Kim Jong Un is sending another 6,000 people to Kursk, after an estimated 6,000 of his troops were killed or wounded there
Russia says Kim Jong Un is sending another 6,000 people to Kursk.
UK intelligence estimates 6,000 North Koreans have already been killed or wounded in Kursk.
Sergei Shoigu said Kim is now sending 1,000 sappers and 5,000 workers to rebuild the oblast.
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un is set to send another 6,000 of his people to aid Russia in the Kursk region.
Russian state media on Tuesday cited Sergei Shoigu, the secretary of Moscow's security council, saying that Pyongyang had agreed to provide 1,000 sappers — combat engineers who deal with explosives and fortifications — and 5,000 construction workers to rebuild the oblast.
Shoigu gave no timeline on the deployment. He said the sappers would help to demine Kursk, where Ukrainian troops held pockets of territory for about eight months after a surprise incursion in the summer of 2024.
The North Korean workers, meanwhile, would "restore infrastructure facilities destroyed by the occupiers," Shoigu told state media.
Shoigu's announcement comes after he visited North Korea for the second time in two weeks. According to Russian state media, he's visited Pyongyang three times in the last three months.
The new arrangement underscores a deepening relationship between Russia and North Korea that's opened up a vital source of arms and troops for the Kremlin to maintain its offensive pace against Ukraine.
Pyongyang, meanwhile, has benefited from economic support, cash payouts, and military tech expertise from Russia. In November, Ukrainian officials had estimated that North Korea would receive up to $2,000 from Russia for each soldier it deployed to fight Ukraine.
"Sending North Koreans to support Russia is a quick and reliable way for Kim Jong Un to make money," Soo Kim, a North Korea researcher and former CIA analyst, told Business Insider about Tuesday's announcement.
"So in the short run, Kim gets money in exchange for providing manpower to Russia," she added. "Long run, the access to critical military know-how will only strengthen his threat base."
North Korean state media wrote on Tuesday that Kim had met with Shoigu. While it did not report on any details of fresh troops being sent to Kursk, it wrote that Kim had "confirmed the contents" and "accepted the relevant plans" of North Korea's cooperation.
Kim initially sent some 12,000 troops in the fall of 2024 to Kursk, the oblast where Ukraine entered in August of that year and seized up to 500 square miles of Russian soil.
Aided by Pyongyang's soldiers, the Kremlin's forces recaptured almost all of those gains by March 2025, effectively ousting Ukrainian forces from the region by late spring.
In the process, Pyongyang reportedly suffered heavy casualties. Ukraine said in early 2025 that about 3,800 to 4,000 North Korean soldiers had been killed or wounded.
On June 15, the UK Defense Ministry said in an intelligence update that it estimated that more than 6,000 North Korean troops had been killed or wounded in Kursk.
Shoigu, who oversaw the first two years of Russia's war in Ukraine as defense minister, said Moscow and Pyongyang are planning memorials for the North Korean troops lost.
"The heads of our states have decided to perpetuate the feat of the soldiers of the Korean People's Army who took part in the military operations," he told state media, referring to North Korea's military.
The top Russian official didn't say if Kim's new tranche of personnel to Kursk would come from North Korea's military. Pyongyang has typically been known to use its massive army to build large infrastructure projects.
In response to the announcement, South Korea's foreign ministry said in a statement that it was "closely monitoring developments" between North Korea and Russia.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
18 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Business Insider names Kim Last Editorial Director of BI Live
Business Insider welcomes Kim Last as Editorial Director of BI Live, the new events business that translates its award-winning journalism to global audiences through interactive event formats. In this role, Last will develop and curate a slate of events that bring Business Insider's unique editorial voice to life. The move is part of Business Insider's commitment to engage its audience by translating content into experiences that spark dialogue and drive value for decision makers. BI Live will focus on in-person, interactive events that showcase the best of Business Insider's reporting across core coverage in business, technology, and innovation. Last will co-lead the initiative alongside Priscilla Ellington, Vice President of BI Live. Last joins Business Insider from The Wall Street Journal, where she most recently served as Head of Live Journalism and Special Content. At the Journal, Last expanded the Future of Everything event franchise and played a pivotal role in driving the publication's live journalism efforts globally. Prior to the Journal, she held critical roles in conference development at Vox Media, including Recode, and at Fast Company, she launched the inaugural Fast Company Innovation Festival. "Kim is an innovative and inspiring journalist, colleague, and leader. We are so fortunate that she will help Business Insider build this critical new format for our journalism. Her vision and deep editorial expertise will drive the exciting future of BI Live," said Business Insider Editor in Chief Jamie Heller. "I'm incredibly excited to join Business Insider's new live events business. There's tremendous opportunity to not only build distinctive event franchises that engage and grow BI's audience across the business, tech, and innovation verticals, but also the chance to create live journalism that goes well beyond the spaces where we convene. I'm especially looking forward to working in the newsroom to help develop BI's journalists into dynamic, insightful live interviewers who can bring their expertise to life on stage," said Last.

Business Insider
19 minutes ago
- Business Insider
The billion-dollar pollution problem
The data center boom is driving utilities to torpedo renewable energy goals and rely on fossil fuels, pushing data centers' expected air-pollution-related public health costs to between $5.7 billion and $9.2 billion annually, a Business Insider investigation found. As Big Tech bets on generative AI, electricity demand for data centers far outstrips what renewable power can currently provide. Utility companies say fossil fuels generate cheaper, more reliable electricity to keep the ever-growing number of data centers running around the clock. Developers filed permits for 1,240 data centers in the US as of 2024 — roughly quadruple the level in 2010. The resulting surge in electricity demand is already one of the most significant since the outbreak of World War II, said Julie Cohn, a research historian at the Center for Public History at the University of Houston. If every permitted facility comes online, their electricity demand could reach between 149.6 terawatt-hours and 239.3 terawatt-hours annually, Business Insider found. The low end of Business Insider's estimate is roughly equivalent to the state of Ohio's electricity needs in 2023, and on the high end, is nearly as much power as the entire state of Florida used that same year. A 2024 federal report projects demand could reach levels at the higher end of Business Insider's estimates by 2026. Communities already overburdened by pollution are bearing the brunt of the impact. Tech companies say their electricity use is driven by consumer demand. They also say the industry is directly incentivized to use electricity efficiently since power is data centers' most significant operating cost. The tech giants have emphasized clean energy commitments when talking about their data center building spree. Amazon announced last year that it had invested billions of dollars into more than 500 solar and wind projects globally to power its data centers and other operations. Microsoft announced a deal estimated at $10 billion to build green energy infrastructure for its data centers. Google pledged $20 billion in a deal to do the same. Despite such efforts, these cutting-edge computer farms are often powered by old-school energy sources that churn out pollution, Business Insider found. If all data centers that have received permits are brought online, Business Insider estimates electricity generation for data centers could reach between $5.7 to $9.2 billion in public health costs. Expected health impacts include between 190,000 and 300,000 asthma symptom cases — wheezing, chest tightness, or coughing — and between 370 and 595 premature deaths each year. To calculate these impacts, Business Insider used data from the backup generator permits for the 1,240 data centers it identified, including the amount of power and the maximum amount of pollutant emissions the generators could produce, an approach inspired in part by research from Julie Bolthouse at the Piedmont Environmental Council, who examined air permits in Virginia. (See more on Business Insider's methodology here.) Guided by expert estimates on data center electricity consumption, Business Insider used the permit data to assess what share of emissions generated by power plants on their electrical grids were attributable to the data centers. Business Insider then estimated the public health burden from those emissions using an Environmental Protection Agency tool that assesses the costs to avoid outcomes like premature deaths, asthma attacks, heart attacks, and missed school or work days. Amazon's 177 data centers are on pace to command the highest electricity demand at between 30 and 48 terawatt-hours a year, with the midpoint of the range about as much electricity as 3.6 million US homes based on average use. Microsoft's 44 data centers would consume about half that. A Microsoft spokesperson said that the company's reliance on fossil fuels was tied to their use by utilities, and that it invests significantly in carbon-free electricity wherever it operates. An Amazon spokesperson stressed the company's commitment to increasing the availability of renewable power sources, but didn't address Business Insider's estimates of public health costs or provide figures for electricity consumption. Another Amazon spokesperson said Business Insider's methodology for estimating consumption "oversimplifies complex data center operations and is based on assumptions that do not account for important differences in how companies build and operate data centers." Google and Meta did not respond to Business Insider's queries about our approach to estimating data center power use, and QTS declined to comment. A Microsoft spokesperson acknowledged that its data centers "do not always run at 100% of their installed capacity." Toxic generators Data centers' backup generators provide occasional emergency power and are tested monthly, usually for less than an hour. Permits show that these generators emit harmful air pollutants that can trigger asthma diagnoses, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations. A report last year for the Virginia legislature said that in 2023, data center generators in the state emitted 7% of the pollutant totals allowed in their permits. Based on that, Business Insider estimated that if all existing and planned generators nationwide emitted at similar rates, they would collectively emit about 2,500 tons of nitrogen oxides a year. That's equivalent to over 2 million passenger cars making round-trip drives between New York and California. Using the EPA tool, Business Insider calculated that data center generators alone could trigger nearly 20,000 asthma symptom cases a year and cost $385 million in annual public health burden. Spokespeople for Google and QTS said Business Insider's generator emission methodology relied on assumptions that overstate backup generator use. Microsoft told Business Insider its backup generators run "significantly fewer hours per year than the industry-wide average used in the EPA estimates." Amazon said further research was needed to validate Business Insider's findings. A representative from the Data Center Coalition, an industry interest group, said data centers were "actively evaluating alternatives that can provide similar reliability, fuel availability, siting flexibility, and workplace safety protections" as traditional, diesel-powered generators. The amounts of individual pollutants emitted annually by different generator models vary. QTS estimated in one air permit that a facility's generators would annually emit as low as 2% of permit limits for sulfur dioxide and as high as 32% of permit limits for nitrogen oxides. More than 230 data centers nationwide — nearly one in five — are in communities already highly overburdened by environmental pollutants, according to a Business Insider analysis that mapped all 1,240 data center locations onto a separate EPA tool. The tool combines census demographic data with data on 13 tracked pollutants present within a mile radius. Increased pollution burdens on these communities can have devastating effects: Children there are found to have asthma at higher rates. Mothers experience more preterm births. Amazon has the most such data centers, with 29 locations in areas with extremely high pollution burdens. Cogent, a rapidly expanding developer with 13 permitted centers by Business Insider's count, sited nearly half of its facilities in overburdened communities; Google and QTS each located nearly one in five of their centers in overburdened communities. An Amazon spokesperson said Business Insider's analysis was based on a defunct tool, pointing to its removal from the EPA website under the Trump administration. QTS said its facilities were designed to meet international green building certification standards. Cogent and Google declined to comment on the specifics of Business Insider's reporting. Clean energy, on paper By 2028, data centers are expected to account for at least 6.7% — and as much as 12% — of all electricity used in the United States, up from 4.4% in 2023 and less than 2% in 2018, according to the 2024 federal report. The US electricity grid sources 60% of its power from fossil-fuel-fired plants, per federal data. To offset their impact, big data center developers are committing to invest heavily in renewable projects such as solar plants and wind farms, and funding the development of more nuclear power. Last year, Amazon invested more than $500 million to develop nuclear power with power purchase agreements in Virginia and Washington state, and Microsoft plans to purchase 100% of the power generated by Three Mile Island should regulators approve that shuttered nuclear plant's revival. In all, the amount of carbon-free power capacity that Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, and Google contracted to use grew 69% in the 12 months that ended in February, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence. Big Tech companies also buy renewable energy certificates, which involve compensating someone else for each megawatt of electricity they deliver to the grid using renewable sources. "Data center owners and operators stand out for their leadership and commitment to decarbonization through clean energy," Aaron Tinjum, an energy policy official at the Data Center Coalition, told Virginia regulators last year. At the same time, data centers' demand is causing utilities and regulators to scrap planned renewable projects — and instead keep using coal power plants and building more natural gas power plants. In 2024, Dominion Energy, Virginia's largest electricity utility company, told regulators that transitioning entirely to renewable electricity generation, as mandated by state law, was "infeasible" and instead proposed using increasing amounts of fossil-fuel-fired power alongside additional renewable energy sources to meet power demand driven primarily by data centers. Aaron Ruby, a Dominion Energy spokesperson, told Business Insider that the utility's proposals to meet historic power demand were compliant with state law and that the utility was still working to increase clean energy. In Louisiana, Entergy, the state's largest electricity utility, told regulators in late 2024 it would need to build three natural gas plants to serve power demands from a recently announced Meta data center. Similarly, representatives of Mississippi Power told regulators early this year that data center demand would necessitate the continued use of the state's largest coal power plant, previously scheduled to close in 2028. A single Amazon data center in Mississippi, once fully online, is expected to demand 2 to 3.3 terawatt-hours a year, according to Business Insider's estimate. On average, that's the same amount of electricity used by 240,000 US homes. A Meta spokesperson told Business Insider that it had over 15 gigawatts of new renewable energy under contract. An Amazon spokesperson said the company was committed to reaching net-zero carbon emissions across all operations by 2040. Entergy and Southern Company, the parent of Georgia Power and Mississippi Power, didn't respond to queries. Waterways threatened River ecologists and urban planners warn that even before data centers go online, their construction imperils habitats for vulnerable species. Last year, an environmental impact report performed by Virginia's Department of Housing and Community Development determined a proposed 11-building Amazon data center campus would permanently affect nearly 6 acres of wetlands. An Amazon spokesperson told Business Insider the company would conduct a wildlife management study and planned to explore opportunities to limit impact on wetlands and species of concern. In 2022, the National Parks Conservation Association commissioned a report that estimated the construction-related soil erosion from two data centers set to be built in Virginia would cause up to 1,350 tons of sediment to be dumped into Quantico Creek, a Potomac River tributary, clogging fish gills and reducing their disease resistance. Sediment increase would risk changing the waterway itself, the report said, potentially disrupting habitats and harming amphibians, turtles, and other aquatic species. The report also raised concerns about data centers' discharge of massive amounts of contaminated water used for cooling. That discharge, the report said, would risk increasing concentrations of metals, petroleum-based chemicals, pesticides, and herbicides, which could cause deformities and sores in aquatic wildlife. Data center violations Business Insider identified 56 civil penalties totaling at least $1.4 million issued by state and federal environmental regulators to data centers across nine states over the past 20 years. These included violations of the Clean Air Act or the Clean Water Act resulting in fines of $100,000 or more. CyrusOne and Equinix, which run so-called colocation data centers that lease computing power to other firms, top the list with seven and six penalties, respectively, followed by QTS with four and Amazon with three. One of the biggest colocators, Digital Realty, engendered the largest dollar amount of penalties in Business Insider's review. In 2018, a Virginia environmental inspector found nine unpermitted emergency generators at a Loudoun County Digital Realty data center. The inspector noted in an enforcement recommendation plan that data center developers "have an economic incentive to construct facilities quickly" and said that by installing generators without a permit, Digital Realty "made a business decision and enjoyed the economic benefit." After additional violations for exceeding permitted generator limits and unauthorized generator use during peak pollution periods, the company eventually agreed to pay $317,913 in 2020 to resolve all violations. Digital Realty declined to comment on Business Insider's reporting. Meanwhile, water contamination risks persist. In 2023, a QTS data center in New Jersey's industrial "Chemical Belt" paid $179,000 to settle claims of failing to adequately monitor pollutants discharged into Ambrose Brook. During the winter, the facility continuously releases water containing corrosive antibacterials, chemical descalers, and algaecides. QTS settled with no admission of fault. A QTS spokesperson said the Piscataway data center was in full compliance with all monitoring requirements and the permit issued by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. The spokesperson added that QTS addressed three other environmental regulation violations at data centers and was in full compliance with the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act. The Amazon spokesperson said the company has a track record of complying with environmental regulations. A spokesperson for CyrusOne told Business Insider it complies with environmental regulations and is committed to environmental responsibility. An Equinix spokesperson told Business Insider that in limited circumstances, the company hadn't fully complied with requirements related to permitting, timing and tracking, and emissions, but that "we aggressively work to ensure that our facilities are in full compliance with all applicable regulations." Series credits About the data: Business Insider used air permits issued to data center backup generators to identify facility location and ownership, and estimate facility power use. We received permits from all but four states, plus Washington, DC. BI also used 2020 US census data and data from the Environmental Protection Agency's COBRA, AVERT, and EJSCREEN tools. Read more about how we investigated the impact of data center growth here. Editing: Jeffrey Cane, Rosalie Chan, Jason Dean, Esther Kaplan, Jake Swearingen
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Satellite image captures decades-old US-made F-5 jets at an Iranian airbase, offering a snapshot of Tehran's vintage air force
New satellite imagery of an Iranian base shows several aging F-5 fighter jets. The US-made F-5s, which first flew in the 1950s, are part of Iran's outdated air force. Tehran relies heavily on its missile and drone arsenal, rather than crewed fighter aircraft. A new satellite image taken of an Iranian airbase showed a handful of decades-old, American-made F-5 fighter jets, offering a look at Tehran's antiquated air force. The photo, captured Tuesday by US commercial satellite imaging company Maxar Technologies and obtained by Business Insider amid Israeli strikes on Iranian military assets, showed six F-5s on alert and dispersed around the Dezful airbase in western Iran. The section of the base did not appear to have been targeted by Israel, which has spent the past six days launching airstrikes against Iranian nuclear and military facilities. The intensive bombing campaign has caused widespread damage across the country and killed a number of senior commanders. There are several variants of the F-5 supersonic light fighter made by the US aircraft manufacturer Northrop Corporation. The early F-5 took its first flight in the late 1950s and was introduced the following decade. The US procured thousands of these aircraft for use by allies. Iran, once an American ally, acquired F-5A/B Freedom Fighters and F-5E/F Tiger IIs in the 1960s and 1970s, building its air force before the 1979 Iranian Revolution tanked relations between the two countries, ending logistical, maintenance, and technological support. Iran is estimated to have had a few dozen F-5s in service in recent years, with many of the originally purchased fighter jets non-operational or long since disposed of amid strains on maintaining the aircraft. The US military, specifically the Air Force and Navy, still uses the jet for training purposes, though not for active combat operations. Iran's air force is fairly outdated and obsolete due to international sanctions and other embargoes that prevent the country from obtaining more high-tech weaponry but also critical components and parts. Aside from the F-5, Tehran operates other aging aircraft, including the Soviet-era Su-24 and MiG-29, and the American-made F-14 Tomcat. An Iranian official said earlier this year that Tehran had purchased newer Su-35 aircraft from Russia, but it's unclear how many, if any, have been delivered. The Israel Defense Forces said on Monday that it had bombed two F-14s at Tehran's main airport, marking what it described as "another loss of strategic weaponry for the enemy." The IDF also confirmed on Wednesday that it struck five Iranian attack helicopters. Limited in its airpower, Iran has invested heavily in developing a large arsenal of ballistic missiles and attack drones. By contrast, the Israeli Air Force operates newer and more powerful aircraft, such as the F-35I stealth fighter and the older but highly effective F-16 and F-15 jets. Israeli officials said that the country has, with its mix of fourth- and fifth-generation fighters, achieved air superiority over swaths of Iran, including Tehran, after battering its air defenses. Amid fighting between Israel and Iran, another image captured by Maxar on Tuesday showed what appeared to be several of Iran's Shahed-136 attack drones on and next to trailers parked on a taxiway at Dezful. Iran has used its notorious Shahed-136s in its ongoing retaliatory attacks against Israel. Tehran has also sent many of these drones, also described as loitering munitions, to Russia, which has used them to carry out strikes on Ukrainian cities and civilian infrastructure. Russia also produces its own domestic version of the Shahed-136, which has increasingly become a problem for Ukraine. Israeli combat aircraft have launched hundreds of airstrikes across Iran since Friday, targeting the country's nuclear program, its leading scientists, senior commanders, air defenses, missile launchers, weapons production sites, bases, and other military infrastructure. Iran has, in turn, retaliated against Israel by launching around 400 ballistic missiles and hundreds of drones. Read the original article on Business Insider