Hurricane Helene's six-month anniversary underscores need for more state action
Starlink was widely used in western North Carolina during the early days after Hurricane Helene. (Photo of storm debris by Getty Images)
It was six months ago this week that Hurricane Helene devastated much of western North Carolina. By now, you'd think elected leaders would have long since devoted all of the resources at their disposal toward emergency relief and getting the basics of life in the mountains back up and running.
Unfortunately, while state lawmakers did approve a new recovery package last week, they continue — quite inexplicably — to ignore several basic and well-documented needs.
Topping the list: direct aid to businesses wiped out by the storm and renters left homeless. As lawmakers like Asheville's Rep. Lindsey Prather have repeatedly explained, offering loans to folks who've lost everything isn't enough.
If mountain communities are going to come close to recovering, the state needs to use its rainy day fund to provide direct grants.
Lawmakers should also heed Gov. Josh Stein's plea to aid devastated local governments and state parks.
The bottom line: North Carolina has the money to do much more to help hurricane ravaged communities recover. The legislature's failure to allocate it simply makes no sense.
For NC Newsline, I'm Rob Schofield.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
23 minutes ago
- New York Post
GOP lawmakers push to jack up proposed tax on money migrants send home after threat by Mexico
GOP lawmakers are pushing to jack up a proposed new tax on money migrants earn in the US and send back home to family — after being threatened by Mexico's president. Nestled in the proposed One Big Beautiful Bill Act making its way through the Senate is a 3.5% tax on 'remittances' from noncitizens in the US, or money transferred back to relatives and family in the migrants' home country. Over the weekend, footage of Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum blasting the planned tax during a speech last month went viral. 'If necessary, we'll mobilize. We don't want taxes on remittances from our fellow countrymen. From the US to Mexico,' Sheinbaum warned in the clip. It is not entirely clear what she meant by 'mobilize.' 4 Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum is griping about the impact a new US tax on money Mexico's migrants send home would have on her country. Carlos Santiago/Eyepix Group / Shutterstock 4 GOP Sen. Eric Schmitt of Missouri proposed now imposing a tax on of 15% instead of 3.5% because of Sheinbaum's comments. Getty Images But her salvo was enough to prompt several Republican lawmakers to promptly call on the Senate to jack up the proposed tax on remittances. 'The House's Big Beautiful Bill addressed the urgent need for a remittance tax. But we can go further. I'm introducing legislation to quadruple the proposed remittance tax — from 3.5% to 15%,' Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.) seethed on X. 'America is not the world's piggy bank. And we don't take kindly to threats.' The tax on remittance is estimated to haul in about $26 billion over the next decade, according to an estimate from the Joint Committee on Taxation. Remittances are generally a huge revenue stream for developing countries. Mexico is the second largest receiver of remittances in the world behind India thanks to cash flows from the US, according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies. 4 Rep. Chip Roy, a Republican from Texas, backed the idea of raising the tax on remittances in response to the Mexican leader's threat. Getty Images Some estimates indicate that Mexico received about $64.7 billion in remittances last year, although transfers to Mexico have begun to wane in recent months amid President Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration. 'New reason to amend the Senate bill to tax remittances at a lot higher rate…' Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) wrote on X in response to the clip of Sheinbaum. 4 Mexico has been grappling with economic fallout from President Trump's tariffs. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) added, 'Raise the remittances!!' Mexico is the largest US trading partner, according to recent data from the US Census Bureau. Earlier this year, Trump slapped 25% tariffs on imports from both Mexico and Canada that are not subject to the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement. Trump claimed the new tariffs were necessary to leverage Canada and Mexico to crack down on the flow of fentanyl and illegal immigration into the US. The president has since fired off a flurry of tariffs on other countries as well.
New York Post
35 minutes ago
- New York Post
The message behind a 51-star American flag flying across from the White House
WASHINGTON — One of the capital's newest curiosities is an American flag bearing 51 stars rather than the regulation 50. The unusual take on the Stars and Stripes went up across Lafayette Park from the White House last week, and features a green star just below its white fellows. District of Columbia officials have been agitating for statehood for decades — but Ryan Lambert, the man behind the standard, told The Post he has a very different idea. 'Greenland makes a lot of sense for America, from a strategic perspective,' said Lambert, who placed the flag on the National Grange building on H Street Northwest after hanging a 'Welcome back, Mr. President!' banner to mark Trump's return to office this past January. Advertisement 'I wanna help America, and part of helping America is by getting other Americans to understand and amplify the president's message.' 3 51 star flag across from White House, spotted from Lafayette Square on June 5, 2025. Trump, 78, has repeatedly said he wants to acquire Greenland, which has a population of just over 56,000, from Denmark in order to bring the Arctic island's strategic resources under US influence. Advertisement The president has also teased desires to annex Canada and the Panama Canal Zone, but Lambert says he is less enthused by those prospects. 'As Americans, we build the canals, we've already done our part for Panama,' he explained. 'Canada is a great country for some really nice, sweet people, but I'm not sure we really need a bunch of more socialists added to the American populace. 'Once they learn about capitalism, once they learn free markets, once they they learn about, kind of the American way of doing things and they wanna start being a little bit more American, they'd be ready to maybe be a 51st state. But I think Greenland right now, there's a lot of natural beauty. There's a lot of resources.' 3 The Greenland flag flies from a pole on March 12, 2025 in Nuuk, Greenland. Getty Images Advertisement 3 Pituffik Space Base is pictured as Vice President JD Vance visits, Friday, March 28, 2025, in Greenland. AP Lambert decided to add a green star to a white stripe on the US flag rather than put an extra white star on the blue field to try to make the message more obvious. 'It makes it visible, right? I mean, whenever the people who are really the quality folks who do flag design, they're going to arrange things in the way they're gonna arrange things. But part of what we're doing right now is building awareness and building support for the president by making this star green,' he said. Lambert claimed most people he's seen walking past the building have indicated support and excitement when they see the flag — but acknowledged 'there's always haters.' Advertisement 'There's always people who want to say no,' he said. 'People are afraid of change, but if we didn't have Alaska right now, we'd be less of a country. If we didn't have Hawaii right now, we'd be less of a country.' The White House didn't immediately respond to requests for comment.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
It's ‘a small part of LA' is latest media refrain to minimize violent mobs
Get ready for the 2025 version of 'mostly peaceful protest.' It's 'a small part of the city.' Even liberal media knows it looks bad when Mexican flag-waving punks are wearing skull masks and setting fire to cars. It's hard to paint President Trump as a fascist when protesters from another country are inciting violence and looting. They're desperate to minimize what's going on, to suggest that it's Trump who is inflaming the situation and not the rioters themselves. Advertisement A burnt US flag is seen on the ground amid clashes with law enforcement. AFP via Getty Images When the George Floyd riots descended into mayhem, the constant refrain on CNN was 'a mostly peaceful protest.' A few bad apples burned that police station, yes, but that's not the full story. This time around, they're going geographic. 'Federal agents clashed with protesters in the Los Angeles area for a third day, and hundreds of National Guard troops were deployed,' The New York Times wrote. 'But much of the sprawling city operated as usual.' Advertisement The Times even wrote a story, 'Life goes on in the city,' remarking on all the parades and events happening in the 18 million person Los Angeles area at the same time as the clashes, as if that was even relevant. The framing is spreading, as these things usually do. Monday morning's Axios report said, 'The clashes between police and protesters were centered in several blocks of downtown — a small slice of the city.' Ah, a small slice. Guess shutting down the 101 Freeway and burning Waymo cars isn't that big a deal — everything's fine in Santa Monica! Advertisement Demonstrators wave flags from atop a wrecked car, standing beside burning Waymo vehicles, as protesters clash with law enforcement in the streets surrounding the federal building during a protest following federal immigration operations in Los Angeles, California, on June 8, 2025. AFP via Getty Images Imagine if all news was treated this way. Murder in Queens, but in Brooklyn, life goes on. Hurricanes in Florida, but that's just a small slice of the United States. The motives are so transparent they are laughable. The media wants to diminish and distract, but for the rest of us, reality goes on.
