‘A tourist tax is playing with fire – and the Scottish government doesn't have a great track record'
But a change is in the air. From next summer, Edinburgh will become the first city in the UK to charge a compulsory tourist tax after ministers in Scotland voted in favour of a five per cent levy. The additional fee, which follows those already introduced in Amsterdam, Barcelona, Berlin, Prague, Venice and Vienna, will cover all accommodation, from hotels and B&Bs to homestay properties let through websites like Airbnb and Vrbo.
Years in the making, the Edinburgh Visitor Levy scheme will take effect from July 24, 2026, and will mean, for example, that a £200-a-night hotel room costs an extra £10. The levy is projected to bring in £50m annually, to be spent on improving infrastructure citywide and creating affordable housing and, not unreasonably, its impact is expected to have repercussions nationwide.
'Introducing this ground-breaking visitor levy means realising a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to invest tens of millions of pounds towards enhancing and sustaining the things that make our city such a great place to visit – and live in – all year round,' says Jane Meagher, the Leader of the City of Edinburgh Council. 'At all stages we've listened to and taken account of the views of industry and other stakeholders. It's in this spirit that we've also extended the amount of time hoteliers and small businesses will have to prepare for the changes that are coming in.'
According to the Council, the levy isn't an anti-tourism measure, or to deter visitors, but to sustain Edinburgh's status as one of the world's greatest cultural and heritage cities — the rationale being visitors who pay to stay in the city use public spaces and services, so should contribute to managing their impact. The levy, the Council confirmed, will give visitors the opportunity to 'do the right thing', to repay in-kind.
But the Council's position doesn't quite convey the delicate balancing act that will be required to keep hoteliers and locals onside. Edinburgh is an instantly beautiful city of romantic ancient buildings, but sometimes the view slips into something far less attractive. Memories of recent Fringe Festivals can't filter out snapshots of overflowing bins, piles of stinking rubbish and looming threats of refuse worker strikes.
'The way visitors perceive Edinburgh once the levy kicks in is going to change and there'll be an expectation for the city to be consistently well-maintained — so, where the money is spent needs to be transparent to both residents and visitors,' says Ross McLean, director of hospitality at The Royal Yacht Britannia and sister luxury floating hotel Fingal, anchored on Alexandra Dock in Leith. 'We feel the tourist levy will be positive, but it'll no longer be acceptable for overflowing bins of rubbish and the whole city looking untidy. If this isn't managed correctly, it could become a rod for the council's back.'
Worse even than this is the risk of putting potential visitors off completely. On paper, the tourist tax mitigates the idea of Scots as being among the most generous of hosts. All the same, research carried out by the Council returned no evidence to suggest that an accommodation tax would reduce demand or bookings. Conversely, it confirmed, Amsterdam — which has introduced its tourist tax to explicitly reduce visitor numbers — has continued to see a rise in demand, despite increasing its tax level from seven to 12.5 per cent.
For Nick Claydon, co-owner of boutique hotel Eleven Stafford Street in Edinburgh's West End, however, the worry remains that the tourist tax could kill Edinburgh's 'golden goose'.
He points to Edinburgh's recent attempt to impose an Airbnb ban as 'shambolic', with its introduction creating a huge administrative backlog. During last year's Edinburgh Festival Fringe, according to Airbnb, bookings dropped by 13 per cent, with the average stay shortened by almost 20 per cent.
'I think any popular destination that implements a tourist tax is playing with fire,' says Claydon. 'It all depends on how it is positioned and implemented — and this government does not have a great track record. Perhaps, the focus should be on making the government more efficient and supportive to the hospitality industry, then a tourist tax wouldn't be needed. It's possible to make it work, but why risk it?'
Another immediate danger, according to Claydon, is the levy having a wider impact on areas close to Edinburgh, particularly enviable golfing destinations like East Lothian and Fife. 'A poorly implanted tax could mean these visitors skip Edinburgh completely — and simply go elsewhere for their golfing holidays,' he adds.
As Edinburgh can imagine a rebooted city rise up amongst its volcanic hills, so the rest of Scotland is eager for extra preen and polish. Currently, Glasgow City Council is in the midst of a public consultation over introducing a like-minded five per cent levy (based on the city's average room rate, unlike Edinburgh, this would hike prices by approximately £4.29 per night). Others toying with the idea are Argyll and Bute, Perth and Kinross, Stirling and Highland Council. In Aberdeen, a jacked-up rate of seven per cent has even been proposed.
Cruise tourism isn't immune either. A Scottish Government motion to give local authorities the power to tax passengers disembarking in Scotland is also gathering momentum, with Orkney Islands Council backing the idea. Already the UK's most popular cruise ship destination, the islands receive more than 210,000 sightseers from sea each year. The overall sense is it's the right thing to do, even if hoteliers and tour operators will have to wait to see if the changes yield results.
'Each local authority needs to consider carefully whether a visitor levy will work for them, as what's right for one destination will not necessarily be right for others,' says Rob Dickson, director of industry and events at Visit Scotland. 'Before considering a levy, a local authority should examine the profile of their visitors – whether largely domestic or international – and the potential impact of a levy on businesses and visitors within the current economic and competitive travel landscape.'
What helps nourish the idea, particularly at policy level, is Scotland's tourism economy continues to outperform the rest of the UK. Between January and June last year, international visitors spent almost £1.5bn, with an increase of 14 per cent on the same period in 2023. And regardless of market volatilities, the ambition of the national tourism strategy, Scotland Outlook 2030, remains: to be a global tourism pace-setter.
'International performance has been positive, driven by visits from North America,' adds Dickson, 'but the industry is operating in a challenging and uncertain economic landscape, with the cost of living continuing to impact the domestic market.'
In a period in which Scotland is undergoing significant tourism change, the vision is to realise a new look. New investment in roads and car parks is needed. As is money for electric vehicle charge points and waste services, piers and public toilets, walking trails and island ferries. Elsewhere, revenue is necessary to bring to life the country's potential third national park in Galloway and reverse the negative impacts of overtourism along the North Coast 500. It's an ambitious, if quixotic, shopping list and one, perhaps, that'll be paid for by future visitors — if they indeed choose to come.
The money talks loudest. But Scotland talks too, and who'd bet against the promise of rippling glens, silver sands and heather on the hills? The case for visiting despite any tourist tax ultimatums remains a strong one and there is a clear opportunity to ensure tourism is a force for good.
More than that, if a balance can be struck between the benefits tourism brings and ensuring communities are capable of opening their arms to it, then, perhaps, the idea of Scotland as a sort of fantasy Brigadoon could be possible after all.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
16 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Airbnb Considering Loyalty Program Following Services Launch
Airbnb Inc.'s business chief said a loyalty program is 'under consideration,' with the launch of the company's experiences and services business putting the home-sharing platform in a 'better position' to reward customers. While Airbnb has no imminent launch plans, it has 'a lot of the tools and elements that would make a compelling loyalty program in the future,' Chief Business Officer Dave Stephenson said in an interview at Bloomberg's office in Chicago. He was in the city to mark the company's first global live music partnership with Lollapalooza festivals around the world.


Hamilton Spectator
17 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Major Drop in Speeding Recorded as Stouffville's Speed Enforcement Cameras Expand
● Speeding infractions in community safety zones monitored by automated speed enforcement cameras dropped by 50 percent between March and June. ● Average speeds fell month-over-month, with 16 percent fewer drivers exceeding the posted limit. ● The highest fine to date was $4,152 for a driver clocked at 210 km/h in a 40 km/h zone. ● Four new ASE cameras will be activated in mid-August. ● A more detailed mid-year report on the program is expected in October, with a full-year review scheduled for April 2026. In a surprise announcement, the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville has released data showing a significant decline in speeding within areas monitored by its automated speed enforcement (ASE) camera program. The preliminary results were expected later this year . Between March and June, the number of speeding infractions recorded in monitored community safety zones (CSZs) dropped by 50 percent. The Town also reported a 16 percent reduction in the rate of drivers exceeding posted speed limits, alongside a consistent month-over-month decrease in average speeds. According to the Town, 90 percent of tickets were issued between 5 a.m. and 8 p.m. The highest fine levied so far, a staggering $4,152, was tied to a vehicle recorded travelling 210 km/h in a 40 km/h zone. 'The program launched…with pole-mounted cameras at eight approved locations throughout Stouffville,' a Town press release stated. 'The initiative is part of the Town's broader commitment to road safety, particularly in areas often frequented by children and seniors.' The number of cameras is set to grow, as four new ASE locations are scheduled to go live in mid-August: Residents are also being reminded that the Town does not request payment for ASE tickets by phone, email, or text message. Official ticket notices are issued solely by letter mail, and any requests for payment through other means should be treated as suspicious. Revenue details from the program were not shared, but a mid-year report with some preliminary figures is expected to be presented to Council in October. According to the Town, revenue generated through ASE is used to offset program operating costs, with any surplus funds supporting additional road safety initiatives. 'While these early indicators are promising, they do not yet reflect long-term or seasonal trends,' the release added. 'A comprehensive, year-one report will be presented to Council in April 2026, with a mid-year, 6-month report in October… As compliance improves, revenues are expected to decline, allowing the program to remain revenue neutral.' Mayor Iain Lovatt welcomed the early results, saying the program is 'influencing driver behaviour in the right direction.' 'By focusing on education and enforcement, we are seeing real improvements in compliance with speed limits near our schools and in our neighbourhoods.' he said in the press release. 'Ultimately, this is about protecting people.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


Forbes
21 hours ago
- Forbes
Beyond Finance: How Technology Is Shaping The Future Of Retail Banking
Barney is a seasoned Data Executive at UniCredit with expertise in financial services, digital banking, AI and data modernization platforms. In today's economy, success isn't defined by asset ownership—it's shaped by connectivity, convenience and experience. Uber owns no vehicles, yet serves 161 million customers worldwide. Airbnb operates no hotels, yet has 275 million users as part of its travel platform. What sets these companies apart is their ability to seamlessly bridge the gap between supply and demand, delivering unparalleled value compared to their traditional counterparts. But their impact goes beyond competition; these platforms generate economic activity that wouldn't exist otherwise. In 2023, Airbnb contributed $85 billion to consumer spending and supported over 1 million new jobs. By reinventing how consumers and suppliers interact, digital marketplaces continue to drive industry transformation, economic growth and consumer empowerment. This same shift is reshaping financial services. Enabled by cloud computing, APIs and AI, a new wave of fintechs and platform banks is challenging legacy institutions—not with lower fees alone, but with faster innovation cycles, composable architectures and embedded distribution models. Despite fintech's decade-long presence, financial services remain resilient due to strict regulations and risk aversion, evolving gradually rather than undergoing rapid disruption. In 2023, nearly 5.5 million new businesses launched in the U.S.—a significant majority being tech-driven. By contrast, fewer than 10 new banks are chartered annually. It's not a matter of capital. The cost of launching a tech startup and a new bank can be similar, with a bank often starting around $5 million and tech startups ranging well beyond that figure. The real difference lies in trust and regulation. While tech companies scale rapidly through user acquisition and agile iteration, banks face high regulatory barriers and must earn consumer trust before they can handle deposits—essential for lending. That said, the definition of trust is shifting. Deposit insurance now provides a baseline, and digital-first banks are increasingly competing based on service offerings, quality and efficiency. For over a century, global systemically important banks (G-SIBs) have been pillars of economic stability, built on trust, regulation and risk management. However, over the past few decades, retail banking has undergone significant changes. Neo-banks, with their digital-first models and low overhead, offer improved rates and seamless experiences, challenging legacy institutions that are burdened by aging infrastructure and high costs. To stay relevant, more traditional banks are realizing the need to modernize, going beyond essential duties and embracing digital innovation to compete in an era of financial disruption. Today's banking customers expect more than static products. They want experiences that are predictive, personalized and seamlessly integrated into their lives. In lending, expectations are evolving just as quickly. Rather than one-off credit issuance, consumers increasingly value solutions that reward long-term financial behavior. This creates opportunities for banks to deploy adaptive credit models that assess real-time cash flow, offer flexible limits and respond proactively to changes in financial health. Loyalty programs—built through airline partnerships, premium tiers and behavioral incentives—can further deepen trust and retention. To stay competitive in this way, there's a push to move beyond transactional models and embrace seamless integration, hyper-personalization and AI-driven financial journeys that adapt to the user—rather than the other way around. As a result of these rising expectations, modern banks are no longer just financial service providers. Many have expanded into value-added ecosystems, offering vendor marketplaces, travel perks and premium product bundles. Through embedded finance, banks are weaving themselves into adjacent sectors—retail, utilities, healthcare—delivering financial solutions at the point of need, often invisibly. This shift marks a broader evolution: banking is moving from transactional utility to experience orchestration. For SMEs, while access to financial infrastructure has improved, they now face challenges in areas like customer retention, inventory optimization, employee management and cash flow forecasting. These pain points—once considered outside the scope of banking—are now opportunities for platform banks to add value through partnerships, APIs and intelligent tools. Financial institutions can play a critical role in their long-term success by working to redefine engagement beyond transactions—something I'll address in more detail shortly. To stay relevant, both legacy institutions and fintechs must reimagine their value proposition—not as isolated service providers, but as enablers of broader outcomes. Banks have established strong ties with SMEs, largely through the support of dedicated portfolio managers. While financial services remain core offerings, there's value in understanding the broader business challenges SMEs face. While everyday needs like campaign execution to recruitment, training and inventory management may fall outside traditional banking, they're integral to the client's ecosystem. By taking a more holistic interest, financial institutions can deepen relationships and position themselves as strategic partners. Forming partnerships that transcend traditional financial offerings can further help users manage everything from SME operations and workforce planning to personal learning and life goals. While legacy institutions may grapple with this complexity due to rigid infrastructures, adopting modular platforms with flexible interface layers can further help banks connect with outside partners, integrate new tools and offer AI-powered services without overhauling everything at once. To foster meaningful transformation, banks should consider adopting new operating models that foster speed, autonomy and innovation. One approach is to establish independent, cross-functional teams that operate outside traditional constraints—such as risk, finance, compliance and legal—while still aligning with enterprise standards. These agile units act as internal startups, championing the development of forward-facing platforms and services. Another involves establishing a neo-bank as a sub-entity under the existing umbrella, enabling experimentation and iterative progress within a safe regulatory and operational framework. Others may opt to acquire a nimble neo-bank with advanced technology infrastructure that complements or replaces their legacy systems, unlocking new market opportunities and product lines. By embracing these models, institutions can remain competitive and redefine engagement in a rapidly evolving financial landscape without disrupting their foundational stability. In Conclusion As AI, open banking and data monetization evolve, more banks are shifting their revenue models by monetizing insights and AI-driven solutions instead of relying on transaction fees. A successful retail banking strategy now relies on three key pillars: a strong spending ecosystem, superior customer service and core banking services. While new entrants may not yet match legacy banks in size, their rapid growth demands swift adaptation to keep up with the pace of innovation. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?