Chhattisgarh reluctant to hand over Maoist leader Kesava's body, say family members
SRIKAKULAM: Suspense continues as the government has yet to hand over the body of slain top Maoist leader Namballa Kesava Rao to his family, who are eager to perform the last rites.
The Maoist general secretary was killed in an encounter in Narayanpur Chhattisgarh on May 21.
Following the encounter, family members, particularly his two brothers, Dhilleswara Rao and Ram Prasad, initiated efforts to bring his mortal remains back to his native village from Chhattisgarh to conduct the last rites according to their customs.
'We have been trying to retrieve Kesava Rao's body and met the senior police officials in both Narayanpur and Srikakulam district in this regard. However, they denied our request, saying it is a policy matter of the government,' Kesava Rao's elder brother, N Dhilleswara Rao, told TNIE.
N'pur police dilly-dallying even after HC order: Family
'We approached the AP High Court on Friday, and the court issued an order in our favour. My other brother, Ram Prasad, along with some relatives, went to Narayanpur and presented a copy of the High Court's order to the authorities. Still, there has been no positive response from the police,' he added.
Ram Prasad said, 'We've been waiting here for the past three days after submitting our Aadhaar cards to the Narayanpur police to confirm our identity. Yet, they continue to send us back and forth between the district hospital and the police authorities, without any clear assurance of handing over the body. Interestingly, the police officials are now asking us to provide a recent family photograph with Kesava Rao. This is impossible as he had joined the Maoist movement nearly five decades ago. How can we produce a recent photo with him?'
Meanwhile, Dhilleswara Rao is planning to file another petition before the HC on Monday, seeking implementation of the earlier order. Advocates associated with Left parties are also reportedly considering approaching the Supreme Court by filing a special leave petition.
Various Left party organizations have decided to meet the Srikakulam SP on Monday, according to information received by this newspaper.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Vishalgad Urs not held, yet 1,300 devotees went to fort for prayers at dargah
Kolhapur: Around 1,300 devotees visited Vishalgad to offer prayers at Hazrat Peer Malik Rehan's shrine on Sunday. The traditional four-day Urs, scheduled to begin on Sunday, was cancelled following restrictions by the state archaeology department. The Bakrid qurbani proceeded according to Bombay high court guidelines. While the Urs typically draws thousands of attendees, recent campaigns by right-wing organisations against encroachments have led to reduced attendance. The previous year's event was marred by violence over encroachment issues. The animal sacrifice ritual was conducted under strict protocols, requiring enclosed private premises. The area was surrounded by metal sheets to ensure compliance. Devotees from various regions queued early to climb to the fort, presenting identification such as Aadhaar cards for registration. The administration limited visits between 9am and 5pm, prohibiting overnight stays. All 1,300 registered visitors completed their darshan/prayers within the stipulated time. Sub-divisional officer Sameer Shingate, of the Pannala division, said: "Everyone left the fort before 5pm. Police bandobast and scrutiny will remain in place for three more days." Although the dargah trust officials proposed a modest Urs celebration, authorities implemented a complete prohibition. Kolhapur's superintendent of police Yogeshkumar Gupta said the administration has challenged the HC ruling permitting animal sacrifice at the fort in the Supreme Court. Right-wing groups opposed the HC decision, demanding the prohibition of both Urs and animal sacrifice at the historic 11th-century fort. These groups celebrated the administration's decision to ban the Urs as their success. Kolhapur: Around 1,300 devotees visited Vishalgad to offer prayers at Hazrat Peer Malik Rehan's shrine on Sunday. The traditional four-day Urs, scheduled to begin on Sunday, was cancelled following restrictions by the state archaeology department. The Bakrid qurbani proceeded according to Bombay high court guidelines. While the Urs typically draws thousands of attendees, recent campaigns by right-wing organisations against encroachments have led to reduced attendance. The previous year's event was marred by violence over encroachment issues. The animal sacrifice ritual was conducted under strict protocols, requiring enclosed private premises. The area was surrounded by metal sheets to ensure compliance. Devotees from various regions queued early to climb to the fort, presenting identification such as Aadhaar cards for registration. The administration limited visits between 9am and 5pm, prohibiting overnight stays. All 1,300 registered visitors completed their darshan/prayers within the stipulated time. Sub-divisional officer Sameer Shingate, of the Pannala division, said: "Everyone left the fort before 5pm. Police bandobast and scrutiny will remain in place for three more days." Although the dargah trust officials proposed a modest Urs celebration, authorities implemented a complete prohibition. Kolhapur's superintendent of police Yogeshkumar Gupta said the administration has challenged the HC ruling permitting animal sacrifice at the fort in the Supreme Court. Right-wing groups opposed the HC decision, demanding the prohibition of both Urs and animal sacrifice at the historic 11th-century fort. These groups celebrated the administration's decision to ban the Urs as their success.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Confusion over Shakti scheme creates a rift between female passengers and bus staff
Belagavi: A woman started shouting at the conductor in a Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) bus, travelling from Belagavi to Ratnagiri recently, after he asked her to pay for her ticket. She refused to pay, claiming that she was entitled to free travel under the state govt's Shakti yojane. The incident took place after the bus moved around 10 km from the Belagavi Central Bus Stand. The woman, who intended to travel to Nippani—a town near the Karnataka-Maharashtra border—presented her Aadhaar card to claim the scheme's benefit. However, the conductor informed her that the Shakti scheme does not apply to interstate routes extending more than 20 km into neighbouring states. Upset over this, the woman questioned him why this wasn't communicated to her before boarding the bus. This isn't an isolated incident. Thousands of women commuting in border areas face similar confusion. A majority of people aren't aware that some of the interstate buses are ineligible for the govt scheme. Moreover, there is no signage indicating that the Shakti scheme doesn't apply to the bus. The absence of a clear identification system for eligible buses and the lack of prior intimation have led to recurring disputes and inconveniences, especially in regions like Belagavi, where interstate travel is frequent. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trading CFD dengan Teknologi dan Kecepatan Lebih Baik IC Markets Mendaftar Undo This has been creating a lot of confusion and outrage among passengers, as conductors ask them to pay for tickets halfway through the journey. Unaware of the issue, many women who board the bus with less money or no money face big trouble. Introduced in 2023, the Shakti scheme allows women to travel free of cost in non-premium govt buses within the state. However, the scheme explicitly excludes interstate services covering distances beyond 20 km outside Karnataka. Speaking to the TOI, KSRTC Belagavi divisional controller Rajesh Huddar confirmed the policy constraints. "Shakti scheme does not apply to long-route interstate buses, including those headed to Pune, Mumbai, Ratnagiri, Nasik etc. We have around 25 such buses travelling to neighbouring Maharashtra and Telangana. Unfortunately, there is no established mechanism to alert passengers in advance," he said. Admitting the growing seriousness of the issue, Huddar said KSRTC is considering measures to avoid such confusion in the future. Meanwhile, women passengers from border districts continue to demand a transparent and passenger-friendly mechanism to identify scheme-eligible buses. "The matter is being taken seriously. We're exploring options to improve visibility and clarity around eligible routes," the officer said.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
HC: Only civil courts can try land ownership or title disputes
1 2 Cuttack: In a significant ruling, the Orissa high court has held that revenue authorities cannot adjudicate disputes involving ownership or title to land, emphasising that such matters fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of civil courts. The vacation bench of Justice S K Panigrahi issued the order on May 30, setting aside an eviction order passed by the tehsildar of Dhamnagar under the Orissa Prevention of Land Encroachment (OPLE) Act, 1972. The case pertains to Dinabandhu Behera, who challenged the eviction proceedings initiated against him on the grounds that the state had erroneously recorded the disputed land in its name during the hal settlement. Behera claimed that his father had legally come into possession of the property after an 'ekpadia' (a written recognition) was issued by the ex-intermediary post-estate abolition. His father's name was subsequently recorded in the tenant ledger and rent was regularly paid to the govt. Upon his death, Behera came into possession of the land. But, despite these records, the tehsildar initiated eviction proceedings treating Behera as an encroacher. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Walgreens Keeps Quiet About This '9 Pills for $7' Generic Cialis Deal Friday Plans Get Offer Undo The sub-collector and collector of Bhadrak later upheld the eviction order. The HC, while setting aside all these orders, stated that the existence of a bona fide dispute over ownership and title renders summary eviction proceedings under the OPLE Act is inappropriate. "The revenue authorities, who conduct summary procedures, are not competent to adjudicate such complex disputes of title," Justice Panigrahi observed. The court further noted that Behera had already approached the civil judge, junior division, Dhamnagar, seeking declaration of his right, title and interest in the suit land. He had also prayed for a declaration that the encroachment proceedings were unsustainable, given the pending civil suit. Reaffirming the supremacy of civil courts in deciding title-related matters, the court ruled that "summary proceedings by revenue authorities cannot constitute the proper forum for adjudication where a bona fide dispute exists over title".
