Judiciary vows to counter 'external influence'
Listen to article
The National Judicial (Policy Making) Committee (NJPMC) has decided to protect judicial officers from external influence and asked the high courts to establish structured mechanisms for reporting and redressing such instances within a stipulated timeframe.
A statutory body responsible for formulating and implementing judicial policy, the NJPMC held its 53rd meeting on Friday at the Supreme Court of Pakistan.
The meeting chaired by Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Yahya Afridi was attended by chief justices of all provincial high courts as well as the Islamabad High Court (IHC). The additional attorney general for Pakistan (AAGP) also attended the moot on special invitation.
According to a statement issued after the meeting, the NJPMC also took serious notice of enforced disappearances in the country. The committee unanimously resolved that the judiciary would not compromise on its constitutional duty to safeguard fundamental rights.
In this regard, it formed a dedicated committee to formulate an institutional response, after taking into consideration concerns of the executive, to be communicated through the attorney general for Pakistan (AGP).
The committee deliberated on key policy issues and adopted several significant measures to improve judicial performance, technology integration in judicial processes and citizen-centric justice delivery.
To improve the commercial dispute resolution landscape, the NJPMC approved the establishment of Commercial Litigation Corridor, with specialized courts and benches.
In line with its commitment to expeditious justice, it endorsed the piloting of a Double-Docket Court Regime in select districts on need basis with optional participation.
The framework for Model Criminal Trial Courts was also approved to address long-pending criminal cases through time-bound trials and optimized judicial resources.
In a major step towards strengthening Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), the committee approved launch of a court-annexed mediation regime as a pilot project. This includes the establishment of district mediation facilities, family court mediation centers and standardized SOPs for operational purposes.
To ensure consistency and excellence in the district judiciary, the NJPMC constituted a committee headed by a former Supreme Court judge, Justice (retd) Rehmat Hussain Jafferi.
It will recommend key performance indicators aligned with international benchmarks, standardized recruitment and training mechanisms, address disparities in service conditions and propose a framework for the District Judiciary Policy Forum as well as overseas exposure opportunities for judges.
The committee also includes Balochistan High Court (BHC) chief justice, registrars of the high courts and the Federal Judicial Academy director general.
The committee also approved the development of a Professional Excellence Index for talent hunt of lawyers for induction in judiciary and asked the high courts to finalize their models within 30 days.
The ethical and policy implications of using generative AI in judicial functions were discussed, and the National Judicial Automation Committee (NJAC) was asked to finalize a comprehensive charter on ethical use of AI in this regard.
The committee appreciated Punjab inspector general of police for his detailed presentation proposing various reform intervention on behalf of all the IGPs of the provinces and Islamabad.
It also decided that the high courts shall issue standard operating procedures (SOPs) for attendance of under trial prisoners and official witnesses through video link.
It was also decided that the federal and provincial judicial academies shall conduct trainings for police officers including district police officers on request of the respective IGPs.
On the request of the AAGP, the NJPMC decided that all constitutional petitions pertaining to tax and financial matters shall be heard and decided by high court division benches instead of single benches.
The NJPMC appreciated the initiatives of the Lahore High Court regarding construction of female bar rooms, daycare center and health insurance for judges and their family members. It was decided that all the high courts will approach their respective provincial governments for similar facilities.
It was also decided that the NJPMC Secretariat shall take up the proposal of consultation with the presiding office before transfer of ministerial staff of the administrative courts and tribunals with the federal government.
"The NJPMC reaffirmed its commitment to a progressive, transparent and responsive judicial system, rooted in constitutional values and guided by the rule of law," it added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
18 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Fairness, accountability, rule of law: CJP reaffirms unwavering commitment to universal principles
ISLAMABAD: Chief Justice of Pakistan Yahya Afridi said the only antidote of maladies like human rights violation, terrorism, climate change, human trafficking and transnational crimes is the rule of law. The CJP in a message on the World Day for International Justice, issued on Thursday, reaffirmed unwavering commitment to the universal principles of fairness, accountability and the rule of law. He stated, 'This day we stand in front of a stark reality that justice is not limited to an isolated act of piety or responsibility of an institution. Rather it is a sacred collective obligation towards fellow human beings in all aspects of their lives. Importantly, justice is not confined by borders, it is a shared aspiration of humanity and a cornerstone of peace, dignity and human rights.' 'In a world confronted by incredibly complex global challenges like social conflicts, human rights violation, terrorism, climate change, displacements, human trafficking and transnational crimes, the role of justice systems, both national and international, becomes ever more pivotal.' 'The only antidote for all these maladies is the rule of law, safeguarding the rights of the vulnerable, upholding the dignity of individuals and protecting societies from tyranny and oppression,' he added. CJP Yahya Afridi said, 'Pakistan's judiciary, as a responsive institution, stands in solidarity with global efforts to strengthen international justice mechanisms. Recognizing the vital role of International Criminal Court and Criminal Tribunals, we genuinely acknowledge the efforts for reinforcing a global culture of justice and deterrence. 'At the national level, we are committed to ensuring that access to justice is timely, impartial and effective. We continue to invest in judicial reforms, digital transformation and capacity-building to make our courts more responsive to the needs of the people, especially the marginalized, the voiceless and the underserved. 'Let this day be a call to deepen our resolve that the cause of justice is not passive, it demands courage, vision and cooperation across institutions and borders. Together, let us strive for a world where justice prevails not only in the courtroom but also in the lives of all people,' the message concluded. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
Higher business costs: MoF, SECP strongly object to amendments thru CSR Bill
ISLAMABAD: Ministry of Finance and Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) strongly objected to amendments through 'The Corporate Social Responsibility Bill, 2025', arguing it will increase cost of doing business of companies in Pakistan. The 16th meeting of the Standing Committee on Finance and Revenue was held Wednesday at the Parliament House under the chairmanship of Syed Naveed Qamar, MNA. SECP Chairman Akif Saeed said that the amendments should not be proposed in the existing law. The present objective can be achieved through other alternate options. The law would create discrimination between the cost of doing business of association of persons (AOPs) and registered companies. Secretary Finance observed that we will come up with a solution where objective would be achieved without increasing cost of doing business of the companies. The committee considered 'The Parliamentary Budget Office Bill, 2025', moved by Rana Iradat Sharif Khan, MNA, and constituted a Sub-Committee under the Convenorship of Dr Nafisa Shah, MNA, for detailed deliberation on the bill and submission of its report within 30 days. Ali Zahid, Arshad Abdullah Vohra, and Muhammad Mobeen Arif, MNAs, will be the members of the newly appointed sub-committee. Dr Mirza Ikhtiar Baig, MNA, presented the report of the Sub-Committee on 'The Corporate Social Responsibility Bill, 2025', moved by Dr Nafisa Shah, MNA. The Committee adopted the report and deferred the discussion on the report for the next meeting of the Committee. The Committee expressed serious concern over the absence of the Secretary, Industries and Production, and deferred the agenda item relating to the new Electric Vehicle Policy. During the meeting, Secretary Finance and Chairman SECP Saeed said that there is no mandatory provision regarding the corporate social responsibility in the world except in India. Furthermore, it would result in increasing the doing of business cost and may discourage companies. The committee was further informed that many companies do not perform CSR. The committee members objected to their reservations while saying that one percent increase companies cost of doing business, but what about the 19 percent mandatory sale tax. On the taxation side, the government has no objection, but when we talk about welfare for the poor, there are serious objections. Nafisa Shah said that some companies are paying even 1.5 percent CSR. The Committee adopted the report and deferred the discussion on the report for the next meeting of the Committee. The meeting was attended by Rana Iradat Sharif Khan, Syed Samiul Hassan Gilani, Ali Zahid, Dr Nafisa Shah, Mirza Ikhtiar Baig, Muhammad Jawed Hanif Khan, Arshad Abdullah Vohra, Muhammad Mobeen Arif, Usama Ahmed Mela, MNAs. The meeting was also attended by Bilal Azhar Kayani, the Minister of State for Finance, Syed Rafiullah and Aliya Kamran, MNAs/movers of the starred questions. The secretaries and officers from the Finance and Revenue Divisions were also present during the meeting. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
3 days ago
- Express Tribune
Top court stays ADRC proceedings
The Supreme Court has ordered a stay on proceedings in all cases currently pending before the Alternative Dispute Resolution Committees (ADRCs), which function under the administrative control of the FBR to handle tax-related matters, especially those involving state entities. The order came from a division bench headed by Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, which issued a two-page directive. It noted that during proceedings, it was brought to the court's attention that the FBR, in consultation with the Ministry of Law and Justice, was in the process of overhauling the mechanism for appointing members to the ADRCs. The FBR's legal member submitted before the bench that the revenue body remains open to constructive suggestions regarding the ADRC proceedings as mandated by law. Taking note, the court observed it would be appropriate for the FBR to first examine the matter in detail. Accordingly, the bench directed the FBR to consult with Shahid Jamil, counsel for the petitioner (ZTBL), counsel for the respondent (FBR), amicus curiae Sultan Mazhar Sher Khan, the Attorney General for Pakistan and the Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice. The order further directed that the FBR must "duly consider the opinions and input" of these stakeholders before finalising the proposed framework for appointing ADRC members. "A report in this regard shall be submitted before this Court prior to the next date of hearing. In the meantime, proceedings in all cases currently pending before the ADRC shall remain stayed till 24.07.2025," the court stated. Shahid Jamil, counsel for ZTBL, maintained that transparency must be ensured in the appointment of ADRC members. However, legal experts remain divided on the current state of ADRCs and their role in dispute resolution. One lawyer representing a state-owned enterprise (SOE) argued that the ADRC mechanism has proven "destructive" for SOEs. "They are being crushed with taxation and have no remedy against the ADRC," he said, alleging that billions of rupees in taxes were forcibly recovered in June without the legally required notices, simply to meet revenue targets. "All profit-making SOEs are being destroyed," he added. Another lawyer contended that the ADRC should function independently and without FBR's influence to be credible. On the other hand, Hafiz Ehsaan Ahmad, who has represented the FBR in numerous cases, defended the institution. He explained that the FBR was legally empowered to constitute ADR committees for the settlement of tax disputes and to avoid prolonged litigation. However, he acknowledged that the ADR system in Pakistan has struggled due to several structural flaws, including the absence of qualified and independent arbitrators, a lack of transparency in ADRC composition, inadequate digital and institutional infrastructure and, most crucially, the limited binding nature and enforceability of ADR outcomes, particularly when they involve findings of fact.
