Portugal's top court blocks bill restricting immigration
Immediately after late Friday's decision, President Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa sent the bill back to parliament, which is on recess until September. Last month, the president told the court to check the document for potential infringements of the principles of equality, proportionality and legal security.
The bill illustrates the rightward shift in politics in much of Europe, as governments try to fend off the rise of the far-right by being tougher on immigration.
The bill would have made hundreds of thousands of migrants legally resident in Portugal wait for two years before they could request permission for immediate family members to join them. Only highly-skilled workers and investors with special residence permits would be exempt.
The court ruled that the bill was "likely to lead to the separation of family members" of foreign citizens legally resident in Portugal, which it said would be a "violation of the rights enshrined in the constitution".
Last year, the government scrapped a programme that allowed migrants entering Portugal on a tourist visa or waiver to stay and get residence permits if they find work.
Immigrants from the Community of Portuguese Language Countries still enjoy most such privileges but the bill would impose the requirement of a long-term work or residence visa that they would need to apply for in the country of origin.
Parliament approved the bill on July 16 with support from the centre-right ruling coalition and far-right Chega party, which emerged as the second-largest parliamentary force in a May general election.
Left-wing opposition parties have criticised the government for what they call an inhumane bill, and for allowing Chega to impose its anti-immigration agenda on the minority administration.
The government denies such accusations, arguing that immigration inflows require better controls, and has already said it intends to adjust the bill to the court's objections.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Poll: A third of young Britons would prefer authoritarianism over democracy
A third of young Britons would prefer authoritarianism over democracy in the UK, a new poll has found. Support for authoritarianism is strongest among young Reform UK voters with half preferring a leader who could make decisions quickly 'even at the cost of some democratic freedoms'. There are 'shocking levels of disillusionment' among 18 to 30-year-olds with less than half expressing support for the current democratic system, according to the survey for the Adam Smith Institute. The think tank said the findings show that many young people 'no longer believe democracy is working' and would prefer a system where leaders 'can act without checks and balances'. Researchers also warn that Labour 's plan to give the vote to 16-year-olds could backfire and 'raises serious questions about whether younger voters support the system they're being invited to join'. The nationally representative poll of 1,338 18 to 30-year-olds - dubbed the 'anxious generation' - reveals 'shocking levels of disillusionment with both political leaders and democratic institutions'. Just 48 per cent of young Britons still prefer the current democratic system to an authoritarian alternative while 20 per cent remain undecided, the survey found. Half of 18 to 30-year-olds who voted for Reform in 2024 would prefer an authoritarian system with only 33 per cent of young Reform voters preferring the current democratic system. Disillusionment amongst young people is cross-party, the poll found, with 34 per cent of young Labour voters and 39 per cent of young Tories expressing support for an authoritarian system. Among 18 to 30-year-olds, 59 per cent believe politicians are not addressing the issues that matter most to them, rising to 66 per cent among young Reform voters. And white 18 to 30-year-olds show the highest levels of disillusionment with 62 per cent expressing dissatisfaction with politicians - almost double that of Black young people. The polling shows that trust in democratic institutions 'cannot be taken for granted' as 'more and more young people are questioning whether the current system can deliver stability or opportunity', researchers said. James Cowling - managing director of campaign group Next Gen Tories, which seeks to increase the Conservative party's ties with younger voters - said Westminster 'should not be surprised' that young people are being drawn to radical solutions given the state of the country. He added: 'This new polling shows us what history and global events can tell us time and time again. 'Yet UK politicians continue to block the reforms that would genuinely improve young people's lives; unlocking housing and infrastructure supply, lowering taxes on work, and making it easier to raise a family. 'Delivering on these aspirations is the only real antidote to rising support for authoritarianism.' Emma Schubart, data and insights manager at the Adam Smith Institute, said the rise in support for authoritarianism among young people 'should ring alarm bells in Westminster'.
BBC News
29 minutes ago
- BBC News
Zelensky rules out ceding Donbas region as Russians make fresh advance
President Volodymyr Zelensky has said Ukraine would reject any Russian proposal to give up the Donbas region in exchange for a ceasefire, warning it could be used as a springboard for future was speaking ahead of a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Alaska on has insisted any peace deal would involve "some swapping of territories" and could see Russia taking the entire eastern Donbas region and keeping Crimea. Meanwhile Moscow's troops have continued their summer offensive, making a sudden thrust near the eastern Ukrainian town of Dobropillia and advancing 10km (six miles) in a short period of time. Zelensky admitted the advance had taken place in "several spots" but said Kyiv would soon destroy the units involved in the official details have emerged on what demands Vladimir Putin could make when he meets Donald Trump in Anchorage on Friday. The Donbas - made up of the eastern regions of Luhansk and Donetsk - has been partly occupied by Russia since now holds almost all of Luhansk and about 70% of Donetsk but speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Zelensky reaffirmed that Ukraine would reject any proposal to leave the Donbas. "If we withdraw from the Donbas today - our fortifications, our terrain, the heights we control - we will clearly open a bridgehead for the Russians to prepare an offensive," he his nightly address on Tuesday, Zelensky also said Moscow was preparing new offensives on three parts of the front - Zaporizhzhia, Pokrovsk and Novopavlov areas. Last week Trump said there would be "some swapping of territories to the betterment of both" Russia and Ukraine - sparking concern in Kyiv and across Europe that Moscow could be allowed to redraw Ukraine's borders by currently controls just under 20% of Ukrainian territory. The White House on Tuesday said the Alaska talks would be a "listening exercise" for Trump and added having him and Putin sit down in the same room would give the US president "the best indication on how to end this war".It follows Trump describing the summit as a "feel-out meeting" on Monday, seeming to tone down expectations that Friday's meeting could bring Ukraine and Russia closer to peace. When he announced the summit last week, Trump sounded positive that the meeting could result in concrete steps towards peace. "I think my gut instinct really tells me that we have a shot at it," he said. But Ukrainian President Zelensky once again expressed serious doubts that the talks could result in a positive outcome for Kyiv, which has been excluded from the summit. "I don't know what they will talk about without us," he has steered clear of criticising Trump but in recent days his frustration at being sidelined has become apparent, and on Tuesday he said the choice of Alaska as a location was a "personal victory" for Putin. "He is coming out of isolation, because they are meeting with him on US territory," he Wednesday, Zelensky is due to join a virtual meeting with Donald Trump, EU leaders, UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Nato chief Mark Rutte. All sides will try to convince Trump of the need not to be swayed by Putin when the two meet at the hastily-organised summit.
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Fans cry conspiracy after it emerges that Chelsea would have been kicked out of the Champions League were it not for Strasbourg's Ligue 1 implosion
Chelsea could have fallen foul to the same fate as Crystal Palace and been kicked out of the Champions League, with fans questioning over whether a club's efforts in their owners' multi-club ownership group at the end of the season were legit. The Blues booked their place back in next season's Champions League after finishing fourth in the Premier League in Enzo Maresca 's first season in charge, and can look forward to another year in Europe's premier competition. Palace, meanwhile, thought they had qualified for the Europa League when they won the FA Cup final against Manchester City, but faced a battle to cling onto that spot and lost their appeal against being kicked out this week. Palace will play in the Conference League this season after UEFA ruled that they had breached their rules on multi-club ownership. Outraged Palace officials appealed the decision in a gruelling, 10-hour session at the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne on Friday. CAS lawyers had promised to hand down a verdict by close of play on Monday. And they have subsequently sided with the governing body, in what will be a devastating blow to the FA Cup winners and their fans and a decision that could cost Palace up to £20million in lost revenue. It is also likely to be welcomed at the City Ground, with the verdict confirmation that Nottingham Forest will take Palace's place. Palace argued that while John Textor's firm - which had also been involved with Lyon - held a 43 per cent stake in the club, it only afforded him 25 per cent of the voting rights and that chairman Steve Parish, along with silent partners Josh Harris and David Blitzer, called the shots with their 75 per cent. As such, they said, Textor had no influence at Selhurst Park. They also claimed that double standards were in play, stating that sides in the European Club Association (ECA) were told that those with potential MCO issues could go beyond UEFA's March 1 deadline to submit their paperwork. Essentially, clubs with the same owners cannot compete in the same competition - and that is exactly what Chelsea and French side Strasbourg have. The Blues were taken over by BlueCo in May 2022, who bought the London-based side from Russian businessman Roman Abramovic. The group, which includes Clearlake Capital, is led by Todd Boehly. A little over a year later, meanwhile, in 2023, Ligue 1 side Strasbourg were bought by BlueCo too, and became part of a multi-club ownership portfolio alongside the Blues. Therefore, the two teams seemingly would not have been able to play in the same competition. And that was at risk of happening until right at the end of the Ligue 1 season. Strasbourg were in the running for a Champions League spot up up until the end of the campaign, and would have achieved that if they had won their last two matches, which they lost against Angers and Le Havre respectively, right after they had beaten PSG. If they had come third, they would have ousted Chelsea's participation in the Champions League as a result of finishing higher in their domestic league, meaning the Blues would have had to have settled for a spot in the Europa League. Strasbourg's end to the season has left a number of fans raising conspiracy theories over whether Strasbourg legitimately lost their final two matches of the campaign. There is no evidence to suggest that was the case. 'Strasbourg conveniently lose two games to weak opposition to allow Chelsea entrance to the Champions League,' one fan posted on X. 'Not dodgy at all. Nope.' Another added: 'Needs investigation. Last match Strasbourg lost in Ligue 1 was Feb 2. 12 games without loss then suddenly lost final two games of the season to allow sister club Chelsea in the CL.' A third posted: 'After beating PSG the best team in Europe, Strasbourg 'coincidentally' lost to relegation fodders to avoid UCL football. Chelsea have a special place in hell.' Aston Villa, meanwhile, would have replaced Chelsea. The Villans missed out on qualifying for the Champions League for the second year in a row when they lost against Manchester United on the final day of the season, themselves having to settle for the Europa League. The revelation will leave Villa fans gutted - but that may turn to frustration when they realise the manner of how the decisive penalty came about in the 98th minute of the final game. Former Norwich and Nottingham Forest man Andrew Omobamidele was sent off after being shown a second yellow card, having fouled Rassoul Ndiaye in the box in an awful challenge. Abdoulaye Toure chipped in a cool penalty to earn Le Havre the three points, but the result would not have changed much - Strasbourg would have finished sixth rather than seventh. Many fans did, though, raise an eyebrow and the last two defeats of the season - which majorly benefitted Chelsea.
