
Majority of young people don't know financial education is on the curriculum
Think back to your school days – how much did you learn about personal finance: mortgages, credit cards and loans?
Before 2014, this information didn't form part of the national curriculum, so understandably the answer for many might be that they didn't learn very much.
Going back a decade, I was still at school and therefore should have been on the receiving end of some of this education, albeit in its early days.
Many of the things I learned at school have stuck with me over the past ten years, most of which don't generally apply to my daily life, be it the science behind the polarisation of light waves or the plots made against Elizabeth I (Ridolfi, Throckmorton, Babington… they still roll off the tongue).
What didn't stick with me was anything related to borrowing money, tax or paying into a pension.
This is not to say that I didn't learn about these things, I probably did. But I would venture that financial education didn't constitute a significant enough part of my education for me to remember it.
Speaking to a few school friends, it seems no one else remembered being taught any of that either.
Data from Boon Brokers also indicates that I might not be alone.
Some 74 per cent of young people said they didn't know financial literacy was part of the curriculum, according to the study of 1,000 people aged between 18 and 24.
As a result, some 83 per cent said school wasn't their main source of financial education, with 39 per cent of them saying their parents provided most of their financial knowledge.
Giang Hughes, business support manager at wealth management consultancy firm Simplify Consulting: 'Financial education is an essential life skill.
'While the statistics are shocking, they are not surprising, and change needs to be made to the curriculum so children can become more financially literate as they enter adulthood.
'We already see a huge advice gap that is yet to be reduced in a meaningful way and many reports suggest young adults are seeking advice from unregulated, uninformed and sometimes questionable sources.'
The biggest knowledge gap appears to arise around mortgages with 58 per cent saying no facilities were provided at school for them to learn about mortgages.
Some 92 per cent said they want mortgages to be taught in schools.
'These figures only highlight the need for formal financial education in schools and collectively we urge the Government to make financial education a compulsory part of every child's school day, regardless of which school they attend,' Hughes adds.
I'm a teacher - the financial curriculum needs work
Liam Hussey, head of PSHE at Ormiston Bolingbroke Academy in Cheshire, runs his school's financial literacy programme and doesn't think the National Curriculum goes far enough.
He told This is Money: 'Quite often PSHE in schools is a bit of a bolt on, it seems a poisoned chalice that no one wants. My vision when I first presented it to the senior leadership team and the head teacher was that I wanted to rip it up and start again.'
That's what he did.
'Coming from a business studies background, [money] was a more important topic to me.'
Hussey built a programme for students that could then be adapted by other teachers to suit the needs of their particular class.
He said: 'I've developed these materials from scratch, it's taken a lot of time and effort to get those set up and to the standard that they need to be.'
Now at Ormiston, students learn about personal finance over six-week blocks, covering everything from mortgages and credit to banking and loan sharks, working through booklets with key definitions and real-life scenarios and tasks such as building a weekly budget.
The classes are tailored to specific year groups, with the year 11 teaching block building on year nine and year seven teaching.
Hussey said: 'It's a stand alone, dedicated project of at least six weeks where students go in depth with the same member of staff working on the same booklet and coming back to that knowledge week in week out.'
And the student response to the programme at Ormiston has been a positive one.
Hussey said: 'The engagement from students is something that has been really positive… It's so relevant for them and they respond so well.
'It's quite pleasing to know that they are taking it seriously, they need to understand the value of this part of the curriculum.'
Student response surveys at the school show that the money sections of PSHE are often the most favoured by the students.
Hussey said: 'Taxation, bills, money, jobs, careers, taxes and mortgages. You can see this is a common theme coming through, the demand is there.'
For all the financial education taking place at Ormiston though, other schools aren't hitting the same mark.
Hussey said: 'In some cases I've heard the situations where the learning outcomes are just given to staff and they have to develop their own materials, which for me creates a lot of issues about consistency and certainly about quality.'
'[Financial Literacy] is not as well implemented as it should be,' he said,
Hussey developed Ormiston's financial literacy content himself, spending hours painstakingly putting together lessons that can be adapted by other teachers for their classes.
But teachers are already stretched, and most simply don't have time to do the same, especially when financial education is often overlooked.
Hussey said: 'To produce those materials yourself takes a lot of time and a lot of effort.'
This means that standards vary wildly, and financial education is far from consistent.
'I think we need an awareness of the importance of financial to see and the expectation on schools to deliver,' Hussey added.
'We need a national bank of materials that we can tap into as teachers, so that you can go online, access a lesson on mortgages and decide which parts you want to keep or amend.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Musk deletes Epstein tweet after Trump fallout
Elon Musk has deleted a tweet in which he alleged that Donald Trump was 'in the Epstein files'. The social media post was written on Thursday amid a fierce war of words between the tech billionaire and the US president – marking an abrupt end to their close alliance – following a dispute over Mr Trump's flagship spending Bill. As the disagreement escalated, Mr Musk also suggested that his former boss should be removed from office. 'The Epstein files' is a phrase colloquially used to describe intelligence US authorities hold on Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced paedophile, who died in 2019. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public,' Mr Musk wrote, before adding: 'Have a nice day, DJT!' However, by Saturday morning, Mr Musk deleted his post on X, in a sign that the pair's row could now be winding down. Mr Trump also appeared to suggest he was moving on from the spat, telling reporters during a flight to New Jersey: 'Honestly I've been so busy working on China, working on Russia, working on Iran... I'm not thinking about Elon Musk, I just wish him well.' The row began when Mr Musk – who last week stepped down as head of the Department of Government Efficiency – criticised the president's upcoming Bill as a 'disgusting abomination' and claimed it would increase the national debt. Mr Trump retaliated by saying the billionaire was upset because one of his allies had not been chosen for a role in the new Nasa administration. The president also suggested Mr Musk was annoyed because the White House's 'big beautiful Bill' would end tax breaks for electric vehicles worth billions of dollars to his car company Tesla. 'He knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left,' Mr Trump said. The president later said, during an Oval Office meeting with Friedrich Merz, the German chancellor, that Mr Musk had 'Trump derangement syndrome'. The Republican later added that he was 'very disappointed' in the entrepreneur. However, Mr Musk was quick to hit back, alleging that the president had only won last year's election because of his support. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election. Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate... Such ingratitude,' he wrote on X. The world's richest man then published his post about the president and the Epstein files – but provided no evidence to back up his claim. Social circles Mr Trump and Epstein ran in the same social circles in New York and were pictured partying together on various occasions in the 1980s and 1990s. Epstein killed himself in 2019 in a Manhattan jail cell while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. In February, Pam Bondi, the US attorney general, pledged to release the Epstein files. However, the 'phase one' documents that were released – to a hand-picked group of conservative influencers – contained information that was largely already in the public domain. As the row escalated, Mr Musk said he would decommission his Dragon spacecraft, which is used by Nasa to deliver and collect astronauts from the International Space Station. Mr Trump in turn threatened to cancel all of the Tesla and SpaceX owner's government contracts. 'The easiest way to save money in our budget, billions and billions of dollars, is to terminate Elon's governmental subsidies and contracts,' he said. The president also reportedly considered selling or giving away the red Tesla car he purchased earlier this year. Tesla shares tanked as the rift intensified, amid investor fears that Mr Trump might hinder the roll-out of self-driving cars in the US, hitting the company's growth potential. Shares closed down 14.3 per cent on Thursday and lost about £111 billion, although the firm staged a partial recovery on Friday. An administration official claimed Mr Musk was 'clearly having an episode', while Steve Bannon, Mr Trump's former adviser, encouraged the president to initiate a formal investigation into Mr Musk's immigration status and have him 'deported from the country immediately'. As well as deleting the Epstein post, Mr Musk also appeared to walk back on his threat to decommission the Dragon spacecraft. When an X user suggested Mr Musk and Mr Trump 'take a step back for a couple days', the Tesla chief executive wrote: 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' However, the billionaire has continued to keep a poll pinned to the top of his X profile which invites users of the social media platform to vote on whether it is time for a new political party in the US. Mr Musk wrote on Friday night: 'The people have spoken. A new political party is needed in America to represent the 80 per cent in the middle! This is fate.'


STV News
3 hours ago
- STV News
Hundreds apply to compensation scheme set up after armed forces LGBT ban
More than 1,200 Scots have applied for payments from a compensation scheme set up to help members of the military impacted by a ban on LGBT personnel serving in the forces. The Scottish Government confirmed the figure as it vowed to act to ensure those who suffered under the ban – which was in place until 2000 – get 'every penny they are entitled to'. It comes after the UK Government announced in December last year that it was setting up the LGBT Financial Recognition Scheme, with up to £75m set aside for payments. These could see former services personnel who were impacted by the ban receive up to £70,000 each. With veterans also potentially able to receive financial help through the council tax reduction scheme, Finance Secretary Shona Robison said regulations will be changed to ensure any compensation payments do not affect eligibility for this. Robison said: 'As we mark 25 years since the lifting of the ban on LGBT people serving in the armed forces, it is important to recognise the hardship that so many faced, with widespread homophobic bullying and harassment. 'Nothing will make up for the difficulties that LGBT veterans faced, however our action will ensure those in Scotland receive every penny that they are entitled to.' Under the UK Government scheme, those who were dismissed or discharged from the armed forces because of their sexual orientation or gender identity could receive £50,000 in compensation. Former service personnel who suffered harassment, intrusive investigations or even imprisonment could also receive payments of up to £20,000. Peter Gibson, chief executive of Fighting with Pride, said it had 'campaigned for justice for LGBTQ+ veterans for many years, helping to secure reparations and financial recognition of their horrendous treatment prior to 2000'. He added: 'As we slowly see the UK Government deal with those financial payments, protected from benefit and taxation impact, it is wonderful to see the Scottish Government taking action to ensure other benefits such as council tax benefit is also protected too. 'We continue to seek out veterans who were discharged or dismissed from the military to support them, and this news is one more step towards helping those in Scotland.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country


Scottish Sun
4 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Hundreds of thousands of Universal Credit claimants to lose nearly £100 a week in Government overhaul
Plus, find out how much Universal Credit you can get NO BENEFIT Hundreds of thousands of Universal Credit claimants to lose nearly £100 a week in Government overhaul HUNDREDS of thousands of people on Universal Credit are set to lose almost £100 per week under Government plans. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) previously announced plans to scrap the health component of Universal Credit for under-22s. 1 The Department for Work and Pensions has announced sweeping benefits changes Credit: EPA At the moment, the Limited Capability for Work and Work-Related Activity (LCWRA) element for Universal Credit is applied to most adults aged between 16 to 21 if they're struggling to stay employed due to health issues. But charity Disability Rights UK is now saying the Government plans will affect almost 110,000 disabled adults. It says they will lose nearly £100 a week if the changes come into effect. That equates to almost £400 a month, or £4,800 over the course of a year. The charity says the move will mostly impact disabled young people who are described as NEET - 'Not in Education, Employment or Training' - and are having difficulties getting into the job market. But it will also affect young people who are in work but are in low-paid or part-time jobs and are using Universal Credit to top up their earnings. Disability Rights UK says on its website: "The proposed policy will not just impact young disabled people who are NEET, but also many young disabled people who are in education. "Despite barriers to students claiming UC, it is often possible for those in non-advanced education who have passed the August after their 19th birthday to successfully claim UC as an adult. "Under the current system, low-income families with a disabled 19-year-old already have to contend with a drop in income of at least £29.25 per week when their child stops being treated as a dependent and starts claiming UC in their own right. "However, under the Government's proposal, young disabled people aged under 22 would only receive £73 rather than £170 per week, meaning a much greater drop in household income." I'm on Universal Credit & I don't know how to survive - I even lost £600 because my husband decided to get a job, it's just impossible The Government unveiled a huge benefits shake-up earlier this year as part of plans to save about £5billion a year in welfare payments. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said the current system is failing millions with one in 10 working-age Brits now on sickness or disability benefits. She said spending on disability benefits has spiralled by £20billion since the pandemic and pledged to fix the 'broken' system with a reform package. Part of the Government's plans include getting people back into work while protecting the most vulnerable. Research suggests removing access to the health element of Universal Credit for under-22s will not impact 73% of 16 to 24-year-old Brits who fall into the NEET category. How much Universal Credit can you get? TRYING to work out how much Universal Credit you can get can be overwhelming. There are so many different elements that can affect your claim and it makes the whole process even more complicated. There are several free calculators that you can use to help you get an estimate, such as Citizen's Advice, MoneySavingExpert, StepChange and Turn2Us. You will need: Details of all your income, such as existing benefits, tax credits, earnings from employment and your pensions, Details of your partner's income if you're married, in a civil partnership or living with someone as a couple. You will be assessed as a couple Information on any savings you have, How much you pay in council tax per year, and whether you get any discounts, reductions or exemptions, Details of your rent or mortgage payments, Employment and income information about anyone else living with you, such as grown-up children, Details about your carer's allowance if you receive it. You'll need to make sure that the information provided is as accurate as possible to get the truest estimate. What other benefits changes have been announced? The Government's proposed benefits shake-up will see a number of changes come into effect. One that has gained lots of attention is a crackdown on eligibility, particularly for those claiming the main disability benefit Personal Independence Payments (PIP). The number of claimants is expected to double by 2030, with the biggest rise among young people and those with mental health conditions. But from 2026, new claimants will need to score at least four points in one category to qualify as part of a plan to curb the rapid rise in payouts. These are some of the other changes planned: