Bill Gates-backed butter made from CARBON is slammed for being 'disgusting' - as even billionaire admits it's 'strange'

Daily Mail​

15 hours ago

A synthetic butter made entirely from carbon, hydrogen and oxygen and backed by Bill Gates-backed, has been slammed online as 'disgusting.'
The bizarre spread is made by Savor, a company based in Batavia, Illinois, and is backed by the Microsoft founder.
Their products are described on their website as: 'Delightfully rich foods without animals, farmland, fertilizers, hormones, or antibiotics. These are real fats, not a substitute.'
But the rollout plan has received mixed reviews with many users slamming the product online as 'disgusting.'
Celebrity chef Andrew Gruel wrote on X: 'Disgusting. They are combining hydrogen, carbon and oxygen to create fat molecules then manipulate that to taste like butter. Why do this when we already have butter?
The scientists say their recipe is made up of fat, water, a touch of lecithin as an emulsifier, and natural flavor and color.
The finished butter allegedly contains no palm oil and is already being tested in restaurants and bakeries to hit the market in 2025. Retail sales could begin around 2027.
Instead of farmland, fertilizers and cows, Savor uses an industrial process to turn carbon dioxide from the air and hydrogen from water into fat molecules identical to those in dairy butter.
The result, according to the company, looks, smells and tastes just like the real thing but is made with zero agriculture and zero emissions.
'So you're using this gas right now to cook your food and we're proposing that we would like to first make your food with-with that gas,' Kathleen Alexander, co-founder and CEO of Savor told CBS News.
'This is really about how we feed our species and heal our planet at the same time,' she added.
While Gates has admitted the concept 'may seem strange at first,' he insists its potential to slash greenhouse gas emissions is 'immense.'
'The idea of switching to lab-made fats and oils may seem strange at first. But their potential to significantly reduce our carbon footprint is immense,' he wrote on his blog.
Another critic accused Savor of using sustainability as a cover for centralizing food production.
'They're not trying to solve a food shortage. They're trying to engineer one… Once they own the source code for your food, they can alter it, gate it, and revoke access at will… The goal isn't to make butter without cows. The goal is to make humans without sovereignty.'
Others emphasized health concerns and warned synthetic butter could 'cause heart attacks and obesity at a minimum.'
Still some defended the concept, saying it could help feed developing countries if it's cheap to produce.
'IF it's cheaper to produce, then it's great for developing countries, e.g. in Africa,' one user added.
But the same person added that 'No one will force me to eat this butter, because the molecules can be cloned, but the authentic taste certainly cannot. Imagine putting this on your $50 steak.'