Mark Read to retire as WPP CEO
HighlightsMark Read, the chief executive of British advertising giant WPP, will retire at the end of the year after a seven-year tenure leading the company that owns renowned agencies like Ogilvy and GroupM. During his leadership, Mark Read focused on streamlining WPP's vast operations and strengthening its core business, while the company faced challenges in adapting to digital platforms and evolving industry dynamics. WPP has not yet named a successor for Mark Read, and the new chief executive will be tasked with revitalizing growth and navigating the rapidly changing global advertising landscape.
Mark Read
, the chief executive of British
advertising giant WPP
, will retire from his position at the end of the year, concluding a seven-year tenure leading the company that owns renowned agencies like Ogilvy and GroupM. The announcement was made by WPP on Monday.
Read's departure comes as WPP, which recently lost its title as the world's largest
advertising
group to Publicis, navigates a challenging market environment. In February, WPP projected a flat to 2% decline in growth for the current year, signaling ongoing struggles.
During his leadership, Read focused on streamlining WPP's vast operations and strengthening its core business. In a statement, he affirmed that he had successfully built "a simpler, stronger business," and that now was "the right time to hand over to a new leader."
Read took the helm in 2018, succeeding founder Martin Sorrell. His time as CEO saw WPP grapple with evolving industry dynamics, including the rise of digital platforms and in-house agency models. The company has been working to adapt its offerings and maintain its competitive edge amidst these shifts.
WPP has not yet named a successor, and the search for a new chief executive is expected to begin shortly. The incoming leader will face the task of revitalizing growth and steering the advertising powerhouse through a rapidly changing global advertising landscape.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
US and China are holding trade talks in London after Trump's phone call with Xi
High-level delegations from the United States and China are meeting in London on Monday to try and shore up a fragile truce in a trade dispute that has roiled the global economy, A Chinese delegation led by Vice Premier He Lifeng was due to hold talks with US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer at a UK government building. The talks, which are expected to last at least a day, follow negotiations in Geneva last month that brought a temporary respite in the trade war. The two countries announced May 12 they had agreed to a 90-day suspension of most of the 100%-plus tariffs they had imposed on each other in an escalating trade war that had sparked fears of recession. The US and China are the world's biggest and second-biggest economies. Chinese trade data shows that exports to the United States fell 35% in May from a year earlier. Since the Geneva talks, the US and China have exchanged angry words over advanced semiconductors that power artificial intelligence, ' rare earths ' that are vital to carmakers and other industries, and visas for Chinese students at American universities. President Donald Trump spoke at length with Chinese leader Xi Jinping by phone last Thursday in an attempt to put relations back on track. Trump announced on social media the following day that the trade talks would resume in London. The UK government says it is providing the venue and logistics but is not involved in the talks, though British Treasury chief Rachel Reeves met with both Bessent and He on Sunday. 'We are a nation that champions free trade and have always been clear that a trade war is in nobody's interests, so we welcome these talks,' the British government said in a statement.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
UK shouldn't repeat US mistakes with international students
Border politics have rarely been so toxic. Yet even governments anxious about migration have every reason to welcome bright 20-somethings who turn up with tuition checks, a readiness to work — and return tickets. The US is threatening to disrupt that flow with new scrutiny of foreign students. That's even more incentive for Britain not to make the same mistake. At issue are efforts to restart the two-way flow of students and young workers that shrunk radically after the UK voted to leave the European Union in 2016. The two sides have proposed a UK-EU youth experience scheme, which would create reciprocal visas, potentially lasting up to two years, for 18- to 30-year-olds to work, study, volunteer or simply travel. If they don't nail down the details quickly, though, the idea risks falling prey to the same nativism and fearmongering that drove the Brexit decision. ALSO READ: Harvard university scores legal win against Trump's international student ban The economic value of reviving such exchanges is clear. Between rent, tuition fees that are double those of local rates, and other expenditures, international students add billions of pounds to the British economy every year. Those tuition payments keep classrooms and laboratories open for British students as well, given that domestic fees have been frozen since 2017 and have barely changed since 2012. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Outside of school, many young people fill vital service jobs, from pouring pints to looking after children and working on construction sites. The cultural and social ties fostered during these stays can help repair some of the damaged wiring of British influence. Live Events ALSO READ: Panic & Plan B: How the US visa pause impacts Indian students Since the UK officially left the EU's single market in 2020, the number of EU-domiciled students has fallen to just over 75,000, barely a tenth of the foreign cohort. Britain also quit Erasmus+, the exchange program that previously allowed some 17,000 students and trainees to spend time in European countries each year. And in a fit of headline-chasing, the last Conservative government barred most graduate students from bringing dependents, despite scant evidence of abuse. ALSO READ: Trump administration proposes $1,000 fast-track fee for US tourist visas Fears about relaxing border controls are overblown. Rejoining Erasmus+ would not restore pre-Brexit free movement: Quotas for incoming Europeans will be capped, stays time-limited and biometric exit checks enforced. Parliament could tighten the tap whenever it wished. The scale would also be modest. Last year, Britain issued only 24,437 youth-mobility visas to citizens of Australia, Canada and a handful of other countries with which it has agreements — just 2.5% of all residence permits. Even doubling that figure for Europeans would barely register in migration totals. And the timing could not be better from Britain's standpoint. The US State Department recently ordered consulates to pause student visa interviews while it hammers out a new regime to screen social media posts. International students spend around $43.8 billion annually in the US on tuition and other expenses; a repeat of the pandemic-era decline in enrollment would be hugely damaging for many US colleges. As host to many of the world's top universities, the UK is ideally positioned to scoop up some of the outflow. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has shown pragmatism in announcing support for a program he initially opposed. But this is all an in-principle agreement for now. The two sides differ on quota sizes, fee levels (Europe wants a return to fee equivalence for EU students), length of stay and other details. If the terms are not concluded quickly, the plan risks getting bogged down in Britain's immigration politics. Postponing an agreement not only leaves unnecessary barriers in place, but it also risks undermining the trust needed to complete agreements in other areas from defense to agricultural trade. Meanwhile, the prize is a stream of young Europeans who rent flats, buy rail tickets and often become lifelong ambassadors for their host countries. Further delay would be foolish. (This is an opinion piece by Bloomberg)
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
NATO chief Rutte calls for 400% increase in alliance's air, missile defence
NATO members need to increase their air and missile defences by 400% to counter the threat from Russia, the head of the military alliance plans to say on Monday (June 9, 2025). Secretary-General Mark Rutte will say during a visit to London that NATO must take a 'quantum leap in our collective defence' to face growing instability and threats, according to extracts released by NATO before Mr. Rutte's speech. Mr. Rutte is due to meet U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer at 10 Downing St. ahead of a NATO summit in the Netherlands where the 32-nation alliance is likely to commit to a big hike in military spending. Also Read | War and talks: On Russia and Ukraine Like other NATO members, the U.K. has been reassessing its defence spending since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Starmer has pledged to increase British defence spending to 2.5% of gross domestic product by 2027 and to 3% by 2034. Mr. Rutte has proposed a target of 3.5% of economic output on military spending and another 1.5% on 'defence-related expenditure' such as roads, bridges, airfields and seaports. He said last week he is confident the alliance will agree to the target at its summit in The Hague on June 24-25. At the moment, 22 of the 32 member countries meet or exceed NATO's current 2% target. The new target would meet a demand by President Donald Trump that member states spend 5% of gross domestic product on defence. Mr. Trump has long questioned the value of NATO and complained that the U.S. provides security to European countries that don't contribute enough. Mr. Rutte plans to say in a speech at the Chatham House think tank in London that NATO needs thousands more armoured vehicles and millions more artillery shells, as well as a 400% increase in air and missile defence. 'We see in Ukraine how Russia delivers terror from above, so we will strengthen the shield that protects our skies,' he plans to say. 'Wishful thinking will not keep us safe. We cannot dream away the danger. Hope is not a strategy. So, NATO has to become a stronger, fairer and more lethal alliance.' European NATO members, led by the U.K. and France, have scrambled to coordinate their defence posture as Mr. Trump transforms American foreign policy, seemingly sidelining Europe as he looks to end the war in Ukraine. Last week, the U.K. Government said it would build new nuclear-powered attack submarines, prepare its army to fight a war in Europe and become 'a battle-ready, armour-clad nation.' The plans represent the most sweeping changes to British defences since the collapse of the Soviet Union more than three decades ago.
