
‘Mountainhead' review: Plutocrats in party mode
Which is the scariest episode of Succession?
If you've watched the HBO sensation — created by British satirist Jesse Armstrong and streaming in India on JioHotstar — you're bound to have a few nominees. It may be the one where a media baron forces his employees to humiliate themselves with a game called 'Boar On The Floor,' the one where a wife spells out to her husband just how surely she doesn't love him, the one where a son desperately wants to confess a crime to his mother, to which she tells him they'll do it over eggs in the morning — only to ghost him come breakfast. Armstrong created awful (and awfully compelling) characters, and they've left scars.
For me, the most chilling episode remains 'Whatever It Takes' (season 3, episode 6) where a media magnate and his family are encamped in a Republican retreat and, in hotel rooms and bathrooms, casually vet and select America's next President. At a time oligarchs appear to be running countries with more certainty than elected leaders, this episode cuts deep, focussing on personal pettiness and whimsy and the impossible imbalance of power. It felt frighteningly plausible.
Armstrong riffs again on men who control the world — who control all our worlds, to be precise — in his debut film Mountainhead, out now on JioHotstar. Four tech moguls, who scrawl their net-worths on their chests, have gathered for an off-the-grid weekend of playing poker and roasting each other, except they can't really fall off the grid because the world happens to be burning. (This only makes the roasting hotter.)
Cory Michael Smith plays Venis Parish, the biggest fish of the four, worth $220 billion and heading a social media network that — because of newly launched AI tools — is spreading so much misinformation so efficiently that reactionary violence is breaking out around the world. As they scroll past horrifying videos on their feeds, Venis convinces himself that the videos look too realistic to be real. 'Do you believe in other people?", he asks Randall, the eldest of the group, who assuages his (momentary) concern. (This, again, is straight out of Succession, where the party line for customers dying on cruise-ships involved the savage acronym NRPI: 'No real person involved.")
Randall Garrett is played by Steve Carrell, who has a terminal disease but literally refuses to die. 'Incorrect," he snaps at a doctor's diagnosis, instead goading Parish to create a post-human world where Garrett's own consciousness can be uploaded to something — anything — that may live on. It's a terrific character, perpetually sinister and self-serving, hiding his own motives behind Hegel and Kant.
Jeff Abredazi, an AI superstar whose net worth is growing by the minute, calls Randall 'Papa Bear" and confides in him. Jeff, played by Ramy Youssef, appears to have a fix to what's ailing the world, a filter that can tell truth from fiction and immediately extinguish the violence — but this would require him to join forces with Venis. This is a slippery conundrum, because while Jeff seems to be the only one affected by the outbreaks of violence, no greater good compels him to shake hands with Venis. Morality, it is apparent, gets fuzzier and fuzzier in rarefied air.
The host of the weekend is Hugo Van Yalk, nicknamed Soupy. While this is tweaked to 'Souperman' from time to time, it stands for 'Soup Kitchen' since he is the only non-billionaire of the bunch. Played by Jason Schwarzman, Soupy has built the high-altitude home that gives the film its title — while all the others decry its ugliness. Schwarzman soaks the character in such unctuousness that he makes it evident that while the others are finished products, he hopes that he is merely a billionaire-in-waiting, a trial version that will make it big someday. A beta.
The performances are great across the board. Smith is absolutely unhinged, picking fights with trees and annoyed by the President putting him on hold. Youssef is visibly grappling with newfound power while trying to be a part of a quartet — however misguided said quartet may be. Carrell is, unsurprisingly, the pick of the bunch, entitled and petty and deeply amoral. As the film moves from deluded-tycoon territory to wilder and more bizarre shenanigans, it is he who grounds the madness and makes it feel scarily real.
One of my top Carrell physical comedy bits is in the 2006 film Little Miss Sunshine when he, as an affectionate uncle, runs towards automatic doors with arms by his side and hands winged up, willing it to open faster so he can run in. It's spectacular. In Mountainhead, his character is so blinded by desperation and envy that he walks straight into a glass door.
Mountainhead is a highly entertaining and characteristically quotable film from Armstrong, but Succession loyalists have seen these themes before, while tech-bros like Peter Thiel and the Paypal mafia have been lampooned far more effectively in Mike Judge's prescient Silicon Valley. There are times when this film begins to resemble the sublime The Death Of Stalin (Amazon Prime, directed by Armstrong's former collaborator Armando Iannucci) but when four tech-bros stand in front of a RISK board-game and start divvying up the world, it feels clumsily literal.
Then again, keeping it literal may be the plan. Mountainhead's significance lies in its urgent timeliness, with world leaders on the payroll of big businessmen, and AI developing quicker than humanity can handle. How much do we know? The film starts by showing horrible violence in Gujarat and ends with a CNN headline where the Indian 'government says order has been restored across most of the country." In this increasingly post-fact world, what can we believe? Who will fact-check the fact-checkers?
Streaming Tip Of The Week
The documentary The Social Dilemma (Netflix) is five years old — which feels like an eternity given the way technology and social behaviour is evolving — but the film remains thought-provoking and essential.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Tom Hiddleston expecting second child as partner Zawe Ashton reveals baby bump at UK premiere of ‘The Life of Chuck'
Actors Zawe Ashton and Tom Hiddleston are preparing to welcome their second child. The couple confirmed the news on Saturday, June 7, with Ashton revealing her pregnancy in a feature for Vogue. The announcement came just ahead of the U.K. premiere of 'The Life of Chuck', Tom Hiddleston's latest film, which screened as part of SXSW London. Ashton accompanied him at the event, where she proudly showed her baby bump in a flowing sky-blue silk crepe gown by British designer Emilia Wickstead. This marks the couple's second child together. Ashton, 40, and Hiddleston, 44, had their first baby in October 2022, following a public baby bump debut earlier that year during a screening of Ashton's film 'Mr. Malcolm's List'. The pair first met in 2019 while performing together in 'Betrayal', a West End and Broadway play in which they starred opposite each other. Their off-stage relationship began soon after and became public in 2021 when they walked the red carpet at the Tony Awards. Zawe Ashton and Tom Hiddleston at the red carpet for the premiere of 'The Life of Chuck'. Though both actors have kept much of their private life out of the spotlight, Hiddleston made a rare comment about their relationship in March 2022 during an interview with the 'Los Angeles Times', simply saying, 'I'm very happy.' Ashton is known for her work on stage and in films, while Hiddleston continues to enjoy global recognition for his role as Loki in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Fans were delighted by the news of their growing family and praised the couple for keeping things graceful and grounded. With their second child on the way, Ashton and Hiddleston look set to continue balancing their high-profile careers with family life.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Royal tradition under pressure: King Charles ‘livid' as cherished Christmas tradition faces threat- here's why
King Charles (File photo) King Charles is reportedly "livid" about potentially missing a cherished Christmas tradition this year. Recent reports from The Sun indicate a shortage of pheasants at Sandringham Estate, potentially affecting the winter shooting schedule. This activity is traditionally one of the monarch's preferred holiday pursuits. "King Charles III is livid, frustrated and disappointed, reflecting both his deep personal attachment to the cherished family tradition and his broader commitment to his royal heritage," British royal expert Hilary Fordwich told Fox News Digital. "He's also annoyed that the mishap reflects rather poorly on the management of Sandringham, which he inherited from his mother, Queen Elizabeth II," she further said. "The shoot gathers his extended royal family and guests, reinforcing bonds while upholding a long-standing aristocratic tradition. The root of the problem is that Charles has always opposed importing birds from elsewhere, preferring to maintain the estate's game population. The eco-friendly approach has failed<" she added. The reduced bird population might force the 76-year-old monarch, currently receiving cancer treatment, to cancel the traditional Boxing Day shoot, a significant component of royal holiday celebrations. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất IC Markets Đăng ký Undo British photographer Helena Chard told Fox News Digital, "Allegedly, King Charles is disappointed that one of his favorite Christmas family traditions may not take place this year. The Sandringham shoot is questionable due to a lack of Sandringham pheasants on the estate. It seems the family will have to bond, enjoy and celebrate over another hobby, or possibly clay pigeon shoots are the way forward." "King Charles may have felt a fleeting healthy upset, but in light of recent times, with the slimmed-down monarchy, cancer battles and more... the monarchy has found their typical ways changing as they are forced to be flexible," she added. A veteran gamekeeper, tasked with overseeing the bird population at the estate, was reportedly dismissed during recent personnel changes, leading to a deficit, as indicated by The Sun. A source informed the publication, "It was a total cock-up. No birds, no bang, just red faces. The king wasn't having it." Per Chard's account, despite the king's disappointment, he remains open to adjustments. The sovereign is currently adapting to a new schedule whilst undergoing weekly cancer treatments, all whilst maintaining his commitment to full-time royal responsibilities. The expert highlighted that the scarcity could lead the king to reassess the hunting custom, which has received criticism from organisations advocating for animal welfare. Meanwhile, royal commentator Ian Pelham Turner believes the altered arrangements might enable the king to focus on reconciliation with his younger son, Prince Harry . The Duke of Sussex and his wife Meghan Markle withdrew from their senior royal duties in 2020, stating they faced intolerable media scrutiny from British newspapers and insufficient backing from the palace. They now live in California. Following their departure from royal duties, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex have voiced their concerns through various media appearances and Harry's revealing 2023 book, "Spare." Insiders familiar with the prince, 40, have informed People magazine about the king's apparent reluctance to engage in communication via telephone or written correspondence. "Perhaps he could bring the royal clan together, lock the door, knock all their heads together and unite the entire family, including Harry and Meghan," Turner told Fox News Digital. "This may be feathers flying in a different way than a grouse shoot, but if they really believe in the Christian principles, they would try, in my view. It is what Britain expects." According to People magazine, Charles advocates for conventional methods and stands against bringing birds from other regions for this rural custom. The publication noted that sustaining the population of game birds in the region has proven to be "challenging."


News18
4 hours ago
- News18
Honey Singh BREAKS Silence On Badshah's Viral Dua Lipa Comment, Calls Him 'Genius'
Last Updated: Yo Yo Honey Singh mocks Badshah's controversial 'make babies with Dua Lipa' comment with a sarcastic 'Genius' post, reigniting their decade-old rivalry. Amid the ongoing backlash surrounding rapper Badshah's controversial comment about British singer Dua Lipa, Honey Singh has chimed in — and his reaction is as loaded as it is brief. Responding to Badshah's public justification for his much-criticized statement, Honey Singh posted a one-word response on social media: 'Genius" — complete with laughing and clapping emojis. The post, which quickly went viral, is being widely interpreted as a sarcastic dig at his longtime rival, reigniting chatter about the two rap titans' famously fractured relationship. The moment in question began when Badshah, also known as Aditya Pratik Singh Sisodia, responded to a fan's question on X (formerly Twitter) about whether he'd rather collaborate with Dua Lipa or have kids with her. His blunt reply — 'Rather have babies with her" — drew swift criticism online, with many calling the comment 'cheap," 'objectifying," and 'just plain weird." Trying to do damage control, Badshah the next day defended his remark, calling it 'one of the most beautiful compliments you could give a woman you admire." He added, 'Meri soch nahi, tumhari soch saamne aayi hai," attempting to flip the controversy back on critics. But his 'clarification" only drew more heat — with social media users calling it 'delusional," 'a PR fail," and 'an even worse look than the original comment." I think one of the most beautiful compliments that you could give to a woman that you really admire is to wish for her to mother your children. Meri soch nahi tumhari soch saamne aayi hai.— BADSHAH (@Its_Badshah) June 7, 2025 Enter Honey Singh. Never one to shy away from subtle shade, the Desi Kalakaar singer dropped his 'Genius" comment on a post discussing Badshah's explanation. And while he didn't mention his former bandmate by name, the timing and context made his target unmistakably clear. For fans who've followed the long-running tension between the two, it was classic Yo Yo: cheeky, savage, and just cryptic enough to avoid being called out directly. Badshah and Honey Singh, once part of the same hip-hop crew Mafia Mundeer, have shared a decade-long love-hate relationship. Their creative fallout led to one of Indian music's most talked-about feuds — a cold war filled with diss lyrics, interview shade, and barely concealed one-upmanship. While both artists built massive solo careers post-split, their paths remained intertwined through constant comparison and occasional shots fired on social media. Last year, Badshah made headlines for seemingly putting the rivalry to rest. During his GraFest 2024 concert in Dehradun, he publicly acknowledged Honey Singh on stage, saying it was time for the industry to move beyond old grudges. The gesture was seen by many as a long-overdue truce. As for Dua Lipa, the British singer has yet to comment on the exchange — and given the scale of her global fame, she may never feel the need to. But for Badshah, the backlash at home continues to simmer, serving as a reminder that in the age of the internet, no 'joke" goes unchecked — especially when it comes at the expense of someone else. First Published: