as the 'Contras' fought the leftist Sandinista government.
That conflict made Nicaragua one of the big proxy battlegrounds of the Cold War.
Chamorro put her country on the path to democracy in the difficult years following the Sandinista revolution of 1979, which had toppled a US-backed right-wing regime.
In a country known for macho culture, Chamorro had a maternal style and was known for her patience and a desire for reconciliation.
When she won the 1990 election at the head of a broad coalition, she defeated Daniel Ortega, the Sandinista guerrilla leader and icon who is now president again -- and has faced criticism for ruling like a leftist dictator.
mis/ad/dw/sst
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Fact Check: Viral Stimulus Check Claims for Summer Are False, IRS Will Not Send New Checks This Summer
The federal government has confirmed that it will not be issuing new stimulus checks this summer, debunking circulating online rumors. What Happened: On Friday, the internet was abuzz with rumors that the U.S. government was planning to distribute stimulus checks to certain income brackets in the near future. However, the IRS has clarified that no such legislation has been passed by Congress, and therefore, no new stimulus checks will be issued in the upcoming weeks, reports the Associated Press. Claims that the Internal Revenue Service and the Treasury Department had approved $1,390 stimulus checks for low- and middle-income taxpayers by the end of the summer were also debunked by the IRS. As per the repot, an IRS official stated that this claim is false and no new stimulus checks will be distributed this summer. Earlier this year, the IRS had announced plans to distribute about $2.4 billion to taxpayers who failed to claim a Recovery Rebate Credit on their 2021 tax returns. However, the IRS official confirmed there is no new credit that taxpayers can claim. Republican Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri had introduced a bill in July proposing tax rebates to qualified taxpayers using revenue from tariffs instituted by President Donald Trump. However, this bill has not been passed by either the Senate or the House. Also Read: Public Opinion Divided Over Donald Trump's Tax-And-Spending Law, New Poll Reveals Earlier this year, the IRS announced that it would distribute $2.4 billion to taxpayers who failed to claim on their 2021 tax returns a Recovery Rebate Credit, a refundable credit for individuals who did not receive one or more COVID-19 stimulus checks. The maximum amount was $1,400 per individual. Individuals who had not yet filed their 2021 tax return were required to do so by April 15 in order to claim the credit. According to an IRS official, no new credit is currently available for taxpayers to claim, reports the outlet. Previous stimulus payments were made possible only through legislation passed by Congress. For instance, the relief checks issued during the COVID-19 pandemic were authorized under three major laws: the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, the COVID-Related Tax Relief Act, and the American Rescue Plan Act. Why It Matters: The rumors of new stimulus checks had sparked hope among many taxpayers who are still grappling with the economic fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic. The clarification from the IRS, however, has put these hopes to rest. The absence of new stimulus checks could potentially impact consumer spending, which is a key driver of the U.S. economy. The proposed bill by Senator Hawley, if passed, could provide some relief to taxpayers, but its future remains uncertain. Read Next Independent Voters' Approval Rating Of Donald Trump Plummets, Latest Poll Indicates Image: Shutterstock/Alex Millauer Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Fact Check: Viral Stimulus Check Claims for Summer Are False, IRS Will Not Send New Checks This Summer originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Shein, Temu expected to raise prices as de minimis loophole closes this month
A trade loophole that allows for low-value goods to be shipped to the U.S. duty-free is set to end on Aug. 29 after President Donald Trump signed an executive order last month to sunset the de minimis trade agreement. Packages valued at $800 or less sent to the U.S. outside of the international postal network will now face "all applicable duties," the White House said in July. Shein and Temu are two popular fast fashion brands that have attracted American shoppers looking to place large orders at heavily discounted costs and often with free shipping. With the trade loophole ending, U.S. consumers are bracing to see rising prices, including in their once-cheap fast fashion orders. Here's how consumers could be affected by the policy change: Shein and Temu sell a range of products, including clothing, furniture and more that arrive quickly and cheaply. Over half of all packages with de minimis exemptions come from China, and more than 30% of all daily packages shipped under de minimis are from Temu and Shein, Reuters reported in February. A provision in the Tariff Act of 1930 allows for de minimis exemptions, which has become the primary route for e-commerce imports from China to enter the U.S. According to a congressional report from February, between 2018 and 2023, Chinese exports of low-value, single packages increased dramatically from $5.3 billion to $66 billion. Shein, Temu prices have gone up: We tracked some items to see how much. Shein and Temu announced in early April that prices would be rising on both platforms in response to changing trade policy between the U.S. and China. They have yet to announce how much their prices will increase once the de minimis trade loophole ends at the end of August. Eliminating the loophole for China would have "far-reaching negative effects for Americans, particularly poorer consumers," according to libertarian think tank the Cato Institute. Republican U.S. Senator Jim Banks of Indiana hailed the executive order, saying "for too long, countries like China have flooded our markets with duty-free, cheap imports." Contributing: Kinsey Crowley and staff, USA TODAY; Reuters This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Why Shein, Temu could raise prices as de minimis ends in August
Washington Post
3 hours ago
- Washington Post
The Trump-Putin summit wasn't a disaster, but it was a U.S. defeat
U.S. leaders and their Soviet or Russian counterparts have met many times in the more than eight decades since Franklin D. Roosevelt journeyed to Tehran in 1943 for a summit with Joseph Stalin and Winston Churchill. The Friday meeting between President Donald Trump and Russian dictator Vladimir Putin in Alaska was far from the worst. But it wasn't good, either, except from the Kremlin's vantage point. It was not Yalta (1945), where Roosevelt and Churchill handed over Eastern Europe to Soviet domination (albeit with little choice in the matter). It was not Vienna (1961), where Nikita Khrushchev was so unimpressed by the young U.S. president, John F. Kennedy, that he was emboldened to build a wall across Berlin and to place nuclear missiles in Cuba. It was not even Helsinki (2018), where Trump humiliated himself and his country by accepting Putin's assurances that Russia had not meddled in the 2016 election over the findings of the U.S. intelligence that it had. The best thing you can say about the Alaska summit is that it could have been worse. There is no indication that Trump endorsed Putin's demand that Ukraine hand over more territory to Russia in return for a ceasefire. Nor was there any deal to relax U.S. sanctions on Russia. If Trump had made concessions on that scale, the Alaska summit would have been remembered as another Yalta. But, if Alaska was not a disaster, it was definitely a defeat. Putin walked away the clear winner from his latest encounter with an American president. Putin's triumph was evident from the very start of the gathering at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson where U.S. troops literally rolled out the red carpet for a dictator, indicted as a war criminal by the International Criminal Court in 2023, who cannot risk journeying to most countries for fear of being arrested. Trump looked positively giddy as he welcomed Putin with a big smile and a handshake and then treated him to a ride in the presidential limousine — a beast inside 'The Beast.' Several hours later, the two men emerged from their meeting with aides for a joint news conference. No deal was announced, but the two leaders heaped praise on each other. Putin flattered his counterpart by insisting that he would never have invaded Ukraine if Trump were president. (Why, then, has Putin has more than doubled drone and missile strikes since Trump was inaugurated?) (yeah, right). Trump looked subdued but nevertheless gushed over Putin: "Thank you very much, Mr. President, that was very profound, and I will say that I believe we had a very productive meeting.' Trump went on to say, mysteriously, 'There were many, many points that we agreed on … a couple of big ones that we haven't quite gotten there.' In the hours after the summit, it became clear that that one of the 'big' points on which there was no agreement was a ceasefire for Ukraine. In the days leading up to the hastily convened summit, Trump had threatened Putin with 'very severe consequences' if he did not stop his attacks on Ukraine, and on the flight to Alaska Trump told Fox News, 'I won't be happy if I walk away without some form of a ceasefire.' Well, there was no ceasefire — but also no consequences. In a post-summit interview with Fox, Trump said he would hold off imposing new sanctions because 'the meeting went very well.' And then, in the middle of the night, Trump revealed on social media that he had dropped his demand for a ceasefire and had agreed with Putin to go straight to negotiating 'a Peace Agreement, which would end the war.' Trump thereby took the pressure off Putin to stop his vicious attacks against Ukraine. As Putin made clear in the news conference, he has not budged from his demand that any peace agreement must address 'the primary causes of that conflict.' Of course, from Putin's perspective, the primary cause of the conflict is Ukraine's insistence on becoming a pro-Western democracy that does not take orders from the Kremlin. Thus, Putin has managed to play yet another U.S. president for a sucker. This has been a pattern ever since his first meeting with George W. Bush in Slovenia in 2001, when, at the post-summit news conference, Bush memorably said that he had looked Putin in the eye, got 'a sense of his soul,' and 'found him to be very straightforward and trustworthy.' John McCain later quipped: 'I looked in Mr. Putin's eyes and I saw three letters — a K, a G, and a B.' Indeed, Putin has become expert at using his KGB training and his native guile to manipulate his gullible American counterparts. In his post-summit interview on Friday, Trump revealed that the Russian dictator had even told him that he won the 2020 election and that the election 'was rigged because you have mail-in voting.' The only thing more ridiculous than imagining that Putin (whose primary rival died in prison) is an expert on election integrity is to imagine that Putin has any 'brotherly' affection for the people of Ukraine, as he claimed in the post-summit news conference. Given Trump's incoherent approach to the war in Ukraine, it is too soon to despair. Trump hinted to European leaders after the summit that he would be willing to extend a U.S. security guarantee to Ukraine as part of a peace settlement. If true, that would be a significant win for Kyiv. Trump is often influenced by the last person he talked to, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is coming to Washington on Monday. Let's hope that the next Trump-Zelensky meeting at the White House will be less tumultuous than the last one, which ended in a shouting match. But it's unlikely to be as friendly as the Trump-Putin meet-ups.
