logo
Utah judge's sentence on child pornography offender sparks controversy, the court's response

Utah judge's sentence on child pornography offender sparks controversy, the court's response

Yahoo3 days ago

Report child sexual assault material to law enforcement by contacting the ICAC Tip Line at (801) 281-1211 or your local law enforcement agency.
SALT LAKE CITY, Utah () — A judge's decision on the sentencing of a 22-year-old man convicted of sexual exploitation of a minor has stirred up discussion among lawmakers that resulted in a statement from the Utah State Courts.
Adian Hoffman, 22, from Maine, was found guilty of two second-degree felony charges of sexual exploitation of a minor. He was initially charged with 10 first-degree felony counts of aggravated sexual exploitation of a minor.
The 22-year-old was accused of possessing child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and distributing it while house-sitting for a relative in Moab. Officers found more than 300 images of CSAM on his devices, according to documents.
Man arrested after neighbor allegedly finds sexual videos of minor on his GoPro
Hoffman was sentenced to 1 to 15 years in prison for each charge, but that sentence was suspended for probation. He received 112 days in jail and 48 months of probation on May 20, 2025, by Seventh District Judge Don M. Torgerson.
There were also conditions ordered on his parole, such as no internet access without approval from the Department of Adult Probation and Parole (AP&P), maintaining a full-time job, and completing a cognitive-behavioral course, among other conditions.
On May 24, 2025, Mike Schultz-R, Speaker of the Utah House of Representatives, and about the sentencing of Hoffman. He even called for Judge Torgerson to resign.
This is deeply troubling and indicative of a broader pattern within the judiciary. Such decisions not only fail to deliver justice for victims — in this case, children — but also erode public confidence in the legal system.
Judge Torgerson's comments and decision are a failure of justice, and cannot be ignored. He must resign. He should not be able to continue sitting on the bench and serving the people of this great state.
Speaker Mike Schultz on Instagram
Several days after Schultz's post, the Utah Republican Party also responded to the sentencing decision made on May 20.
On May 27, 2025, the Utah GOP shared a screenshot of Schultz's , 'Speaker Schultz is exactly right. Justice must protect children, and that requires holding those who harm them fully accountable. Judge Torgerson's decision is a clear miscarriage of justice. He should resign.'
Sex offender arrested for attempting to meet child in Lehi, documents say
In a statement by the Utah State Courts on May 28, they clarified that quotes from the sentencing 'omitted several relevant and important facts' and were 'without context and should not be the sole basis for any conclusion.'
The State expressly agreed in its written plea agreement that the Defendant would receive probation, rather than a prison sentence. Additionally, the sentence imposed by Judge Torgerson was squarely aligned with the 2025 Adult Sentencing, Release, & Supervision Guidelines promulgated by the Utah Sentencing Commission and unanimously approved by the Utah Legislature during the 2025 General Session. Adult Probation and Parole's probation recommendation was also aligned with the Adult Sentencing, Release, & Supervision Guidelines
Part of the Utah State Courts' statement on Hoffman's sentencing
A link to the full sentencing video was provided for the public. Those who are interested can watch Hoffman's sentencing in full on the .
'The Judiciary is committed to transparency and encourages anyone who has questions about the sentence to listen to the entire audio recording of the sentencing hearing,' the Utah State Courts concluded in their statement.
Man arrested for allegedly using cryptocurrency to purchase child sex abuse material, first arrest of its kind in Utah
This section will contain quotes and a full explanation of everything that happened during the sentencing hearing. As aforementioned, those who are interested can view the full sentencing on the .
Two evidence files that were sent from Kik — the app where Hoffman distributed CSAM — to law enforcement were shown to Judge Torgerson at the request of the prosecution. This defense said they would leave it to the court's discretion and would not block the viewing of the files.
Judge Torgerson reviewed the files and stated that they depicted 'obvious prepubescent children engaging in sexual activity.' He asked the Grand County Attorney, Stephen J. Stocks, to give his sentencing recommendation.
'This is where this whole case starts off, we look at the [pre-sentence investigation] and there is a substantial amount of images, a hundred images, and although the defendant didn't plead to all of those, that was what was found,' Stocks stated.
Man charged with alleged sexual abuse of human trafficking victim in Duchesne County
Stocks told the judge that Hoffman downplayed his involvement in downloading and distributing the CSAM. Hoffman allegedly claimed to be ill and that his sickness led to his developing a CSAM addiction. According to Stocks, among the images were children from the ages of 3 to 15, and he described them as 'horrendous.'
The state requested prison, and Stocks stated that jail time would not be sufficient. He said that although Hoffman was seeking treatment now, his desire and intention created a demand for more CSAM to be made.
'I think the light amount of jail doesn't really take into consideration the severity of this case. I think there are aggravating factors, such as the distribution. Now, I know he's engaged in treatment… but this type of behavior and this type of charge demands, in the interest of justice for the children, that he be incarcerated in the Utah State Prison,' Stocks concluded.
Tara Isaacson, the defense attorney for Hoffman, then provided her recommendation. She started by stating that Hoffman is only 22 years old, and was 20 when he committed the offense. Isaacson said that those who are under 21 when committing these types of offenses usually receive a lighter sentence due to their age.
Hoffman completed a psychosexual evaluation and has been involved in 'intense' sex offender therapy while the case was being processed, according to Isaacson. She also stated that since his release, he has been engaged in the community, found a job, and entered an age-appropriate relationship, all things that she claims have prevented him from reoffending.
Red Rock Canyon School faces lawsuit over employee's alleged sexual misconduct
'This is not a family, or a defendant, who has downplayed or minimized the seriousness of this. We recognize that these images are terrible, and that this pornography is terrible and these images are awful, but this is someone who has absolutely not attempted to minimize… in every single category, he was in the low range, I rarely ever see that,' Isaacson told the court.
Isaacson stated that Hoffman acknowledged what he did was wrong during therapy and did not try to 'minimize' the crime that he had committed. She stated that Hoffman would not be receiving a light sentence as he was working hard to turn his life around after being jailed at age 20.
'I think this is a situation where Aidan has demonstrated, over the last months he's been out, that he can follow the rules, he can comply, he's engaged and motivated in treatment and he's not given up. Instead, he's really kicked into overdrive to try to be productive and to contribute to society,' Isaacson said.
In AP&P's review of the sentencing recommendation from the defense, Isaacson said they did not find the aggravating circumstances mentioned by the prosecution and recommended the jail sentence. She asked for an appropriate jail sentence for Hoffman's actions based on this recommendation.
McDonald's employee charged for alleged sexual relationship with 16-year-old coworker
Hoffman then addressed Judge Torgerson to share his statement before sentencing.
'Since I was released, I've been engaged in intensive treatment. In that treatment, I've worked on being accountable for what I've done, and also I've learned about the abuse perpetuated through the viewing and sharing of child pornography and just how awful that abuse is,' Hoffman stated.
He shared that he felt guilty about the images and videos he viewed and regretted the impact it had on those child victims. Hoffman said that he was working hard to build a new life in Utah and completing therapy while complying with all restrictions of probation. He intends to start college in the fall if AP&P allows.
'I'm grateful, to some extent, that law enforcement intervened, because I needed help for something real. And it's something that's not — it's not something you can talk about with people, you can't bring it up to your parents, you can't find help normally in society, and unfortunately, I had to confront this problem in the worst way possible,' Hoffman said.
Hoffman concluded by saying there was no justification for what he did, but he was committed to being better, and he was willing to do 'whatever the court sees fit.'
'I've done defense work, I've seen worse. That's not to minimize at all, Mr. Hoffman, what has happened here. You didn't perpetrate those two videos that I saw… what you did was pour all that gasoline on all those fires, because by viewing and sharing those images, you were stoking a problem that just seems to grow,' Judge Torgerson stated.
U.S. Army Sgt. charged with 30 felonies for alleged online sexual relationship with 15-year-old
Judge Torgerson stated that it was a large problem in Utah, and that he's seen it among young adults with access to social media and phones, and that he's also seen it in older adults who don't have that same access.
'Mr. Stocks' position on this, I think, is well-founded, to say that there's really zero tolerance from his perspective as the county attorney for this kind of behavior. The reality is a little different, and I think the [pre-sentence investigation] takes that into consideration in its recommendation,' Judge Torgerson continued.
He clarified that the pre-sentence investigation's recommendation is created through reviewing similar cases and comparing how those sentencings were handled.
'I can't send everybody to prison who views child pornography. There aren't enough prisons. There aren't enough prisons for people who are severe, extreme viewers of child pornography, like you,' he said. 'I think it's like alcoholism, and you may not, but the compulsion to view child pornography, scientists will say, may or may not be an addiction.'
Judge Torgerson stated that he didn't believe Hoffman's addiction began with CSAM, but rather adult pornography, and that Hoffman had escalated that addiction. He said that Hoffman was not yet a 75-year-old 'Mormon bishop' who is perpetrating on children and grandchildren, and hopes that he will never become that.
Utah National Guardsman arrested on suspicion of child sex abuse
The judge told Hoffman that he was young, he had too much time on his hands, and that he had shown an improvement from who he was when he was 20. Judge Torgerson stated that this was going to be a life-long process, and Hoffman needed to prevent this compulsion and addiction from returning.
'Children get raped because of men like you, who encourage that kind of perpetrating,' he stated. 'I truly do hope what your therapist says is true about you and the work that you've done.'
Judge Torgerson followed AP&P's recommendation and sentenced him to 1 to 15 years in prison, the standard sentence for that felony charge. He then suspended the sentences and placed Hoffman on probation, and gave him credit for time served in jail.
'Does that mean I'm going easy on you here? I don't know. I don't want you to engage in this kind of activity, obviously. You don't want to, I trust. Your parents don't want you to do that… if you violate the terms of your probation, I won't hesitate to send you to prison,' Judge Torgerson stated.
He concluded by reminding Hoffman that this was an opportunity to correct his behaviors and make a difference, but the right to that opportunity could be taken away. Judge Torgerson said he would not hesitate to give the maximum sentence if he saw Hoffman in his courtroom again.
Federal trade court blocks Trump from imposing sweeping tariffs under emergency powers law
Low water levels lead to increased fishing limits at Crouse Reservoir
Lt. Gov. Henderson gets more death threats over Primary signature gathering issues — How will they be handled?
Utah judge's sentence on child pornography offender sparks controversy, the court's response
'New milestones:' Seismic upgrade almost complete at Salt Lake City temple, renovations ongoing
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republicans in Congress pull out all the stops to protect Trump tariffs
Republicans in Congress pull out all the stops to protect Trump tariffs

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Republicans in Congress pull out all the stops to protect Trump tariffs

Warning signs flashed this week that Donald Trump's tariffs were beginning to destabilize what had, at the start of his term, appeared to be a solid economy. But in Congress, Republican leaders pulled out all the stops to protect his signature trade policy. The threat appeared in the form of a Senate resolution sponsored by the Republican Rand Paul and Democrat Ron Wyden that targeted the levies and looked like it had a shot at passing a chamber in which the Republican majority had previously shown little inclination of resisting the president. But even before the first votes were cast, Trump and his allies moved to ensure it would go nowhere. First, the White House issued a veto threat against the resolution, which would have repealed the national emergency Trump declared earlier in the month to impose sweeping 10% tariffs on imports and, briefly, even higher levies on many trading partners. Then the GOP-controlled House of Representatives enacted a rule to prevent consideration of the Senate resolution until at least the end of September. When the resolution came up for a vote in the Senate on Wednesday, Paul, a libertarian-leaning conservative, described it as necessary to take back power Congress had ceded to the president, and pleaded with fellow Republicans to get onboard. 'The founders would not have expected the upper chamber, the Senate, to let the novel use of a statute traditionally used to sanction adversaries to become used for tariffs, to tax American people and to let it go unchallenged. This is not constitutionalism. This is cowardice,' the Kentucky lawmaker said. While all Democrats in attendance voted for the bill, only the moderate Republicans Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine heeded Paul's words, and the measure deadlocked, with 49 votes both in favor and against. Not long after, Vice-President JD Vance appeared in the Capitol to break the tie on a procedural motion that made certain the resolution was dead for good. Trump has moved to ensure that a similar fate will befall any other attempts percolating through the Senate to undermine his tariffs. He has threatened to veto both a bipartisan bill that would set a 60-day deadline for Congress to approve new tariffs, and a resolution to block his tariffs on Canada, which made it through the chamber but has been stopped in the House. This week's vote took place against the release of data showing the US economy shrank in the first three months of the year, its first contraction since 2022 and a consequence, economist say, of a rush of imports prompted by unease over the new president's trade policies. 'A major culprit is unquestionably Donald Trump and his senseless global tariffs,' Wyden said on the Senate floor. 'If this continues to be our tariff policy, every major economist and forecaster is unfortunately predicting recession, job losses and the misery that was all over our news feeds this morning.' The vote might have succeeded if the Democrat Sheldon Whitehouse and Republican Mitch McConnell, who has spoken out against tariffs, were present. But the Democratic minority leader, Chuck Schumer, told reporters on Thursday that the situation was a 'win-win either way' because it presented an opportunity to get Republicans on the record supporting the levies. 'We've already forced them to vote on tariffs a couple of times, and we may try to do that again in the future,' Schumer said, adding he expected the policy to come up as Republicans negotiate a forthcoming bill expected to approve Trump's tax and immigration policies while making cuts to social safety net programs. 'Republicans own it. They cared so much about tariffs, they had to bring JD Vance to come in and break the 50-49 tie, and they own it now … they're stuck.' Better economic news arrived on Friday, when government data showed employers hired more people than expected in April. Earlier in the week, Mike Johnson, the House speaker and ardent defender of Trump's agenda, had acknowledged a 'rocky start' to the tariff policy, but described them as a gamble that would pay off. 'Right now, even today, people are beginning to see the dust settle on that. They understand there's a master strategy behind this, and they're seeing the results,' Johnson said at a Tuesday press conference. 'We're going to have 100 countries – by some counts, it may be higher – renegotiate their trade policies with America, because of what President Trump did.' Asked why he deployed parliamentary tactics to prevent the consideration of the Senate's attempts to undo Trump's tariffs, Johnson replied: 'We're using the rules of the House to prevent political hijinks and political stunts. And that's what the Democrats have.'

Why Trump does not suffer Congress when it comes to his prized tariffs
Why Trump does not suffer Congress when it comes to his prized tariffs

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why Trump does not suffer Congress when it comes to his prized tariffs

When it comes to cutting taxes or paying for mass deportations, Donald Trump is happy to work with Congress. But if the issue is his prized and disruptive tariff policy, the president has made clear that he has no time for legislative wrangling. Trump underscored his sentiment towards Congress after a US trade court this week briefly put a stop to his controversial policy of placing levies on a wide range of countries, before a different court reversed that decision while legal proceedings continue. 'The horrific decision stated that I would have to get the approval of Congress for these tariffs. In other words, hundreds of politicians would sit around DC for weeks, and even months, trying to come to a conclusion as to what to charge other Countries that are treating us unfairly. If allowed to stand, this would completely destroy Presidential Power – the Presidency would never be the same!' the president wrote on Truth Social. The statement served to put Congress in its place, even though its Republican leaders have shown Trump great deference since taking office. The Senate has approved just about every official he has nominated, no matter how controversial, while the House of Representatives last week overcame substantial differences within the GOP conference to pass the 'One Big Beautiful' bill containing Trump's tax and spending priorities. Related: China has 'totally violated' its trade agreement with the US, says Trump If there's one place where there is daylight to be found between Trump and his Republican allies, it's his tariff polices. Even avowed supporters of the president have raised their eyebrows at his on-again, off-again imposition of levies on the countries from which US consumers buy their goods and factories source their inputs, and Republican leaders have gone to great lengths to thwart their attempts to do something about them. Which might be why Trump struck out on his own, and hoped the courts would back him up. So far they have not. The US court of international trade, which ruled to block Trump's tariffs on Wednesday, was very clear it believed his policies 'exceed any authority granted to the president'. The matter may ultimately come down to the views of the supreme court, where Trump appointed half of the six-justice conservative supermajority during his first term. Jack Goldsmith, a Harvard Law School professor, said the case is likely to present a test of how the supreme court views the 'major questions doctrine' (MQD), which argues clear congressional authority is needed for agencies to carry out any regulations of national importance, in light of Trump's tariffs moves. The doctrine was used to defang regulators last year when the court overturned the Chevron decision, limiting regulators' powers and arguing they had overstepped their authority. The supreme court may not be minded to accept the major questions doctrine when it comes to the commander in chief, wrote Goldsmith in his newsletter Executive Function. 'It is an open question whether the MQD applies to congressional authorizations to the president. Every Supreme Court decision involving the MQD has involved agency action, and lower courts are split on whether the MQD applies to presidential authorizations,' he said. For Congress's beleaguered Democrats, this week's court intervention, however fleeting, provided grist for the case they've been trying to make to voters ever since Trump took office, which is that he is trying to act like the sort of monarch America was founded on rejecting. 'This is why the framers gave Congress constitutional power over trade and tariffs,' said Suzan DelBene, a Washington state House Democrat who has proposed one of many bills to block Trump's tariffs. 'The court spoke decisively in defense of our democracy and against a president attempting to be king.'

GOP Senator Doubles Down On 'We All Are Going To Die' Comment In Wild Non-Apology
GOP Senator Doubles Down On 'We All Are Going To Die' Comment In Wild Non-Apology

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

GOP Senator Doubles Down On 'We All Are Going To Die' Comment In Wild Non-Apology

Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) has doubled down on her dismissive response to worries about GOP legislation that includes huge Medicaid and food assistance cuts. On Friday, Ernst faced angry constituents at a town hall in Parkersburg, Iowa, with one woman in the crowd yelling, 'People will die.' Ernst replied, 'People are not ― well, we all are going to die. So, for heaven's sakes, folks.' The retort was met with backlash and mockery. On Saturday afternoon, Ernst addressed the controversy with what may have initially appeared to some to be a genuine apology. 'Hello everyone, I would like to take this opportunity to sincerely apologize for a statement that I made yesterday at my town hall,' Ernst said in a video posted to her Instagram Story. Ernst's tone began to shift as the video continued. 'See, I was in the process of answering a question that had been asked by an audience member when a woman who was extremely distraught screamed out, from the back corner of the auditorium, 'People are going to die!'' It soon became crystal clear that Ernst had no intention of delivering a real apology. 'And I made an incorrect assumption that everyone in the auditorium understood that yes, we are all going to perish from this earth,' Ernst said. 'So I apologize. And I'm really, really glad that I did not have to bring up the subject of the tooth fairy as well.' In a second video, she followed up with a pitch for Christianity. 'But for those that would like to see eternal and everlasting life, I encourage you to embrace my lord and savior, Jesus Christ.' Eagle-eyed observers may also notice both videos were filmed in a cemetery. The non-apology went viral, with one X user noting that 'Against all odds, Joni Ernst has made it worse.' The Republican legislation that sparked the town hall exchange on Friday includes $1 trillion in cuts to federal health and food programs and would result in an estimated 8 million fewer Americans having access to health insurance. The massive cuts offset the bill's nearly $4 million in tax cuts, which mostly benefit higher earning people. GOP Senator Pooh-Poohs Fears On Medicaid Cuts: 'Well, We All Are Going To Die' GOP Senator Ignores Insane Town Hall Gaffe — And Social Media Goes Off House Passes Trump's Tax And Spending Cuts

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store