Record number of students to begin Leaving and Junior Cert exams
140,457 students will sit the exams, the first time the number has exceeded 140,000. The rise is due to population growth.
61,632 candidates will take the main Leaving Certificate written exams over the next several weeks, an increase of 5% compared to last year.
There has been an 11% rise in students opting for the Leaving Certificate Applied programme. 4,512 students have chosen that pathway.
74,313 candidates will begin their Junior Cycle exams this morning.
The State exams will take place in examination centres across more than 800 post-primary schools and other centres across the country.
The State Examinations Commission has described the process as "a massive logistical exercise involving the secure distribution of circa four million examination papers".
The exams begin at 9.30am with English Paper 1 for most Leaving Certificate students. LCA and Junior Cycle candidates will also sit English papers.
The last Leaving Certificate exam takes place on 24 June.
Leaving Certificate results this year will once again be artificially inflated through a post-marking adjustment which will be applied after all marking of individual papers has been completed.
Post-marking adjustments were introduced following the Covid pandemic in an attempt to compensate students who had missed out as a result of school closures and other restrictions arising from the pandemic.
Following a request from the Department of Education and in order to facilitate a gradual return to normal pre-Covid outcomes, this year's post-marking adjustment will be reduced to bring results in aggregate on average to a point broadly midway between 2020 and 2021 levels.
Leaving Certificate results will be issued to candidates on Friday 22 August.
The State Examinations Commission said this date took account of the time needed to apply the post-marking adjustment.
It said the timeline for results also had to allow sufficient time for an extensive range of quality assurance checks to be undertaken.
Minister for Education Helen McEntee is among many public figures and organisations who have wished the Class of 2025 good luck.
Sending her best wishes, Ms McEntee said: "I know the amount of work and effort you have put in to reach this point. It is the culmination of many years of effort.
"This can be a very stressful time so I would remind everyone that when it comes to examinations, all we can do is our best.
"We are all very much behind you over the next few weeks, and I know that regardless of the outcome of these examinations, there will be many great opportunities ahead for you all," she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
33 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
5 things to know about Al Jazeera
Qatari broadcaster Al Jazeera said yesterday that five of its journalists were killed in an Israeli strike, including a prominent reporter. The Israeli military acknowledged in a statement targeting correspondent Anas al-Sharif, accusing him of being a "terrorist" affiliated with Hamas. Here are five things to know about the Arab media giant, which has been at odds with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's administration since well before Israel's war with Hamas in Gaza started on 7 October 2023. 1. Founded by decree Al Jazeera was launched in Doha in 1996 by a decree issued by the former emir of Qatar, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al-Thani. While stipulating that the channel should be "totally independent of all influences", the decree also provided a $150m (€130m) government loan for "setting it up and covering its operating costs for five years". Though Al Jazeera Media Network is a private business, the broadcaster has retained some Qatari government funding, which its critics often cite when questioning its editorial independence from Doha. The broadcaster immediately emerged as a rival to international media giants but its no-holds-barred coverage as the self-described "first independent news channel in the Arab world" also sparked a series of legal disputes in the region in its early years. 2. Global reach The channel says it operates in 95 countries with 70 bureaus and a staff of 3,000 employees, with a global audience of more than 430 million homes. Al Jazeera, the network's initial Arabic-language news channel, was joined in 2006 by an English service. Al Jazeera and Al Jazeera English, the network's flagship channels, have distinct editorial lines with the Arabic-language channel more frequently facing criticism from within the region. The network also includes a live public affairs channel, Al Jazeera Mubasher, and its digital-only AJ+ channel, which targets young audiences. 3. Airtime for dissidents When a wave of popular uprisings swept the Middle East and North Africa in 2011, Al Jazeera was seen as a key shaper of public opinion because it gave unprecedented airtime to opposition groups, most notably the Muslim Brotherhood. The network has repeatedly rejected any accusation of bias in its coverage. Al Jazeera faced pressure from governments across the region and became the focus of feud between Cairo and Doha after the 2013 military ouster of Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood president Mohamed Morsi. Cairo considered it a mouthpiece for Morsi's Islamist movement and Egyptian authorities arrested three Al Jazeera journalists, including Australian Peter Greste, provoking international condemnation. 4. Regional blockade In 2017, Qatar's neighbours, led by Saudi Arabia, imposed a three-year diplomatic and economic blockade on the Gulf monarchy. As well as demanding Qatar cut ties with the Muslim Brotherhood and its sister organisation Hamas, and downgrade relations with Iran, the boycotting states also called for the closure of Al Jazeera and all its affiliates. The channel called the pressure an attempt to "silence freedom of expression". 5. On the ground in Gaza Since war broke out in Gaza on 7 October 2023 triggered by Hamas's attack on Israel, Al Jazeera has aired continuous on-the-ground reporting of Israel's military campaign and its consequences. Its broadcasts have been among the most watched in the Middle East amid widespread disenchantment with Western media coverage regarded as skewed in Israel's favour. In April 2024, Mr Netanyahu called Al Jazeera a "terrorist channel", saying he would "act immediately" to halt its activities after parliament passed a law allowing the banning of media broadcasts deemed harmful to national security. The law was used to ban Al Jazeera from broadcasting from Israel as of 5 May 2024 and to close its offices in the country in a temporary but renewable measure. Israel later moved to revoke the press credentials of some Al Jazeera journalists. The network has decried a "criminal" violation of "the human right to access information". Since the start of the Gaza war, Al Jazeera's office in the besieged Palestinian territory has been bombed and a number of its staff have been killed. Israel has repeatedly accused Al Jazeera journalists, including those killed or injured in strikes, of "terrorism" links or collaborating with Hamas. Al Jazeera has fiercely denied the allegations and accused Israel of systematically targeting its employees in Gaza.
RTÉ News
16 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Arrests reach 522 following Palestine protest in London
London's police service has said that officers had arrested 522 people the previous day for breaching anti-terror laws by supporting the recently proscribed group Palestine Action. In an update to its previous arrest tally, the Met said all but one of those 522 arrests took place at a Parliament Square protest and were for displaying placards backing Palestine Action. The other arrest for the same offence took place at nearby Russell Square as thousands rallied at a Palestine Coalition march demonstrating against Israel's war in Gaza. The 522 total is thought to be the highest ever recorded at a single protest in the UK capital. The Met made 10 further arrests, including six for assaults on officers, though none were seriously injured, it added. The force said the average age of those arrested yesterday was 54, with six teenagers, 97 aged in their 70s and 15 octogenarians. A roughly equal number of men and women were detained. The government outlawed Palestine Action on 5 July, days after it took responsibility for a break-in at an air force base in southern England that caused an estimated £7 million (€8.08 million) of damage to two aircraft. The group said its activists were responding to Britain's indirect military support for Israel amid the war in Gaza. Britain's interior ministry has insisted that Palestine Action was also suspected of other "serious attacks" that involved "violence, significant injuries and extensive criminal damage". In a statement following the latest mass arrests, interior minister Yvette Cooper defended the government's decision, insisting: "UK national security and public safety must always be our top priority". "The assessments are very clear - this is not a non-violent organisation," she added. 'Concerns' But critics, including the United Nations and groups such as Amnesty International and Greenpeace, have condemned its proscription as legal overreach and a threat to free speech. "If this was happening in another country, the UK government would be voicing grave concerns about freedom of speech and human rights," Greenpeace UK's co-executive director Areeba Hamid said Saturday. She added the government had "now sunk low enough to turn the Met into thought police, direct action into terrorism". Police across the UK have made scores of similar arrests since July 5, when being a member of Palestine Action or supporting the group became a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Police announced this week that the first three people had been charged in the English and Welsh criminal justice system with such backing following their arrests at a July 5 demo. In its update Sunday, the Met revealed a further 26 case files following other arrests on that day are due to be submitted to prosecutors "imminently" and that more would follow related to later protests. It believes 30 of those held Saturday had been arrested at previous recent Palestine Action protests. Eighteen people remained in custody Sunday lunchtime, but were set to be bailed within hours, the Met added. It noted officers from its counter-terrorism command will now "work to put together the case files required to secure charges against those arrested as part of this operation".
Irish Daily Mirror
18 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Liverpool fans' reason for booing 'God Save the King' English anthem explained
Liverpool are gearing up to take on Crystal Palace in the Community Shield at Wembley Stadium this Sunday. Under the leadership of Arne Slot, the Reds are eyeing their second piece of silverware of his tenure already, after lifting the Premier League trophy last season at the end of a dominant first campaign in England. A sea of Liverpool supporters is set to take to northwest London for the match. And it's expected that they will voice their disapproval during the national anthem. 'God Save the King', traditionally sung before domestic finals at Wembley, often receives a chorus of boos from the Reds faithful. There are several reasons why fans - and indeed many Liverpudlians - choose not to associate themselves with the English anthem. The origins of this sentiment among Liverpool's red contingent can be traced back to the 1980s. The city's 'managed decline' by the Conservative government, coupled with the government's failings in the wake of the Hillsborough disaster, intensified these feelings. A banner often spotted at Anfield even reads 'Scouse not English'. In recent times, Merseysiders feel they continue to be let down by the state, pointing to the foodbanks outside Anfield as proof of growing inequality, according to the Liverpool Echo. The tense relationship between city and country is also mirrored in the English national team, with many Liverpudlians choosing not to back England during major tournaments such as the European Championships or the World Cup. Liverpool found themselves in a tough position in 2023 after opting to play the national anthem before their home fixture against Brentford to mark the King's coronation, despite considerable resistance from sections of supporters. The Premier League had approached clubs to "strongly suggest" that the anthem be played ahead of fixtures that weekend. Liverpool knew that the intensity of sentiment on this issue had placed them in a difficult situation, with Anfield spectators having individual discretion over how they acknowledged the coronation and responded to the anthem being played. As expected, the anthem was met with boos from large sections of the ground. Sunday's fixture comes just as Liverpool forward Mohamed Salah made headlines for calling out UEFA over not explaining how a footballer dubbed the "Palestinian Pele" died in its tribute to him. Mohamed Salah took issue with UEFA's post on Saturday (Image:) The Palestinian Football Association (PFA) said on Wednesday that Suleiman Al-Obeid, 41, died in an Israeli attack in Gaza. UEFA posted on X that he was "a talent who gave hope to countless children, even in the darkest of times". Responding on Saturday, Egyptian star Salah posted: "Can you tell us how he died, where, and why?" Among those who appreciated his response was former UK Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, who replied: "Well said, Mo!" Salah, 33, who has more than 19 million X followers, previously called for the massacres in the conflict to stop and for aid to be allowed into Gaza. In an Instagram video posted in October 2023, he said: "It is not always easy to speak in times like this. There has been too much violence and too much heartbreak and brutality. "The escalations in the recent weeks is unbearable to witness. All lives are sacred and must be protected. The massacres need to stop. Families are being torn apart." The PFA said that Al-Obeid, who was married with two sons and three daughters, made 24 appearances for the national team, scoring twice. He was fondly known as the "Palestinian Pele", according to the PFA. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) has been approached for comment.
