'Israel' on blast as media exposes report discrepancies in Gaza ambush
On Tuesday, the Israeli military confirmed that five soldiers from the Netzah Yehuda Battalion were killed and two others seriously wounded after explosive devices detonated during battles in the area. The announcement came only after Israeli media had circulated inaccurate preliminary casualty figures.
Later reports indicated that the total number of wounded occupation soldiers had reached 14, including two in critical condition, six with moderate injuries, and six with minor wounds.
The discrepancy between the initial and updated figures sparked public scrutiny over the concealment of accurate casualty data, raising further concerns about the deliberate withholding of critical data from the public.
Hadashot B'zman consequently accused the occupation military's spokesperson of intentionally hiding the true number of casualties, arguing that this is part of a broader strategy aimed at "engineering Israeli public consciousness" by concealing human losses to preserve "civil resilience" amid continued warfare.
The platform compared the incident to previous state efforts to downplay suicide rates among both soldiers and civilians, noting that since 2018, institutions like the Ministry of Health have withheld real statistics, following reports of over 1,280 suicides in a single year, despite official claims of a decline.
Hadashot B'zman further questioned whether Israelis would have known the reality without platforms such as WhatsApp and Telegram, stating, "Certainly not from official or mainstream media."
Palestinian Resistance fighters carried out a deadly ambush targeting Israeli occupation forces in northern Gaza late on Monday.
Some of the soldiers were reportedly burned to death during the assault, which closely resembled a previous ambush on June 24, when seven Israeli troops were killed after Palestinian Resistance fighters targeted an armored combat engineering unit.
The latest operation is believed to have occurred in Beit Hanoun, a town in northern Gaza that has been under relentless Israeli bombardment since October 7, 2023.
Israeli media described the operation as "extremely serious" and one of the most complex confrontations since the war began.
Read more: 3 Israeli soldiers killed by Resistance gunfire in south, north Gaza
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LBCI
10 hours ago
- LBCI
Trump: Journalists should be allowed into Gaza
President Donald Trump said on Thursday he would like to see journalists gain access to Gaza to see humanitarian efforts. Israel has not allowed foreign reporters to enter Gaza since the start of its war in October 2023, unless they are under Israeli military escort. "I'd like to see that happen. Sure," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. "I would be very fine with journalists going. And it's a very dangerous position to be in, as you know, if you're a journalist, but I would like to see it." Reuters
LBCI
16 hours ago
- LBCI
‘Greater Israel' vision: Brief exchange on Israeli TV revives Arab concerns over expansion
Report by Wissam Nasrallah, English adaptation by Karine Keuchkerian Without appearing clearly on screen, the interviewer from Israel's i24NEWS handed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu an amulet, saying it depicted 'Greater Israel' and 'the map of the Promised Land.' When asked whether he felt connected to the vision of Greater Israel, Netanyahu replied, 'Very much.' That brief exchange, lasting less than half a minute, was enough to spark a wave of strongly worded Arab condemnations. After all, the Greater Israel vision threatens the security — and even the existence — of many of those countries. The term 'Greater Israel' is not new in Zionist political and religious literature. Its roots go back to biblical interpretations and ancient texts describing the 'Promised Land,' which the Israelites claim they were promised. According to those accounts, it stretches from the Nile River in Egypt in the west, through Lebanon, Jordan, and Syria, to the Euphrates River in Iraq in the east, extending into northern Saudi Arabia and southern Turkey. This vision goes beyond Israel's current borders to encompass large parts of several countries. In biblical texts, the 'Promised Land' is not presented as an unconditional 'gift,' but rather as contingent on a set of religious and moral obligations, such as obeying the law and keeping covenants. However, in modern Zionist political readings, the spiritual dimension has been sidelined, and the concept has been reframed as a nationalist settler project — invoked to justify territorial expansion or sustain the notion of a 'historical right,' even if the original biblical conditions are not met. The reappearance of this concept in a public interview on an Israeli TV channel, even in a clip lasting just seconds, revives a sensitive question: Is this vision an active element in the mind of Israel's decision-makers, or merely an ideological symbol summoned for domestic purposes?
LBCI
16 hours ago
- LBCI
Lebanon's showdown: Will the Lebanese army succeed in enforcing state control over arms?
Report by Nada Andraos, English adaptation by Karine Keuchkerian The Lebanese army is finalizing its plan to centralize weapons under state control and implement U.N. Security Council Resolution 1701 across the country, ahead of presenting it to the cabinet at the end of the month. According to LBCI sources, the plan will rely on military, financial, and timeline frameworks, supported by U.S. technical assistance and the backing of the ceasefire monitoring mechanism. The army's plan builds on the ceasefire agreement, which marked the start of an initial plan launched under Joseph Aoun, who was then commander of the Lebanese Armed Forces and is now president, focusing on the south of the Litani River. The next phase will extend across Lebanon. The timeline for the army to collect weapons by the end of this year could be extended to better match conditions on the ground. Financially, while the army and security forces await $1 billion annually over 10 years from international donors to strengthen equipment and personnel, U.S. support will continue at $150 million per year, alongside salary increases and an expansion of troops to 4,500 fully equipped personnel—or more, as implementation progresses. On the ground, the plan calls for enhancing military capabilities on land, in the air, and at sea. The air force will be strengthened for reconnaissance and aerial surveillance missions. The navy will be upgraded to secure coasts and territorial waters. On land, the plan will involve organizational restructuring and advanced training for units deployed south of the Litani, along the borders, and internally, in preparation for expanding the roles of all units tasked with reconnaissance, surveillance, and security operations to other areas. The plan is divided into three phases beyond the south of the Litani River: up to the Awali River, Greater Beirut, and the Bekaa. Each phase defines objectives and the arms to be collected, allowing for gradual and coherent implementation. The army's anticipated plan is expected to outline the operational and security requirements at a politically sensitive moment, though political backing and consensus are not guaranteed. In other words, by the end of August, the cabinet could face a difficult crossroads if it approves the army's weapons collection plan and insists on assigning the army to implement it on the ground, even without the approval of the Hezbollah-Amal Movement political duo.
