Second DR Congo city falls to Rwanda-backed rebels
Rwandan-backed M23 rebels have entered Bukavu, the second-largest city in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, seizing the regional governor's office.
Some people lined the streets to clap and cheer the fighters as they marched and drove into the city centre without resistance. It is the second city after Goma to fall to the rebels in the mineral-rich region in the past few weeks.
The Congolese government has acknowledged its fall and urged residents to stay at home "to avoid being targeted by the occupying forces".
The UN and European countries have warned that the latest offensive, which has seen hundreds of thousands of people forced from their homes, could spark a wider regional war.
What's the fighting in DR Congo all about?
Who's pulling the strings in the DR Congo crisis?
The evidence that shows Rwanda is backing rebels in DR Congo
A resident in Bukavu, who asked to remain anonymous because of concerns for her safety, told the BBC on Sunday that most people were still afraid to leave their homes.
"Since yesterday the children and the youth took the weapons. They are shooting everywhere in all directions, they are looting," she said.
"This morning the M23 entered and they were acclaimed by the people, very happy to see them. We don't know if it's because they are afraid or because they found that there were no authorities in the city.
"The place where I live the crackling [gunfire] can still be heard."
On Friday, the M23 captured Bukavu's main airport, which is about 30km (18 miles) north of the city - and then began advancing slowly towards the city, which is the capital of South-Kivu province.
The provincial governor, Jean-Jacques Purusi Sadiki, confirmed to the Reuters news agency the fighters were in Bukavu city centre by Sunday morning, adding that Congolese troops had withdrawn to avoid urban fighting.
This left a security vacuum in the city on Saturday with chaotic scenes playing out, including a reported prison break from the central prison.
The UN World Food Programme (WFP) said a warehouse with nearly 7,000 tonnes of food was looted.
The city of around two million people on the southern tip of Lake Kivu borders Rwanda and is an important transit point for the local mineral trade.
Its fall represents an unprecedented expansion of territory for the M23 since their latest insurgency started in late 2021 - and is a blow to the government of President Félix Tshisekedi.
Government spokesman Patrick Muyaya said Rwanda was violating DR Congo's territorial integrity through expansionist ambitions and human rights abuses.
The Congolese government accuses Rwanda of sowing chaos in the region - as well as having troops on the ground - so it can benefit from its natural resources, something Kigali denies.
President Tshisekedi wants his Rwandan counterpart Paul Kagame to face sanctions over the latest unrest.
But President Kagame has dismissed such threats - and has repeatedly pointed out that Rwanda's main priority is its security.
He has long been angered by what he sees as the failure of the Congolese authorities to deal with the DR Congo-based FLDR rebel group, which he sees as a danger to Rwanda.
The group is made up of some members of the ethnic Hutu militia accused of involvement in the 1994 genocide in Rwanda when over 100 days around 800,000 people, mainly from the Tutsi ethnic group, were killed.
Troops from the Tusti-led M23 gathered at the Place de l'Indépendance in central Bukavu on Sunday, where one of its commanders, Bernard Byamungu, was filmed chatting to locals and answering their questions in Swahili.
He urged government forces "hiding in houses" to surrender - and accused the withdrawing military of spreading terror by arming local youths who had gone on a looting rampage.
The African Union (AU) - which has been holding a heads of state summit in Ethiopia this weekend - again urged the M23 to disarm.
"We are all very, very concerned about an open regional war," Reuters quotes the AU's peace and security commissioner Bankole Adeo as saying.
The DR Congo rebel leader whose fighters have created turmoil
DR Congo's failed gamble on Romanian mercenaries
Your phone, a rare metal and the war in DR Congo
Go to BBCAfrica.com for more news from the African continent.
Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
Africa Daily
Focus on Africa
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
As Trump goes to G7 summit, other world leaders aim to show they're not intimidated
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump has long bet that he can scare allies into submission — a gamble that is increasingly being tested ahead of the Group of Seven summit beginning Monday in Canada. He's threatened stiff tariffs in the belief that other nations would crumple. He's mused about taking over Canada and Greenland. He's suggested he will not honor NATO's obligations to defend partners under attack. And he's used Oval Office meetings to try to intimidate the leaders of Ukraine and South Africa. But many world leaders see fewer reasons to be cowed by Trump, even as they recognize the risks if he followed through on his threats. They believe he will ultimately back down — since many of his plans could inflict harm on the U.S. — or that he can simply be charmed and flattered into cooperating. 'Many leaders still seem intimidated by Trump, but increasingly they are catching on to his pattern of bullying,' said Jeremy Shapiro, research director at the European Council on Foreign Relations. 'In places as diverse as Canada, Iran, China and the EU, we are seeing increasing signs that leaders now recognize that Trump is afraid of anything resembling a fair fight. And so they are increasingly willing to stand up to him.' In the 22 instances in which Trump has publicly threatened military action since his first term, the U.S. only used force twice, according to a May analysis by Shapiro. Ahead of the G7 summit, there are already signs of subtle pushback against Trump from fellow leaders in the group. French President Emmanuel Macron planned to visit Greenland over the weekend in a show of European solidarity. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has said the U.S. is no longer the 'predominant' force in the world after Trump's tariffs created fissures in a decades-long partnership between the U.S. and its northern neighbor. 'We stood shoulder to shoulder with the Americans throughout the Cold War and in the decades that followed, as the United States played a predominant role on the world stage,' Carney said this past week in French. 'Today, that predominance is a thing of the past.' The new prime minister added that with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, the U.S. became the global hegemon, a position of authority undermined by Trump's transactional nature that puts little emphasis on defending democratic values or the rule of law. 'Now the United States is beginning to monetize its hegemony: charging for access to its markets and reducing its relative contributions to our collective security,' Carney said. Israel's attack on Iran has added a new wrinkle to the global picture as the summit leaders gather to tackle some of the world's thorniest problems A senior Canadian official said it was decided early on that the G7 won't be issuing a joint communiqué as it has at past summits — an indication of how hard it can be to get Trump on the same page with other world leaders. The White House said individual leader statements will be issued on the issues being discussed. Speaking last month at a conference in Singapore, Macron called France a 'friend and an ally of the United States' but pushed back against Trump's desire to dominate what other countries do. Macron said efforts to force other nations to choose between the U.S. and China would lead to the breakdown of the global order put in place after World War II. 'We want to cooperate, but we do not want to be instructed on a daily basis what is allowed, what is not allowed, and how our life will change because of the decision of a single person,' Macron said. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba pushed back against Trump's agenda of levying higher tariffs on imported goods, arguing it would hurt economic growth. The Japanese leader specifically called Trump ahead of the summit to confirm their plans to talk on the sidelines, which is a greater focus for Japan than the summit itself. 'I called him as I also wanted to congratulate his birthday, though one day earlier,' Ishiba said. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., the ranking member of the Foreign Relations Committee, said the summit was an opportunity for Trump to 'mend' relationships with other countries so China would be unable to exploit differences among the G7. She said other foreign leaders are 'not intimidated' by Trump's actions, which could be driving them away from tighter commitments with the U.S. 'The conversations that I've had with those leaders suggest that they think that the partnership with the United States has been really important, but they also understand that there are other opportunities,' Shaheen said. The White House did not respond to emailed questions for this story. Having originally made his reputation in real estate and hospitality, Trump has taken kindly to certain foreign visitors, such as U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni. Starmer has sought to keep Trump in line with Europe in supporting Ukraine and NATO instead of brokering any truces that would favor Russia. He has echoed the president's language about NATO members spending more on defense. But in his Oval Office visit, Starmer also pleased Trump by delivering an invite for a state visit from King Charles III. The German government said it, too, wanted to send a public signal of unity, saying that while Trump's recent meeting with Merz at the White House went harmoniously, the next test is how the relationship plays out in a team setting. There will also be other world leaders outside of the G7 nations attending the summit in mountainous Kananaskis, including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, whom Trump dressed down in the Oval Office. Italy's Meloni has positioned herself as a 'bridge' between the Trump administration and the rest of Europe. But Italy's strong support of Ukraine and Trump's threatened tariffs on European goods have put Meloni, the only European leader to attend Trump's inauguration, in a difficult position. Mark Sobel, U.S. chair of the Official Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum, an independent think tank, said Trump's 'trade policies, backing for right wing European movements, seeming preference for dealing with authoritarians and many of his other actions are alienating our G7 allies,' even if the U.S. president is correct that Europe needs to do more on defense. But even as other G7 leaders defuse any public disputes with Trump, the U.S. president's vision for the world remains largely incompatible with they want. 'In short, behind the curtains, and notwithstanding whatever theater, the Kananaskis summit will highlight a more fragmented G7 and an adrift global economy,' Sobel said. ___ AP reporters Rob Gillies in Toronto, Mari Yamaguchi in Tokyo, Sylvie Corbet in Paris, Jill Lawless in London, Geir Moulson in Berlin and Nicole Winfield in Rome contributed to this report.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
U.N. Atomic Agency Says Israel Took Out Core Nuclear Facilities at Isfahan, Reports No Damage at Fordow
The U.N. atomic energy agency has given several updates on Iran's nuclear facilities on Saturday. It is reporting that the Isfahan nuclear complex was hit several times on June 13 and that four critical buildings were damaged there. Also damaged was the fuel plate fabrication plant, which can make uranium metal, a key substance in a nuclear bomb.
Forbes
5 hours ago
- Forbes
Israel-Iran Strikes: What Are The Worst Case Scenarios For Oil Markets
An oil tanker negotiating shallow waters of northern Persian Gulf. (Photo: by Barry Iverson) Israel-Iran strikes have taken a dangerous turn in recent days. They follow an attack by Israel on the Iran's military and nuclear sites. Ever since tensions escalated on Friday, there have been calls for restraint from the United Nations, U.S., U.K., and European Union but to no avail. Fighting has so far been restricted to the two warring countries. However, the level of the ferocity of the strikes has raised the alarming prospect of a wider conflict in a region that is a key exporter of crude oil. On Friday, Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said his country's forces had struck nuclear and military targets deep inside Iran and that action will continue until his country has met all its targets. Israeli strikes targeted sites in Arak and Isfahan, as well as Iran's main uranium enrichment site Natanz and its capital Tehran. In retaliation, Iran has launched over a 200 ballistic missile attacks against Israel so far, and counting. It has also called off the ongoing U.S.-Iran nuclear talks and threatened to attack U.S., U.K. and French military bases and ships in the region if they help with stopping its military strikes on Israel. Critically, Iran's oil and gas infrastructure has been left somewhat untouched by Israel. But given the unpredictability of the situation, this can no longer be ruled out. Late on Saturday, the Shahran oil depot in Tehran was hit by Israel, following on from earlier attacks on Iranian natural gas fields. Should Iran's energy infrastructure be hit more widely and the Islamic Republic retaliates to disrupt regional energy supplies or to draw the U.S. into the conflict, there could be consequences of varying degrees of severity for the oil market. Here are a five worst case scenarios, split between what Israel and Iran may do next in an unpredictable and rapidly escalating conflict. Israel may launch an attack on Kharg Oil Terminal, situated on Kharg Island, 15 miles off Iran's northwestern coast. The terminal handles over 90% of the country's global crude oil exports. If such an attack cripples the facility, the domino effect could be instant. It carries the potential for huge disruption, primarily to Iran's exports to China — the world's largest importer of oil. Not only would it contribute to a further short-term spike in prices, but forward oil futures contracts four to six months out may also see upswings. That's because bringing it back onstream would neither be easy nor quick. Instead of a high profile oil export target like the Kharg Terminal, Israel could hammer Iran's domestic energy chain. The Shahran oil depot in Tehran on Saturday by Israel lends weight to this theory. Upscaling the tactic may involve targeting a bigger cluster of oil terminals and hubs in the Southern province of Hormozgan. The region is also home to two free trade zones on Kish and Qeshm Islands. Kish also hosts the Iranian oil bourse — the only exchange of its kind that does not trade oil and derivatives in U.S. dollars. The domestically focused Abadan Refinery - located across Shatt Al-Arab River on the border between Iraq and Iran - could also be an Israeli target. Reliable up-to-date data on the refinery's production capacity is hard to find. But estimates and regional media sources (e.g. Financial Tribune) suggest it could be producing around 400,000 barrels per day. Abadan has symbolic status too as Iran's oldest oil processing facility. Originally built in 1909 by Anglo-Persian oil (which later became BP), it services around 25% of Iran's domestic fuel demand. Any outages there could be crippling for both Iranian consumers as well as the country's military. Mahshahr Oil Terminal, an oil port located on the Khor Musa Channel, is a related target. It stores and shifts products from the Abadan Refinery, and serves as an engineering and jetty construction hub for Iran. If any of these are hit, Iran's domestic supply chain will likely be severely crippled and may require Tehran to redirect resources. Instead of targeting oil production and export facilities, Israel may execute a plan to cripple Iran's natural gas industry. Iran produces just over 270 billion cubic meters of natural gas per year, almost entirely for domestic use. Israel has already attacked two of Israel's gas fields, including Phase 14 of South Pars so far. The attacks could be a harbinger of what may follow. Such targets would have little ramifications for the global natural gas industry, although Iran does share the natural gas basin with Qatar. However, Iran's natural gas production volume equates to around 6% of the world's output. Domestic outages may see Tehran turning to international liquefied natural gas supplies to meet its needs. For its retaliatory measures, many ponder if Iran could shut down the Strait of Hormuz, a key maritime artery for oil and liquefied natural gas shipments from the Persian Gulf out to the Gulf of Oman and beyond (see map below). Cargo volumes lend relevance to such discussions. Iran's own shipments, plus that of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iraq, and to an extent United Arab Emirates' crude - roughly equating to 30% of the world's traded oil - as well as Qatar's LNG cargoes pass through the Strait daily. Strait of Hormuz, a waterway between Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman, a strategically extremely ... More important choke point, with Iran to the north and UAE and Oman's exclave Musandam to the south. While Iranians could certainly can attempt to close the Strait, they most probably won't, despite junior Iranian political voices currently calling for it. For starters, it would disrupt Iran's own oil shipments. Furthermore, a U.S.-led global retaliation may likely follow that would leave Iran's own coastline and all its ports vulnerable to a vastly superior American air and naval strike arsenal. Nearby Bahrain is home to the U.S. Navy's Fifth Fleet. Any disruption would also irk Iran's number crude oil customer - China. Iran exported on average 1.65 million bpd of oil to China last year. Furthermore, nearly half of crude oil passing through the Strait - whether Iranian or not - in the region of 20.5 million bpd also heads to China. A potential blockade would be very difficult to maintain under pressure from Beijing, the world's main taker of Middle Eastern oil. In an attempt to drag the U.S. into the conflict, Iran may either directly or via its regional proxies in Iraq, Yemen, Lebanon, West Bank and Gaza, attack the energy infrastructure of neighboring Gulf states. This has alleged precedent, for in the past Iran has been accused of targeting Saudi Arabia's oil fields (2019) and an attack in the UAE (2022). While the route of direct attacks remains open to Iran, its regional proxies Hamas and Hezbollah are severely diminished at the moment courtesy of Israel's sustained campaign against them. However, the Houthi Rebels in Yemen - the last standing Iranian proxy ally - remain in a position to ramp up their attacks on commercial shipping, and oil and gas cargoes in the Red Sea - a campaign that began in 2023. Sidestepping energy infrastructure, on Saturday, Iranian officials also warned that the country would attack the military bases of the U.S., U.K. and France in the region, if they are seen to be coming to Israel's defense. All three nations have also have special forces camps and large diplomatic missions in the Gulf. Such a scenario is being widely contemplated in intelligence circles, with U.S. regional forces closely monitoring the situation and the U.K. opting to send more military aircraft to its bases 'for contingency support across the region.' Any such escalation will likely trigger a wider regional war, and prolonged disruption to oil cargoes will likely draw China into a diplomatic row too. As things stand, should one or more of the above scenarios, especially an attack on Iran's Kharg Terminal, materialize during the Israel-Iran strikes, there could be serious near-term ramifications for the global oil and gas markets.
