Push to ban ciggies from supermarkets
Supermarkets should be banned from selling cigarettes, the Lung Foundation of Australia says.
The foundation has floated the ban as a means to stop smokers being tempted to buy a pack or a pouch alongside their groceries.
'We need everyone from government to big corporations to put the lung health of Australians ahead of profits from a product that kills 66 Australians daily,' foundation chief executive Mark Brooke said.
'Previous news reports have highlighted Coles estimates their cigarette sales each year is enough to kill more than 1600 Australians and cause tobacco-related medical costs of more than $300m a year.'
Former smoker Sarah Waters has joined the campaign for cigarettes to be banned from supermarkets. Sales of legal cigarettes have plummeted in Australia. NewsWire Credit: NCA NewsWire
Ms Waters started smoking aged 13, and continued for nearly 30 years.
'It isn't easy to quit but not being able to buy cigarettes so easily would have made a big difference. When I started smoking there was no age limits in place, and they were marketed to young people as being cool.'
Prince Charles Hospital thoracic physician Henry Marshall said nicotine is as addictive as heroin.
'The difference is you can't buy heroin with your weekly shopping.'
'It is hard to fight an addiction while also being able to buy tobacco products so easily.'
Professor Marshall has thrown his voice behind the lung foundation's calls for a ban.
'People who smoke deserve more help from health professionals and the government,' he said. Coles says it is providing smokers the choice to buy legal tobacco products. NewsWire / Liam Kidston Credit: News Corp Australia
'I would like to see people demand action from the multinational tobacco companies who have known smoking causes lung cancer since before 1954 and continued to sell products to make profit off Australians. It is time we said, 'enough is enough'.'
The Lung Foundation is calling for the government to ban supermarkets from selling tobacco products.
In response, Coles said in a statement it is providing smokers with a legal way to obtain tobacco.
'Coles complies with all Commonwealth, State and Territory laws aimed at minimising the negative health effects of tobacco use, however we recognise the need to provide choice to those customers who wish to purchase these products legally,' a spokesperson told NewsWire.
Woolworths has been approached for comment.
Earlier this year, IGA reported it had lost $150m of revenue over three years, as tobacco black market sales skyrocketed across the country.
Australians have comprehensively turned to the black market for cigarettes and tobacco, as the tax on legal smokes becomes unaffordable.
The taxes the federal government takes from tobacco have plummeted from $16.3bn five years ago, to $7.4bn this year.
Smoking rates have fallen from 20 per cent of the population in 2001, to about 8 per cent now, the latest government data shows.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
6 hours ago
- ABC News
One in seven of us take antidepressants. Getting off them can be a nightmare
Chances are you, or someone you know, took an antidepressant this morning. One in seven Australians are on the medication, and for many it's lifesaving. But are we staying on antidepressants for too long? Is there a right time to stop? And what should we know about withdrawal symptoms? Guest: Jordan Bissell, journalist and producer on Radio National's Life Matters. ------ To find out more about how frequently antidepressants are prescribed, check out this Life Matters episode. Or you can read on the topic here. And if you're into mental health-related chats, check out our show on how to make big life decisions. As always, we'd love to hear from you. If you enjoyed the episode, email us at If you or anyone you know needs help: Lifeline on 13 11 14 Kids Helpline on 1800 551 800 Beyond Blue on 1300 224 636 Headspace on 1800 650 890
Sky News AU
12 hours ago
- Sky News AU
'Considered eating dog or cat food': Staggering number of Aussies forced to look in bins for food, skips meals entirely as cost of living bites under Albanese govt
A growing number of Australians are being forced to choose between food or medication as the nation's most vulnerable people continue to get crushed under the government's worsening cost of living crisis. A new survey by The Salvation Army Australia found about 55 per cent of Aussies, who reached out to the charity, were skipping meals because of financial hardship, 57 per cent could not afford prescription medication, while almost a quarter were forced to eat expired or spoiled food, and one in 20 are dumpster diving for food. Amongst the figures are survivors of domestic violence as well elderly residents who have considered desperate measures such as eating pet food. "I've cut down on my medication, only taking half of my meds. I have considered eating dog or cat food," an elderly woman told The Salvation Army. A single mother from Queensland, who fled domestic violence, said it is a mental, financial and emotional struggle, as she has to go most days without food to provide for her children. "I've had to restart over again, which put me in financial hardship, I'm in more debt now than ever," she said. "Bills are paid first, then kids' food, but the increase in everyday living means my kids are going to have less food.' Parents are finding it particularly difficult to feed themselves as well as their children, which has forced 62 per cent of parents to completely skip on meals so their kids could eat. The survey also found 43 per cent of families could not afford essentials like baby formula and nappies, while over a third (36 per cent) struggled to cover the costs of basic non-prescription medications like paracetamol or ibuprofen. A 30-year-old mum, who works in the public sector, told the charity she could not provide for her family despite being employed and has considered quitting her job to save on the cost of petrol, parking and childcare. "I feel like I am failing as a mother," she said. A second community member said: 'I just drink water to fill up my tummy. And the milk for the baby, for example, one bottle is for four scoops of milk, I always put two scoops in every bottle. I don't use nappies for the baby because I can't afford to buy nappies for her. And also, when we wash our clothes, we are not using soap. I can't afford that.' Several Aussies have reported a decline in mental health from completely isolating themselves as a way to avoid non-essential spending. 'To manage financially I isolate myself completely, stop eating basically, and feel desperate most of the time, thinking about how I can get through till the next payday, what else I can cancel or stop doing," a New South Wales mum said. Major Bruce Harmer from The Salvation Army said it is "truly shocking" to see the staggering number of people doing it tough in a "country like Australia". "No one should be forced to eat expired food or to eat out of rubbish bins," he said. "The fact that over one in twenty (6 per cent) of those we surveyed said they were eating from dumpsters breaks our heart. "Those presenting to us are some of the most marginalised and disadvantaged in our community." With Australia choosing to back the Labor government for a second term after a historic election win, struggling households are hoping Prime Minister Anthony Albanese can offer more assistance or to find a way to resolve the cost of living crisis. As part of his election promises, the PM vowed to deliver more relief including cheaper medicine and childcare, boosts to Centrelink payments and wages for low-paid workers. Mr Albanese has also promised an $8.5billion investment to Medicare to expand the bulk billing incentive to all Australians as well as incentivise payments for clinics to bulk bill. The Labor government's big-ticket relief items have been criticised for not doing enough to match the nation's ongoing cost of living crisis. However despite the criticism, the Albanese government has claimed it has kept inflation down, incomes are growing and unemployment is low under its leadership.
7NEWS
a day ago
- 7NEWS
Toxic forever chemicals in the blood of most Aussies as researchers uncover EPA testing gap for potential polluters
The Australian Bureau of Statistics has published new data revealing forever chemicals are in the blood of most Australians. These PFAS chemicals, which can accumulate in the body over a lifetime, are linked to cancer — but researchers have also now linked high PFAS concentrations in a Sydney drinking water catchment to sewage sources that the EPA does not test. Detectable levels of the three most prevalent PFAS chemicals — PFOS, PFOA and PFHxS — were found in 85 per cent of the biomedical samples given to the ABS, it said on Tuesday. That data comes just days after Western Sydney University researchers published their own alarming findings about PFAS in Sydney's waterways. 'Essentially, we wanted to look at potential contributors to PFAS in our aquatic ecosystems and were very interested in sewage treatment plants that discharge into Sydney's drinking water catchment,' lead study author Katherine Warwick told The study, built on Warwick's 2024 research, looked into nine dead PFOS-contaminated platypus found in the Warragamba catchment. The Warragamba catchment supplies about 80 per cent of Sydney's water, which is consumed by over five million people. For her latest study, Warwick and her team tested water at sewage treatment plants which pump their treated wastewater back into that catchment, and the researchers found a concerning build-up of PFAS in sediment downstream from the outfalls. 'While PFAS may not be detected in high concentrations in the sewage outfall, it can build up in the downstream sediment, which can pose ecological risks to aquatic wildlife and potentially enter our drinking water supply,' Warwick told 'Currently, these sewage treatment plants are not required to test or monitor for PFAS in either the water or the sediment, and so this issue is largely going undetected.' NSW EPA confirmed it does not currently test for PFAS in the wastewater pumped out into rivers and streams by the sewage treatment plants. But they said that wheels have been in motion to do so for several months. 'As part of the implementation of the revised PFAS National Environmental Management Plan, the EPA has commenced a process to include PFAS monitoring on sewage treatment plant (STP) licences,' the spokesperson said. 'We have commenced targeted engagement on the implementation of monitoring conditions consistent with the NEMP, which was released in March. 'We have also commenced public consultation on our statutory five-yearly review of Sydney Water's STP licences, including on the level of treatment required at STPs. Public submissions close on 12 June 2025 and feedback will inform future licence changes.' Thorough investigation recommended PFAS was not the only pollutant that Warwick's study tested for in the water by sewage treatment plants serving Lithgow, Goulburn, Mittagong, Moss Vale, and Bowral — it also tested for metals, nitrogen and phosphorus. 'The concentration of these pollutants generally exceeded recommended NSW Government catchment guidelines in rivers downstream of the sewage treatment plant outfalls,' the study said. And while PFAS levels measured in running water from the sewage treatment plant outfalls were generally below Australian guideline values, it did found PFAS sediment bioaccumulation areas in water nearby. 'We suggest consideration should be given to establishing effluent disposal licence requirements that impose concentration limits and require the regular measurement of PFAS,' the study said. Sewage treatment plants are not the only possible source of PFAS in the catchment — landfills, or and run off from fire training locations where the chemicals in firefighting foam, could also be at fault. The study recommended that 'the source and concentration of PFAS in Warragamba catchment STPs and rivers is thoroughly investigated over an extended period of time.' Sydney Water does test for PFAS in its drinking water, but asserts that there is a safe level of PFAS that can be consumed daily. Australian standards lag behind the US, where a new safety standard would deem some Sydney drinking water unsafe based on 2024 data. An expert previously told that Australian drinking water standards are an 'international embarrassment'. Warragamba Dam was just one of the places where the 2024 testing by Sydney Water found controversial levels of PFAS in the drinking water. The highest levels were detected at Cascade Dam in Blackheath and Katoomba in the Blue Mountains. Toxic national blood findings There were 11 different types of PFAS that the ABS sought to detect in the blood of the Australians over the age of 12, for its National Health Measures Survey. ABS head of health statistics James Eynstone-Hinkins said that the data is will work 'to create a national baseline for levels of PFAS in the Australian population' and 'support further research into PFAS and the potential impacts of these chemicals on human health.' It will allow the nation to monitor the levels of PFAS in Australians in the future, he said. While the 85 per cent of Australians were found to contain a combination of the three most common PFAS chemicals, the most common of the three, PFOS, was found in 99.1 per cent of men, and 98.3 per cent of women. Two of the other types of PFAS, that the ABS was testing for, were detected in Aussie blood samples at rates between 15 per cent and 45 per cent. Six other types of PFAS were also detected in less than 10 per cent of people. Older people were found to have higher levels of PFAS in general, despite varying levels among survey respondents 'This was in line with expectations as there have been changes in the population's exposure to PFAS over time,' Eynstone-Hinkins said. 'PFAS levels were also generally higher for males than for females.'
