Why This Artist Isn't Afraid of AI's Role in the Future of Art
Miami-based Panamanian photographer Dahlia Dreszer stands out as an optimist and believer in AI's powers. She likens AI's use in art to the act of painting or drawing—simply another medium that can unlock creative potential and an artistic vision that may have never been realized without it. Using generative AI models like Stable Diffusion, 3.5, Midjourney, Adobe, Firefly, and Nova, Dreszer trained an AI image generator on her style for over a year, instructing it to produce artwork with her sensibilities, with one piece in her current exhibition produced entirely by AI.
Entitled 'Bringing the Outside In,' Dreszer calls the show a 'living organism.' (It is on display until May 17, 2025 at Green Space Miami.) Her vivid, maximalist still lifes depict layered familial heirlooms, Judaica, flowers, and textiles made by Panamanian indigenous women. Attendees can interact with an AI image generator in the exhibition to produce their own artworks in Dreszer's style, telling the machine in a sentence or two what they want it to produce, and in seconds, an artwork is created. Also as part of the show, Dreszer programmed an AI-generated clone of herself, which looks and speaks like her, to guide visitors via video chat through the space.
This interview has been lightly edited for length and clarity.
TIME: Take me back to the first moment you realized AI could enhance your art. What about AI drew you in? What did you feel?
Dreszer: I believe technology is here to supercharge us. When generative AI entered the mainstream, I knew I wanted to get my hands dirty right away. I was already in the world of NFTs, but this was a different conversation. It took over a year of experimentation and dialogue with image generators to feel comfortable finally creating a piece to include in a body of work.
This exhibition includes one piece I made in collaboration with AI. I personalized an AI image model on what the exhibition means, feels like, and looks like, feeding it images embodying my style. I included the Florida Everglades in the foreground, reflecting the landscape where I'm living today. I'm not only interested in AI and art, but also in adding nature to that conversation. I've hung flowers on top of this piece that fall onto the frame or the ground when they die, allowing nature to do its thing. I have not intervened physically. I believe nature, art and technology can coexist nicely.
I actually thought that all the pieces in your exhibition were produced by AI.
That's also the intention, right, because they are not. I'm always trying to play with the viewers, to disorient, because everything is not what you see at first glance. There's no artificial enhancements in most of these works, but just the fact that you think there are—I find that narrative interesting.
What inspired you to create a clone for this exhibition?
My clone is so fun. I'm trying to pose questions to the community as they engage with these works: Moving forward, what does it mean for relationships when we're speaking to a machine as if it was a human, and we cannot know the difference? What is our role as humans if we have clones that can mimic what we do? I want to see how that dialogue evolves. There's a practicality as well. The clone guides you through the show, probably better than I can. It's trained on what I know, but as a machine, it's supercharged.
Why did you include your clone?
I wanted to have an AI version of myself to guide viewers and answer questions, to educate others in order to demystify AI. Through the clone, I can humanize the technology, 'the art of the possible,' of incorporating technology into artistic workflows.
Will you keep your clone after the exhibition? Will you educate it about other parts of yourself?
I'm very interested in continuing the relationship with her. I'm working through ideas and ways to train her. I haven't shared it yet, but there are different personas of the clone. I'll be fine tuning and creating different versions based on the relationship I want her to have with the audience she's engaging with.
Some critics would call the use of AI in art 'cheating.' What do you say to those critics?
I'd love to have a conversation to understand how that opinion was formed. I'd encourage them to see it as a collaboration. Many people don't understand the process and the time it takes.
I would invite critics to dive deeper, and think about it not just as: 'I put in a prompt, it makes art, then I'm done.' It's a long process.But this relationship between technology and the arts is not new. We've had disruptions in art through technology before. This is just more aggressive, intrusive, and rapid in its speed and pace of innovation.
What specific challenges have you faced so far using AI in your art?
Oftentimes the outputs are not what I wanted. As an artist, I have high expectations. I like to control the visualization so it's highly stylized, curated, and composed. With AI, that control goes away, because AI has its own intelligence and creativity, no matter how good the prompt is. It's a hard and frustrating yet also enlightening process; it may not create what you wanted, but it can make something you didn't know you wanted. Then there's technical things it doesn't know how to do, but eventually will. It's not great with certain renders or visualizations.
What scares and excites you about where AI is headed for the next generation of artists?
I'm mostly excited because of the rapid pace. Updates to generative AI software happen in a matter of weeks. There's also a healthy competition in the market, which means that as users, our needs are being satisfied quicker than ever. Our feedback is being incorporated and the tools are changing.
You asked about fears. AI is entering our workflows and industries in one way or another. Will we accept it? Deny it? Who will fall behind, and who will be at the forefront? I'm more excited than fearful, but I see why others may be fearful. It disrupts our workflows, and if we're not ready to change or learn new skills, it can be scary.
Will collaboration with AI replace collaboration between artists?
No, no, no. There are many examples of how me and several artists have collaborated with AI. One artist came to me with her artistic vision and her words, and I used my prompt engineering skills and knowledge of AI systems, and together, we created an AI piece that was her vision come to life—this beautiful red textile tree that had a huge trunk.
As an artist, there is a journey one goes through when creating. When you use AI, does it still allow you to access this other-worldly experience of the creative process?
There's definitely parts of the creative process that AI is not inclusive of. So for example, when I'm making AI art, I'm not painting, or getting my hands dirty. There's physicalities that are not included in that journey. But I think that's similar to any medium. So let's say I'm choosing to use my camera as my tool and not a paint brush. There's also experiences that are missed out through my photographic artistic process, that if I were using a paintbrush or another tool, would be a different journey. So that's why I see generative AI art as its own medium, and each medium comes with its own journeys and processes that are exclusive to that medium, right?
Do you see the term 'post-human' as an accurate way to reflect this era we are entering in art?
I would divert a bit from 'post-human.' I see AI more as a booster, not a replacer, but an accelerator and an enabler. So, if 'post-human' means it's a replacement, then I would lean in more to the perspective of AI as a turbo supercharger that us humans can carry with us to bolt forward. I think it could replace mundane tasks that we may not want to do. And that's where the beauty of the collaboration comes in, where we give it these tasks so our human brains reach our fullest potential, because then the low value tasks we can outsource into generative AI.
How do you think historians will look back on this particular era of rapid expansion with AI?
We are in the foundation era. Everyone knows what ChatGPT is. We've passed the point of inflection, and now we're at a point where industries, individuals, businesses, and creatives are finding their place in AI. How are we adapting–or not–to it? Time is of the essence. What we decide to do now, literally today, versus in a week or two, or three, or in a month, will define the next five to 10 years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
7 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
AI-Powered Solar Installation Support
Temecula-based Freedom Forever, a leading residential solar installation company, has launched Raya, a groundbreaking AI tool that revolutionizes project support and pipeline management. Built on Lightspeed, Freedom Forever's proprietary CRM and operational engine, Raya delivers real-time intelligence, automated issue resolution and 24/7 phone support to sales partners nationwide. This breakthrough technology marks a major leap forward in operational efficiency, customer satisfaction and industry innovation. By tapping into Lightspeed's expansive data infrastructure and integrated sales resource center, Raya delivers real-time project updates, actionable insights and instant ticket resolution. The AI tool intelligently navigates complex workflows and information systems to provide sales partners with 24/7 access to critical project details. Raya is built to ensure sales reps can address inquiries and access critical information instantaneously, streamlining the solar installation process and enhancing customer satisfaction.
Chicago Tribune
7 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
New sensors are designed to predict flooding in Chicago
As the rain came down in sheets one summer afternoon late last month, Thomas Baranowski was sitting on the back porch of his Garfield Ridge home when his wife, Rose, stepped outside. ''Oh come on, you've got to see this,'' she told him. He followed her down the steep stairwell to their basement, where water was spewing out of their flood drain 'just like a geyser,' Baranowski, 79, recalled. Though he and Rose, 80, are lifelong Chicagoans and no strangers to urban flooding, they didn't see the deluge coming — or the thousands of dollars in water damage that followed. But what if they had been given a heads-up the rain would hit their block so hard? A new initiative recently launched in Chicago is striving to do just that. Verizon, in conjunction with Chicago's Center for Neighborhood Technology and a Michigan-based startup, is equipping the city with technology that will give officials and residents alike the ability to track urban flooding in real time. The venture, project partners say, could eventually help Chicago better respond to and mitigate the impact of flash floods — especially in areas that have historically faced the brunt of torrential rain — as human-made climate change intensifies storms in the Midwest and places pressure on the city's outdated sewer system. At the core of the initiative are wireless floodwater sensors that, using sonar technology, can calculate the depth of nearby water in seconds. The idea is to deploy a network of these sensors citywide, which together will be able to track when and where water levels are rising during a storm. To date, 10 sensors have been installed from South Deering on the Far South Side to Austin on the West Side, with 40 more due for installation over coming months. This marks only the second time in the United States that technology of this kind has been deployed on a citywide scale. The sensors are the product of Hyfi, an Ann Arbor company launched five years ago by University of Michigan engineering professor Branko Kerkez and his former doctoral student, Brandon Wong, after the pair sought to devise a technological solution to changing climate conditions, according to Wong, now CEO of the startup. From California, Wong grew up around weather extremes, from droughts and flooding to wildfires, he said, noting he still remembers days when he'd wake up to 'ash raining' from a bright orange sky. But it wasn't until he moved out to Michigan for graduate school 12 years ago and shortly after saw historic flooding kill two people and cause millions of dollars of damage in Detroit that Wong knew he wanted to find a way to temper the impact of climate disasters. Hyfi sensors can detect how high floodwaters are rising within a 30-foot radius by generating a continuous, nearly inaudible sound wave pulse on the water's surface. To detect urban flooding, sensors are placed in low-lying areas, along viaducts and under manhole covers to see where water is pooling first or backing up, down to a city's pipes. Data the sensors collect is reported to a central server, which Hyfi then visualizes in a map of real-time flood conditions. The technology is making its Chicago debut as part of a larger effort by Verizon, using Hyfi's sensor platform, to improve flood response and stormwater management systems across the country. The initiative first rolled out in New Orleans last summer and is due to launch in Detroit over the next year, according to Donna Epps, chief responsible business officer at Verizon. For now, as sensors are piloted in Chicago, water level readings won't be widely available quite yet, Wong said, but the goal is to have data live on a public-facing platform that residents can access. Wong pointed to New Orleans, where, after an initial citywide installation of 27 Hyfi sensors, the city integrated the data into its own public alert system. The sensors could give communities and first responders a warning that flooding is imminent up to an hour before it hits, Wong says. That advance notice, Wong said, could be indispensable to local residents fearful of flood damage in their homes and for avoiding streets prone to flooding. Almost every time it's rained this year, Emmanuel Garcia has noticed that water pools on the streets and sidewalks around Belmont Cragin, where the 17-year-old has lived his entire life, he said. His family has had to stay in their apartment during storms for fear of encountering dangerous roadway conditions or having their basement flood, Garcia said. Jean Flisk, 58, who grew up in Canaryville but now lives on the Southwest Side, said she 'rain preps' her basement, which frequently floods during storms. 'If they say there's a flood warning or the rain is going to be really bad, I have to go and move everything in the basement … just in case,' she said. 'It's aggravating, it's a pain. I don't know if there's something to do.' There is, Hyfi and Verizon hope. Beyond proactively reporting floods, the project's partners imagine that over time, data can help inform long-term resilience planning, they say, particularly in areas of the city that have habitually been vulnerable to significant flooding. Hyfi and Verizon are also collaborating with the Center for Neighborhood Technology, a Chicago-based urban research group, to host community meetings where residents can give their input on where and how they'd like to see sensors used. So far, the group has hosted meetings in Chatham and Belmont Cragin, two neighborhoods troubled with chronic flooding, with several more planned for this year. The meetings were held in tandem with local organizations, including the Greater Chatham Initiative on the South Side and the Grassroots Empowerment Mission and North River Commission on the Northwest Side. With these meetings and the venture overall, the broader goal is to chart a path forward where 'we systemically even stop the flooding from happening,' Center for Neighborhood Technology CEO Nina Idemudia said. 'How do we work on improving the drainage system, improving where we make capital improvements in order to make sure the water is draining?' Sensors won't reveal new insights into which parts of Chicago are hit hardest by flooding, Idemudia said, but it could draw awareness to a long-standing need. She pointed to a 2019 study by the center that found urban flooding in Chicago disproportionately affects communities of color. 'Data is another way of accountability, right?' Idemudia said. 'It's one way to say you can't deny our current circumstances or our lived experience anymore. Here's the hard data. We're going to hold you to making changes until the outlook and impact of this data changes.' Following recent rainfall, the lived impact of urban flooding has been in full view. Since Wednesday, representatives from Chicago's Office of Emergency Management and Communications, alongside the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Small Business Administration and the Illinois Emergency Management Agency and Office of Homeland Security, have been going door to door assessing homes for damage from storms and subsequent flooding that swept through the city last month. These assessments follow disaster proclamations both Mayor Brandon Johnson and Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle issued on Aug. 6 to assist residents in recovering from the July storms. They will help determine if and how much government assistance residents will qualify for, according to OEMC Emergency Services Manager Kaila Lariviere. Assessment teams have been directing their efforts based on a survey released a few weeks ago that gave residents the chance to self-report if they had been affected by the storms. Some 2,900 Cook County and Chicago residents reported damages, Lariviere said. Last Thursday, assessment teams spent the morning walking through Garfield Ridge on the Southwest Side. One of the surveyed homes belonged to Larry Anguiano, a husband and father whose basement flooded entirely in last month's storms, forcing his family to replace rugs, carpets and furniture in their home of the past five years, he told the Tribune. 'It was extremely quick,' he said, adding that since, he's been wary of it happening all over again. 'If there's that type of rain and you see it fill up in the streets, (you think), 'Oh no.'' The Baranowskis, who were also visited by damage assessment teams last week, echoed the sentiment. The past few weeks have been 'backbreaking' work to replace the walls and flooring of their flooded basement, Hope Baranowski said. The couple plans to install a flood control system because 'we can't have this happen again,' Thomas added. When Chicago received from 1.5 to 4.5 inches of rainfall across the city last week, according to the National Weather Service, the Baranowskis waited anxiously for the storms to pass. 'I was scared to death,' Hope Baranowski recalled.
Time Magazine
7 hours ago
- Time Magazine
Taylor Swift's Album Release is Quintessential Swiftynomics
On Aug. 12, Taylor Swift announced her 12th original studio album, The Life of a Showgirl and a sparkly orange era on her website. This news spread like a ray of golden sunshine, cutting through some bleak headlines for women. The Bureau of Labor Statistics lost its female leader because President Donald Trump did not like the published jobs numbers. And as TIME reported, this labor market data also revealed that women are leaving the labor market in droves The next day on New Heights, Jason and Travis Kelce's podcast, Taylor complimented Travis' sweatshirt. 'Thanks, sweetie, it's the color of your eyes,' responded Travis, sending Swifties into a tailspin. Finally, Swift revealed more details. Her album will be released on Oct. 3 and she shared its artwork and tracklist. The announcement is not just a reflection of modern American gender dynamics, but a masterclass in modern advertising. Read More: Everything We Know So Far About Taylor Swift's 'The Life of a Showgirl' In less than 24 hours, everything turned orange. Everyone, and I mean everyone, was in on it. The Empire State Building, New York Times Square, and the Kansas City Union Station lit up in orange lights Tuesday evening. M&Ms, Playdoh, and Sesame Street came out to play, flouting orange and the number 12 in honor of Taylor Swift's twelfth album. The Olive Garden flashed a garlic bread turned showgirl in honor of the era's new album title. Petco brought out Meredith, Taylor's cat, in an orange haze. Even Aquaphor hand lotion showed up in sparkle. The list of brands getting in on the mania went on and on. Orange became the new social marketing technique. Business classes in universities across the nation will ponder Taylor's successful grip on our psyche. With the economy-moving Eras Tour behind us, companies had caught on to Swift's success even if they could not understand how she had done it. They were grasping for the attention of Taylor's fans, riding the coattails of her brand. But what is Taylor's brand? 'I am in the business of human emotion,' said Swift while discussing her decision to buy back her music catalog from the private equity firm Shamrock Capital with Jason and Travis. 'I would so much rather lead heart-first in something like this.' Not music, not entertainment, not writing, but human emotion. And though Swift maintains she has not made such business decisions because of the projected returns or dividends, her emotion-focused approach has still been key to her success. Throughout her career, Swift has remained true to herself and invested in getting to know and understand her audience. She builds her product around human emotions—hers and ours. The day before the announcement, I had been working with a librarian discussing how to build research muscle among a new class of incoming freshmen who would be taking my new class, The Academic Lore of Taylor Swift. The librarian began telling me she came to the fandom late, that the romance between Taylor and Travis really drew her in because it gave her so much joy to watch. Read More: The History of Music Copyright—Before (Taylor's Version) More than a million listeners tuned in to the New Heights podcasts the night of Swift's announcement. The emotional tug of a new announcement or any crumb of new information into the life of the artist had a magnetic pull far and wide. Human emotion sells. In critical, historical moments like the one we are in now, where immigrants are being unfairly targeted by the federal government, inequality is ever increasing, and moms cannot catch a break in the labor market, it sells even more. As advertisers continue paying attention to who's controlling the market today, they'll look to megastar influencers like Taylor Swift and latch themselves to her sparkly orange belt. She will, in turn, look to her fans who are more than happy to dig deep into their pockets for a chance to experience the human emotions she's selling, whether via CD, vinyl, cassette, and any other form. Maybe all of her fans won't buy the orange Playdoh, but they will buy the music that she ever-so-delicately, perfectly, and precisely laid out to a sound track—and they will devour it. She'll make them happy in what might be seen as otherwise depressing times. This is what I call 'Swiftynomics.' It is women's ability to dominate consumption and marketing patterns by harnessing their human experiences for economic benefit. It is women investing in one another, and it thrives today, even in these challenging times. A business built on human emotions is a smart, strategic business plan. An economy which thrives off of the emotions, and realities, of deeply authentic women is an economy we should all want to build together, in this era and the next. If that is what Taylor is selling, then sign me up.
