Habitat for Humanity plans to build 48 affordable homes in Whisper Valley in Travis County
Austin Habitat for Humanity is coming to Whisper Valley, a subdivision in northeastern Travis County about three miles south of Manor.
With a 40-year history of helping working residents attain the "American Dream of homeownership," the nonprofit Habitat says it is now accepting applications for homes in Whisper Valley, a community recognized for its energy-efficient designs and cutting-edge technology.
Habitat and its volunteers plan to build 48 single-family homes in Whisper Valley, off the Texas 130 toll road, to help with the Austin region's growing need for workforce housing for middle-income earners, giving them an affordable place to call home.
"Hard work and determination are no longer enough to own a home in Central Texas," Michele Anderson, CEO of Austin Habitat for Humanity, said in a news release. "Rising property values and rental rates have outpaced income growth, making it nearly impossible for middle-income workers to buy a home and build generational stability. Through this initiative, we are not just constructing houses — we are creating opportunities for families to establish roots, build equity, and create a foundation for future generations."
The initial Habitat homes are expected to be priced between $230,000 and $245,000. For buyers who sign contracts by 2026, home prices are expected to run about $260,000.
Habitat's Whisper Valley homes will be built in phases over the next several years. Qualified owners will benefit from below-market mortgage rates and 100% financing, which means no down payment is required to purchase, Habitat officials said.
Construction on Austin Habitat's homes in Whisper Valley is set to begin in October with the 2025 Jimmy & Rosalynn Carter Work Project.
"This initiative, started by the former president and first lady, will unite the Central Texas community to build 25 homes in just one week in October, showcasing the power of collaboration and shared resources," Habitat's release said.
As for the remaining 23 homes, foundation work will begin on 11 houses in the fall or winter of this year, with volunteer construction starting in February.
Foundation work on the remaining 12 homes will begin in early summer 2026, followed by volunteer building starting in September 2026. All home closings are expected to be completed by March 2027.
Currently at the master-planned Whisper Valley subdivision, 590 single-family homes and duplexes are on the ground, with 560 of those occupied.
For the market-rate homes at Whisper Valley, duplexes start in the low $300,000's. Single-family homes range from about $300,000 to $700,000, depending on size, features and builder.
More: Home sales under way at eco-minded Whisper Valley
Once fully built out, Whisper Valley is expected to have about 5,000 single-family homes and 2,500 multifamily or rental units, including build-to-rent homes and apartment complexes, for a total of 7,500 residential units. Whisper Valley is expected to be completed within the next 10 to 15 years.
When Whisper Valley was poised to break ground on its first homes back in 2015, developer Taurus of Texas said the project would be the first large single-family housing development, locally and nationally, that would be 'energy neutral,' meaning its homes would be designed to produce as much energy as they consume on a net basis every year.
The homes would be equipped with geothermal pumps for heating and cooling; roof-mounted solar panels, energy-efficient appliances and other green-building technologies, Taurus officials said.
More: Development's plan: 7,500 'energy neutral' homes in Austin
Austin Habitat offers a variety of housing types — including single-family homes, townhomes, and condos — for low-to-moderate-income workers. To qualify for an Austin Habitat home, applicants must earn below 80% of the region's median family income. The following annual income limits apply for 2025:
One-person household – up to $68,500
Two-person household – up to $78,250
Three-person household – up to $88,050
Four-person household – up to $97,800
A complete qualifying income chart, including larger household sizes, is on the Austin Habitat website.
'We often find that many middle-income workers don't realize that they can qualify for affordable homeownership through Austin Habitat," Billy Whipple, chief impact officer of Austin Habitat, said in a statement. "If you're not certain whether you qualify, you can visit our website and fill out an interest questionnaire. Our team will work with applicants to help them understand their eligibility, improve their financial readiness, and ultimately put them on the path to homeownership."
Homes built by Austin Habitat for Humanity in the five-county Austin region are often valued at $400,000 and above but sell between $152,000 and $245,000, Whipple said in a recent email.
Habitat is able, to an extent, to control housing-market headwinds "through reduced interest rates thanks to partnerships with participating lenders, and access to downpayment assistance," Whipple said.
Central Texas residents interested in owning a home in Whisper Valley can begin the application process by visiting austinhabitat.org/own/.
Over the past four decades, Austin Habitat for Humanity, part of the global Habitat network, has built more than 570 new homes and repaired more than 435 homes across Bastrop, Blanco, Caldwell, Hays, and Travis counties.
This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Habitat for Humanity homes coming to Whisper Valley in Travis County
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Want To Be In The Top 5% Of Households? Here's Exactly How Much You Need—And It's Much Lower Than You'd Guess
How do you know if you're actually rich — like, rich rich? If you've ever wondered whether your savings, investments, or home equity stack up to the country's wealthiest, there's a number that draws the line. And while it might sound like an elite bracket reserved for finance bros and inheritance babies, the top 5% isn't as far out of reach as some might think. You'll hear people toss around figures like "I want to retire with $5 million," or "You're not rich until you never check your balance." Fair. But in the background, many are just quietly checking to see if their net worth is even close to making the cut. You'll spot them in Reddit threads, in comment sections, or sitting across from you at brunch, casually mentioning their Roth IRA. So—how rich do you need to be to join the top 5% of households? Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: . According to the Federal Reserve's Survey of Consumer Finances, you'd need a net worth of about $3.8 million to break into the top 5% of U.S. households. That includes everything you own—retirement accounts, investments, your home—minus any debts you owe. Seems steep? Compared to the median net worth in America, which is around $192,700, it is. But if you've been aggressively saving, investing wisely, or just got lucky with some real estate timing, you might be closer than you think. The average net worth of households in the U.S. is about $1.06 million, but don't let that fool you. Averages get warped by the ultra-wealthy. The median is a better measure for the "typical" household—and that's why $192,000 matters. If you're above it, you're ahead of most. If you're below it, you're not alone. Trending: Invest where it hurts — and help millions heal:. This number includes: Retirement savings (401(k), IRA) Brokerage and investment accounts Real estate equity Business ownership or equity Cash and bank holdings Minus credit card debt, student loans, mortgages, etc. It doesn't count income—this is strictly net worth, not how much you make. Whether you're halfway there or just getting started, here are a few things that actually move the needle: Automate your investing. Consistency beats timing. Pay down high-interest debt. It eats your momentum. Own appreciating assets. Think equities or property, not depreciating toys. Reinvest wisely. Compound interest rewards the yourself to others isn't the recipe for happiness—but it is human nature. Benchmarks like this help give context, not judgment. Some people live well below their means and still feel broke. Others drive a 15-year-old car and feel free. Your version of "rich" might mean peace of mind, flexibility, or just not sweating the small stuff. These numbers are guideposts, not gospel. But if you're aiming for top 5% status? Now you know the number. The rest is strategy. Read Next: Here's what Americans think you need to be considered wealthy. Image: Shutterstock UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Want To Be In The Top 5% Of Households? Here's Exactly How Much You Need—And It's Much Lower Than You'd Guess originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
New York Post
a day ago
- New York Post
Why both the Left and the Right are failing American workers
Working-class voters had high hopes that Donald Trump would help them out economically: Inflation and the economy were top priorities for Trump voters in 2024. These voters have seen the fading of the American Dream first-hand: Over 90% of Americans did better than their parents in the decades after World War II, but only half born in 1980 will. Why? A major reason is that employers pocketed workers' fair share of productivity increases. Wages used to rise when productivity did; if that had continued, workers' wages would be 43% higher than they are today. 6 Only half of Americans born in 1980 are doing better than their parents, with the root causes far harder to solve than mere DOGE-style cost cuts by President Trump and Elon Musk. FRANCIS CHUNG/POOL/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock You won't hear about this from President Trump. Instead, his villain is foreign trade, and his solution is to use tariffs to bring back blue-collar jobs. But tariffs won't work quickly, because onshoring means building new factories, which takes years. And it may never happen. Meanwhile, tariffs threaten to take away the only real benefit workers got from globalization: cheap Nikes, T-shirts, and party favors. To add to that, the Trump administration is DOGE-ing away stability at the Veterans Administration and Medicaid, which middle-class and rural Americans rely on. In short, the right isn't doing right by Lunchpail Joe and Jane. But neither is the left. Instead, it's obsessing nonstop about Trump's flouting of democratic norms — that's all progressives want to talk about. Defense of democracy was a top priority for those who voted for Kamala Harris, but way, way down for those who voted for Trump. The left also wants to talk about how DOGE is firing government workers, making professionals' jobs unstable and nerve-wracking. 6 Attacks on Obama-era healthcare initiatives are another reason American workers are feeling the pinch, some critics claim.. Getty Images Welcome to our world, say non-college voters. Thirty years ago, sales personnel at Macy's had full-time jobs with benefits. Today, associates worry constantly about whether they will accrue enough hours to pay the rent, in jobs that typically lack health insurance. As a result, many workers without degrees are working all kinds of hours. A 38-year-old construction worker described the impact on family life: 'People can't get or stay married because it takes so much effort to survive. My ex-fiancée said, 'You're never around.' But I was working to get a better life for us. No one has time for their kids. It's the American Nightmare.' 6 Today, associates worry constantly about whether they will accrue enough hours to pay the rent, in jobs that typically lack health insurance. Bloomberg via Getty Images DOGE is placing college-educated professionals where workers without degrees have been for decades — worried sick about how they're going to support their families. Don't expect workers to care. In earlier eras, the left was focused on good jobs for blue-collar workers and universal programs to ensure stability for the middle class, like Social Security, Medicare, and VA home loans and college benefits. In the 1970s, the focus changed to prioritize issues of greater concern to liberal college grads: environmentalism, racism, and sexism. As political priorities changed, so did 'feeling rules' that set the parameters of our heartstrings. A good lefty should feel angst about climate change, the poor, LGBTQ+, racism, and immigrants. But blue-collar Americans who vote for Trump? They're deplorable. If you care deeply about people disadvantaged by race, gender, and country of origin — but ignore class disadvantage — then people disadvantaged by class will seek solace by flocking to those who channel their anger. In both Europe and the US, those who flock to the far right are middle-status voters in routine jobs, holding on for dear life and just waiting for the other shoe to drop. A reality check: Democrats have generally done better for working people than Republicans. Obamacare is only the most recent example. The Trump administration has cut funding to programs that underlie the stability of middle-class Americans, like the VA and Social Security, creating overly lengthy wait times. 6 'Out-classed: How the Left Lost the Working Class and How to Win Them Back' by Joan C. Williams. 6 Author Joan C. Williams. This is what the left should be focusing on, not the defense of democracy. Americans who feel they've been screwed for the last 40 years feel democratic institutions haven't delivered for them. If Democrats are seen as defending the status quo, they won't win over non-college voters who feel like the status quo isn't working for them. And nearly two-thirds of Americans lack college degrees. Without them, Democrats can't win elections. Here's the bottom line. My message for Republican powers-that-be is a question: Does the current business climate, rife with chaos, instability, and the corrosion of both democratic norms and the US credit rating, really work for you? If you'd prefer a more orderly political and business climate, you need to deliver a stable, middle-class future for Americans without college degrees. 6 The Trump administration is DOGE-ing away stability at the Veterans Administration and Medicaid, which middle-class and rural Americans rely on. Getty Images My message for Democratic powers-that-be is also a question: Do you want to win elections? If you do, you need to change policies and feeling rules to deliver both economic stability and respect for non-college voters. Because if you don't, what you now see is what you'll get. There's your coalition out of this mess. Joan C. Williams is director of the Equality Action Center at UC Law San Francisco and the author of 'OUTCLASSED: How the Left Lost the Working Class and How to Win Them Back.'
Bloomberg
2 days ago
- Bloomberg
Private Equity Doesn't Actually Want to Kill the American Dream
There is a lot of the titular bad, intended and unintended, in Megan Greenwell's Bad Company: Private Equity and the Death of the American Dream (Dey Street, June 10). There is the main charge: that private equity investors are bad, careless, pampered, unimaginative, extractive, faceless people who have 'reshaped the American economy to serve [their] own interests, creating a new class of billionaires while stripping ordinary people of their livelihoods, their health care, their homes, their sense of security.' There is the bulk of the book's content: well-researched stories, often heartbreaking, of people touched by four bad private-equity deals, all in shrinking industries or troubled situations. And there is the connective tissue: that private equity's core business and source of power is thriving through failed investments in shrinking industries or troubled situations. This is Greenwell's central thesis. It doesn't make much sense.
