
Ukrainians are fighting Russia so US troops don't have to
Recent statements from Moscow make this calculation clear. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov declared in June that the Ukraine war cannot end until NATO 'pulls out' of the Baltic states. This demand represents a dramatic escalation from Russia's previous position, which focused solely on Ukraine's NATO aspirations. Now the Kremlin is demanding the abandonment of NATO allies who have been treaty-protected members since 2004.
This escalation reveals Russia's true strategic objective: not just preventing Ukraine's NATO membership, but rolling back the alliance's existing commitments. The Baltic states — Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania — are full NATO members covered by Article Five, which states that an attack on one member constitutes an attack on all. Unlike Ukraine, any Russian aggression against these nations would legally require direct American military intervention.
The strategic logic is clear: If Russia succeeds in Ukraine and then moves against the Baltics, American soldiers will be legally obligated to fight Russian forces directly. There would be no choice, no debate, no alternative.
Supporting Ukraine today costs money and weapons. Fighting Russia tomorrow under Article Five would cost American lives. The current investment in Ukrainian defense represents perhaps the most cost-effective military expenditure in modern U.S. history.
Critics might argue that Russia's Baltic demands are mere negotiating tactics. But this ignores the pattern of Russian aggression established over the past 16 years: Georgia in 2008, Crimea in 2014 and Ukraine in 2022. Each time, Western leaders assumed Moscow would be satisfied with its gains — each time, they were wrong.
The difference now is that Russia's next logical target, the Baltics, cannot be abandoned without destroying NATO itself. The alliance's credibility rests on the principle that Article Five means something. If NATO retreats from the Baltics under Russian pressure, the alliance becomes meaningless, and America's security guarantees across the globe lose their deterrent effect.
There is now a unique strategic opportunity. Ukraine has demonstrated remarkable resilience and military capability, effectively serving as a force multiplier for U.S. security interests. Ukrainian forces are doing the fighting that American troops might otherwise have to do later, against a Russian military that grows weaker with each passing month.
The choice facing American policymakers is between stopping Russia in Ukraine or potentially fighting them in the Baltics under conditions far less favorable to U.S. security.
Every dollar spent on Ukrainian defense today is an investment in preventing American casualties tomorrow. Every Ukrainian victory weakens Russia's capacity to threaten NATO members. Every month this conflict continues reduces the likelihood that American troops will face Russian forces in direct combat.
The question isn't whether America can afford to support Ukraine. It's whether America can afford not to.
Khusanboy Kotibjonov is a political science student at New York University.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
a few seconds ago
- New York Post
Putin kept claims Hillary Clinton had physical, ‘psycho-emotional' problems under wraps because he thought she would win 2016 election: Gabbard
WASHINGTON — Russian intelligence obtained damaging information about former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's health amid her 2016 presidential campaign — including evidence that she had 'psycho-emotional problems' that were being treated with severe sedatives — but Vladimir Putin chose not to release it before that year's election because he thought the Democrat would win. The astounding revelations were contained in a 2020 House Intelligence Committee report which reviewed purported Russian influence on the presidential contest and was declassified and made public Wednesday by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. Russia's intelligence service 'possessed DNC communications that Clinton was suffering from 'intensified psycho-emotional problems, including uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression. and cheerfulness,'' the report stated. Advertisement A 2020 House Intelligence Committee report detailing Russia's knowledge of damaging information about Hillary Clinton's health amid the 2016 Presidential election was released Wednesday. Getty Images 'Clinton was placed on a daily regimen of 'heavy tranquilizers' and while afraid of losing, she remained 'obsessed with a thirst for power.'' Moscow's foreign intelligence service, the SVR, also 'possessed a campaign email discussing a plan approved by Secretary Clinton to link Putin and Russian hackers to candidate Trump in order to 'distract the [American] public' from the Clinton email server scandal.' Advertisement Putin chose not to release this information as he believed Hillary was sure to win the 2016 election. The revelations, which were taken from emails hacked from Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee accounts, even found that the Russians concealed details about Clinton shaking down religious organizations for campaign donations by pledging more favorable treatment by a future Democratic State Department. The Post reached out to the Clinton Foundation for comment.


New York Post
a few seconds ago
- New York Post
Trump admin sent 6,000 ICE detainers to NYC — nearly all of them have been ignored, DHS says
The Trump administration has issued more than 6,000 immigration detainers pushing NYC authorities to hand over illegal immigrant criminals to the feds as part of its mass deportation effort, the Department of Homeland Security said Wednesday. That's a 400% increase compared to the Biden administration as the Trump administration surges Immigration and Customs Enforcement to sanctuary cities, DHS said. However, 'sanctuary politicians' in the Big Apple have 'honored only a handful' of the 6,000 detainers, 'sending violent criminals back onto the streets,' the agency said in a post on X. Advertisement 3 The Trump administration sent 6,000 ICE detainers to NYC, pushing local authorities to hand over illegal immigrant criminals to the feds as part of its mass deportation effort. James Messerschmidt 'Every New Yorker should know: their sanctuary politicians are working against law enforcement and RELEASING criminal illegal aliens with prior convictions for rape, murder, and drug trafficking back into their communities,' DHS said Wednesday. 'ICE will continue to enforce the law and protect American neighborhoods,' DHS added. 3 'ICE will continue to enforce the law and protect American neighborhoods,' the Department of Homeland Security stated. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement DHS Secretary Kristi Noem tore into Eric Adams on Monday over the city's sanctuary policies, blaming him for the shooting of an off-duty Customs and Border Protection officer by an illegal immigrant who had a lengthy rap sheet. Adams has said he wants to change sanctuary laws in New York, but he's constrained by the city council. 3 DHS Secretary Kristi Noem blames Mayor Eric Adams for the shooting of an off-duty Customs and Border Protection officer by an illegal immigrant who had a lengthy rap sheet. Getty Images Dominican illegal migrant Miguel Francisco Mora Nunez, 21, had already received a deportation order before he allegedly ambushed the officer and his female companion in Fort Washington Park late Saturday, Noem said. Advertisement 'There's absolutely zero reason that someone who is scum of the earth like this should be running loose on the streets of New York City,' Noem told reporters from Harlem Hospital, where she and President Trump's border czar Tom Homan said they met with the wounded 42-year-old agent's family. 'Make no mistake, this officer is in the hospital today, fighting for his life, because of the policies of the mayor of the city and the City Council and the people that were in charge of keeping the public safe refused to do so,' she said. 'When I look at what Mayor Adams has done to New York City, it breaks my heart to see the families that have suffered because of his policies.'


The Hill
a few seconds ago
- The Hill
US automakers say Trump's 15% tariff deal with Japan puts them at a disadvantage
WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. automakers are concerned about President Donald Trump's agreement to tariff Japanese vehicles at 15%, saying they will face steeper import taxes on steel, aluminum and parts than their competitors. 'We need to review all the details of the agreement, but this is a deal that will charge lower tariffs on Japanese autos with no U.S. content,' said Matt Blunt, president of the American Automotive Policy Council, which represents the Big 3 American automakers, General Motors, Ford and Jeep-maker Stellantis. Blunt said in an interview the U.S. companies and workers 'definitely are at a disadvantage' because they face a 50% tariff on steel and aluminum and a 25% tariff on parts and finished vehicles, with some exceptions for products covered under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement that went into effect in 2020. The domestic automaker reaction reveals the challenge of enforcing policies across the world economy, showing that for all of Trump's promises there can be genuine tradeoffs from policy choices that risk serious blowback in politically important states such as Michigan and Wisconsin, where automaking is both a source of income and of identity. Trump portrayed the trade framework as a major win after announcing it on Tuesday, saying it would add hundreds of thousands of jobs to the U.S. economy and open the Japanese economy in ways that could close a persistent trade imbalance. The agreement includes a 15% tariff that replaces the 25% import tax the Republican president had threatened to charge starting on Aug. 1. Japan would also put together $550 billion to invest in U.S. projects, the White House said. The framework with Japan will remove regulations that prevent American vehicles from being sold in that country, the White House has said, adding that it would be possible for vehicles built in Detroit to be shipped directly to Japan and ready to be sold. But Blunt said that foreign auto producers, including the U.S., Europe and South Korea, have just a 6% share in Japan, raising skepticism that simply having the open market that the Trump administration says will exist in that country will be sufficient. 'Tough nut to crack, and I'd be very surprised if we see any meaningful market penetration in Japan,' Blunt said. Major Japanese automakers Toyota, Honda and Nissan did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the trade framework, nor did Autos Drive America or the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, organizations that also represent the industry. There is the possibility that the Japanese framework would give automakers and other countries grounds for pushing for changes in the Trump administration's tariffs regime. The president has previously said that flexibility in import tax negotiations is something he values. The USMCA is up for review next year. Ford, GM and Stellantis do 'have every right to be upset,' said Sam Fiorani, vice president at consultancy AutoForecast Solutions. But 'Honda, Toyota, and Nissan still import vehicles from Mexico and Canada, where the current levels of tariffs can be higher than those applied to Japanese imports. Most of the high-volume models from Japanese brands are already produced in North America.' Fiorani noted that among the few exceptions are the Toyota 4Runner, the Mazda CX-5 and the Subaru Forester, but most of the other imports fill niches that are too small to warrant production in the U.S. 'There will be negotiations between the U.S. and Canada and Mexico, and it will probably result in tariffs no higher than 15%,' Fiorani added, 'but nobody seems to be in a hurry to negotiate around the last Trump administration's free trade agreement.'