
Watch the birth of a new PLANET: Incredible images show a distant world sculpting spirals of dust around it
The planet orbits the star HD 135344B, which is located around 440 light–years from Earth.
The stunning snaps show the planet beginning to sculpt spirals of dust and gas around its home star.
The scientists who made the discovery say that the planet is likely twice the size of Jupiter and is as far from its star as Neptune is from the Sun.
Planets are formed from spinning halos of hot material known as protoplanetary discs, which form around very young stars.
As planets start to form, they 'sweep' their orbits to produce intricate patterns of rings, gaps, and spirals in the dust.
Although astronomers have spotted these patterns in the past, this is the first time anyone has caught one of these planetary sculptures in the act.
Lead author Francesco Maio, a doctoral researcher at the University of Florence, says: 'We will never witness the formation of Earth, but here, around a young star 440 light–years away, we may be watching a planet come into existence in real time.'
The star HD 135344B has a distinctive spiral pattern, which astronomers believe is caused by a young planet starting to disturb the cloud of gas and dust which spins around young stars
The European Southern Observatory's Very Large Telescope (VLT) first spotted the spiral patterns around HD 135344B back in 2016.
However, the equipment used in those early studies wasn't sensitive enough to confirm whether there was a protoplanet – the first stage of planetary formation – within the rings.
In a new study, published today in the journal Astronomy and Astrophysics, researchers have used the VLT's new Enhanced Resolution Imager and Spectrograph (ERIS) to pinpoint the planet's likely location.
Mr Maio and his co–authors spotted a 'planet candidate' – something strongly believed to be a planet – right at the base of one of the disc's spiral arms.
If these spirals were caused by a planet disturbing the ring of dust, that is exactly where astronomers would expect the planet to be.
What makes these observations so special is that the astronomers were actually able to capture light coming directly from the planet itself.
This is a significant piece of evidence in favour of the theory that gaps and rings in protoplanetary disks around other stars are hiding protoplanets of their own.
Mr Maio says: 'What makes this detection potentially a turning point is that, unlike many previous observations, we are able to directly detect the signal of the protoplanet, which is still highly embedded in the disc.
These observations could also help shed light on how the planets in our own solar system formed over four billion years ago.
At the same time, a second group of researchers have used ERIS to spot another potential planet forming around another young, distant star.
V960 Mon sits roughly 5,000 light years from Earth and is believed to be extremely young.
When astronomers first found captured images of it in 2023, they found that the star was spitting out arms of gas and dust wider than our entire Milky Way.
In this new study, astronomers found that the spiral arms are 'fragmenting' in a way that suggests a process known as 'gravitational instability' is at play.
Planets normally form like snowballs rolling down a hill, as matter collides and clumps together into ever bigger lumps – this is known as core accretion.
But sometimes, when the gas and dust are cooler and further from the host star, matter will slowly pull itself together under gravity and form clumps that collapse into the core of a planet.
Scientists believe this is how gas giants like Jupiter and Saturn typically form.
Researchers have also spotted an object around the star V960 Mons. They believe this may be a planet or brown dwarf forming through a process called gravitational instability. This would be the first time that anyone has seen this process in action
If this is what has caused the fragmentation around V960 Mons, it would be the first time that anyone has ever seen a planet forming via gravitational instability.
However, astronomers now say that something even stranger could be lurking around V960 Mons.
The researchers believe that the object could be a 'brown dwarf', an object bigger than a planet that didn't gain enough mass to shine as a star.
These giant planets can be between 13 and 80 times the size of Jupiter and typically orbit far out from their companion stars.
Likewise, no one has yet captured the exact moment that one of these mysterious objects comes into existence.
Planets are formed from a cloud of dust and gas within a nebula
According to our current understanding, a star and its planets form out of a collapsing cloud of dust and gas within a larger cloud called a nebula.
As gravity pulls material in the collapsing cloud closer together, the centre of the cloud gets more and more compressed and, in turn, gets hotter.
This dense, hot core becomes the kernel of a new star.
Meanwhile, inherent motions within the collapsing cloud cause it to churn.
As the cloud gets exceedingly compressed, much of the cloud begins rotating in the same direction.
The rotating cloud eventually flattens into a disk that gets thinner as it spins, kind of like a spinning clump of dough flattening into the shape of a pizza.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
24 minutes ago
- BBC News
Butch Wilmore: 'Stranded' Nasa astronaut retires from US space agency
One of the two Nasa astronauts who came back to Earth earlier this year after being 'stuck' in space, has decided to Wilmore's announcement comes less than five months after his return from the International Space Station (ISS). Over his 25-year career at the US space agency, he flew in four different spacecrafts, took part in five spacewalks and spent a total of 464 days in a statement, Nasa paid tribute to Mr Wilmore and thank him for his long service. What's been announced? Mr Wilmore first served as a test pilot before being selected by Nasa to become an astronaut in his time at NASA, Wilmore completed three missions launching aboard the space shuttle Atlantis, Roscosmos Soyuz, and Boeing Starliner to the International Space last mission was taking part in the first crewed test flight of the Starliner spacecraft with fellow Nasa astronaut Suni Williams last the capsule suffered technical problems, resulting in the pair staying in space for a much longer time than Mr Wilmore's retirement was announced, Stephen Koerner, from Nasa's Johnson Space Center, thanked him for his dedication to space exploration."His lasting legacy of fortitude will continue to impact and inspire the Johnson workforce, future explorers, and the nation for generations," he said. How did Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams get 'stuck in space'? Nasa astronauts Barry 'Butch' Wilmore and Sunita Williams set off from Florida to the International Space Station on Boeing's Starliner spacecraft on 5 June part of their mission, they were only meant to stay in space for around a their craft developed a number of issues including leaks - meaning they were unable to head back as return trip was delayed a number of times and in the end, the pair spent 286 days in March 2025, they finally splashed back down to Earth in a Space X dragon capsule off the coast of Florida.


Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Astronaut who spent 286 days stranded in space dramatically RETIRES from NASA - as fans quip 'I wouldn't test my luck either'
He famously spent more than nine months stuck in space alongside fellow astronaut, Suni Williams. Now, Butch Wilmore, 62, has dramatically retired from NASA – less than five months after returning to solid ground. Williams and Wilmore returned to Earth on March 19 aboard a SpaceX Crew Dragon capsule which splashed down off the coast of Florida. The pair had left Earth in June last year, planning to undertake an eight–day test flight of the new Boeing Starliner capsule. However, after the Starliner capsule developed numerous technical issues during the flight, the astronauts were forced to wait until the next crew rotation to return to Earth. In total, the pair spent 286 days in space – 278 days more than they had initially planned. Many fans have flocked to social media to wish Wilmore well, with one joking: 'I wouldn't test my luck either.' Another added: 'Being up there that long did all kinds of things to their bodies. He probably had no choice.' Another added: 'Being up there that long did all kinds of things to their bodies. He probably had no choice' Wilmore announced his retirement via NASA last night. 'From my earliest days, I have been captivated by the marvels of creation, looking upward with an insatiable curiosity,' he said. 'This curiosity propelled me into the skies, and eventually to space, where the magnificence of the cosmos mirrored the glory of its creator in ways words can scarcely convey. 'Even as I ventured beyond Earth's limits, I remained attuned to the beauty and significance of the world below, recognizing the same intricate design evident among the stars is also woven into the fabric of life at home.' Wilmore served as a test pilot before being selected as a NASA astronaut in 2000. 'Butch's commitment to NASA's mission and dedication to human space exploration is truly exemplary,' said Steve Koerner, acting director of NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston. 'His lasting legacy of fortitude will continue to impact and inspire the Johnson workforce, future explorers, and the nation for generations. On behalf of NASA's Johnson Space Center, we thank Butch for his service.' In total, he spent 464 days in space – 286 of which were accumulated during his most recent mission. How 9 months in space can damage the body Gaunt face Shifting fluids in the body causes the appearance to change. As fluid moves to the head, the legs and feet appear to wither. Vision loss Increased pressure in the brain presses on eyes, causing blurry vision. Exposure to ionising space radiation increases the cancer risk. Cognitive decline Astronauts show slower reasoning and weakened working memory. After his return, Mr Wilmore's daughter, Daryn, 19, spoke out about her father's health challenges after spending more than nine months in space. She explained that while her dad had readjusted to gravity well, he struggled with his muscles, joints and inner ears. That was 'because [he's] not used to gravity or having to hold up weight,' she said in response to a comment in a TikTok video. Research has shown that astronauts who complete long–term mission on the ISS — which usually last six months — experience muscle and bone loss as well as fluid shifts inside the inner ear due to low gravity. While it typically only takes a few days for the inner ear to readjust to Earth's gravity, regaining physical strength can take weeks to months. Some former astronauts have found that it can take up to 1.5 times the length of their mission to really feel like themselves again. On X, several users have speculated that his exended stint in space may have sparked his retirement. 'Smart move if you stranded me in space for 9 months I would not fly for you either,' one user tweeted. Another added: 'Well hell can you blame him. They were stuck in space for damn near a year. I'd never take another mission after that' 'Smart move if you stranded me in space for 9 months I would not fly for you either,' one user tweeted And one wrote: 'I bet he was no longer capable of passing physical from his extended sojourn' Another added: 'Well hell can you blame him. 'They were stuck in space for damn near a year. I'd never take another mission after that.' And one wrote: 'I bet he was no longer capable of passing physical from his extended sojourn.' Joe Acaba, chief of the Astronaut Office at NASA's Johnson Space Centre, says that Mr Wilmore 'exemplified the technical excellence of what is required of an astronaut.' He added: 'His mastery of complex systems, coupled with his adaptability and steadfast commitment to NASA's mission, has inspired us all. 'As he steps into this new chapter, that same dedication will no doubt continue to show in whatever he decides to do next.'


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
How will you die? Scientists reveal the odds of being killed by everything from an asteroid strike to an elephant attack
From asteroid impacts to elephant attacks, there are plenty of nasty ways to die that might keep you up at night. Now, scientists have revealed just how much you need to worry about each of these potential disasters. The bad news is that death by asteroid strike is much more likely than you might have thought. According to physicists from the Olin College of Engineering, the average person is significantly more likely to be killed by a space rock than to be struck by lightning. Using the latest NASA data, physicists from the Olin College of Engineering found that there are 22,800 near-earth objects (NEOs) measuring 140 metres or larger. Assuming that an impact will kill one in 1,000 people, your odds of being dying in a collision with a space rock are one in 156,000. By contrast, the odds of being killed by a lightning strike are just one in 163,000. However, if it is any comfort, scientists say you are far more likely to be killed in a car crash long before that ever happens. Scientists have worked out exactly how likely you are to die to everything from asteroid impacts to elephant attacks. This table shows how likely these events are to happen, and how likely you are to die as a result The bad news is that you are much more likely to be killed by an asteroid impact than by a lightning strike. Although car crashes are far more deadly on average According to the researchers, each year there is a 0.0091 per cent chance that a 140-metre or larger asteroid will slam into the Earth. That means there is a staggeringly high one in 156 chance of the Earth being struck by an asteroid within any given person's lifetime. If that were to happen, the blast could be thousands of times larger than the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II. In the worst-case scenario, a large enough asteroid could produce global events on a civilisation-ending scale. In their pre-print paper, soon to be published in the Planetary Science Journal, the researchers write: 'The dust lofting alone has the potential, in some cases, to obscure the sun to the point of stopping photosynthesis, which would then cause a mass extinction.' However, a 140-metre asteroid might land harmlessly in the ocean and cause no deaths, or slam into a populated city and kill up to one million people. To reflect this, the researchers say that the risk of death by asteroid ranges from essentially zero to near certainty based on a number of factors. To help put the odds of an asteroid death in perspective, the researchers also worked out how likely you are to die in a host of other ways. In their study, the researchers calculated both how likely it is that these events will happen to someone in their lifetime and how likely they are to die in that scenario. Their calculations suggest that the odds of being struck by lightning are just one in 16,300, which is only fatal in around one in 10 cases. Likewise, according to a study conducted in Nepal, the odds of being attacked by an elephant are about one in 14,000. Since those attacks are fatal around two-thirds of the time, your odds of being killed by an elephant are a surprisingly high one in 21,000. This analysis also reveals that, compared to the risk of an asteroid impact, many parts of our everyday lives are absurdly dangerous. The researchers found that the average person has a roughly one in 66 chance of suffering carbon monoxide poisoning, and a one in 714 chance of dying as a result. Likewise, the flu is much more likely to kill you than an asteroid impact, lightning strike, or elephant attack. Killing roughly one in 1,000 people, the flu is about as deadly as an impact from a 140-metre asteroid, but you are almost guaranteed to catch it at some point in your life. How likely is it that someone will be killed by space junk? Researchers calculated that the chance of a piece of rocket body hitting a plane was one in 430,000 each year. Given that there are around 200 people per plane, this gives a fatality risk of one in 2,200. Previous studies have estimated a higher risk due to debris breaking up and satellites falling to Earth. The Aerospace Corporation says the risk of someone being killed by space debris while on a plane is one in 1,000. Other studies estimate that the chances of one or more people being killed on the ground by falling space debris in the next ten years is one in 10. Yet it is driving that turns out to be one of the biggest risks to our lives, with a third of people being involved in an injury-causing crash at some point in their lives. Given that those crashes are deadly in around one in 100 cases, the odds of being killed in a car crash are roughly one in 273. You are, therefore, more than 500 times more likely to be killed in a traffic accident than by a deadly asteroid. On the other hand, some seemingly terrifying risks turn out to be hardly a threat at all. Death by rabies, for example, is almost entirely preventable through a vaccine called post-exposure prophylaxis. Of the 800,000 Americans who sought treatment for rabies following an animal bite, only five died - four of whom did not seek rabies post-exposure prophylaxis treatment. Of course, these probabilities are dependent on where you live and what kind of life you lead. If you don't live near elephants or refuse to jump out of a plane, you are very unlikely to die in an elephant attack or skydiving accident. Likewise, the researchers point out that someone who regularly checks their carbon monoxide alarms has a much lower chance of being killed by carbon monoxide poisoning. The point of doing these morbid calculations is that asteroid impacts are, like rabies deaths, entirely avoidable in theory. The researchers write: 'The asteroid impact is the only natural disaster that is technologically preventable.' In 2022, NASA's DART mission showed that humanity can knock an approaching asteroid off course by hitting it with a fast-moving satellite. However, these missions require years of planning and huge amounts of investment. By comparing the risk posed by asteroids to threats we face every day, we can decide if it is worth investing millions in a new space defence program or whether we should be more worried about improving road safety. WHAT COULD WE DO TO STOP AN ASTEROID COLLIDING WITH EARTH? Currently, NASA would not be able to deflect an asteroid if it were heading for Earth but it could mitigate the impact and take measures that would protect lives and property. This would include evacuating the impact area and moving key infrastructure. Finding out about the orbit trajectory, size, shape, mass, composition and rotational dynamics would help experts determine the severity of a potential impact. However, the key to mitigating damage is to find any potential threat as early as possible. NASA and the European Space Agency completed a test which slammed a refrigerator-sized spacecraft into the asteroid Dimorphos. The test is to see whether small satellites are capable of preventing asteroids from colliding with Earth. The Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) used what is known as a kinetic impactor technique—striking the asteroid to shift its orbit. The impact could change the speed of a threatening asteroid by a small fraction of its total velocity, but by doing so well before the predicted impact, this small nudge will add up over time to a big shift of the asteroid's path away from Earth. This was the first-ever mission to demonstrate an asteroid deflection technique for planetary defence. The results of the trial are expected to be confirmed by the Hera mission in December 2026.