Belonging Fund expands focus to cover legal services for immigrants
Why it matters: The Belonging Fund drew fierce criticism from Republicans, who blasted Mayor Freddie O'Connell for publicly promoting the effort and opposing local ICE raids.
The move to cover legal work contradicts O'Connell's repeated descriptions about the fund's intent.
Catch up quick: O'Connell and the nonprofit Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee, which administers the Belonging Fund, were initially clear that money raised for the new fund would not be spent on paying for immigrants' legal fees.
"The Belonging Fund is not set up to support legal services," O'Connell said at a May 5 press conference announcing the formation of the fund. The fund does not use public money.
Community Foundation CEO Hal Cato said at the press conference announcement the Belonging Fund would be used for child care, transportation, housing assistance, food insecurity and "anything else they need."
"I think what you'll probably see going forward is independent efforts to look at scenarios related to deportation, but that's not what the Belonging Fund is constituted for," O'Connell said on May 5.
Although O'Connell touted the Belonging Fund, the city does not financially contribute or decide how the money is spent.
Congressional investigations championed by U.S. Rep. Andy Ogles are probing Metro's response to the May raids.
Friction point: After Ogles criticized the effort, O'Connell reiterated the fund was for pressing family needs, not legal services.
"It's not even intended to be about legal services," he said in mid-May.
Yes, but: The Belonging Fund website now says it will provide money to nonprofits for "legal services, including immigration-related representation and advocacy."
Driving the news: A spokesperson for the Community Foundation tells Axios the Belonging Fund was initially used to "quickly respond to families experiencing acute crisis in our community."
Spokesperson Kelly Walberg says now that the immediate response phase is over, the Community Foundation is working with its nonprofit partners to "revisit the original intent/long-term vision of the fund."
"The fund has currently paused its distribution as we formalize new processes to fulfill the long-term intent of the Belonging Fund," Walberg tells Axios.
"Ideally, the grant dollars will soon be available to support legal and medical assistance, and it will likely open up even further to support additional humanitarian needs."
By the numbers: The Belonging Fund raised more than $525,000, Walberg says.
To date $98,000 has been sent to the nonprofit Conexión Américas and was used to support 132 immigrant families via that nonprofit. Just under $430,000 remains with the Belonging Fund, according to Walberg.
"In one case, emergency support helped a single parent with a child on the autism spectrum remain safely housed," she says.
What he's saying: "The fund is run by the Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee and includes only private donations," O'Connell spokesperson Alex Apple says. "How they use the funds is at their discretion. Metro has no involvement and continues to follow guidance that keeps us compliant with state and federal law."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Over 300 protests held Saturday against Trump redistricting push
Pro-democracy activists and labor groups held hundreds of rallies and other events across the United States on Saturday, Aug. 16, protesting the Trump administration's push for Texas to redraw its congressional map in favor of Republicans. Former Congressman Beto O'Rourke was among those who spoke on Saturday in Texas, from which dozens of Democratic state lawmakers fled to deny Republicans the quorum needed to vote on a redistricting plan that President Donald Trump had demanded. "They do this because they are afraid," O'Rourke told an audience on Saturday, speaking of those attempting redistricting. "They fear this power they see here today." More: Obama calls Texas GOP redistricting an 'assault' on democracy Drucilla Tigner, executive director of pro-democracy coalition Texas For All, told Reuters pro-democracy and labor groups held over 300 events attended by tens of thousands of people in 44 states and Washington, D.C. Many of the more than 50 Texas Democrats who fled the state have been staying in Illinois, also the site of protests on Saturday. The Texas lawmakers in Illinois are out of reach of civil arrest warrants that could be acted on within Texas. The Texas Democrats kept the map from coming to a vote during a special session Texas Gov. Greg Abbott called that ended Friday. Abbott immediately called a second special session. Abbott said that redistricting plans, legislation to increase flash flood safety in the wake of deadly July flooding, and other legislative work remain undone because Democrats are absent. California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom on Thursday, Aug. 14 unveiled a redistricting plan in his state that he says would give Democrats there five more Congressional seats, possibly offsetting any Republican gains in Texas. The Texas House Democrats said in a written statement on Thursday that they will only return to Texas if their state's special legislation is ended and once California's redistricting maps are introduced.
an hour ago
In Trump's redistricting push, Democrats find an aggressive identity
ATLANTA -- Fight! Fight! Fight! It's not just Donald Trump's mantra anymore. As the Republican president pushes states to redraw their congressional districts to the GOP's advantage, Democrats have shown they are willing to go beyond words of outrage and use whatever power they do have to win. Democrats in the Texas Legislature started it off by delaying, for now, Republican efforts to expand the GOP majority in the state's delegation and help preserve party control of the U.S. House through new districts in time for the 2026 midterm elections. Then multiple Democratic governors promised new districts in their own states to neutralize potential Republican gains in Washington. Their counter has been buoyed by national fundraising, media blitzes and public demonstrations, including rallies Saturday around the country. 'For everyone that's been asking, 'Where are the Democrats?' -- well, here they are," said U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas, one of several Democrats who could be ousted under her state's new maps. "For everyone who's been asking, 'Where is the fight?' – well, here it is.' There is no guarantee Democrats can prevent the Republican-powered redistricting, just as Democrats on Capitol Hill have not been able to stop Trump's moves. But it's a notable turn for a party that, by its own leaders' admissions, has honored conventional rules and bypassed bare-knuckled tactics. So far, progressive and establishment Democrats are aligned, uniting what has often been a fragmented opposition since Republicans led by Trump took control of the federal government with their election sweep in November. Leaders on the left say the approach gives them a more effective way to confront him. They can challenge his redistricting ploy with tangible moves as they also push back against the Republicans' tax and spending law and press the case that he is shredding American democracy. 'We've been imploring Democrats where they have power on the state and local level to flex that power,' said Maurice Mitchell, who leads the Working Families Party at the left flank of mainstream U.S. politics. 'There's been this overwrought talk about fighters and largely performative actions to suggest that they're in the fight.' This time, he said, Democrats are 'taking real risks in protecting all of our rights' against 'an authoritarian president who only understands the fight.' Texas made sense for Republicans as the place to start a redistricting scuffle. They dominate the Statehouse, and Gov. Greg Abbott is a Trump loyalist. But when the president's allies announced a new political map intended to send five more Republicans to the U.S. House, state Democratic representatives fled Texas, denying the GOP the numbers to conduct business in the Legislature and approve the reworked districts. Those legislators surfaced in Illinois, New York, California and elsewhere, joined by governors, senators, state party chairs, other states' legislators and activists. All promised action. The response was Trumpian. Govs. Gavin Newsom of California, JB Pritzker of Illinois and Kathy Hochul of New York welcomed Texas Democrats and pledged retaliatory redistricting. Pritzker mocked Abbott as a lackey who says 'yes, sir' to Trump orders. Hochul dismissed Texas Republicans as 'lawbreaking cowboys.' Newsom's press office directed all-caps social media posts at Trump, mimicking his signature sign off: 'THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER.' U.S. Rep. Al Green, another Texas Democrat who could lose his seat, called Trump 'egomaniacal.' Yet many Democrats also claimed moral high ground, comparing their cause to the Civil Rights Movement. State Rep. Ramon Romero Jr., invoked another Texas Democrat, President Lyndon Johnson, who was 'willing to stand up and fight' for civil rights laws in the 1960s. Then, with Texas bravado, Romero reached further into history: 'We're asking for help, maybe just as they did back in the days of the Alamo.' A recent Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll found that about 15% of Democrats' own voters described the party using words like 'weak' or 'apathetic.' An additional 10% called it 'ineffective' or 'disorganized.' Beto O'Rourke, a former Texas congressman who is raising money to support Texas Democrats, has encouraged Democratic-run statehouses to redraw districts now rather than wait for GOP states to act. On Friday, California Democrats released a plan that would give the party an additional five U.S. House seats. It would require voter approval in a November election. 'Maximize Democratic Party advantage,' O'Rourke said at a recent rally. 'You may say to yourself, 'Well, those aren't the rules.' There are no refs in this game. F--- the rules. ... Whatever it takes.' Democratic National Committee Chairman Ken Martin acknowledged the shift. 'This is not the Democratic Party of your grandfather, which would bring a pencil to a knife fight,' he said. Andrew O'Neill, an executive at the progressive group Indivisible, contrasted that response with the record-long speeches by U.S. Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J. and the Democratic leader of the U.S. House, New York Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, in eviscerating Trump and his package of tax breaks and spending cuts. The left 'had its hair on fire' cheering those moments, O'Neill recalled, but were 'left even more frustrated in the aftermath.' Trump still secured tax cuts for the wealthy, accelerated deportations and cut safety net programs, just as some of his controversial nominees were confirmed over vocal Democratic opposition. 'Now,' O'Neill said, 'there is some marriage of the rhetoric we've been seeing since Trump's inauguration with some actual action.' O'Neill looked back wistfully to the decision by Senate Democrats not to eliminate the filibuster 'when our side had the trifecta,' so a simple majority could pass major legislation. Democratic President Joe Biden's attorney general, Merrick Garland, he said, was too timid in prosecuting Trump and top associates over the Capitol riot. In 2016, Democratic President Barack Obama opted against hardball as the Senate's Republican leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, refused to consider Obama's nomination of Garland to the Supreme Court. 'These unspoken rules of propriety, especially on the Democratic side, have created the conditions' that enabled Trump, Mitchell said. Even on redistricting, Democrats would have to ignore their previous good-government efforts and bypass independent commissions that draw boundaries in several states, including California. Party leaders and activists rationalize that the broader fights tie together piecemeal skirmishes that may not, by themselves, sway voters. Arguing that Trump diminishes democracy stirs people who already support Democrats, O'Neill said. By contrast, he said, the GOP 'power grab,' can be connected to unpopular policies that affect voters' lives. Green noted that Trump's big package bill cleared the Senate 'by one vote' and the House by a few, demonstrating why redistricting matters. U.S. Rep. Greg Casar of Texas said Democrats must make unseemly, short-term power plays so they can later pass legislation that 'bans gerrymandering nationwide ... bans super PACs (political action committees) and gets rid of that kind of big money and special interest that helped get us to this place.' U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas, added that a Democratic majority would wield subpoena power over Trump's administration. In the meantime, said U.S. Rep. Julie Johnson, D-Texas, voters are grasping a stark reality. 'They say, 'Well, I don't know. Politics doesn't affect me,'' she said of constituents she meets. 'I say, 'Honey, it does' If you don't do politics, politics will do you.''
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lawmakers will start with a clean slate if Democrats fail to return Friday, governor calls for second special session
AUSTIN (KXAN)– As Texas House Democrats remain out of the state to block a controversial redistricting bill, Gov. Greg Abbott has threatened to call a second consecutive special session, raising questions about what these legislative sessions actually mean and how they reshape the political process in Texas. With Republicans controlling the Texas legislature but lacking the quorum needed to pass legislation due to the Democratic walkout, the state finds itself in a dramatic standoff that highlights the unique powers and limitations of special sessions in Texas government. Unlike the constitutionally mandated 140-day regular legislative session held every two years, special sessions are gatherings that only the governor can call. These sessions are limited to a maximum of 30 days and lawmakers are confined to addressing only the issues specifically named in the governor's proclamation. Importantly, there are no limits on how many special sessions a governor can call between regular legislative sessions. Sessions can be scheduled back-to-back or even on the same day one ends. How the legislative process changes The compressed 30-day timeline changes how legislation moves through the Capitol. Unlike regular sessions, which have multiple deadlines for bills to advance through committees or pass floor votes, special sessions operate with an accelerated schedule designed to focus attention on the governor's priorities. Key differences include: No bill-filing deadline: Unlike regular sessions where lawmakers must file bills within the first 60 days, special session bills can be filed at any time during the 30-day period. Shortened notice requirements: Public hearing notices drop from five days to just 24 hours in the House Limited floor debate: Speaking time is reduced to 10 minutes per member during the final five days. Focused agenda: Only topics in the governor's proclamation can be considered Perhaps most importantly for the current situation, all bills must be refiled when a new special session is called. Legislation doesn't carry over between sessions, even if identical bills were filed in the previous session, they must be introduced as new bills and assigned new numbers in the subsequent session. What exactly this means for the committee process? Bills will have to be referred back to committees and voted on once again. When it comes to redistricting, we may not see the same redistricting field hearings like we saw in Houston and Arlington. That is a decision for the chair of the committee. However, if the committee is going to vote on a bill, it will allow for public comment. If the current special session ends without passing the redistricting plan, Abbott has promised to 'call the Texas Legislature back immediately for Special Session #2' with the exact same agenda. For the legislative process, this would mean: All bills would need to be refiled with new number and go through the introduction process again The 30-day timeline would restart completely Committees would need to hold public hearings allowing for testimony before voting on bills, though they would not be required to repeat field hearings already conducted during the current session Although the session is set to end Aug. 19, it is likely headed for an early conclusion, with Speaker Dustin Burrows announcing Tuesday they will adjourn Friday if Democrats don't return, and Abbott vowed to call another special session immediately. For Texas voters watching the drama unfold, the standoff illustrates how the state's legislative rules and procedures can amplify political conflicts. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
