Revealed: Number of migrants using NZ as a stepping stone to Australia
Between July 2023 and June 2025, more than 92,000 New Zealand citizens applied for Australian citizenship, its Department of Home Affairs said.
The figures raised questions about whether New Zealand had become a launch pad for migrants aiming to settle in Australia.
When Max Siqueira moved from Brazil to New Zealand in 2016, he had no firm plans.
He arrived on a visitor visa, but after landing a job, he stayed long enough to gain permanent residency and eventually became a New Zealand citizen last year.
ADVERTISEMENT
Soon after, his family went on holiday to Australia and liked it so much they decided to move there and now live on the Gold Coast.
The Gold Coast has sandy beaches, world-class surfing spots and lively entertainment precincts (Source: istock.com)
"It's really easy once you get the New Zealand passport," Siqueira said.
"I just bought a plane ticket. At the airport, I gave them my passport and said I was moving to Australia. They said 'Welcome, good luck' — that's it. The next day, I applied for a tax number and started working. It was that easy."
His case was not unique.
In 2024 alone, nearly 30,000 New Zealanders moved to Australia — the highest number in more than a decade.
Since July 2023, New Zealand citizens on a Special Category Visa (SCV) had been able to apply directly for Australian citizenship after four years of residence, without first needing to become permanent residents.
ADVERTISEMENT
Australia did not cap the number of SCVs issued, and nearly every New Zealand citizen was eligible for one on arrival.
While Siqueira believed most migrants came to New Zealand intending to settle, he agreed some planned to move on.
"It happens, but not as much as people might think. I know a few who had that plan from day one, go to New Zealand, then move to Australia once they get the passport.
Max Siqueira (second from right), during his New Zealand citizenship ceremony - he has now moved to Australia. (Source: rnz.co.nz)
"But most didn't plan that. They were happy in New Zealand and only thought about moving once they visited Australia or realised how easy it would be with the passport.
"I can't speak for all nationalities, but among Brazilians I know, the main reason people move to Australia is the weather. It reminds us of home," Siqueira said.
Stats NZ said since the early 2000s, migrants born outside of New Zealand have made up a growing share of New Zealand citizens moving across the Tasman.
ADVERTISEMENT
Of New Zealand citizens who migrated to Australia in 2024, 35% were foreign-born.
Data form the Department of Home Affairs showed, from July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2025, more than 92,000 New Zealand nationals who hold a Special Category Visa (SVC) applied for Australian citizenship.
Of these, 48% were born outside of New Zealand.
Emeritus Professor Richard Bedford, a population geographer, said while New Zealand had a net loss of citizens to Australia, it had also a considerable net gain of citizens from other countries during the same period.
"There's sometimes an assumption all the people going to Australia are highly skilled, and those coming here are not, but that's incorrect", he said.
"We bring in many highly skilled migrants, and it does help balance the overall flow."
The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including Hulk Hogan dies, sentencing for a New Zealander who assaulted two airline stewards, and a big accolade for Te Papa. (Source: 1News)
ADVERTISEMENT
But retaining that talent was a real challenge, he said.
"We need to take very seriously the factors that attract skilled migrants. It's not always about money, but money is a big one.
"We must ensure that highly skilled migrants we bring in get good jobs and are well paid. But we're a small country with a smaller economy, and we can't compete on everything.
"What we can offer is a good lifestyle, a welcoming environment, and a strong sense of community, things that also matter to many migrants."
Immigration rules were an important factor, he said.
"Many barriers to skilled employment in New Zealand come from our own professional associations, like medical or engineering boards.
"If we're not letting these skilled people work, we shouldn't be inviting them in the first place.
ADVERTISEMENT
"And once someone has residency, they have the same rights as anyone else. If they don't want to stay in the job they came for, or if they want to move to Australia, they have every right to do so.
Bedford, who had been working on migration issues since the 1960s, said it's too difficult to tell if more immigrants are using this country as a stepping stone across the Tasman.
He said the real challenge was making New Zealand a place people want to stay.
"Not just with good pay, but with access to housing, a welcoming culture, and opportunities. If we want migrants to commit to staying, we have to make it worth their while beyond just the job offer."
'The lights are still on' — population economist
Emeritus Professor Jacques Poot, a population economist at the University of Waikato, said New Zealand and Australia had long functioned as two closely linked labour markets, and New Zealand had typically come out on the losing side.
"Australia's economy is about five times bigger, and wages tend to be higher due to slightly greater productivity."
ADVERTISEMENT
Poot said it was unfair to assume migrants who left had always intended to do so.
"People migrate for all kinds of reasons. Some move on, some return home, and others stay. There's a lot of churn in modern labour markets. Migration today is often temporary."
Still, he said New Zealand should improve its ability to retain people who wanted to settle.
"We should revisit our pathways to residency. We need to make sure people who want to settle here have every opportunity to do so."
He also pointed to New Zealand's wage gap as a long-standing push factor.
Poot pointed to New Zealand's wage gap as a long-standing push factor. (Source: istock.com)
"Australia offers higher wages, and that's tied to their larger economy and more populous cities. Cities like Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane generate what we call 'agglomeration advantages', with more productivity, more opportunities, better pay."
ADVERTISEMENT
Even so, he said the narrative of a mass exodus from New Zealand was overstated.
"If you look at the numbers in proportion to our total population, the real exodus happened in the late 1970s, when we only had 3 million people. Now we have over 5 million. So while the numbers may look big, they're not records in relative terms.
"One of the things that struck me in 1979 was the big headline in two papers in Wellington: 'Last one to turn off the light.' Because they were really amazed about the out migration from New Zealand.
"Well, since then, we're still having the lights on in New Zealand, so I wouldn't worry too much about it."
rnz.co.nz
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
5 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Government responds to tariff shock as Labour accuses it of ‘major fail'
Finance Minister Nicola Willis and Trade Minister Todd McClay will respond to the Trump administration's decision to raise its proposed tariff on New Zealand. In April, US President Donald Trump announced proposed tariffs on America's trading partners including a 10% tariff on New Zealand. That base tariff has been increased to 15%. Other countries, like Australia and the United Kingdom have secured tariffs of 10%. McClay earlier told RNZ the higher rate could be because New Zealand has a trade surplus with the United States, meaning we export more than we import. He said the Government will try to push back on the higher rate. McClay and Willis are scheduled to speak on the matter at 4.15pm. However, Labour pointed the finger at the Government, with trade spokesman Damien O'Connor saying the episode was 'a major fail for the Government and for our relationship with the US'. 'Christopher Luxon has failed to secure a low tariff rate for our exports, while others around the world such as the EU and UK have managed to make a deal,' he said. 'Businesses will have to decide whether to pass the costs on to American customers, or weather those themselves. They may have to explore new markets. None of these options are good for business confidence here at home,' he said. Deputy Prime Minister and Act leader David Seymour said the tariffs were 'a choice' for the American Government. 'Our choice is to continue expanding to new markets with new trade deals,' he said. Seymour said New Zealand believes in free trade and would continue to advocate for low tariffs around the world. 'We can't control other countries' policy at the end of the day. We can seek new markets and new trade deals,' he said. Seymour would not say whether he believed the tariffs would be inflationary. 'There is so much going on in the world economy. One person's reckons are probably not worth the paper they're written on. There are things we can change, there are things we can't change. 'We can't change other countries' political choices, that's their right to make, what we can change is that this is a place that's good to build a business, things that people will beat a path to our door for, rather than us begging them to open theirs,' he said. Trade expert Stephen Jacobi said the tariff was unjustified at 10%. 'And it's now even more unjustified.' 'We impose very few tariffs on the United States. 'They have no major trade issues with us.' He said the impact of the revised tariff regime on New Zealand exports would depend on the individual sector. 'I think it's going to depend, of course, but there may be some water to flow under the bridge on this.' Today's statement from the White House said the Australian tariff would stay at 10%. 'Britain obviously is at 10%, but we don't really compete directly with them,' Jacobi said.
Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
NZ First Bill Legislates 'New Zealand' As Official Name Of Country In Law
Rt Hon Winston Peters Leader of New Zealand First New Zealand First has today introduced a Member's Bill that seeks to state in law that 'New Zealand' is the official geographic name of our country. 'Over the past few years, we have had a bunch of unelected bureaucrats, officials, government departments, and politicians trying to change our country's name by stealth - with no permission or consent from the people' says Rt Hon Winston Peters Leader of New Zealand First. The 'New Zealand (Name of State) Bill' confirms that 'New Zealand' is our country's official name, and it is only parliament and the people, not bureaucrats, government departments, or officials, that have the authority to make decisions about the name of the country. 'The vast majority of New Zealanders are shocked at this insidious creep of misguided and misinformed cultural history of the name 'Aotearoa'.' 'Any true historian or cultural expert would know that it was never the original Māori name for New Zealand – and we should not allow it to be misused for cultural virtue signalling.' 'Colonialist William Pember Reeves incorrectly used 'Aotearoa' in the late nineteenth century, now the cultural hand-wringers have embraced his mindset.' 'Don't force the South Island's iwi Ngāi Tahu to use 'Aotearoa'. In 2021, Ngāi Tahu said the history of the name 'Aotearoa' originally referred solely to the North Island.' Putting the name 'New Zealand' in law will also provide constitutional clarity and legal certainty. 'The name 'New Zealand' is recognised around the world as the name of our country, and any uncertainty about that risks our global economic markets and political identity that we have built, and spent billions of dollars promoting, over many decades' says Mr Peters. 'Our country's name is New Zealand and should not change unless the people of our country decide to change it.'
NZ Herald
4 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Making ‘New Zealand' country's official name added to NZ First's ever-changing list of bills
'Inconsistency in recent years in the way public agencies and officials describe the country – including partial or informal use of other names has created uncertainty regarding the legal foundation for making those choices.' Winston Peters has been frustrated lately by the use of "Aotearoa" in Parliament. Photo / Mark Mitchell It's the eighth Member's Bill the party has announced this year, but due to the rules of Parliament, NZ First is only able to have four in the ballot at any one time. Only MPs who aren't ministers – NZ First has four backbenchers – can have Member's Bills and they can only have one in the ballot at a time. This has meant the party has had to shuffle out several of the bills it has previously announced, but which remain on NZ First's website as 'Our Member's Bills'. For example, the 'Conscience Acts Referendums Bill', which was revealed in March to remove conscience votes in Parliament and instead require some particular legislation to go to a national public referendum, no longer appears on Parliament's website. It was previously held in the name of NZ First MP Jamie Arbuckle. But he now has a bill protecting New Zealanders' right to use physical currency. Other bills to pulled out recently include a bill to have a binding referendum when deciding whether to add fluoride to drinking water, one to remove diversity, equity and inclusion aspects from the public service, and another to improve access to palliative care. In some instances, the bills have been overtaken by events. For example, the Government's Public Service Amendment Bill, which this week passed its first reading, intends to remove diversity provisions. When the party announced a Member's Bill to clarify the definition of a woman and man in law, it removed another bill that would fine people who use a single-sex toilet not matching their own sex. Peters said the new proposal addressed the issue more comprehensively. The party says if it could have all of its bills in the ballot at once, it would. Those not currently in the ballot, but which have been announced, remain current policy and could be returned. MP Andy Foster has had a number of bills under his name. Photo / Mike Scott The party's MP Andy Foster has been the sponsor of many of the bills, before they have then either been picked from the ballot, transferred to another MP or removed. For example, earlier this year, his bill to stop banks withdrawing services from clients for 'woke' reasons was picked from the ballot and began going through the parliamentary process. This meant he could add another to the ballot, which ended up being the bill to remove diversity elements from law. Eventually, however, this was dropped and he picked up another requiring government buildings to only display the official flag of New Zealand. But after the resignation of NZ First's Tanya Unkovich, this bill was transferred from Foster to new MP Dr David Wilson. Foster now has the bill about the country's name. The four bills currently in the ballot for NZ First are: Legislation (Definitions of Woman and Man) Amendment Bill – Jenny Marcroft Cash Transactions Protection Bill – Jamie Arbuckle Display of Flags (Government Premises) Bill – Dr David Wilson New Zealand (Name of State) Bill – Andy Foster. NZ First MPs in Parliament. Photo / Mark Mitchell The newest bill comes after several showdowns between Peters and Parliament's Speaker Gerry Brownlee over the use of 'Aotearoa' in Parliament. Peters has bristled when other MPs have used it in questions. In March, Brownlee ruled 'Aotearoa' was 'regularly used' as a name for the country including by the country's geographic board. He noted it appeared on the country's passport and currency, and Parliament's rules allowed MPs to use English, te reo Māori or sign language. Peters subsequently told the Herald that Brownlee was 'wrong' as the matter had 'never gone to the people of this country'. The NZ First leader raised the issue again last week, leading Brownlee to reiterate his previous comments. Brownlee said: 'In his time serving New Zealand, in the capacity as Minister of Foreign Affairs, he would've, over some five years or more, presented the New Zealand passport at various passport stations around the world and never had questioned the fact that our passport has the word Aotearoa on the front of it. 'It was always a New Zealand passport despite the use of that word. That is the end of the matter.' Following that, Minister for Internal Affairs Brooke van Velden confirmed the New Zealand passport would eventually be updated to have English appear before the te reo Māori text. In a release on Friday morning, Peters said 'a bunch of unelected bureaucrats, officials, government departments and politicians trying to change our country's name by stealth – with no permission or consent from the people'. 'The 'New Zealand (Name of State) Bill' confirms that 'New Zealand' is our country's official name, and it is only parliament and the people, not bureaucrats, government departments, or officials, that have the authority to make decisions about the name of the country.' NZ First's coalition agreement with National includes a commitment about not changing the country's name. 'Commit that in the absence of a referendum, our Government will not change the official name of New Zealand.' Jamie Ensor is a political reporter in the NZ Herald press gallery team based at Parliament. He was previously a TV reporter and digital producer in the Newshub press gallery office. In 2025, he was a finalist for Political Journalist of the Year at the Voyager Media Awards.
