35 Years of CNDH: Morocco Reaffirms Commitment to Human Rights
Rabat – 35 years ago, Morocco took a bold step. Long before global standards emerged, the country established its first national human rights institution on May 8, 1990, laying the groundwork for what would become a key pillar in its governance landscape.
This week, the National Human Rights Council (CNDH) marks that turning point. The anniversary speaks not only to the passage of time, but to the country's steady shift toward greater accountability, justice, and rights protection.
The Council's president, Amina Bouayach, sees this moment as more than symbolic. 'We are looking back on a path of transformation, but also of construction. Morocco changes constantly, so must we,' she said.
What began as a modest advisory body has grown into a constitutional institution with regional branches and a far-reaching mandate.
Since 2018, the Council has operated with expanded powers to address violations, support victims, and defend freedoms.
Morocco had already taken this path in the early 1990s, three years before the UN adopted the Paris Principles that define how human rights institutions should function.
That early move, Bouayach said, reflected a national decision to address past abuses and build a system based on truth, justice, and reconciliation. The country marked the 20th anniversary of that process earlier this year.
Over the years, the Council has played a role in major reforms: from restructuring the justice system and revising the Constitution to observing elections and launching discussions around Morocco's Family Code. 'We are not outside of national dynamics, we stand in the middle of them,' Bouayach explained.
Under the slogan '35 Years: Rights. Freedoms. Effectiveness', the Council plans to mark the anniversary throughout 2025. The goal is to reinforce the rule of law, support victims where needed, and ensure that rights do not remain theoretical but become real and enforceable.
Morocco's human rights body asserts that it stands on principles of independence and accountability. But it also carries a story, one of political will, institutional learning, and the belief that no reform holds weight unless it protects human dignity. Tags: CNDHCNDH Morocochuman rightsmorocco human rights
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Morocco World
a day ago
- Morocco World
Hilale Slams UN Security Council Report for Biased Western Sahara Paragraph
Doha – Morocco's Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Omar Hilale, has formally challenged the UN Security Council over a biased paragraph concerning Morocco's Western Sahara in its latest report to the General Assembly. In a strongly-worded letter addressed to the Security Council's president and members, Hilale expressed Morocco's 'profound surprise and firm rejection' of the singling out of 'two parties' in the paragraph about the Sahara. The missive was sent following the Council's adoption of its 2024 informative report to the General Assembly on May 30. The Moroccan diplomat pointed out that the introduction to the Security Council's report specifies in its final paragraph that the section's purpose 'is not to provide an exhaustive list of meetings, developments or Council responses,' but rather 'a succinct and useful overview of the main developments throughout the year.' Hilale blasted the contested paragraph for 'flagrantly deviating' from this directive, which has guided the drafting of previous annual reports. He charged that instead of faithfully reporting the Security Council's position and sincere efforts toward a political, just, and sustainable solution to this regional dispute, it presents 'a partisan and unbalanced reading' of positions expressed within the Council. 'This paragraph reflects only, in a selective and non-contextualized manner, the national position of the introduction's writer and that of a non-permanent Security Council member,' Hilale declared, noting it 'silences the contributions and positions expressed by other members,' thus 'moving away from the consensus within this body.' The ambassador firmly asserted that contrary to the paragraph's claim, the Security Council has established four parties to the political process: Morocco, Algeria, Mauritania, and the separatist Polisario Front, citing them five times in all its resolutions since 2018. Morocco's representative stressed that no report from the Secretary-General nor any General Assembly resolution singles out two parties at the expense of the four stakeholders in the political process. A futile attempt to derail the growing international momentum He added that the writer's biased approach is contradicted by the current international momentum, marked by widespread support for resolving this regional dispute solely on the basis of Morocco's Autonomy Plan, respecting the country's sovereignty and territorial integrity. The Moroccan envoy continued that this serious and credible initiative enjoys strong and open support from 116 countries. This includes two permanent Security Council members, with the United Kingdom joining just yesterday, as well as three non-permanent members who sat on the Council in 2024, and six among the current non-permanent members. Hilale condemned how this approach 'discredits the Security Council's work vis-à-vis the General Assembly' by departing from the established practice of factuality and neutrality that traditionally characterizes Security Council reports to the General Assembly. He warned it also 'raises questions about the General Assembly's confidence in the integrity of reports transmitted to it by the Security Council.' 'Instead of attempting to mislead the General Assembly by referring to his national position and that of a non-permanent Council member who is also a main party to this dispute, the writer of this section should have demonstrated neutrality and objectivity,' the diplomat thundered. He further insisted that the writer should have informed the General Assembly about the constants and foundations of the political process established by the Security Council. The Moroccan representative lambasted the writer for opposing the restoration of factuality in this section by invoking a supposed 'procedural integrity,' which 'cannot take precedence when such a flagrant inaccuracy is reported at any stage.' Hilale went on to say that the report's objectivity and factuality are 'a political prerequisite to the Security Council's mission as guarantor of the political process' for resolving the Sahara question. For all these reasons, Morocco firmly denounces this failure to maintain the rigor, impartiality, and integrity of this section of the report. The country also rejects the politically motivated distortion of this paragraph, which 'can only be perceived as a vain attempt to undermine the international momentum in favor of the political process undertaken under the exclusive auspices of the United Nations.' The letter has also been transmitted to the General Assembly president and the secretary-general, and will be published as an official document of both the Security Council and the General Assembly. Read also: Hilale: 'Sahara Occupation Ended with Provinces' Return to Morocco' Tags: Ambassador Omar HilaleUN Security CouncilWestern sahara
Ya Biladi
6 days ago
- Ya Biladi
Moroccan single mother granted right to asylum in the Netherlands in landmark ruling
Issued by the Council of State in The Hague on May 20, 2025, and published on the 26th of the same month, a landmark ruling now allows Moroccan single mothers to apply for asylum in the Netherlands—provided they can demonstrate a genuine risk of criminal prosecution. The decision was handed down in favor of a woman who had appealed after facing deportation alongside her three children, following an administrative rejection in 2023. The initial decision had sided with the Ministry of Asylum and Migration, which argued that Morocco is considered a safe country of origin. However, the Council clarified that this presumption does not apply in cases where individuals can «specifically demonstrate that legal safeguards in Morocco against violations of rights and freedoms are not guaranteed in their individual case». In its appeal, the ministry argued that «there must be concrete and individualized indications that criminal proceedings will actually be initiated». The Council of State, however, found the applicant's claims admissible, stating that she had shown «a clear risk of facing criminal prosecution upon return to Morocco, and that legal protections for her rights and freedoms are not assured in her specific case». Risk of Prosecution and Far-Reaching Consequences The woman's appeal was based on Morocco's Penal Code Articles 490 and 491, which criminalize extramarital relationships and adultery, as well as Family Code provisions regarding the annulment of guardianship and child custody. Her case also referenced the 2022 report by Protection Not Prison: How the criminalization of sexual relations outside of marriage promotes violence against women. According to the report, over 10,000 prosecutions for similar cases were recorded annually in Morocco during the study period. The report contrasts this with the country's response to gender-based violence, highlighting that in 2020, only 46 people were prosecuted for femicide, 756 for rape, 2,034 for violence against women resulting in incapacitation of more than 20 days, and 505 for sexual harassment in public spaces. In the workplace, 20 cases of sexual harassment were prosecuted, while only 2 cases were pursued for breaching restraining orders. In total, there were 3,363 prosecutions for gender-based violence, compared to 13,018 prosecutions for extramarital sexual relations that same year. The applicant also referenced an article titled Response to Morocco : Convictions for Extramarital Sexual Relations by the Austrian Centre for Country of Origin and Asylum Research and Documentation, as well as the Brief Thematic Official Report on the Principle of ne bis in idem, Foreign Criminal Convictions, and Privacy Legislation in Morocco (2023). A Debate on Legal Reforms and the Duty of Protection A letter from MRA, dated December 14, 2023, was also included in the case file. In her application, the mother explained that she «must contact the Moroccan authorities to obtain official identity documents for her youngest child». The Council of State noted in its ruling that this process requires presenting the Dutch birth certificate, which does not list a father, allowing Moroccan authorities to infer that the child was born out of wedlock. An email from MRA confirmed that «when a single mother requests official identity documents for a child born outside marriage, the authorities are alerted to a criminal violation of laws against extramarital sexual relations and proceed with prosecution». While some Moroccan cities allow single mothers to give their child their own surname or choose from a list of approved names, these practices largely depend on individual efforts within local administrations and NGOs, as there is no legal framework to protect such cases. Morocco's reluctance to use DNA testing for establishing paternity in children born out of wedlock also remains a major issue. Without legal recognition of paternal lineage, these children face second-class citizenship. For mothers, the consequences can be severe: in addition to the loss of legal guardianship, they risk imprisonment, economic hardship, and difficulties reentering the workforce after serving a sentence. All these factors contribute to greater insecurity for the children's well-being and future. When contacted by Yabiladi on Wednesday, the MRA association welcomed the ruling as a step forward for the protection of children's rights. «Given the risk of criminal prosecution and the precarious legal status of children born out of wedlock, these children could have been deprived of a normal education like their peers if they had returned to Morocco», the NGO told us. «They would have been separated from their mother if she had been convicted. The priority was to ensure the children could stay with their mother and that their rights were protected, in line with the obligation of international protection under the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC)». Beyond this individual case, MRA expressed hope to Yabiladi that this legal precedent will help advance discussions around the status of children born out of wedlock and single mothers in Morocco, particularly in light of the ongoing Family Code reform and the provisions of the Penal Code.
Ya Biladi
27-05-2025
- Ya Biladi
Morocco to draft new law on the National Press Council, Communication Minister says
The Minister of Youth, Culture, and Communication, Mohamed Mehdi Bensaid, announced on Monday in the House of Representatives the drafting of a new law concerning the National Press Council (CNP). The draft has been reviewed by the government in terms of form, while its content will be discussed with industry professionals as part of the profession's self-regulation process. Responding to questions about the self-regulation of the press sector, the minister explained that the lessons drawn from the self-regulation experience have informed the drafting of this text, with the aim of producing «a law that guarantees self-regulation and the moralization of the press profession». Bensaid elaborated on the self-regulation experience that led to the establishment of the CNP, describing it as «far more than an administrative measure», but rather «a reflection of a profound awareness that press freedom, as enshrined in the Constitution, can only be realized through self-regulation mechanisms». He stressed that self-regulation is designed to reinforce press freedom and uphold the constitutional right to practice the profession. He also highlighted that Article 28 of the Constitution underscores the importance of organizing the press sector on democratic foundations. Self-regulation, he continued, seeks to protect the profession from unethical or unprofessional practices that could damage its reputation, including fake news, disinformation, and other harmful behaviors. Bensaid concluded by emphasizing that self-regulation is not solely the responsibility of journalists, but a shared societal concern, given that the press serves society as a whole.
