After Trump vows tariffs on foreign movies, the Canadian film industry says he's lost the plot
6 hours ago
Duration 1:48
Social Sharing
U.S. President Donald Trump says he wants to impose a 100 per cent tariff on movies produced outside the country, a move that could devastate the Canadian film landscape — but experts are scratching their heads over how such a tax would work, given how intertwined the global film industry is.
Trump, in a Truth Social post on Sunday night, said he directed the Department of Commerce and the U.S. Trade Representative to "immediately begin the process" of imposing the tariff. He hasn't signed an executive order, and the White House said on Monday that no final decisions had been made.
Other countries "are offering all sorts of incentives to draw out filmmakers and studios away from the United States," Trump wrote.
"Hollywood, and many other areas within the U.S.A., are being devastated," he went on, framing it as a matter of national security.
Asked if he'd float the issue during his meeting with Prime Minister Mark Carney on Tuesday, Trump responded that Canada is "only one of many countries" that uses tax incentives to lure U.S. film productions.
WATCH | 'We will stand with our film industry,' says B.C. premier:
B.C. Premier speaks on Trump's threatened tariff on movies made outside U.S.
14 hours ago
Duration 10:08
The BC Government is warning about more possible chaos as a result of comments from US president Donald Trump. Trump has said he's interested in Canada becoming the 51st state, and recently talked tariffs being levied on films made outside the US. Premier David Eby says the comments are a red flag.
He offered few details on what this latest plank in his tariff regime would entail, or how it would be executed — including whether it would impact co-productions, or films made entirely abroad and exhibited in the U.S., not to mention those that appear on streaming services and at film festivals.
Greg Denny, a Canadian film producer whose most recent credits include The Apprentice, a biopic about Trump that was partially shot in Toronto, says movies are rarely the product of a single country.
WATCH | Trump 'just unbelievable,' Ford says:
Ford responds to Trump's tariff threats on non-U.S. movies
13 hours ago
Duration 0:25
Ontario Premier Doug Ford is calling out U.S. President Donald Trump after he ordered new tariffs on movies made outside the United States. Speaking to reporters on Monday, Ford said Trump is going after the entire world and called the president 'unbelievable.'
"We're not creating a good here. We're creating a movie. How do you put a tariff on top of that?" he asked. "This is many countries working together at all times, creating footage and content... It's not really something I see you can put a tariff on."
The announcement also drew swift rebukes from the Canadian Media Producers Association (CMPA) and the Alliance of Canadian Cinema, Television and Radio Artists (ACTRA), the actors' union.
B.C. Premier David Eby called the proposal "incredibly hard to understand," while Ontario's Doug Ford lamented that it's "something new with [Trump]" every day.
Why Hollywood goes north
Like other parts of its economy, Canada's film industry is deeply intertwined with that of its southern neighbour. Oscar-winners like Titanic, The Revenant and Juno were all filmed at least partly on Canadian soil; and Hollywood filmmakers from Guillermo Del Toro to Christopher Nolan have shot multiple movies here.
That means Canada is also vulnerable to crises that originate in Hollywood, like the 2023 Writers Guild of America and SAG-AFTRA strikes, which further wounded an industry still recovering from pandemic-related shutdowns.
Canada is highly appealing to U.S. film producers, according to experts. The filmmaking workforce is highly skilled, but costs less to pay, and Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, Calgary and Halifax are frequently used as stand-ins for other cities in the U.S., Europe and Asia. U.S. film production creates 30,000 jobs and has a $2.6 billion economic impact in Toronto alone, according to Mayor Olivia Chow.
Most importantly, the federal government offers a 16 per cent refundable tax credit, which is used to attract foreign productions from Hollywood and elsewhere to Canada.
Provinces also have their own tax incentives, some of which — like Ontario's — can be harmonized with the federal credit. B.C., meanwhile, announced just a few months ago that it would up its production tax incentives, and give a $2 billion bonus to productions that spend big in the province.
CBC News reached out to several major U.S. studios for their reaction, but none have responded. Trump said on Monday that he'd meet with the industry to discuss the proposal.
"I'm not looking to hurt the industry. I want to help," he said. "I want to make sure they're happy with it because we're all about jobs."
'The consumer still wants to consume'
Charlie Keil, professor at the University of Toronto's Cinema Studies Institute, says a U.S. film industry exodus from Canada would have a "devastating impact" on the domestic sector.
But it's hard to know how a tariff like the one Trump is proposing would be imposed, and to which movies it would apply.
"There's a whole spectrum here, between films that are primarily made in the U.S. but might have some post-production work done in another country, to films that are entirely made by another country," he said.
There's also the question of who would absorb the cost of the tariff. After years of price hikes and hidden junk fees, a more expensive movie ticket likely wouldn't fly with audiences, says Keil.
That would mean theatre owners would eat the cost themselves or split it with a distributor, which would make production itself more expensive. Retaliatory tariffs would further complicate things, given that the global box office is deeply important to the success of a blockbuster, Keil notes.
And what about U.S. streaming services? Netflix, for example, has seen success with foreign-made content — being the primary distributor for Oscar fare like Spain's Society of the Snow and South Korea's Okja.
Noah Segal, the co-president of the Toronto-based film distributor Elevation Pictures, says major streamers are unlikely to get on board with Trump's proposal.
"I think that they want to get localized content going because they know there's certain [niches] that they can't get through American content," he said.
However, if a U.S. tariff is imposed globally on other filmmaking countries, Segal argues that it could be a boon for Canada's domestic industry.
"If there's less content, the consumer still wants to consume as much as the consumer wants to consume. So therefore, it may be a great opportunity for Canadian content, Canadian culture and Canadian industry," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Vancouver Sun
11 minutes ago
- Vancouver Sun
B.C. NDP sticking to secretive ways, if replies to complaints over shíshálh deal are any indication
VICTORIA — This time last year the New Democrats signed a secret deal with the shíshálh Nation on the Sunshine Coast, providing $104 million over five years, six square kilometres of public land and other far-reaching terms. The agreement was withheld from the public until well after Oct. 19 provincial election. When the terms were finally announced on Jan. 29 of this year, the New Democrats tried to portray the news as a mere update on an agreement from 2018. But the money, land transfer, and commitments to negotiate Aboriginal title and exclusive decision-making for the Indigenous nation went beyond the earlier terms. The 44-page text was also redacted in parts, raising suspicions. A daily roundup of Opinion pieces from the Sun and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Informed Opinion will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Not until an online public information session on March 20 did the New Democrats acknowledge the coverup. The telling admission came from Randene Neill, cabinet minister for water, land and resource stewardship and the new NDP MLA for Powell River- Sunshine Coast. 'I was not aware of the agreement when I was a candidate,' the former journalist confessed. She learned about it after Premier David Eby appointed her to cabinet in December. 'One reason I got into politics included the feeling that you haven't been heard,' Neill told her community. The belated release of the terms had contributed to 'mistrust.' At the same session, the deputy minister of Indigenous relations and reconciliation, Tom McCarthy, claimed 'we simply ran out of time.' The agreement was signed Aug. 16, 2024. In the five-week gap before the government moved to caretaker mode for the election, the New Democrats put out 200 positive news releases to boost their re-election chances. But they also withheld news of a cash and land transfer negotiated in complete secrecy, without a moment of public consultation. 'We should have found a way to get this out the door before the election,' the deputy minister conceded. 'We have to do better than that. We will do better.' By the time he said that, the damage was done. Government staffers pulled together the public feedback from March 20 and a followup session on March 31. Even after they edited out 'disrespectful and derogatory language,' the surviving comments and questions were blistering. • 'How come you kept your talks a secret till after the election?' • 'You really do insult our intelligence by saying you ran out of time, absolutely no one believes you.' • 'The provincial government has clearly prioritized reconciliation between the shíshálh Nation and itself over residents.' • 'Remember that you also represent the non-First Nations people that live on the Coast.' Yet there was little sign of contrition from Indigenous Relations Minister Christine Boyle when she was challenged over the belated release of the shishalh agreement during debate on her budget April 30. The agreement was announced 'as soon as we could after ministers were sworn in and briefed and we could prepare a joint announcement and shared celebration,' she claimed. Boyle did concede that 'we could have found a way to announce the renewal before the election. My commitment is to provide more timely information about these types of agreements to support public confidence in the work that we're doing together.' But when pressed for details of what the government signed a year ago, she disclosed little beyond the $104 million in funding for economic development, a cultural centre and housing, and related provisions announced Jan. 29. As for the six square kilometres of public land, those had yet to be identified. When they were, the province and the First Nation 'will engage with local governments and interest holders in the area and consider other nations, groups and the public.' That's a lot of acreage, observed Conservative MLA Scott McInnis. Would the government also disclose the market value of the land, so the public knows what was being handed over on its behalf? Probably not, said Boyle. 'These land transfer agreements don't typically include the assessed value of the land, but they do include detailed maps.' The MLA asked how government negotiators determine the mix of land and dollars included in such agreements. 'We're spending public money here — tens of millions of dollars, hundreds of millions of dollars in some cases — and transferring vast amounts of public land,' said McInnis. 'Did they just kind of pull numbers out of somewhere and present offers to nations?' There was a mix of considerations replied Boyle and every First Nation is different. 'I feel like the minister is avoiding this,' said McInnis. 'Is it publicly available that people can see how these agreements are formed and based on what criteria?' 'The simple answer is no,' replied the minister, slamming the door on further disclosures. 'The agreements are public. But our negotiation mandates are confidential to protect the public interest.' Boyle has since been shuffled to the housing ministry and replaced in Indigenous Relations by Spencer Chandra Herbert. But Boyle was and is one of the best-connected members of the cabinet. I have no doubt that she was speaking for a premier and cabinet inclined to disclose as little as possible about the deals they make with Indigenous nations. vpalmer@


Edmonton Journal
11 minutes ago
- Edmonton Journal
West Kelowna, B.C. denies Christian singer Sean Feucht permit, citing safety concerns
The City of West Kelowna, B.C., has cited public safety to deny a permit for a concert by American Christian singer Sean Feucht, who is outspoken in the Make America Great Again movement. Article content The city says in an emailed statement that the permit for a concert in Memorial Park on Saturday had been sought by Burn 24/7 Canada Worship Ministries Society. Article content Article content It says the city, with the help of the RCMP and West Kelowna Fire Rescue, reassessed a safety and security plan submitted by the organizer and concluded that public safety risks 'have not been appropriately mitigated.' Article content Article content West Kelowna in the B.C. Interior is the latest Canadian community to reject a concert by Feucht, who ran unsuccessfully as a Republican candidate for Congress in 2020 and has been criticized for remarks on the LGBTQ+ community and abortion. Article content Article content


CTV News
11 minutes ago
- CTV News
One in five small businesses dealing with tariffs won't last more than six months if nothing changes, says survey
A new survey says one in five small Canadian businesses dealing with tariff costs won't last more than six months if the status-quo lingers on. The survey of Canadian Federation of Independent Business members shows 62 per cent of businesses are facing higher expenses, 48 per cent are seeing lower revenues, 41 per cent are experiencing supply chain disruptions, and 41 per cent are pausing investments. ADVERTISEMENT Additionally, 19 per cent of small businesses dealing with extra tariff costs report they won't be able to last more than six months if the tariff situation remains, with 38 per cent saying they would last less than a year. 'At the end of the day many of these small businesses have been trying to absorb these added costs, but frankly they're running out of runway,' said Ducan Robertson, the federation's director of legislative affairs in Nova Scotia. The federation is calling for the federal government to take retaliatory tariffs collected at the border and return it to businesses feeling the most impact. 'That could be in the form of reducing the federal small business tax rate to zero per cent, temporarily,' said Robertson. 'It could be a rebate sent to small businesses, similar to what happened during the carbon tax.' The federation said its online survey has been active since Aug. 8, with 1,721 respondents. For comparison purposes, a probability sample with the same number of respondents would have a margin of error of at most +/- 2.36 per cent, 19 times out of 20. For more New Brunswick news, visit our dedicated provincial page.