Councillors agree plans for 2.95% council tax rise
Residents in south Essex face larger bills after a local authority agreed to increase council tax and car parking charges.
Rochford District Council's 2.95% council tax increase will raise approximately £240,000, with a further £24,000 coming from increased parking charges.
James Newport, the Liberal Democrat leader of the council, said: "Every penny we spend must deliver the best possible outcomes for our residents."
Danielle Belton, leader of the Conservatives, said the increases were "surprising".
At the full council meeting on Tuesday, councillors agreed to a council tax rise just below the maximum level, with 2.99% being the threshold.
People living in a Band D property will see their bills rise by an additional £90.48 a year.
Parking charges will go up, with an annual season ticket at Hockley Woods increasing by £92.33.
Other car parks, including those at Websters Way, Mill Hall, and Old Ship Lane, are also set for an increase in costs, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.
Belton said: "We're increasing parking to raise £24,000 despite the fact this council has a pot of money called £90,000 for priorities.
"A priority for this council should be keeping as much money in our residents' pockets as possible to help businesses, high streets and individuals."
Newport said: "Value for money is at the heart of this budget.
"We are focused on social value, making decisions that strengthen our economy, support community wellbeing, and deliver long-term benefits for residents and businesses."
Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Council tax to rise with more money for roads
Council reveals plan to raise tax by maximum 4.99%
Local Democracy Reporting Service
Rochford District Council
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Epoch Times
an hour ago
- Epoch Times
Tories Bid to Reclaim Economic Credibility, But Mel Stride's Speech Lacks Policy Punch
Shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride has renewed the push to reclaim the Conservatives' reputation for economic credibility, as he delivered a speech in which he sought to distance the party from former Prime Minister Liz Truss's mini-budget. But while Stride acknowledged past failings and criticised Labour and Reform UK policies, his remarks notably lacked detailed economic policy proposals. He called for a radical 'rewiring' of the economy and admitted his party has learned from its mistakes. Speaking at the Royal Society for Arts, Manufactures and Commerce on Thursday, Stride promised the Conservatives will never replicate Truss by making promises it can't afford. He referenced the 'We see what happens when fiscal responsibility goes out the window,' the shadow chancellor said, adding that the Conservatives' plan for economic stability and growth would 'take time to put together.' Related Stories 6/4/2025 5/2/2025 He laid out a framework of what needs to be tackled—the size of the state, a complicated tax system, bloated welfare, and sluggish productivity—but stopped short of diving into specifics. More detail could be expected from the party leader Kemi Badenoch, who is set to make a speech on Friday. Tories Trailing Behind Stride's address comes at a time of dire polling for the Conservative Party. The Conservatives believe that restoring public trust in their economic management is essential to improving their electoral prospects. 'We have to demonstrate to the British public first thing that we are on their side and will hold this government to account,' said Stride. Shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride delivers a speech at the Royal Society of Arts in London on June 5, also sought to distance the party from Reform, accusing Nigel Farage of promoting unfunded policies that lack proper scrutiny. 'Reform says that they will take everybody earning up to £20,000 out of income tax altogether. The cost of that, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies, is between £50 and £80 billion. 'You have got to have a pretty robust plan on savings or where you going to find that money,' Stride said. Despite Conservative criticism, Reform continues to benefit from public disillusionment with the Tories after 14 years in power, as well as defections from Conservative ranks. Its success in the Stride's own credibility is under scrutiny owing to his time in government during Truss's premiership, when the controversial mini-budget was announced. In response to his remarks, Truss The former Tory leader also claimed that Britain's system of government is 'broken,' adding that 'nothing will change with people like [Stride] in charge.' Clash Over Economic Strategy Stride's remarks come ahead of the government's Spending Review and just a day after Chancellor Rachel Reeves ruled out tax hikes. Similar to Stride, she said she would never jeopardise market confidence in the government's fiscal discipline. Despite Labour's push for growth since July elections, the UK economy faces Stride said that the £25 billion national insurance hike under Labour had 'slowed the economy down' and that their spending spree had 'driven up inflation' and 'keeps interest rates higher for longer.' However, according to Reeves, the £40 billion tax increases in last October's Budget and the funding decisions made by the government rule out
Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
Violence Against Jews Is About More Than Left or Right
Since the advent of what we might call the new antisemitic terror, beginning with the Tree of Life synagogue massacre in Pittsburgh in 2018, many Jews have comforted themselves—if one can call it comfort—by believing that antisemites are clustered at just one end of the political spectrum, which meant that the other end is safe. Liberals pointed to the murderous attacks in Pittsburgh and in Poway, Calif., in 2019, perpetrated by white supremacist zealots. Conservatives pointed to the wave of street violence against Jews in Brooklyn, perpetrated by Black men and in their view ignored by the left, and to antisemitic rhetoric on campuses, along with the tendency of DEI ideology to promote safe spaces for everyone except Jews. But with the recent attacks on Jews in Washington, D.C., and Boulder, it's past time to abandon the fantasy that your side—whatever it is—doesn't have an antisemitism problem. Antisemitism is not a left-wing phenomenon or a right-wing one. It's a mass psychosis. Whatever house you live in, it's not in order. There's a madman in the attic, and he hates Jews. What we have is not a fringe problem but a national—indeed, international—problem, and the solution will have to come from all of us.
Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Will Donald Trump Get to Pick New Supreme Court Justices?
President Donald Trump may have the opportunity to appoint new Supreme Court justices during his second term in office, legal experts told Newsweek. Trump reshaped the judiciary during his first term, appointing three justices to the nation's highest court. The next few years may grant him another chance to pick a new justice, who could serve on the court for decades. This could have major implications for public policy on issues related to abortion, LGBTQ+ rights, immigration and the scope of executive authority. Conservative-leaning Justices Clarence Thomas, 76, Samuel Alito, 75, and Chief Justice John Roberts, 70, already face pressure from some on the right to step down over the coming years as Republicans currently hold a trifecta in the federal government. Not only is Trump president, but the GOP holds a 53-seat majority in the Senate. This means no Democrats would be needed to vote in favor of Trump's Supreme Court nominees. Republicans could learn from Democrats about the consequences of their justices not retiring. Late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg faced calls to retire during former President Barack Obama's administration from Democrats who wanted him to pick her replacement, rather than a Republican president potentially getting to do so. However, she declined to do so, continuing to serve during Trump's first term. She died in September 2020—just months before the election in which President Joe Biden would unseat Trump. But it was Trump who got to pick her replacement, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, 53, who could continue serving on the court for decades. Conservatives point to that example as to why some of their older justices should retire while Trump can pick their successor. Daniel Urman, a Northeastern University law professor, told Newsweek no one really knows when someone will leave the court, but that Alito and Thomas would be the most likely to retire to ensure someone with similar legal views could replace them on the court. But it may not necessarily be likely because they are now in the majority after years of being dissenting voices they care most about. Pressure from the right may not be convincing to the justices, he said. "Judges and especially Justices are very independent, and I don't think they will be too influenced by the pressure campaign," he said. "It's ultimately a very personal decision and the Ginsburg example is important but she was older and faced more health issues than the current justices." None of the current justices on the court have publicly said they plan to retire anytime soon. Former federal prosecutor Gene Rossi told Newsweek Thomas could wait until after the 2026 midterms to avoid giving Democrats a motivating issue ahead of the elections. "However, if that happens, President Trump will pick a very young and conservative nominee because in his mind, he got burned with Justice Barrett," he said. "And he wants to put his further imprint on the tenor of the High Court." Although many conservatives may like to see Roberts retire, it's not clear that is likely, Stephen Wermiel, professor of practice in constitutional law at American University, told Newsweek, noting that he is only 70. His willingness to stand up against Trump may also leave a question about whether he would be "less than thrilled to give Trump the opportunity to replace him." Thomas, meanwhile, is only three years away from becoming the longest serving justice in history, and Alito also seemingly "still has a lot to say and do in the conservative Court," Wermiel said. "I think it is uncertain whether Trump will have another Supreme Court vacancy," he added. "It is certainly likely that conservatives will start putting pressure on Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito to retire after the current term so that Trump can appoint younger replacements." Whether a jurist is conservative may not be the only question for Trump, analysts said. Barbara McQuade, former federal prosecutor, told Newsweek Trump could consider loyalty in appointing justices, as some conservatives on the court have been willing to break with him on key issues. "With frustration over some of the decisions by Justices Barrett and Roberts, there would be a push for justices who are not just conservative, but who are loyal to Trump himself," she said. "They could make a significant difference in some of the cases that are percolating up from the lower courts on issues such as birthright citizenship, transgender healthcare, and executive power." Barrett, at times, has been more willing than some of the other conservatives on the bench to break from the president, such as when she opposed his efforts to deport alleged gang members under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 and other key cases. Her independent streak has drawn backlash from conservatives aligned with Trump. Urman agreed Trump may be inclined to nominate a loyalist in the future, noting that he "seems to prize loyalty above all other characteristics in his nominees," and that his appointees could be more aligned with Alito or Thomas than Barrett. Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani told Newsweek: "It's likely Trump appoints at least one Supreme Court Justice, and maybe two. The odds increase over his four-year term, especially with Justices Thomas and Alito being in their mid-70s." "Trump's Cabinet and officer appointees during his second term have been largely loyalists without the experience or independent streaks that frustrated him during his first term. His Supreme Court appointment(s) will likely reflect those same values, especially given the importance of the judiciary in standing in the way of his executive orders." Roberts, during a fireside chat in May, reported The Hill: "I'm going out feet first. I say that now. I mean, I'm sure if your health declines, and if you recognize that you're a burden to the court rather than part of an assist to everybody, then, it'll be time to go." It's unclear whether any justices plan to retire in the coming years, but the court will continue weighing in on key legal issues and serve as a check on Trump's executive authority. Related Articles How Democrats Could Woo Elon Musk Back: Fired Trump AideMap Shows Where Prisons Are Expanding as Trump Ramps Up DeportationsSchumer Calls Trump Bill the 'We're All Going To Die Act'John Cornyn's Chances of Losing Republican Primary After 20 Years: Poll 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
