
EXCLUSIVE I'm going barefoot for a YEAR... I've suffered gruesome injuries on my feet and have been thrown out of stores
Bear Intentions, 34, a personal trainer, yoga teacher and massage therapist from the UK, made it his goal to walk around without any footwear on for an entire year.
He began the project in October, and over the last nine months, he has gone completely shoe-less.
That means he's gone without shoes on public transportation, on dirty streets in New York, and even in public toilets.
Now, he has spoken exclusively with the Daily Mail about the bizarre endeavor, and he admitted that he's faced a slew of challenges along the way - like getting 'glass, stones and countess thorns' stuck in his feet and being thrown out of stores.
But he insisted that it's been incredibly 'liberating' and totally worth the discomfort.
'When I get past those moments of discomfort (i.e. public toilets, gravel tracks, London Underground, glass alleyways, New York City etc.), it's radically shaped how I engage with the world,' he dished.
'I've had very novel and fascinating conversations with strangers that I wouldn't have had otherwise, I pay more attention to my environment, I feel more confident somehow.
'It's been a rollercoaster. A seemingly minor change such as not wearing shoes or socks for almost a year has changed my life in many - mostly positive - ways.'
The UK-native explained that in addition to constantly stepping on sharp objects, he has developed multiple serious conditions over the last nine months.
He battled something called trench-foot, which develops after prolonged exposure of the feet to cold, wet conditions.
'Living in Portugal in the winter led to some unexpected trench-foot - two weeks of solid rain in which I had to walk my dog a few times a day, plus surfing and not drying or taking proper care of my feet,' he explained.
'The soles of my feet started to disintegrate. I had to spend another couple of weeks with zero moisture to dry them out.'
He also developed tendinitis, which is the inflammation, irritation, or swelling of a tendon, which is the tissue connecting muscle to bone.
But he confessed that the biggest risk has nothing to do with injuries.
'One of the biggest hazards that's keep my eyes to the ground is dog s**t,' he joked.
He insisted that it's been incredibly 'liberating' and totally worth the discomfort. 'When I get past those moments of discomfort, it's radically shaped how I engage with the world,' he said
Bear admitted to the Daily Mail that he often faces cruel judgement from strangers and has been kicked out of stores on multiple occasions.
'I'm used to people staring at me but with being barefoot, it's frequently a look of disgust which can grate on me sometimes,' he said.
'I've had no problems with restaurants but I've been told I'm not allowed inside multiple supermarkets.
'A few of those times I'd be in the middle of my shopping and be asked to leave.'
Arguably one of most dramatic moments was when he was almost thrown off a flight after he boarded with no shoes on.
'I had already boarded the flight (as I had done on the previous three flights I'd flown on to get there),' he recalled.
'The cabin crew saw I was shoeless and told me I couldn't be on the plane barefooted.
'So myself and my friend got off the plane and quickly went to speak to the flight manager at the gate desk.'
After explaining the situation and 'a few minutes of back and forth,' Bear said the manager told him he 'could embark on the plane as long as he told them it was for religious purposes.'
As for why he's doing it, Bear explained that it's part of a bigger 'project' he's working on that involves multiple year-long challenges
'Thankfully I was allowed back on moments before they ended boarding. There was a lot riding on that flight, with two connecting flights back to Europe,' he added.
'They were all doing their jobs and I respect their policies however, it was an emotional moment.'
As for why he's doing it, Bear explained that it's part of a bigger 'project' he's working on that involves multiple year-long challenges.
'I'm a wellbeing artist, which basically means I look for creative ways to live a healthy life,' he explained.
'This year-long challenge of being barefoot is a part of four years of consecutive challenges that I've set myself in order to study the relationship between intention and tension.
'The previous challenges have consisted of 365 day-long vow of silence, 365 days wearing only fancy dress costumes, and 365 days of service (asking "how can I help").
'My plan is to take all of my experiences and findings over the last four years and place them in a book about why purpose matters now more than ever.
'I grew up without my father present so these four years can also be seen as a "rite of passage."
'I want to be a caring husband and stable father one day and felt this would be a good way for me to learn what I didn't as a child.'
He's now setting out to walk all the way from Italy to London while barefoot - which is a whopping 745 miles.
He expects it to take six to eight weeks and plans to walk anywhere from 10-25 miles per day depending on weather.
'I want to use it as a time to reflect on my experiences and process the past four years,' he said.
'I'm also fundraising for two UK charities: CALM (Campaign Against Living Miserably) and Medical Detection Dogs.'
In the end, he said he's learned so much from the endeavor, and he's impressed by his own dedication.
'I sold my house to afford to go through these challenges and dedicated the last six years of my life to this project,' he dished.
'So if there's one thing I've learnt is that having and fulfilling ones purpose is a matter of dedication - sacrifice.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Plane passenger's life-saving allergy request sparks outrage as he's labelled 'selfish'
As someone with a severe nut allergy, Dan Kelly always has to be cautious when he's flying. In a video, posted to his TikTok account @_maycontain, Dan can be seen onboard an easyJet flight, asking the cabin crew whether it's okay to make an announcement to the whole plane to warn them the flight should be nut-free for his safety. In the clip, the flight attendant can be seen asking Dan whether he has an EpiPen - which he confirms he does - and where he's sat. Dan captioned the video: 'I love it when flight attendants understand straight away. 'Surely people can go without nuts for a few hours if it could save someone's life! 'Honestly, I don't understand why some people still don't take food allergies seriously. 'If it were you or your child living with a life-threatening allergy, you'd hope others would show a bit more empathy and recognise just how serious it really is!' But, while most people were very sympathetic towards Dan, he revealed the video 'caused quite a stir' and he received some very negative comments from 'a few small-minded people who seem to have nothing better to do than try to provoke a reaction'. View this post on Instagram A post shared by May Contain | Allergy Blog and Podcast 🎙️ (@_maycontain) One of the cruel comments was: 'I would make all people with allergies sit in a toilet the whole flight. So annoying as I love peanuts with my Gin and tonic.' Another added: 'One person shouldn't dictate what a plane load of people can and cannot eat.' A third nutty passenger agreed: 'I'd be the first to open up a packet of peanut m&ms. Just because I can!' And another troll wrote: 'I always eat Snickers on planes. Nobody tells me not to eat.' But Dan took these negative comments in his stride and said: 'I think it really highlights just how much misunderstanding still exists around allergies even if it's just a small group of people, the lack of seriousness in society is still very real.'


Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Six patient deaths linked to use of ‘substitute' doctors by NHS
Six patient deaths have been linked to the NHS introducing physician associates as a 'substitute' for fully trained doctors, a government-commissioned review has found. Professor Gillian Leng, the president of the Royal Society of Medicine, was asked by Wes Streeting, the health secretary, to examine the role of physician associates (PAs), a group of 3,500 NHS staff who assist doctors but do not have a medical degree. Leng's 134-page report concluded there had been cases where PAs had been used as a substitute for doctors in the NHS, which was 'clearly risky and confusing for patients'. She said that, in future, PAs should be renamed physician 'assistants' and wear lanyards, badges and uniforms that make it clear to patients that they are not trained doctors.


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
NHS physician associates should not diagnose untriaged patients, review finds
NHS physician associates should be banned from diagnosing patients who have not already been seen by a doctor, a government review has concluded. The review calls for the government to overhaul the role of physician associates (PAs), who it says have been substituted in for doctors to fill staffing gaps despite having significantly less training. The health secretary, Wes Streeting, ordered the review of the more than 3,500 PAs and 100 anaesthesia associates (AAs) working in the NHS after six high-profile deaths of patients who were misdiagnosed by PAs. Prof Gillian Leng, the president of the Royal Society of Medicine, spoke to more than 1,000 people for the review and concluded there were 'no convincing reasons to abolish the roles of AA or PA' but there was also no case 'for continuing with the roles unchanged'. She wrote in the report: 'Despite the significantly shorter training, PAs and to a lesser extent AAs have sometimes been used to fill roles designed for doctors. The rationale for doing this is unclear, and was probably one of pragmatism and practicality, relying on medical staff to provide the additional expertise when required. 'This lack of planning may have been responsible for driving the resentment felt by some resident [doctors] and potentially exposed patients to unnecessary risk.' One of her main recommendations is that PAs should not see 'undifferentiated or untriaged patients', meaning those who have not yet been diagnosed by a doctor. Leng recommended further work to establish which patients they should be able to see and to set clinical protocols that would enable PAs to diagnose patients with mild ailments. 'Let's be clear, [the role of PAs] is working well in some places, but there indeed has been some substitution and any substitution is clearly risky and confusing for patients,' she said. Leng recommended PAs should be renamed 'physician assistants' and AAs 'physician assistants in anaesthesia' to ensure that patients and their families are clear on whether they have been seen by a doctor. She observed that this confusion was the core concern voiced by the bereaved families she had spoken to, who believed it was a contributing factor in their loved ones' death. She noted in her report that despite the role's rapid expansion since it was introduced in the early 2000s, there was limited data and evidence on whether PAs were safe or unsafe. Most concerns related to PAs being the first clinician to see patients unsupervised. 'Making the wrong initial diagnosis and putting patients on an inappropriate pathway can be catastrophic,' she said. The report found that 'relatively few doctors felt it was appropriate for PAs to diagnose illness' and it identified disparities between the tasks PAs considered right for them to carry out and what doctors thought. Leng recommended that newly qualified PAs work in hospitals for two years before they are allowed to work in GP surgeries or mental health trusts, enabling them to start their careers where there are more training opportunities and supervision. She also recommended more leadership training for doctors, who shared concerns about the lack of preparation for supervision duties, and better career development for PAs and AAs. She suggested a named doctor supervise each PA, while uniforms, lanyards, badges and staff information should be standardised to 'distinguish physician assistants from doctors'. Dr Tom Dolphin, the chair of the British Medical Association, said the report 'laid bare the catastrophic failures in NHS leadership that have put patients at serious risk of harm', but he argued the recommendations did not go far enough on national patient safety standards. 'Prof Leng has succeeded in exposing how NHS England introduced these roles and encouraged their expansion without any robust evidence of their safety,' he said. 'The report reveals inadequate national leadership, no accountability and no attempt to listen to the concerns raised by doctors, patients and coroners. 'The blurring of lines between doctors and non-doctors, aided and abetted by the GMC [General Medical Council], has been an unfolding disaster for all to see, and many doctors today will be relieved to see that they were right to raise the alarm,' Dolphin said. Dr Naru Narayanan, the president of the hospital doctors' union, the HSCA, said: 'Safety concerns will continue until a properly defined national scope is established. The review acknowledges this by calling for standardised job descriptions and clinical protocols. This work needs to be fast-tracked. 'Given how poorly these roles have been defined, and the fact physician assistants earn more after a couple of years of clinical training than resident doctors do after nearly a decade in medicine, it's not surprising there's been tension. We've got a shortage of medical training places and a limited supply of trainers. Additional support and time for senior doctors, as recommended by Prof Leng, are essential.'