GitHub CEO Thomas Dohmke to Step Down, Microsoft Will Not Directly Replace Role: Report
GitHub CEO Thomas Dohmke is stepping down to pursue new ventures, as Microsoft folds the platform deeper into its AI strategy.
GitHub CEO Thomas Dohmke Monday announced he will step down from the developer platform, with Microsoft deciding not to directly replace the position, according to a report by Axios.
Dohmke, who took over as CEO in 2021, told employees in an email that he is leaving to pursue 'entrepreneurial endeavors", according to the outlet.
Microsoft, which acquired GitHub in 2018, will now restructure the leadership of the platform.
In a separate memo to staff, Microsoft CoreAI head Jay Parikh said GitHub leadership will report to multiple Microsoft executives under the new structure.
Microsoft developer division president Julia Liuson will oversee GitHub's revenue, engineering and support, while chief product officer Mario Rodriguez will report to Microsoft AI platform vice president Asha Sharma, Axios said.
GitHub, which has largely operated independently since the acquisition, has become a key part of Microsoft's push to attract developers to its Windows and Azure ecosystems, as well as its growing suite of AI-powered tools.
What Does GitHub do?
GitHub is a global developer platform that simplifies version control using Git, while offering tools like issue tracking, pull requests, wikis and integrated IDEs such as Codespaces. It fuels collaboration across teams and open-source projects, hosts tens of millions of repositories, and integrates CI/CD workflows with GitHub Actions.
As one Redditor on r/learnprogramming put it, GitHub makes everyday software work smoother—think cloud-based project development, secure backups, and easy collaboration, even from your phone—so building software feels a lot more accessible and efficient.
view comments
First Published:
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Bill Gates decodes the toughest interview question professionals face: ‘Why should we hire you?'
Even the world's most accomplished entrepreneurs confront the same questions that many job seekers find daunting. Billionaire philanthropist and Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates may never need to participate in a formal job interview, yet in a 2020 conversation for NBA star Stephen Curry's YouTube series State of Inspiration , Gates role-played as a young software engineer — a college dropout preparing for his first professional position at Microsoft. This exercise was more than a performance; it offered both graduates and early-career professionals rare insights into how to approach classic interview questions with clarity, strategic thinking, and confidence. The question every candidate fears Among the questions Gates addressed, none carried greater weight than: 'Why should we hire you?' In responding, he emphasized not only his technical skills but also his collaborative potential. He stated, 'You should look at the codes that I've written. I write software programs far beyond any classes that I've taken. I think I've improved over time, so take a look at how ambitious I've been.' The message was clear: Recruiters evaluate more than raw competence. They seek professionals who demonstrate initiative, a commitment to continuous learning, and measurable achievements. Gates reinforced this perspective by highlighting his ability to work in a team and his adaptability. 'I do think I can work well with people. I might criticise their code a little harshly, but overall, I like to be on a team. I like ambitious goals. I like thinking through how we can anticipate the future. Software is fascinating, and I want to be involved,' he explained. Honesty as a professional asset Another important lesson emerged when Gates discussed weaknesses. When asked to reflect on areas for improvement, he candidly admitted, 'I'm not a natural at sales or marketing; I would rather focus on product creation and definition.' This transparency underscores a timeless principle: Self-awareness and honesty can strengthen a candidate's profile, provided it is paired with a clear articulation of the value one brings to an organization. Employers today seek professionals who can identify gaps in their skills, pursue growth opportunities, and communicate effectively without exaggerating or underselling their capabilities. Approaching compensation conversations strategically Discussions about compensation often intimidate applicants, yet Gates approached the topic with thoughtfulness. He stated, 'I hope the option package is good. I'm able to take a risk, and I think the company has a great future, so I prefer to receive stock options even more than cash compensation.' By prioritizing equity over immediate cash, Gates conveyed confidence in the company's trajectory and positioned himself as a long-term contributor. For professionals in 2025, understanding how to balance compensation expectations with company vision and personal growth opportunities remains a critical negotiation skill. Lessons for job seekers in 2025 Stephen Curry summarized the broader takeaway succinctly: Gates' mock interview responses reveal a framework for presenting oneself with confidence, curiosity, and strategic foresight. Modern recruiters evaluate more than technical ability; they also assess teamwork, honesty, adaptability, and negotiation skills. Whether pursuing careers in coding, product strategy, or design, professionals who combine technical competence with foresight and integrity stand out. Gates' approach demonstrates a principle that transcends time and industry: The most compelling candidates are those who couple talent with ambition, ethical professionalism, and the ability to contribute meaningfully to a team's collective objectives. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
India Today
5 hours ago
- India Today
AI engineer Varun Gupta, an IIT grad, gets probation and $34,000 fine for leaking Intel secrets to Microsoft
An ex-Intel engineer who stole 'thousands of files' from his former employer has escaped prison but won't escape the headlines. Varun Gupta, who left the chip giant in early 2020 to join Microsoft, has been handed two years' probation and a fine of $34,472 (around Rs 30,21,510) for lifting confidential documents, data that prosecutors say helped him secure his new role and gave Microsoft an edge in high-stakes negotiations with to Oregon Live, Gupta spent his final days at Intel quietly copying sensitive information from company systems. Among the material he walked away with was a PowerPoint presentation that outlined Intel's pricing strategies for a major client, the kind of playbook most rivals could only dream of report highlighted that Gupta had worked at Intel for a decade, serving as a product marketing engineer, before leaving in January 2020. Just days later, he was in the ranks at Microsoft. Court documents revealed that the files he took were 'instrumental' both to landing his new post and in later discussions between the two tech titans. Assistant US Attorney William Narus, who prosecuted the case, argued that Gupta's behaviour was deliberate and repeated. He urged the judge to impose eight months in federal prison, stressing that Gupta had 'purposefully and repetitively accessed secret documents' in order to bolster his defence painted a different picture. Gupta's lawyer, David Angeli, admitted the theft was a 'serious error in judgment' but insisted his client had already paid a heavy price. Gupta has lost the kind of senior industry roles he once held, and he previously settled a civil lawsuit with Intel to the tune of $40, Angeli argued, was punishment the end, US District Judge Amy Baggio settled somewhere in the middle. While refusing to send Gupta to prison, she did not let him off lightly. The $34,472 fine wasn't plucked out of thin air, it was calculated to reflect the cost of the eight months of federal imprisonment that prosecutors had pushed explained that this unusual figure underscored the seriousness of Gupta's misconduct, signalling that the court did not see it as a 'one-off indiscretion.' But she also noted that Gupta's reputation had already been dragged through the mud, which she considered punishment in its own the case now behind him, Gupta is turning his back on the world of semiconductors. Having paid his fine in full, he has relocated with his family to France, where life looks very different. Instead of battling over chips and contracts, he's swapping servers for say Gupta is currently studying vineyard management and plans to reinvent himself in the wine industry. His ambition? To become a technical director in viticulture.- EndsMust Watch
India Today
6 hours ago
- India Today
Who moved my job
Ankit Das (name changed), an employee with a top IT firm in Bengaluru, is losing sleep. In his 30s, he had recently moved his family to the city. He had spent four and a half years at the firm, working on the same project. He had been getting a satisfactory 'C' band at employee evaluations, and his Work From Office index, which tracks an employee's adherence to the company's mandated office attendance policy, was '100 per cent'. But suddenly, without explanation, he has been 'benched' (i.e. not on any project) and put on a 'fluidity list'—if your name appears on this list, you will likely be subject to layoff or restructuring. 'Initially, my project manager told me I am getting released from the project due to cost-cutting, but he told my delivery manager that my performance is not good,' Das said in a Facebook post on August 12. 'It's been 12 days in bench, not getting calls on domain (Linux, VMware, AWS, Ansible, GIT etc),' he says, fearful of his company's new 35-day bench policy after which one could face the axe.
