Vedanta Resources secures $600 mn loan for refinancing high-cost pvt credit facility
Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
London-based Vedanta Resources Limited (VRL), the parent firm of Mumbai-listed mining conglomerate Vedanta Ltd , has secured a term loan facility of up to USD 600 million that will be used to refinance a high-cost private credit facility, according to a communication sent to bondholders.The first tranche of USD 380 million has been committed, with the remaining USD 220 million expected to be finalised shortly with other participating banks.Lenders for the USD 380 million facility comprise a consortium of Gulf, Japanese, and European banks, including First Abu Dhabi Bank, Mashreq, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp, and Standard Chartered."The facility carries a door-to-door tenor of over four years, with an average maturity of approximately three years and a pricing of SOFR (Secured Overnight Financing Rate) plus 450 basis points."This proactive refinancing, combined with internal cash flows, positions us to fully repay the PCF facility - substantially enhancing our credit profile by increasing average debt maturity beyond four years and reducing our overall cost of debt to single digits," said the communication to bondholders.With savings of over 900 basis points in the interest costs for the USD 550 million refinancing, this will result in total annual interest savings of around USD 50 million for the company.In its communication, VRL said, "This transaction reflects the continued confidence of global financial institutions in Vedanta's credit quality and strategic vision. It underscores our commitment to prudent capital management, proactive refinancing, strengthened financial flexibility, and long-term value creation."VRL is also looking for a credit rating upgrade to BB levels on the back of its proactive refinancing and improving financial and operational performance.In the medium term, the company plans to achieve an Investment Grade rating supported by its robust earnings, healthy free cash flows, ongoing growth projects, strengthened balance sheet and deleveraging plans.An investment-grade credit rating signifies a company's strong capacity to meet its financial obligations and is considered a safe investment for institutional investors. It also allows a company to borrow money at lower interest rates, attracting a broader range of investors and gaining easier access to global debt markets.The refinancing is part of VRL's efforts to manage its debt profile as it seeks to optimise cost and extend maturities.As of March, VRL's debt hit a decadal low of USD 4.9 billion, as the company deleveraged its balance sheet by over USD 4 billion in the last three years.The group continues to focus on deleveraging and bringing down its cost of finance, stating in a recent earnings call that in FY25 its group-level debt reduced by USD 1.2 billion, of which USD 0.7 billion was at VRL and the rest USD 0.5 billion was at its Indian listed subsidiary, Vedanta Limited.The Indian conglomerate said in its recent earnings call that the company and its parent entity "now maintain a stronger leverage position (net debt to EBITDA ratio) than most of their key global peers".Over the past few quarters, VRL has refinanced its entire USD 3.1 billion bonds, which has helped the company flatten its maturity curve and extend the maturity to more than eight years, reducing VRL's cash requirement and average coupon rate by 250 bps.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Climate finance: India takes lead in cornering developed nations
In a small but important victory in climate negotiations, developing countries led by India have managed to force a reopening of discussions on the obligations of developed nations to 'provide' finance, and not just make efforts towards 'mobilising' financial resources, for climate action. The issue of climate finance was sought to be settled last year at the COP29 meeting in Baku, Azerbaijan, where developed nations had agreed to mobilise a sum of at least USD 300 billion per year from 2035. The figure is three times the amount that developed countries are currently obligated to raise, but well short of the USD 1.3 trillion a year that is the assessed minimum requirement of the developing countries. At the ongoing annual climate talks in Bonn, Germany, a formal 'consultation' was held on the issue Monday after developing countries made a united pushback, seeking inclusion of a dedicated agenda item to discuss the obligation of the developed countries under the 2015 Paris Agreement to provide financial resources to the developing countries. The Paris Agreement obligates the developed nations to both 'provide' finance (Article 9.1) as well as 'take the lead in mobilising climate finance' (Article 9.3). The two are related but independent obligations. One does not replace, or take precedence over, the other. The promise to mobilise USD 300 billion a year from 2035 sidesteps the obligation under Article 9.1. The developing countries had been extremely dissatisfied with last year's outcome in Baku, with India calling the USD 300 billion amount 'abysmally poor'. Later, India had also said that it would be forced to temper the ambition of its future climate action if adequate amounts of climate finance was not provided for. In the run-up to the Bonn climate talks, which began last week, India enlisted the support of other developing countries in demanding that a separate agenda item be opened to discuss the implementation of Article 9.1 of the Paris Agreement. The demand has been met with strong opposition from the developed nations who argued that the matter was already being addressed through various existing strands of negotiations on climate finance which made a new and standalone agenda item unnecessary. The issue shut down the talks for two days last week. Held as a compromise, the formal 'consultation' on Monday saw country after developing country highlighting the failure of the developed nations to deliver on their finance commitments. Expressing deep concern at the lack of adequate financial resources being made available, India said the inability of the developed nations to fulfil their obligations was resulting in an erosion of trust. It said Article 9.1 of the Paris Agreement was not just a moral imperative, but a legal obligation and a commitment flowing directly from Article 4.3 of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The 1992 framework convention, the overarching international agreement that sets down the broad principles for global fight against climate change, makes it mandatory for the developed countries, in Article 4.3, to 'provide new and additional financial resources' to meet the 'agreed full costs' incurred by developing countries in taking climate action. The formal consultation will result in a 'report' that would be placed before a similar meeting during the COP30 climate conference that is scheduled to be held in Belem, Brazil towards the end of the year. The developing countries are hoping that at Belem they would manage to force the creation of a separate workstream to discuss the implementation of Article 9.1. While that may be some distance away, the developing countries can have the satisfaction of bringing climate finance back under the spotlight, and forcing a discussion that developed nations are generally averse to get into.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
How The End Of Carbon Capture Could Spark A New Industrial Revolution
The U.S. Department of Energy's decision to claw back US$3.7 billion in grants from industrial demonstration projects may create an unexpected opening for American manufacturing. Many of the grant recipients were deploying carbon capture and storage – technologies that are designed to prevent industrial carbon pollution from entering the atmosphere by capturing it and injecting it deep underground. The approach has long been considered critical for reducing the contributions chemicals, cement production and other heavy industries make to climate change. However, the U.S. policy reversal could paradoxically accelerate emissions cuts from the industrial sector. An Emissions Reality Check Heavy industry is widely viewed as the toughest part of the economy to clean up. The U.S. power sector has made progress, cutting emissions 35% since 2005 as coal-fired power plants were replaced with cheaper natural gas, solar and wind energy. More than 93% of new grid capacity installed in the U.S. in 2025 was forecast to be solar, wind and batteries. In transportation, electric vehicles are the fastest-growing segment of the U.S. automotive market and will lead to meaningful reductions in pollution. But U.S. industrial emissions have been mostly unchanged, in part because of the massive amount of coal, gas and oil required to make steel, concrete, aluminum, glass and chemicals. Together these materials account for about 22% of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions. The global industrial landscape is changing, though, and U.S. industries cannot, in isolation, expect that yesterday's means of production will be able to compete in a global marketplace. Even without domestic mandates to reduce their emissions, U.S. industries face powerful economic pressures. The EU's new Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism imposes a tax on the emissions associated with imported steel, chemicals, cement and aluminum entering European markets. Similar policies are being considered by Canada, Japan, Singapore, South Korea and the United Kingdom, and were even floated in the United States. The False Promise Of Carbon Capture The appeal of carbon capture and storage, in theory, was that it could be bolted on to an existing factory with minimal changes to the core process and the carbon pollution would go away. Government incentives for carbon capture allow producers to keep using polluting technologies and prop up gas-powered chemical production or coal-powered concrete production. The Trump administration's pullback of carbon capture and storage grants now removes some of these artificial supports. Without the expectation that carbon capture will help them meet regulations, this may create space to focus on materials breakthroughs that could revolutionize manufacturing while solving industries' emissions problems. The Materials Innovation Opportunity So, what might emissions-lowering innovation look like for industries such as cement, steel and chemicals? As a civil and environmental engineer who has worked on federal industrial policy, I study the ways these industries intersect with U.S. economic competitiveness and our built environment. There are many examples of U.S. innovation to be excited about. Consider just a few industries: Cement: Cement is one of the most widely used materials on Earth, but the technology has changed little over the past 150 years. Today, its production generates roughly 8% of total global carbon pollution. If cement production were a country, it would rank third globally after China and the United States. Researchers are looking at ways to make concrete that can shed heat or be lighter in weight to significantly reduce the cost of building and cooling a home. Sublime Systems developed a way to produce cement with electricity instead of coal or gas. The company lost its IDP grant in May 2025, but it has a new agreement with Microsoft. Making concrete do more could accelerate the transition. Researchers at Stanford and separately at MIT are developing concrete that can act as a capacitor and store over 10 kilowatt-hours of energy per cubic meter. Such materials could potentially store electricity from your solar roof or allow for roadways that can charge cars in motion. Technologies like these could give U.S. companies a competitive advantage while lowering emissions. Heat-shedding concrete cuts air conditioning demand, lighter formulations require less material per structure, and energy-storing concrete could potentially replace carbon-intensive battery manufacturing. Steel and iron: Steel and iron production generate about 7% of global emissions with centuries-old blast furnace processes that use intense heat to melt iron ore and burn off impurities. A hydrogen-based steelmaking alternative exists today that emits only water vapor, but it requires new supply chains, infrastructure and production techniques. U.S. Steel has been developing techniques to create stronger microstructures within steel for constructing structures with 50% less material and more strength than conventional designs. When a skyscraper needs that much less steel to achieve the same structural integrity, that eliminates millions of tons of iron ore mining, coal-fired blast furnace operations and transportation emissions. Chemicals: Chemical manufacturing has created simultaneous crises over the past 50 years: PFAS 'forever chemicals ' and microplastics have been showing up in human blood and across ecosystems, and the industry generates a large share of U.S. industrial emissions. Companies are developing ways to produce chemicals using engineered enzymes instead of traditional petrochemical processes, achieving 90% lower emissions in a way that could reduce production costs. These bio-based chemicals can naturally biodegrade, and the chemical processes operate at room temperature instead of requiring high heat that uses a lot of energy. Is There A Silver Bullet Without Carbon Capture? While carbon capture and storage might not be the silver bullet for reducing emissions that many people thought it would be, new technologies for managing industrial heat might turn out to be the closest thing to one. Most industrial processes require temperatures between 300 and 1830 degrees Fahrenheit (150 and 1000 degrees Celsisus for everything from food processing to steel production. Currently, industries burn fossil fuels directly to generate this heat, creating emissions that electric alternatives cannot easily replace. Heat batteries may offer a breakthrough solution by storing renewable electricity as thermal energy, then releasing that heat on demand for industrial processes. Companies such as Rondo Energy are developing systems that store wind and solar power in bricklike materials heated to extreme temperatures. Essentially, they convert electricity into heat during times when electricity is abundant, usually at night. A manufacturing facility can later use that heat, which allows it to reduce energy costs and improve grid reliability by not drawing power at the busiest times. The Trump administration cut funding for projects working with Rondo's technology, but the company's products are being tested in other countries. Industrial heat pumps provide another pathway by amplifying waste heat to reach the high temperatures manufacturing requires, without using as much fossil fuel. The Path Forward The Department of Energy's decision forces industrial America into a defining moment. One path leads backward toward pollution-intensive business as usual propping up obsolete processes. The other path drives forward through innovation. Carbon capture offered an expensive Band-Aid on old technology. Investing in materials innovation and new techniques for making them promises fundamental transformation for the future. (Disclosure Statement: Andres Clarens receives funding from the National Science Foundation and the Alfred P Sloan Foundation.)
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
India to roll out incentive scheme for rare earth production 15-20 days
With the rare earth material supply crisis looming large, the government is set to launch an incentive programme to encourage domestic production of these minerals. The government will roll out a scheme to subsidise domestic production of rare earth magnets in 15-20 days, Heavy Industries Minister H D Kumaraswamy said on Tuesday. The minister said that consultation with stakeholders is underway to decide the amount of the incentive programme. According to ministry officials, if the total incentive crosses Rs 1,000 crore, the scheme will be sent to the Union cabinet for approval. The latest crisis emanates from stricter controls imposed by China on the export of seven rare earth elements and finished magnets. This revised framework demands detailed end-use disclosures and client declarations, including confirmation that products will not be used in defense or re-exported to the US. This added scrutiny has prolonged the clearance process to at least 45 days, leading to significant delays and a growing backlog that is tightening global supply chains. China is the world's dominant exporter of rare earth magnets, controlling over 70% of global Rare Earth Element (REE) production and over 90% of refining capacity. Kumaraswamy on Tuesday said India is looking at alternative sources for procurement of rare earth minerals in the interim period, including Japan and Vietnam. He informed that one Hyderabad-based company has promised to deliver 500 tonnes by this year-end. The secretary said the actual production of rare earth magnets will take about two years, and the government, along with the industry, is looking at alternative sources of procurement in the interim period, including Japan and Vietnam. Rare earth magent, an alloy rare earth metal, are integral to Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors (PMSMs), which are widely used in electric vehicles (EVs) for their high torque, energy efficiency, and compact size. Hybrid vehicles also rely on them for efficient propulsion. In Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) vehicles, their use is primarily limited to electric power steering and other motorized systems. Elements like Dysprosium (Dy), Terbium (Tb), Neodymium (Nd), and Praseodymium (Pr) are crucial for these magnets, especially in high-performance applications. Meanwhile, ministry officials said that said 30 automotive firms have sought authorisation from the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) to import rare earth magnets from China a fortnight ago, so that production is not impacted negatively due to the shortage.
