Pakistani Student Sentenced To 2.5 Years In Jail For Learning Bomb-Making Via Social Media
Last Updated:
Abdullah used the Instagram handle 'Ibn-e-Abdullah Al-Pakistani' to engage in a conversation with another user based in Iraq and sought information on how to make bombs at home.
An anti-terrorism court here in Pakistan has handed down a two-year and six-month jail term to a university student for learning to make bombs on social media networking sites, an officer said on Monday.
Lahore's ATC Judge Manzer Ali Gill also imposed a fine of PKR 50,000 on Hannan Abdullah, a human resource studies student of the University of Narowal in Punjab, who was arrested by the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) in 2022 on the charges of seeking information about making bombs at a social media networking site in Iraq.
"The prosecution informed the court that Abdullah was learning how to make bombs on Facebook and Instagram. He also established contacts with terrorists and a banned outfit through Facebook in this regard," Dawn quoted the FIA officer as saying.
The prosecution also submitted evidence to the court in this regard. Abdullah was on bail since 2023 and was arrested after the sentencing.
advetisement
The officer said Abdullah in 2022 used the Instagram handle 'Ibn-e-Abdullah Al-Pakistani' to engage in a conversation with another user based in Iraq and sought information on how to make bombs at home.
"While interacting with a user — 'Professional Cook 67' — on Instagram, Abdullah received basic information on how to develop explosive devices using materials like ammonium nitrate, sulfur, ammonium powder, charcoal, and other components," he said.
This conversation was being monitored by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
The FIA officer said it received a complaint against the suspect from the FBI, which provided his (Abdullah) conversations with the Iraq-based account, and the email address used to create the Instagram handle 'Ibn-e-Abdullah Al-Pakistani'.
The officer said Abdullah used to watch bomb-making videos on YouTube and searched on the American e-commerce website Amazon for ingredients mentioned in the Instagram conversations related to bomb-making.
Abdullah, in his defence, told the court he sought bomb making information only out of curiosity.
No evidence was found to suggest that he tried to manufacture any explosive materials using the information or had allegiance with any terror organisation.
(This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI)
Watch India Pakistan Breaking News on CNN-News18. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
First Published:
May 26, 2025, 22:06 IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
Supreme Court Ruling On Gun Companies: Supreme Court Blocks Mexico's Gun Lawsuit Against US Companies, ET LegalWorld
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday spared two American gun companies from a lawsuit by Mexico's government accusing them of aiding illegal firearms trafficking to drug cartels and fueling gun violence in the southern neighbor of the United States. The justices in a 9-0 ruling authored by liberal Justice Elena Kagan overturned a lower court's ruling that had allowed the lawsuit to proceed against firearms maker Smith & Wesson and distributor Interstate Arms. The lower court had found that Mexico plausibly alleged that the companies aided and abetted unlawful sales routing guns to Mexican drug cartels, harming its government. Advt Advt Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals Subscribe to our newsletter to get latest insights & analysis. Download ETLegalWorld App Get Realtime updates Save your favourite articles Scan to download App The justices embraced the argument made by the companies for dismissal of Mexico's suit under a 2005 U.S. law called the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act that broadly shields gun companies from liability for crimes committed with their products. The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had decided in 2024 that the alleged conduct by the companies fell outside these Supreme Court decided that while it has little doubt that U.S. companies are aware of some unlawful sales to Mexican gun traffickers, Mexico's lawsuit failed to allege that the companies had aided and abetted such illegal firearms sales by deliberately helping to bring about the transactions."Mexico's plausible allegations are of 'indifference' rather than assistance," Kagan wrote. "They are of the manufacturers merely allowing some unidentified 'bad actors' to make illegal use of their wares." The case came to the Supreme Court at a complicated time for U.S.-Mexican relations as President Donald Trump pursues on-again, off-again tariffs on Mexican goods. Trump has also accused Mexico of doing too little to stop the flow of synthetic drugs such as fentanyl and migrant arrivals at the lawsuit, filed in Boston in 2021, accused the two companies of violating various U.S. and Mexican laws. Mexico claims that the companies have deliberately maintained a distribution system that included firearms dealers who knowingly sell weapons to third-party, or "straw," purchasers who then traffic guns to cartels in suit also accused the companies of unlawfully designing and marketing their guns as military-grade weapons to drive up demand among the cartels, including by associating their products with the American military and law enforcement. The gun companies said they make and sell lawful avoid its lawsuit being dismissed under the 2005 law, Mexico was required to plausibly allege that the companies aided and abetted illegal gun sales and that such conduct was the "proximate cause" - a legal principle involving who is responsible for causing an injury - of the harms claimed by Mexico. The Supreme Court, which heard arguments in the case on March 4, declined to resolve the proximate cause question after finding that Mexico's suit failed to adequately allege aiding and Arrocha Olabuenaga, the legal adviser for Mexico's Foreign Ministry, vowed that Mexico will continue pursuing its legal fight."While we are disappointed with the decision from this Supreme Court, we are convinced of the strength of our arguments and the evidence that upholds them, and we are encouraged by the support at home and abroad for Mexico's actions," he in the lawsuit had sought monetary damages of an unspecified amount and a court order requiring Smith & Wesson and Interstate Arms to take steps to "abate and remedy the public nuisance they have created in Mexico."The Second Amendment Foundation, a gun rights group that backed the U.S. gun companies in the case, welcomed Thursday's ruling."The lawsuit, dreamt up by multiple gun control groups, had one goal - bankrupt the American firearms market by allowing civil liability to apply for the criminal misuse of its products," the group said in a social media post. "Thankfully the Supreme Court stepped in and squashed it."Gun violence fueled by trafficked U.S.-made firearms has contributed to a decline in business investment and economic activity in Mexico and forced its government to incur unusually high costs on services including healthcare, law enforcement and the military, according to the a country with strict firearms laws, has said most of its gun homicides are committed with weapons trafficked from the United States and valued at more than $250 million Perez Ricart, an international affairs researcher at Mexico's Center for Economic Research and Teaching (CIDE), criticized the ruling."Once again, the industry is shielded. It doesn't matter how many bullets cross the border or how many people are killed on the Mexican side. Bullets are not the only things that kill; so does the legal impunity guaranteed by Washington," Ricart said in a social media post.
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Lucknow trader dead, 2 injured in e-way accident
Kanpur: A Lucknow-based surgical equipment trader died while two others were injured in the Auras police station area of Unnao in a hit-and-run case on Agra-Lucknow Expressway on Thursday. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The accident occurred when a high-speed truck hit a stationary car parked in the parking lane near Hajipur Gosha village at around 4am on Thursday. Aditya Singh (24), son of Krishna Kumar Singh, a trader dealing in surgical equipment, and resident of Geetapalli Alambagh, Lucknow, was travelling to Agra by car with his younger brother Abhay Singh (21) and friend Mohit (23), son of Omprakash Kashyap from Jayrajpur, Lucknow. Mohit was driving the car. When they reached near Hajipur Gosha village in Auras police station area, they stopped the car in the parking lane of the Expressway for a short break. As soon as the trio three opened the car door to get back in, a high-speed truck coming from Lucknow hit them. Aditya died on the spot, while his brother Abhay and friend Mohit sustained severe injuries. Upon being informed, the rescue team from UPEIDA and the police arrived at the scene. Both injured were admitted to Auras CHC. Due to the severity of Abhay's condition, he was referred to Lucknow Trauma Center while Mohit, was sent home after treatment. Superintendent of Police Deepak Bhker stated, "It was a hit-and-run case. With the help of CCTV footage, investigations are underway to locate the truck and its driver, who fled along with the vehicle after the accident."
News18
37 minutes ago
- News18
Woman Books Ola Ride For Only 180 Metres, Netizens Amused After Knowing Reason
Last Updated: A woman had booked an Ola Bike ride, but the rider was puzzled to know that the destination was only 180 metres away. In an unusual incident, a woman booked an Ola Bike ride to travel just 180 metres. Reason: To avoid a pack of street dogs in her locality. A short video captured by the bike rider has gone viral on social media. It shows the driver arriving at the pickup spot and asking the woman for the one-time password (OTP). After entering it, he saw the location was just 180 metres ahead. This left the rider puzzled and he questioned the woman whether she had selected the right drop location. The woman said the destination was accurate, and she had opted for a ride just to avoid street dogs in the area. View this post on Instagram A post shared by ROHIT VLOGSTER (@rohitvlogster) The woman explained that she was scared of the street dogs and did not want to walk past them. Left highly amused by the reason, the driver nevertheless dropped off the woman at the spot and closed the trip. Her total fare was only Rs 19. Netizens were left highly amused over the woman's bizarre decision, while some complimented the driver for acting professionally and still giving her a lift. 'Thank you brother for helping a girl feel safe…," one netizen commented. 'Technologia," another user commented. 'It was better to pay Rs 19 than get an injection," a third user wrote. ' Ek bhi dog toh dikha nahi (Not a single dog was seen?)", pointed out another individual. First Published: June 05, 2025, 23:47 IST
