Hurricane Helene's six-month anniversary underscores need for more state action
It was six months ago this week that Hurricane Helene devastated much of western North Carolina. By now, you'd think elected leaders would have long since devoted all of the resources at their disposal toward emergency relief and getting the basics of life in the mountains back up and running.
Unfortunately, while state lawmakers did approve a new recovery package last week, they continue — quite inexplicably — to ignore several basic and well-documented needs.
Topping the list: direct aid to businesses wiped out by the storm and renters left homeless. As lawmakers like Asheville's Rep. Lindsey Prather have repeatedly explained, offering loans to folks who've lost everything isn't enough.
If mountain communities are going to come close to recovering, the state needs to use its rainy day fund to provide direct grants.
Lawmakers should also heed Gov. Josh Stein's plea to aid devastated local governments and state parks.
The bottom line: North Carolina has the money to do much more to help hurricane ravaged communities recover. The legislature's failure to allocate it simply makes no sense.
For NC Newsline, I'm Rob Schofield.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
43 minutes ago
- New York Post
Zohran Mamdani's $2,300 rent scandal exposes who this ‘socialist' is really looking after first —himself
Who are government-mandated rent-stabilized apartments for? Apparently well-compensated bureaucrats. Mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani is only paying $2,300 for his stabilized place in Astoria, despite making $142,000 a year as an assemblyman, plus stipends, in addition to however much his artist wife is also raking in. It's part of a long-term pattern of Mamdani scheming programs meant for less-fortunate people for his own benefit. First he's claiming to be an African American to get into college, now he's grifting on rent-stabilization that lower income people should be benefiting from. Advertisement Mamdani's rent had been pointed out for around a week before Andrew Cuomo caught on and challenged him in a Friday tweet about the matter, which attracted a staggering 33 million views on X. 5 Zohran Mamdani is under fire for only paying $2,300 a month for his rent-stabilized apartment. Getty Images 'You are actually very rich, [yet] you and your wife pay $2,300 a month, as you have bragged, for a nice apartment in Astoria,' the former governor wrote. 'I am calling on you to move out immediately and give your affordable housing back to an unhoused family who needs it.' Advertisement Cuomo inaccurately first claimed that Mamdani's home is rent-controlled (a statement he's since corrected). The one-bedroom apartment is actually rent-stabilized, as are almost half of rentals in New York City. But Cuomo is not wrong to question why Mamdani — who claims to be a champion of the lesser-fortunate — has never sought to correct why someone like him can benefit from a system that should be for low-income, housing-insecure New Yorkers first. Rent-stabilized apartments are subject to only modest annual increases in rent, as determined by the Rent Guidelines Board, and virtually guaranteed rights to lease renewal. And there are generally no income restrictions for moving into one — it's mostly a matter of luck. 5 Andrew Cuomo called for Zohran Mamdani to move out of his rent-stabilized home. @andrewcuomo/X Advertisement But shouldn't a socialist assemblyman be concerned with making sure low-income New Yorkers who need those protections most are prioritized in getting them? Apparently not so much. Mamdani has bragged about only paying $2,300 a month for rent in debates and interviews alike. He has made housing the primary pillar of his campaign, calling on New York City to freeze the rent for apartments under the provision of the government and to build 200,000 affordable housing units in the next 10 years. The question is: Who gets to benefit from these policies? Will well-off New Yorkers like Mamdani, who are unfairly occupying rent-stabilized homes, benefit from indefinite freezes? Advertisement 5 Cuomo is proposing legislation called Zohran's Law which would block wealthy tenants from accessing affordable housing. SARAH YENESEL/EPA/Shutterstock Former governor Cuomo told The Post Sunday that he's proposing new legislation, calling it Zohran's Law, which would block wealthy New Yorkers like Mamdani from accessing rent-stabilized housing. 'We're not supposed to be providing rent-stabilized apartments to the children of millionaires,' he said. Mamdani's father is a major Columbia professor, his mother an internationally renowned movie director. Cuomo is right, but he shouldn't stop there. Mamdani — who has previously called for the 'abolition of private property' — should be made to explain exactly who will benefit from his expanded affordable housing scheme. He did, after all, tell the New York Editorial Board that he's 'deeply skeptical of means testing' when asked by an interviewer whether we should 'have any way of ensuring that people who are better off who live in rent-stabilized housing don't get those benefits.' Seems like Mamdani has a very personal interest in batting down proposals for means testing. 5 Zohran Mamdani's wife, Rama Duwaji, leaving their apartment in Astoria recently. Brigitte Stelzer Advertisement 5 Mamdani was featured on The Post's cover calling on him to give up his rent-stabilized place. This scandal fits into a larger pattern in the candidate's past. It's not unlike when Mamdani, who grew up in Uganda but is of Indian descent, decided to check the 'African American' box on his application to Columbia University. Mamdani had no problem potentially benefiting from racial affirmative action — a system set up to uplift the descendants of American slaves — in the admissions process, despite quite evidently not being Black or African American. Advertisement Similarly, he seems to have no issue getting all the perks of rent-stabilization — a system set up to receive cash-strapped New Yorkers — despite being the well-compensated son of successful parents. Mamdani has a long history of identifying special-interest programs meant for others worse off than him, and then scheming them for his own benefit. Is this really the sort of leader that New Yorkers trust to roll out and dole out vast new entitlement programs?


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Trump assures gold bars will not face tariffs after US customs ruling rocked markets: ‘Crisis averted'
President Trump on Monday said gold bars will not face tariffs – leading to relief from global bullion markets after days of speculation that the precious metal could be caught up in the ongoing global trade war. 'Gold will not be Tariffed!' Trump wrote in a post on his social media platform Truth Social Monday. US spot gold – the global benchmark – fell 1.2% to $3,357 an ounce following Trump's comment, while gold futures dropped 2.4% to $3,407 after soaring to a record-high above $3,500 last week. President Trump on Monday said gold bars will not face tariffs. AFP via Getty Images 'Delighted to hear the crisis has been averted,' Ross Norman, an independent gold market analyst, said Monday. 'It will come as an enormous relief to the bullion markets, as the potential for disruption was incalculable.' A White House official told The Post that Trump plans to issue an executive order 'in the near future clarifying misinformation about the tariffing of gold bars.' Spooked by Trump's tariffs, investors have flocked to the safe haven asset, pushing it past $3,000 an ounce for the first time ever earlier this year. On Friday, US Customs and Border Protection ruled that 1-kilogram and 100-ounce gold bars from Switzerland would be subject to Trump's 39% tariff on the country. 'Although Trump has used tariffs extensively, tariffs on gold could have significantly disrupted global supply chains and led to higher prices for the metal overall,' Ted Jenkin, president of Exit Stage Left Advisors, told The Post. 'Gold is a strategic asset and maintaining its tariff-free status preserves its role as a hedge against geopolitical instability.' Gold prices had soared to a record high Friday following the US Customs ruling. AFP via Getty Images While a US gold tariff would have been especially harmful for Switzerland, which is a major refining hub for the precious metal, it would have applied to any country exporting gold bars to the US, according to the Swiss Precious Metal Association. The group warned on Friday that the customs ruling 'may negatively impact the international flow of physical gold.' Shares of Barrick Mining fell 2.8% Monday, while shares of Newmont – the world's largest gold miner – were down slightly to $68.87. Both companies are major US gold producers. Explore Top Gold IRAs American Hartford Gold American Hartford Gold is a precious metals dealer that specializes in gold and silver for physical delivery and retirement accounts. With a reputation for clear pricing and personalized service, it offers tailored solutions, secure storage, and a price match guarantee, helping investors hedge against inflation and uncertainty. learn more Goldco Goldco is a leading provider of gold and silver IRAs, helping investors protect and grow their retirement savings with precious metals. With a strong reputation for client satisfaction, GoldCo makes it simple to diversify your portfolio with physical gold, offering personalized consultations, secure vaulting, and tax-advantaged strategies. learn more Patriot Gold Patriot Gold is a top-rated Gold IRA provider known for its No Fee for Life IRA program and endorsements from prominent conservative figures and organizations. With a minimum IRA investment of $25,000, the company offers low-cost bullion, premium coins, and a strong reputation backed by an A+ BBB rating and years of trusted service. learn more New York Post may be compensated and/or receive an affiliate commission if you click/buy something through our links. Trump last week imposed a batch of new reciprocal tariffs – many at higher-than-expected rates – on dozens of nations. With Post wires


New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Trump extends China tariff deadline for 90 days just hours before truce was set to expire: official
WASHINGTON — U.S. President Donald Trump has signed an executive order extending a tariff truce with China by another 90 days, a White House official said on Monday with only hours to go before U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods were due to snap back to triple-digit rates. The order followed a noncommittal answer by Trump to reporters as to whether he would extend the lower tariff rates a day after he urged Beijing to quadruple its purchases of U.S. soybeans. A tariff truce between Beijing and Washington was set to expire on Tuesday at 00:01 ET (04:01 GMT). Advertisement 3 Donald Trump signed an executive order extending a tariff truce with China Monday, according to a White House official. REUTERS The order prevents U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods from shooting up to 145%, with Chinese tariffs on U.S. goods set to hit 125%, rates that would have resulted in a virtual trade embargo. 'We'll see what happens,' Trump told a press conference, when asked how he planned to extend the deadline. 'They've been dealing quite nicely. The relationship is very good with President Xi (Jinping) and myself.' Advertisement Imports from China are currently subject to 30% tariffs, including a 10% base rate and 20% in fentanyl-related tariffs imposed by Washington in February and March. China had matched the de-escalation, lowering its rate on U.S. imports to 10%. The two sides in May announced a truce in their trade dispute after talks in Geneva, Switzerland, agreeing to a 90-day period to allow further talks. They met again in Stockholm, Sweden in late July, but did not announce an agreement to further extend the deadline. 3 A container ship at a port in Lianyungang, China's eastern Jiangsu province on August 7, 2025. AFP via Getty Images Kelly Ann Shaw, a senior White House trade official during Trump's first term and now with Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, said she expected Trump to extend the 90-day 'tariff détente' for another 90 days later on Monday. Advertisement 'It wouldn't be a Trump-style negotiation if it didn't go right down to the wire,' she said, adding Trump could also announce progress in other aspects of the economic relationship as a backdrop for granting the extension. 'The whole reason for the 90-day pause in the first place was to lay the groundwork for broader negotiations and there's been a lot of noise about everything from soybeans to export controls to excess capacity over the weekend,' she said. 3 The president said his relationship is 'very good with President Xi (Jinping).' Getty Images Ryan Majerus, a former U.S. trade official now with the King & Spalding law firm, welcomed the news. 'This will undoubtedly lower anxiety on both sides as talks continue, and as the U.S. and China work toward a framework deal in the fall. I'm certain investment commitments will factor into any potential deal, and the extension gives them more time to try and work through some of the longstanding trade concerns,' he said. Advertisement The White House declined to comment beyond Trump's remarks. The Treasury Department and U.S. Trade Representative's Office did not respond to requests for comment. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said Washington has the makings of a deal with China and he was 'optimistic' about the path forward. Trump pushed for additional concessions on Sunday, urging China to quadruple its soybean purchases, although analysts questioned the feasibility of any such deal. Trump did not repeat the demand on Monday. But Washington has also been pressing Beijing to stop buying Russian oil, with Trump threatening to impose secondary tariffs on China.