Scientists say they have solved the mystery of what killed more than 5 billion sea stars
Sea stars – often known as starfish – typically have five arms and some species sport up to 24 arms. They range in color from solid orange to tapestries of orange, purple, brown and green.
Starting in 2013, a mysterious sea star wasting disease sparked a mass die-off from Mexico to Alaska. The epidemic has devastated more than 20 species and continues today. Worst hit was a species called the sunflower sea star, which lost around 90% of its population in the outbreak's first five years.
'It's really quite gruesome,' said marine disease ecologist Alyssa Gehman at the Hakai Institute in British Columbia, Canada, who helped pinpoint the cause.
Healthy sea stars have 'puffy arms sticking straight out,' she said. But the wasting disease causes them to grow lesions and 'then their arms actually fall off.'
The culprit? Bacteria that has also infected shellfish, according to a study published Monday in the journal Nature Ecology and Evolution.
The findings 'solve a long-standing question about a very serious disease in the ocean," said Rebecca Vega Thurber, a marine microbiologist at University of California, Santa Barbara, who was not involved in the study.
It took more than a decade for researchers to identify the cause of the disease, with many false leads and twists and turns along the way.
Early research hinted the cause might be a virus, but it turned out the densovirus that scientists initially focused on was actually a normal resident inside healthy sea stars and not associated with disease, said Melanie Prentice of the Hakai Institute, co-author of the new study.
Other efforts missed the real killer because researchers studied tissue samples of dead sea stars that no longer contained the bodily fluid that surrounds the organs.
But the latest study includes detailed analysis of this fluid, called coelomic fluid, where the bacteria Vibrio pectenicida were found.
'It's incredibly difficult to trace the source of so many environmental diseases, especially underwater,' said microbiologist Blake Ushijima of the University of North Carolina, Wilmington, who was not involved in the research. He said the detective work by this team was 'really smart and significant.'
Now that scientists know the cause, they have a better shot at intervening to help sea stars.
Prentice said that scientists could potentially now test which of the remaining sea stars are still healthy — and consider whether to relocate them, or breed them in captivity to later transplant them to areas that have lost almost all their sunflower sea stars.
Scientists may also test if some populations have natural immunity, and if treatments like probiotics may help boost immunity to the disease.
Such recovery work is not only important for sea stars, but for entire Pacific ecosystems because healthy starfish gobble up excess sea urchins, researchers say.
Sunflower sea stars 'look sort of innocent when you see them, but they eat almost everything that lives on the bottom of the ocean,' said Gehman. 'They're voracious eaters.'
With many fewer sea stars, the sea urchins that they usually munch on exploded in population – and in turn gobbled up around 95% of the kelp forest s in Northern California within a decade. These kelp forests provide food and habitat for a wide variety of animals including fish, sea otters and seals.
Researchers hope the new findings will allow them to restore sea star populations -- and regrow the kelp forests that Thurber compares to 'the rainforests of the ocean.'
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
What the colour of your snot says about your health
No one enjoys struggling with a streaming nose. We're quick to apologise to colleagues for constantly snivelling and quick to discard our tissues, too. While you may think it disgusting, researchers looking into our nasal secretions find snot fascinating. The nasal microbiome is becoming increasingly studied, with experts learning more about how our airways work, which protective bacteria dominate and which appear at the site of disease. They've also found that snot is crucial for supporting our immune system and that studying it could hold the key to curing respiratory problems such as asthma and sinusitis. So what exactly is snot, and why do we need it? 'Snot is essentially a hydrogel, similar to the water-based gels used in beauty products like moisturisers,' says Rebecca Carrier, a professor of chemical engineering at Northeastern University in the US. 'Its chief role is keeping the nasal passageways moist and defending us against infection.' As a result, it contains proteins that control the microbes' ability to penetrate the mucus wall, which, in turn neutralises dangerous bacteria. Dr Aran Singanayagam, a respiratory clinician scientist, adds: 'It is absolutely critical for protecting the airways by trapping the virus and bacteria that we breathe in. Bacteria binds with snot and the snot changes the way the bacteria function, influencing the severity of a disease,' says Prof. Carrier. The role mucus plays in immune health Snot colour and consistency can be a good indicator of our health and can often tell us a lot about the state of our respiratory system. So, what might the colours of our snot indicate about our health? Here, Dr Pedro Barata, a professor at the University of Porto, who has worked extensively with colleagues to learn more about the nasal microbiome and identify the role mucus plays in immune health, shares his insight.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Transplant plea from Hartlepool man on record waiting list
A man living with stage five kidney disease due to complications from type 1 diabetes has shared his story in the hope of encouraging more transplant donors to come Webb, from Hartlepool, is one of more than 8,000 people in the UK currently on the active transplant waiting list, the highest recorded number spends more than four hours on a dialysis machine three times a week while he waits for a transplant, with the average wait time about three and a half doctors described an "urgent need" for donors to register their intention, Mr Webb said: "Every time the phone rings, you're wondering is this the transplant team." He said the needles required for his dialysis, which filters waste from the blood when the kidneys cannot perform the function, can be three inches (7.6cm) long and "really uncomfortable".Missing even one session can be particularly dangerous, he said."I've had fluid overload... it's absolute torture," he said. Mr Webb, who has been on the transplant list since February, said he previously trained as a chef but had been unable to work while undergoing treatment. "I enjoy cooking and [would] like to go back and work in a kitchen again." 'One donor helps nine' Specialist organ donation nurse Dominic Manning, based in Newcastle, said the transplant list was so long now that "someone will die every day waiting for an organ transplant".NHS Blood and Transplant said there were 100 fewer deceased organ donors last year than in Anthony Clarkson said: "We urgently need more people to register their decision to donate and to have these vital conversations with their families."Meanwhile Mr Webb hopes that sharing his story will encourage others to consider organ donation and ensure their loved ones know of their decision."From one person you can save and prolong and improve the quality of life of nine different people," he said. Follow BBC Tees on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Americans get more than half their calories from ultraprocessed foods, CDC report says
Most Americans get more than half their calories from ultraprocessed foods, those super-tasty, energy-dense foods typically full of sugar, salt and unhealthy fats, according to a new federal report. Nutrition research has shown for years that ultraprocessed foods make up a big chunk of the U.S. diet, especially for kids and teens. For the first time, however, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has confirmed those high levels of consumption, using dietary data collected from August 2021 to August 2023. The report comes amid growing scrutiny of such foods by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who blames them for causing chronic disease. 'We are poisoning ourselves and it's coming principally from these ultraprocessed foods,' Kennedy told Fox News earlier this year. Overall, about 55% of total calories consumed by Americans age 1 and older came from ultraprocessed foods during that period, according to the report. For adults, ultraprocessed foods made up about 53% of total calories consumed, but for kids through age 18, it was nearly 62%. The top sources included burgers and sandwiches, sweet baked goods, savory snacks, pizza and sweetened drinks. Young children consumed fewer calories from ultraprocessed foods than older kids, the report found. Adults 60 and older consumed fewer calories from those sources than younger adults. Low-income adults consumed more ultraprocessed foods than those with higher incomes. The results were not surprising, said co-author Anne Williams, a CDC nutrition expert. What was surprising was that consumption of ultraprocessed foods appeared to dip slightly over the past decade. Among adults, total calories from those sources fell from about 56% in 2013-2014 and from nearly 66% for kids in 2017-2018. Williams said she couldn't speculate about the reason for the decline or whether consumption of less processed foods increased. But Andrea Deierlein, a nutrition expert at New York University who was not involved in the research, suggested that there may be greater awareness of the potential harms of ultraprocessed foods. ' People are trying, at least in some populations, to decrease their intakes of these foods,' she said. Concern over ultraprocessed foods' health effects has been growing for years, but finding solutions has been difficult. Many studies have linked them to obesity, diabetes and heart disease, but they haven't been able to prove that the foods directly cause those chronic health problems. One small but influential study found that even when diets were matched for calories, sugar, fat, fiber and micronutrients, people consumed more calories and gained more weight when they ate ultraprocessed foods than when they ate minimally processed foods. Research published this week in the journal Nature found that participants in a clinical trial lost twice as much weight when they ate minimally processed foods — such as pasta, chicken, fruits and vegetables — than ultraprocessed foods, even those matched for nutrition components and considered healthy, such as ready-to-heat frozen meals, protein bars and shakes. Part of the problem is simply defining ultraprocessed foods. The new CDC report used the most common definition based on the four-tier Nova system developed by Brazilian researchers that classifies foods according to the amount of processing they undergo. Such foods tend to be 'hyperpalatable, energy-dense, low in dietary fiber and contain little or no whole foods, while having high amounts of salt, sweeteners and unhealthy fats,' the CDC report said. U.S. health officials recently said there are concerns over whether current definitions 'accurately capture' the range of foods that may affect health. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Agriculture Department recently issued a request for information to develop a new, uniform definition of ultraprocessed foods for products in the U.S. food supply. In the meantime, Americans should try to reduce ultraprocessed foods in their daily diets, Deierlein said. For instance, instead of instant oatmeal that may contain added sugar, sodium, artificial colors and preservatives, use plain oats sweetened with honey or maple syrup. Read food packages and nutrition information, she suggested. 'I do think that there are less-processed options available for many foods,' she said. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
