Badenoch and Cleverly attack Labour housing record after Tory reshuffle
The newly appointed shadow housing secretary promised that 'under Kemi's leadership, I am ready to lead the fight' on new homes policy in the capital, a day after returning to the Conservative front bench.
Opposition leader Mrs Badenoch accused Sir Keir Starmer's Government of having done 'the exact opposite' of showing it was serious about housebuilding.
Sir James Cleverly was appointed shadow housing secretary this week (Stefan Rousseau/PA)
Labour, which has pledged to deliver 1.5 million homes by the next parliament, said the country was still 'living with the consequences' of the Tories' 'disastrous decision to abolish mandatory housing targets'.
ADVERTISEMENT
Mrs Badenoch said the Prime Minister is 'seemingly more concerned about homes for illegal migrants than getting Britain building' following remarks made by Sir Keir to Parliament's Liaison Committee.
Sir Keir has suggested there is 'lots of housing available' to accommodate both rising numbers of homeless people and asylum seekers when asked about the need to house both groups.
'Under my leadership, Conservatives will stand up for property rights. Private owners should not face the threat of their property being taken over by the council to house illegal immigrants,' she said.
Sir James said: 'This Labour government is totally failing the country, and the capital, on housing – and under Kemi's leadership, I am ready to lead the fight against this failure.'
Ahead of a joint visit with Mrs Badenoch on Wednesday, he criticised actions such as cancelling the London Plan review of housing and 'using precious stock to house asylum seekers'.
ADVERTISEMENT
Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner has withdrawn the review, which had been ordered by the previous government, to pave the way for what she called a 'partnership approach' to development between Government and City Hall.
The joint visit is the first since Mrs Badenoch reshuffled her front bench on Wednesday as part of efforts to demonstrate what she described as the Tories' 'mission of renewal'.
Former foreign secretary Sir James will shadow Ms Rayner in the housing, communities and local government brief, while ex-Conservative Party chairman Richard Holden becomes shadow transport secretary.
Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch has reshuffled her front bench (Chris Radburn/PA)
Kevin Hollinrake has been appointed party chairman, replacing Nigel Huddleston, who will become shadow culture secretary.Stuart Andrew will become shadow health secretary, replacing Edward Argar, who resigned citing health reasons.
ADVERTISEMENT
Julia Lopez has been appointed shadow science secretary, taking over from Alan Mak, who has left the shadow cabinet.
Gareth Bacon has been replaced by Mr Holden in his transport brief and demoted from the shadow cabinet, but remains minister for London.
Sir James served in the Foreign Office and as home secretary when the Conservatives were in power before spending months on the back benches after coming third in the Tory leadership contest last year.
The MP for Braintree in Essex has since used his influential position as a former minister to warn against pursuing a populist agenda akin to Nigel Farage's Reform UK.
In the same speech, he also said he wanted to return the Tories to government 'at every level,' amid speculation he could harbour ambitions of running for the London mayoralty held by Sir Sadiq Khan in 2028.
ADVERTISEMENT
He has also urged the Conservatives to reject climate change 'luddites' on the right who believe 'the way things are now is just fine,' in remarks that were widely seen as at odds with the net-zero stance of the Tory leader.
In a press release ahead of the joint visit, the Tories described Sir James as a 'political heavyweight' who will take the fight to Labour 'over their failure to provide the people of Britain with the houses they need – particularly in London, ahead of the mayoral elections in 2028.'
The release contained no new Conservative housing policy announcements, after Mrs Badenoch said she did not want to rush into new proposals following the party's election defeat last year.
A Labour spokesperson said: 'No amount of deckchair shuffling can hide that the architects of 14 years of Tory failure still sit around Kemi Badenoch's top table.
'We're still living with the consequences of the Tories' disastrous decision to torpedo supply by abolishing mandatory housing targets.
'While Labour is working in partnership with regions to turn the tide on the acute and entrenched housing crisis, the Conservatives haven't changed and they haven't once apologised for the mess they left behind.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ottawa threatens to pull Toronto's housing funding over sixplex decision
OTTAWA — Claiming the city is falling short on its promise to ramp up density, Federal Housing Minister Gregor Robertson is threatening to pull some of Toronto's housing funding. In a letter to Toronto Mayor Olivia Chow earlier this week, Robertson wrote that he's disappointed by a recent decision to limit where builders can put up to six housing units on a lot. Last month, Toronto city council compromised with a plan that would see some wards sign up to the sixplex framework, while others would have the choice to opt in later. Robertson argues that decision went against Toronto's agreement with the federal government under the Housing Accelerator Fund — a tool Ottawa uses to encourage cities to rapidly build more housing. Toronto signed a deal with the feds in late 2023 that would see the city build nearly 12,000 new units over three years and receive $471 million in federal funding. In his letter, Robertson encourages Chow to revisit the sixplex decision over the next five months and warns Toronto could lose some of its housing funding if the city fails to meet the goals of the original agreement. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 23, 2025. The Canadian Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Department of Transport issues update on free bus passes for over 60s in England
Local councils in England "do have the power" to lower the age threshold for the older persons' bus pass, the UK Government has confirmed. But lowering the age would "need to be carefully considered for its impact on the scheme's financial sustainability." Surrey Heath representative MP Dr Al Pinkerton had queried whether an evaluation had been conducted on the "potential merits of extending free bus pass eligibility to people aged over 60," in a written response, the Daily Record reports. Given that concessionary travel falls under devolved jurisdiction, the qualifying age for complimentary bus journeys varies across Scotland, England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. While Scots aged 60-plus enjoy this benefit, those residing in England typically receive it upon reaching State Pension age. READ MORE: DWP issues update for disability benefit claimants owed £1,000s in compensation READ MORE: State Pension age may be increased to 70 following DWP proposals However, in the written response, Transport Minister Simon Lightwood, explained that 'local authorities in England have the power to offer concessions in addition to their statutory obligations, such as lowering the age of eligibility'. Never miss a story with the MEN's daily Catch Up newsletter - get it in your inbox by signing up here It comes after a petition online calling for bus passengers in England to be given the same financial benefits as those in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland received more than 100,000 signatures. Mr Lightwood said: 'The English National Concessionary Travel Scheme (ENCTS) provides free off-peak bus travel to those with eligible disabilities and those of state pension age, currently sixty-six. 'The ENCTS costs around £700 million annually and any changes to the statutory obligations, such as lowering the age of eligibility, would therefore need to be carefully considered for its impact on the scheme's financial sustainability. 'However, local authorities in England have the power to offer concessions in addition to their statutory obligations, such as lowering the age of eligibility. Additional local concessions are provided and funded by local authorities from local resources.' He also said that the UK Government has confirmed £955 million for the 2025/26 financial year to support and improve bus services in England outside London. This includes £243m for bus operators and £712m allocated to local authorities across the country. He added: 'Funding allocated to local authorities to improve services for passengers can be used in whichever way they wish. This could include extending the discretionary concessions available.' More than 101,200 people signed the online petition supporting calls for changes to be made to the ENCTS and bring it into line with the same service provided by the Scottish Government. Join the Manchester Evening News WhatsApp group HERE Petition creator Karen Hickman argues the current scheme is 'unjust' and calls for 'equality for everyone over 60'. The campaigner explained people in England, living outside London, are not entitled to free bus travel until they reach State Pension age - 66 for both men and women - which she believes has 'changed dramatically.' The 'extend free bus travel for people over 60 in England' petition states: 'We call on the Government to extend free bus travel to all people over 60 years old in England outside London. We believe the current situation is unjust and we want equality for everyone over 60. 'Currently, people in England who do not live in London are not entitled to free bus travel until they reach the state pension age, which we believe has changed dramatically. As people get older some over 60s drive less and less, therefore we believe we need equality on public transport. 'It would mean England had the same provision as Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.'
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
U.K. Announces Random Sanctions Hoping To Reduce Irregular Migration
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Foreign Secretary David Lammy. (Photo by SAUL LOEB / AFP) ... More (Photo by SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images) The government of the United Kingdom has announced a raft of financial sanctions and asset freezes against various individuals and entities it says are 'driving' irregular migration to Britain. It is the latest step in the Labour party government's attempts to reduce arrivals to the U.K., particularly those coming across the English channel by small boat from France. While the government is saying this move represents an 'innovative foreign policy approach" to deliver on its commitments to reduce irregular migration, it is unclear how this raft of sanctions will help, given the diffuse nature of smuggling networks and irregular migration. 'This is a landmark moment in the government's work to tackle organized immigration crime (and) reduce irregular migration to the U.K.' said Foreign Secretary David Lammy in the press release announcing the sanctions. In total, the government says it will sanction 25 individuals and entities 'at the heart of people-smuggling networks that drive irregular migration to the U.K.' These sanctions target various people and entities that are allegedly involved in the smuggling trade, including a Chinese company which makes boats roughly corresponding to those used by people to cross the channel, as well as various Balkan groups that allegedly make fake passports for irregular migrants. On the list as well are people allegedly involved in the informal 'Hawala' system of payments very common in developing countries, as well as the 'Tetwani Gang' who are referred to in the government's press release as 'known as one of the Balkan's most violent people.' Various other people and groups are listed for sanctions under headings such as 'Iraqi-linked people-smuggling," 'Gangland bosses,' and 'North African gangs operating in the Balkans." If the scattershot nature of these financial sanctions is confusing, it is better understood within the context of the pressure the Labour government is under to reduce irregular migration. The party, under Prime Minister Keir Starmer, campaigned heavily on a platform of reducing irregular arrivals to the U.K. Since coming to power in mid-2024, the government under Starmer has put a heavy emphasis on border security, detention and deportations. Nonetheless, they have faced significant electoral challenge from the far-right anti-immigration Reform Party. Facing challenge from Reform - and fearing that if they do not appear 'tough' enough on migration they will lose further electoral ground - the Starmer government has done its best to show it is taking the issue 'seriously.' In recent months, the government has announced a massive increase in deportation flights of rejected asylum seekers - despite concerns raised by legal and human rights advocates. It has also announced it is considering leveraging visa policy arrangements to get poorer countries to accept more deportations of their nationals. None of this seems to have shifted the needle. Nonetheless, with this latest raft of sanctions, it seems the Labour government is doubling down on the strategy, isolating what various people and groups it can find to show the British public it is serious about reducing irregular migration - even if this rag-tag group of entities being denied access to the U.K. banking system probably won't quite 'stop the boats.'
