Salvation Army to exit three Denver shelters by year's end amid controversy
Why it matters: The move marks a major rupture in a longtime partnership strained by safety concerns and criticism of the Salvation Army's shelter management — signaling a deeper rift between the city and one of its largest homeless services providers.
The big picture: The change terminates contracts for the Aspen, Stone Creek and Tamarac shelters, per a statement from the nonprofit, which operates multiple local shelters for people experiencing homelessness and receives millions in city funding.
Between the lines: The Salvation Army reapplied but was not selected for two of its three sites in the city's competitive bidding process, Mayor Mike Johnston's spokesperson Jon Ewing tells Axios.
The nonprofit was rejected for one and "mutually parted ways" on another, Ewing says.
State of play: The decision, the nonprofit contends, will allow the Salvation Army's Intermountain Division — which covers Colorado, Utah, Wyoming and Montana — to better deliver services and save money.
Friction point: The nonprofit said it shouldered $5.2 million in shelter operating costs last year, which it says exceeded funding.
City officials say they can't verify that figure. "I haven't heard it before," Ewing tells us, noting contracts outline funding and eligible expenses.
Zoom out: The severed contracts won't affect the Crossroads Shelter, the 24/7 facility exclusively for men that's among the busiest in the city.
The massive shelter in June received a $4.6 million infusion from the city, which helps serve about 250 men a day.
What they're saying: The Salvation Army said it helped 1,994 people get into permanent and stable housing in connection with Johnston's All In Mile High (AIMH) program.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
2 days ago
- The Hill
Social Security field offices report widespread staffing losses
Social Security field offices across the country may have lost a whopping 20 percent of their staff since March of last year, according to estimates by Axios and the Strategic Organizing Center, a coalition of labor unions. The unions estimated that field offices — where Americans can apply for benefits and deal with the agency face-to-face — had altogether lost about 5 percent of their staff by March. Hawaii (11 percent), Montana (14 percent), and New Mexico (10 percent) were among the states most impacted. Tack onto that the nearly 2,000 field workers who took the Trump administration's voluntary buyout, along with the reassignment of about 1,000 local call center representatives to staff the agency's overwhelmed national hotline. Axios estimated that the total reductions account for about 20 percent of the Social Security workforce from March 2024. The Social Security Administration did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Department of Government Efficiency has also looked to let lapse the leases of at least 26 field offices this year. Social Security said in a July press release that it had slashed average wait times at field offices to 23 minutes, down from 30 minutes last year. It also said it had dramatically reduced the average waiting time for a phone call to just six minutes this week, down from an 18-minute average for the rest of the year. The trust fund that supplies Social Security has also been accelerating towards insolvency, with latest estimates saying the agency may no longer be able to fulfill all claims as soon as late 2032.
Axios
2 days ago
- Axios
Philly back-to-school spending dips from last year
Back-to-school spending is slightly down in Philly this year — but parents here are still spending more than the average U.S. parent, per the latest Deloitte survey. Why it matters: Many Philly parents surveyed say their financial situations haven't improved or have gotten worse since last year. Driving the news: Philly parents are expected to spend on average about $725 per child for back-to-school supplies this year — about 5% less than 2024, per the survey. Yes, but: That's $108 more than 2023's average, and this year's total is still 27% higher than the national average of $570. The big picture: New U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports — including backpacks, pens, binders and shoes — kicked in earlier this year, rose sharply, then came back down to levels still historically high, Axios' Kelly Tyko reports. The full impact hasn't hit store shelves yet — and back-to-school season may be the first test of how much price pressure shoppers will tolerate, according to a recent Wells Fargo Investment Institute report. State of play: More parents say they're expecting to spend on tech products (34% compared to 31% last year), while those spending on clothes and accessories is slightly down and school supplies remained flat. Nearly two-thirds of parents had planned to finish school shopping by the end of July, many of them taking advantage of sales on Prime Day, ahead of Philly's first day of classes on Aug. 25. How it works: Deloitte surveyed more than 430 Philly parents with at least one school-aged child with a local margin of error of ± 5%. Zoom in: Brick-and-mortar retailers are still most popular among Philly parents. Those who shop online tend to spend about 1.5 times more than those who do not, per the survey.
Gizmodo
2 days ago
- Gizmodo
The White House Keeps a ‘Loyalty' Scorecard for Companies: Report
The White House has created a spreadsheet that rates hundreds of companies for their loyalty, according to a new report from Axios. And while that may not be entirely shocking news, given Donald Trump's way of doing business, it's worth stepping back and asking how news of a loyalty scorecard by a sitting president would've been received in the pre-Trump era. The rankings on the loyalty spreadsheet are currently determined by a given company's perceived support of the so-called Big Beautiful Bill, a budget package that passed in July and is poised to strip healthcare from at least 17 million people while lowering taxes on the wealthiest Americans. That support is gauged by social media posts, press releases, ads, and more, according to Axios. The spreadsheet reportedly contains 553 companies and trade organizations, each getting one of three ratings of support for Trump: Strong, moderate, or low. Examples of companies that were 'good partners,' according to Axios, include Uber, DoorDash, United, Delta, AT&T, and Cisco. And while it's entirely possible the rankings are solely determined by public displays of support, it's impossible to ignore the financial contributions those companies have often made to Trump. AT&T, Delta, United, Uber, and Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi each contributed $1 million to Trump's inaugural committee, according to CNBC. DoorDash contributed $100,000. Cisco didn't donate to Trump's inauguration, but spoke glowingly about the president shortly after he was elected in 2024. Trump has insisted on fealty to his far-right agenda and has set out to crush anyone who doesn't fall in line. That includes some of the largest companies in America, which have dutifully met with Trump to kiss the ring and sing his praises. Apple CEO Tim Cook, who also donated $1 million to Trump, visited the White House to announce new spending in the U.S. and even gave the president a piece of glass with the Apple logo sporting a 24-karat gold base. It's the kind of tacky gesture that Trump loves—symbolism that makes it clear the king is in charge. Axios quotes an unnamed White House source who describes the loyalty spreadsheet as an 'evolving' document, and support for other initiatives beyond the Big Beautiful Bill will be included in the future. And Axios notes it will be used whenever lobbyists approach the Trump regime with requests. 'If groups/companies want to start advocating more now for the tax bill or additional administration priorities, we will take that into account in our grading,' the White House official is quoted as telling Axios. It all sounds like a mafia-style operation, of course. But that's no secret. Trump has always been a transactional president and isn't shy about shaking down anyone who he thinks isn't sufficiently deferential to his whims. Even if Trump doesn't like someone, he seems willing to bring them back into the 'loyal' camp as long as they play along. For example, Trump recently criticized the CEO of Intel, Lip-Bu Tan, calling him 'highly conflicted' and insisting he needed to resign over supposed ties to China. Tan denied the allegations, met with Trump, and now we have reports from Bloomberg that the U.S. government might take a stake in Intel and might use funds from the Chips Act to do it. We don't know exactly what happened there, but we can make some educated guesses. If you want to do business in the U.S., you need to pay your tithe to Trump's empire in one way or another. Unfortunately, Trump's empire isn't just his collection of private businesses these days. He sees the entire country and all its wealth as his for the taking. Trump is also working on getting a 15% cut from Nvidia and AMD on chips shipped to China in what's being characterized as a 'revenue-sharing agreement.' That deal seems unconstitutional, according to Fortune, but that doesn't seem like it will matter in the long run. Trump's government flagrantly breaks the law, there's sometimes a protracted legal fight, and he keeps pushing boundaries while the courts that are stacked with his own judges debate the finer points. The U.S. public was absolutely scandalized when it learned of President Richard Nixon's enemies list in 1973. But in the second Trump era, this kind of loyalty ranking from the White House is just a tiny drop in an ocean of bizarre news that defies the norms of another age.
