Opinion: community wellbeing about more than roads and water
It's critical that whatever is done, the wellbeing of the nearly 10,000 people who live there is considered as much as the money.
Our sense of home and shared spaces is bound intimately into our health — physical and mental — and our opportunity for fulfilled lives, individually and together.
Perhaps some of this money might have been saved if at every local body election, the electorate hadn't swung hard at the "keep rates low" target; meaning maintenance and smart upgrades were constantly deferred.
It's the "wicked cycle" of voting, electing, feeling like not much is happening, building frustration, diminishing trust, lower turnout, curdling into resentment about councillor pay and public expenditure for others (some loathe the stadium, others think DPAG should charge an entrance fee), while the deferred maintenance mounts up.
Partly, it's that most of us don't understand how much decision-making is out of councillors' hands, to a degree we'd never put up with in central government. It's hard to get stuff done in local government.
But the thing is, we live here together.
The four wellbeings — social, economic, cultural, and environmental — baked into the Local Government Act really matter.
Do the bus routes make sense and is there a stop near yours? Are there speed limits outside your children's school? Does your significantly older community have an immensely popular swimming pool for physio, exercise, connection? Are there playgrounds near your children's home, do your kids adore reading time at the library? Is there an arts / film / music festival? Fireworks at New Year?
These are the places where we come together and are Dunedin, and what makes Dunedin a great place to live.
Yet here we are again, with government looking to remove the four wellbeings in favour of roads and water, which are somehow neutral of quiet neighbourhoods, accessible parks, safe schools, community, belonging. As if we were not people but units.
But if the DCC or ORC don't take care of this ... who will?
If you would like to support the mission's work with a donation, please visit www.givealittle.co.nz and search for the Methodist Mission.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
8 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Lead-soil rule review idea nixed
An independent review of Dunedin's contentious rules for lead-soil testing requirements is the only "credible" way forward, a critic says. However, the Dunedin City Council yesterday rejected his idea. Terramark resource management planner Darryl Sycamore used yesterday's public forum to call on the council to end its "overly conservative" approach towards potential lead contamination in soil surrounding the city's older housing stock. To redevelop older properties where lead paint has possibly been used, a new soil-testing process is required, and properties can be permanently added to the Hazardous Activities and Industries List (Hail) register. Developers have railed against the requirement, saying the council's "misinterpretation" of national standards and its resulting policy was adding $15,000 to $30,000 to the cost of every new home in Dunedin that required resource consent. Speaking on behalf of Terramark, engineering, surveying and planning firm Patersons Dunedin, TL Survey Services, and the Otago Property Investors Association, Mr Sycamore told councillors he had approached 50 councils and heard from 36 — and the Dunedin City Council was an outlier in this case. "There is no doubt the DCC is applying the NESCS [National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health] in a different way to other councils. "The implications of a residential property being identified as contaminated land cannot be overstated. "The approach of council is contrary to the advice of [Ministry for the Environment] who wrote the NESCS, and inconsistent with Health NZ guidance. "We respectfully ask that councillors direct city planning to cease this overly conservative approach and follow the approach of other councils throughout the country. "We also request that city planning commission an independent report on the issue, using a party agreed to by both parties." The council was often told the cost to build was too high in Dunedin, "and that the council is perceived as anti-development". Its rules in this instance was evidence of that. An independent review was required to determine if Dunedin developers and home buyers were indeed "at a disadvantage compared to every other district", Mr Sycamore said. "I think that's the only credible way through." A council spokesman yesterday said the council disagreed with Mr Sycamore's assessments. "We have already sought independent professional advice and are not planning to change our approach or commission a further independent review," the spokesman said. Only a small number of properties which had pre-1945 painted wooden or roughcast houses were covered by the new requirements and the council said the impact of its interpretation of the national standards was "minor". "We also reject any suggestion the DCC is anti-development." He said the council's approach "responds to the regulations and the findings of an independent review by Stantec". The spokesman noted the Otago Daily Times last year reported Health New Zealand Te Whatu Ora Southern medical officer of health Dr John Eastwood applauded the council's approach to the issue.
Otago Daily Times
8 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Rep aims for full council role
Pania Coote Not being able to vote when it mattered most has prompted an Invercargill mana whenua representative to stand for council. Pania Coote has represented Te Rūnanga o Awarua at Invercargill City Council since 2021, when two mana whenua roles were introduced. The appointees were given voting rights at committee level, but not full council. Ms Coote said she had gained an in-depth knowledge about council operations, but the voting restriction had shown the "limits of symbolic inclusion". "Literally I could participate on the subcommittees and contribute greatly, but when it came to the final decision at the council table, unfortunately I didn't have the vote. "Representation must be more than just a presence and must have influence, so that's why I'm standing for council." Ms Coote said her commitment was driven by responsible leadership, efficient governance and tangible progress on issues which mattered most to the community. Council needed to be driven by energy, vision and practical-type leadership, she said. Voters do not select mana whenua representatives at local body elections; rather they are put forward by their respective rūnanga. In response to questions, council manager governance and legal Michael Morris explained the Local Government Act meant only elected members could vote at full council. Including mana whenua roles on committees was a decision made at the start of each term by way of a vote, he said. "This is usually put to council at the inaugural meeting, so I'd expect this to happen at the beginning of November after the October election." How much the representatives were paid was also determined by the incoming council.
Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
Mayoral candidate keen for big changes
Wide-ranging changes — from slashing council salaries to creating a mayoral forum of "intelligent people" — are proposed by the man challenging to be mayor in Central Otago. Roxburgh resident Mark Quinn, who is travelling New Zealand in his role as the founder of Challenging Councils New Zealand (a grassroots movement focused on holding local councils accountable), has joined the mayoral contest and wants to take the region back to the future by taking councils back to borough councils. Mr Quinn said he would be back at his home in Roxburgh early next month to campaign for the mayoralty and a council seat in the Teviot Valley ward. In 2016 he bought land for an almond orchard and had been slowly developing that, although for the past three years he had been travelling New Zealand promoting the Challenging Councils message, he said. He is standing as he is concerned his children and more particularly, his grandchildren, will never have the chance to own a house. "I know a lot and I just think that we need to stand up and do what granddad did for us. "We need to protect our grandchildren and I don't see the current system protecting my grandchildren in any way, shape or form." His two biggest bugbears were the Central Otago District Council, which was absorbing the rates take in-house through wages and expenses, and Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ). "The council was designed by great-granddad and granddad and dad and they set up a core structure for us to live under in a healthy way, and the people all ran the council and did the work and everything else. "Now we're finding that these people no longer have a job and they're bringing contractors in from outside and their charges are excessive." Nine councils in New Zealand, including Auckland and Christchurch, had already left LGNZ, and that should be a trend, Mr Quinn said. "I don't see that local government, which is designed by Parliament, is actually here for the people." He said there was nothing wrong with the borough council system and "we were a bit happy-go-lucky" with the 1989 reform of local government that reduced councils from 120 to 78 around the country. Mr Quinn said New Zealanders were naive and complacent at that time and as a result, central government has over time "slowly chipped away at things", first with the introduction of the LGA (Local Government Act) in 2002, then the LGFA (Local Government Borrowing Act) in 2011. Since then, councils have been able to borrow freely, and now "we're at a tipping point," Mr Quinn said. He said councils needed to return to core responsibilities and step back from funding areas never intended for local or central government. Mr Quinn said he was not aware of anyone dying from drinking water, apart from through human error like not cleaning out filters, as in Hawke's Bay and Tauranga, but sewers were in dire straits and subdivisions were being built without the comparable increase in sewer capacity. Mr Quinn was planning to create a "brains trust" around this if he became mayor. He had 40 years in business behind him, having designed the first Countdown and Pak'nSave supermarkets, as well as being Ron Brierley's "hatchet man" in the 1980s. "Being a mayor is one thing, but sitting down with some intelligent people outside of the council and having a cross-section look at it is imperative." That group would analyse and prioritise things, take them back to the public, then to the council and tell them what they were going to do, Mr Quinn said. The rest of the elected councillors would not fit that bill, he said. "There must be some [intelligent people] . . . I just don't know who they are yet. There are others coming on board that have got that intelligence, so we need to form a good crew. "I'm certainly not going to write anyone off until I sit in front of them. But the question is, what on earth have they achieved in the last 20 years other than debt and natural resources not being updated?" Mr Quinn said the council was a service centre not a corporate entity, yet it paid corporate wages. He stated that lowering wages would not be an impediment to attracting staff, and that those who had wages cut would not be a loss if they left, as that would demonstrate they were there for the wages and not to serve the people.
