Did politics kill Women's History Month?
LANCASTER, OHIO — Kim Barlag knew she couldn't let women be canceled.
For nearly two decades, Ohio University's Lancaster campus hosted an annual conference to 'promote and advance gender equity by recognizing the past, present, and future achievements of women from diverse ages and backgrounds.' Known as Celebrate Women, it featured awards honoring women in leadership, panels on business and civic engagement and service opportunities. The plan for this year was to collect food and school supplies for university students facing financial hardship.
Celebrate Women became a much-anticipated Women's History Month tradition in this central Ohio city of 40,000, just 30 miles southeast of Columbus, the state capital. But then, on the eve of its 19th year, politics intervened.
On March 6, two weeks and a day before the event, Ohio University announced that the conference had been 'placed on hold … in light of recent guidance from the Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights,' which threatened to withhold federal funding to institutions that do not conform to the Trump administration's notion of anti-discrimination. The university's decision followed the cancellation of a reunion for Black alumni, another regular occurrence in previous years.
When she heard the news about the women's conference, Barlag, herself an alumnus and the president of the Chamber of Commerce in nearby Pickering, cycled through a series of emotions: disappointment, sadness, anger, resolve.
'I guess I should have seen it coming after that happened, but I was still surprised,' she told The 19th. 'I was pretty devastated. I shed a few tears. Then I thought: Action makes people feel better. How can we save this event? We needed to act fast.'
She called and emailed other women leaders in the area — including some who, like her, had been scheduled to participate in Celebrate Women panels — to gauge their interest in reviving the conference as a non-university event. Their response, Barlag said, was 'gung ho.' The plans for the new event came together quicker than Pam Kaylor, a communications professor who organized Celebrate Women for the university, was able to notify participants of the previous one's cancellation.
The independent event had a new name, We Rally & We Rise Women's Conference, and it brought together some 300 women at the Crossroads Event Center in Lancaster last week. Many Celebrate Women sponsors shifted their support and some new sponsors signed on, angry about the cancellation — Barlag took to calling it 'mad money.' Organizers handed out branded tote bags and notebooks. The event raised money for local nonprofit organizations. Speakers shared strategies to conquer anxiety and impostor syndrome. The boxed lunches were made by a nonprofit caterer that employs survivors of sex trafficking. The writing on the back of attendees' name tags captured the vibe: 'Welcome All BABS!!! BAD ASS BITCHES. Yes, you read that correctly.'
As Barlag opened the conference, the audience's enthusiastic response 'set me off my game there for a minute' because 'it was so powerful and inspiring,' she later said.
'The energy was great — people were grateful to have a conference to attend, to be together, a show of force in support,' she added.
Lancaster may be close to the state's capital, but it's the county seat in an agricultural region of pig and cattle farms. Lancaster itself is known for its glassware — the hometown company, Anchor Hocking, is named for the Hocking River, which snakes through the city. Once one of the world's largest manufacturers of glassware, Anchor Hocking went through a merger, then a bankruptcy. Like in so many small cities and towns, Lancaster's historic downtown became a symbol of economic decline in the post-industrial Rust Belt. In recent years, though, Lancaster's population began to tick up again.
Fairfield County is a Republican stronghold in presidential elections. President Lyndon Johnson, in 1968, is the only Democrat who has won there since 1944. Republican President Donald Trump's America-first economic message resonated with voters who have watched Lancaster struggle, then rebound. In 2024, close to 62 percent of the county's voters cast ballots for Trump and Vice President JD Vance, who was then one of the U.S. senators for Ohio. The state, a one-time presidential bellwether that has in recent cycles grown more conservative, backed Trump over Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris by 55-to-44 percent.
In this slice of Trump Country, personal interpretations of the reasons for the cancellation of Celebrate Women are a sort of political Rorschach test. Some left-leaning voters believe it was the inevitable result of Trump's assault on diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEI, a broad concept that his administration has deployed to challenge and threaten institutions deemed too liberal. Some conservative-leaning voters believe the cancellation to be an overly cautious move by the university — and potentially a way to make the new administration look bad.
One thing on which women on both sides agree is that they should not be silenced.
'There is dissent about how we came to this place,' Fairfield County Auditor Carri Brown, an elected Republican, acknowledged during her opening remarks. But 'when we're told we cannot celebrate women, we'll respond by saying, 'Yes we can' … and we'll rally and we'll rise!'
When she described diversity as 'not a bad word' but a 'blessing,' the crowd applauded and some rose to their feet. 'I have a very strong faith in America,' Brown said.
Ohio University's decision to cancel the Celebrate Women event is the latest skirmish between conservative politicians and the elite institutions of higher education that they have long charged with being hostile to their political viewpoints, with so-called DEI efforts at colleges and universities now front and center to their case.
A February 14 'dear colleague' letter from the civil rights office of Trump's Department of Education to colleges and universities alleged an 'embrace of pervasive and repugnant race-based preferences and other forms of racial discrimination' at the expense of White students. It noted that federal law 'prohibits covered entities from using race in decisions pertaining to admissions, hiring, promotion, compensation, financial aid, scholarships, prizes, administrative support, discipline, housing, graduation ceremonies, and all other aspects of student, academic, and campus life.' Noncompliance would risk the federal funding that nearly all colleges and universities receive.
Though the letter made no direct mention of gender, it put university administrators on alert as they sought to identify any programming that could jeopardize their funding. When the Department of Education, which Trump now seeks to dismantle, launched investigations against more than 50 education institutions, it included two in Ohio: the University of Cincinnati and the Ohio State University.
Judith Cosgray, a librarian and leader of an arts nonprofit who has attended Celebrate Women on and off for the past 15 years, described its cancellation as a balloon deflating when its attendees most needed a lift.
'I understand that they're afraid of losing their funding, I understand that, but sometimes you've got to stand up, too,' Cosgray said in between conference sessions.
In addition to the various executive orders and directives that Trump has made about DEI, the Ohio legislature, where Republicans hold a veto-proof majority in part due to unconstitutional gerrymandering, recently approved a higher education bill that bans DEI training, scholarships and offices, and contains admonitions about teaching 'controversial' topics. It is expected to be sent to GOP Gov. Mike DeWine for his signature as early as this week.
A spokesperson for DeWine did not respond to a request to comment on whether he will sign the anti-DEI legislation or if, by his estimation, events like Celebrate Women would fall under its purview. The office of GOP state House Speaker Matt Huffman likewise did not respond to the same question by publication time.
Celebrate Women isn't the only recent example of how the assault on DEI across public life has led to a seeming prohibition on celebrating the accomplishments of women, with many actions taken during March, the month specifically earmarked to remember such events.
Information about the first woman to pass Marine infantry training was among some 26,000 photos and online posts marked for deletion as part of a DEI purge at the Defense Department, the Associated Press reported. A page about Golden Girls actor Bea Arthur, one of the first to serve in the Marine Corps Women's Reserve, also disappeared. There are reports that Arlington National Cemetery scrubbed its website of references related to notable women veterans.
It isn't limited to women. A Defense Department webpage that described the military service of Black civil rights icon and baseball player Jackie Robinson disappeared — and then reappeared. Information about the Tuskegee Airmen, the first Black military pilots who served in World War II, when the U.S. military was still segregated, has also vanished. Outcry over the removal of webpages about the Navajo Code Talkers who served during the same war led to their restoration. 'History is not DEI,' Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said as the department scrambled to respond.
Tabitha Stover, a financial adviser who describes herself as liberal, attended Celebrate Women for the first time last year. Despite spending most of her life in Lancaster, she didn't know anyone at the event, but found the group kind and inviting. She was disappointed to hear this year's conference would not move forward, then heartened when We Rally & We Rise took its place. She has vacillated about who was to blame, but described it as an event that brings people together instead of driving them apart.
Stover shared a table with a group of colleagues from the area branch of a national nonprofit organization focused on youth mentorship. Several of them are friends of hers on Facebook; she knows the women have what she called 'very different' politics from one another.
'And yet we're all here sitting at the same table,' Stover said.
The post Did politics kill Women's History Month? appeared first on The 19th.
News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday. Subscribe to our free, daily newsletter.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
20 minutes ago
- Fox News
'I call it a rebellion': Maxine Waters' history of enflaming crowds, from Rodney King to today
Eighteen-term Democrat Rep. Maxine Waters resurfaced in the news after several run-ins with federal authorities during the ongoing illegal immigration riots in California, just as her House tenure began amid prior Angeleno unrest. In 1992, as she was finishing her first term in Congress, the not-guilty verdict against White LAPD officers seen beating a Black motorist named Rodney King sparked a similar conflagration in Los Angeles, and Waters was in the midst of it then as well. The riots greatly affected her South Los Angeles district, and Waters was quoted at the time as appearing to downplay the violence not as a "riot" but as "just a bunch of crazy people who went out and did bad things for no reason." "I maintain it was somewhat understandable, if not acceptable. So I call it a rebellion," she said, according to the Los Angeles Times. Waters had joined the Rev. Jesse Jackson in trying to convince the Justice Department to file civil rights charges against the acquitted officers, blaming the rioting on Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) Chief Daryl Gates and President George H.W. Bush, according to famed journalist Robert Novak. When Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., attempted to have Waters expelled from Congress in 2021 for "inciting violence and terrorism," the Democrat claimed some of her past remarks were taken out of context. "I am not worried that they're going to continue to distort what I say," she told The Grio after Greene led her resolution with Waters' Rodney King-era statements. Greene said Waters violated House Rule 23's clause regarding conduct by members "at all times in a manner that shall reflect creditably on the House." At a 2007 anti-war protest, Waters declared she was "not afraid of George Bush" and also pledged to "get rid of" then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. She later drew the ire of Greene and other Republicans when she told an LGBTQ gala, "I will go and take out Trump tonight." Defenders said she was speaking rhetorically and politically and not threatening the mogul. Later in Trump's first administration, Waters was filmed on a California street corner shouting at supportive demonstrators and instructing them to be disruptive toward Trump allies. "If you see anybody … in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out, and you create a crowd, and you push back on them. And you tell them that they are not welcome." She later said she did not physically threaten Trump supporters, though then-White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders had earlier been run out of a Lexington, Va., restaurant and then-Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen was accosted at a Washington, D.C., eatery. In April 2021, Waters rallied in Brooklyn Center, Minn., while ex-Minneapolis Officer Derek Chauvin was on trial for the murder of George Floyd. Waters was recorded telling protesters to "stay" in the street and warned that if the jury delivered a not-guilty verdict, "We cannot go away … we've got to get more confrontational." The comments caught the attention of trial Judge Peter Cahill, suggesting the comments could lead to a defense appeal and also disrespected the judicial branch. Waters later pushed back on some characterizations, saying, "I am nonviolent. I talk about confronting the justice system. … I'm talking about speaking up." In February, Waters appeared in front of the Department of Education building in Washington along with other House Democrats. A security guard was confronted as lawmakers tried to gain entry to voice concerns about Secretary Linda McMahon's downsizing plans. This week, while riots again raged in Los Angeles, Waters hurried toward a group of National Guardsmen entering the plywood-covered door of the Metropolitan Detention Center. "I just came to use my congressional authority to check on David Huerta," she said, referring to the SEIU union leader arrested during an immigration raid. A Guardsman told Waters to contact "public affairs" and slammed the door in her face. She was later seen asking armed Guardsmen if they planned to shoot her, why they were there and that the conflict was President Donald Trump's fault. Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin told Fox News Digital after that incident that instead of "taunting" Guardsmen, Waters should have been trying to assuage the unrest. While some of her recent Republican challengers, like Joe Collins and Omar Navarro, have received hefty donations from around the country due to her polarizing comments, the 86-year-old has been re-elected with typically 70% of the vote. Fox News Digital reached out to Waters for comment but did not immediately hear back.


Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Andrew Cuomo Gets Bad News from New York Poll
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo's hopes for a political comeback may have hit a roadblock. A new poll, conducted by Public Policy Polling for Democrat Justin Brannan's city comptroller campaign on June 6 and June 7 among 573 likely voters, and reviewed by Politico, shows socialist Zohran Mamdani, 33, ahead of Cuomo for the first time, two weeks before the Democratic primary. Newsweek has contacted representatives of Cuomo and Mamdani for comment via email. Why It Matters A primary win for Cuomo, 67, would mark a dramatic political comeback, just four years after he resigned as New York governor in 2021 amid the threat of impeachment over sexual misconduct allegations, which he has consistently denied. No charges relating to the allegations have ever been brought against him. But this latest poll suggest he may face strong headwinds from voters still skeptical of his leadership. Democratic mayoral candidates Andrew Cuomo, left, shakes hands with Zohran Mamdani, center, as Whitney Tilson reacts after participating in a Democratic mayoral primary debate, Wednesday, June 4, 2025, in New York. Democratic mayoral candidates Andrew Cuomo, left, shakes hands with Zohran Mamdani, center, as Whitney Tilson reacts after participating in a Democratic mayoral primary debate, Wednesday, June 4, 2025, in New York. Yuki Iwamura/AP What To Know The poll showed Mamdani beating Cuomo 35 percent to 31 percent—a difference that is narrowly within the 4.1 percent margin of error. While Mamdani's strongest backing came from white and Asian voters, he also attracted 27 percent of Black voters and nearly one-third of Hispanic voters. Still, Andrew Cuomo maintains a solid lead among Black voters at 42 percent. Meanwhile, the survey also revealed a wide gap between the two leading candidates and the rest of the field. City Comptroller Brad Lander, despite his citywide role and heavy campaign spending, drew just 9 percent support. Former Comptroller Scott Stringer was at 5 percent, and City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams trailed at 4 percent, even with high-profile endorsements from Attorney General Letitia James and labor giant District Council 37. The poll is the first to give Mamdani, who was endorsed by Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez earlier this month, a lead over Cuomo. The primary election is a rank-choice voting election, meaning voters have the opportunity to rank their five top choices for mayor. Since entering the race on March 1 to challenge Mayor Eric Adams, who will seek reelection as an independent, Cuomo has consistently held the frontrunner position, with most public polls showing him maintaining a comfortable lead. A Cuomo campaign poll conducted by Expedition Strategies and shared with Politico earlier this week showed the former governor leading Mamdani by 12 points—56 percent to 44 percent—after eight rounds of ranked-choice voting. That poll was conducted during the same period as the Public Policy Polling survey that had Mamdani in the lead. And a SurveyUSA poll conducted in mid-May 2025 showed that he was the top choice among likely Democratic voters for the upcoming June primary, with 43 percent support. He held a solid lead over his closest competitor, Mamdani, who had 11 percent. But some polls have shown Mamdani catching up to his opponent. That includes the most recent Data for Progress poll, which surveyed 819 likely Democratic primary voters between May 30 to June 4, and showed Mamdani 2 points behind Cuomo in a poll on the final ballot of the primary's rank-choice voting system. The poll also showed that Mamdani was polling 10 percent more favorable than Cuomo, at 58 percent to Cuomo's 48 percent Overall, Cuomo's support is strongest among Black voters (74 percent), voters over 50 (66 percent), and women (with a 58 percent to 42 percent edge over Mamdani). In contrast, Mamdani has built a solid base among voters under 50, leading with 61 percent, as well as among white voters (57 percent to 43 percent) and college-educated voters (58 percent to 42 percent). Zohran Mamdani has built momentum through social media and grassroots energy. His slick, attention-grabbing videos highlight proposals like free public bus service, government-run grocery stores, and a citywide rent freeze. As the race tightens, Cuomo has sharpened his criticism of Mamdani, calling him inexperienced and arguing that his proposals are unrealistic without significant tax hikes. Mamdani, however, insists his policies are designed to ease the burden on working-class New Yorkers. Mamdani told The New York Times that affordability is "the most important issue facing New Yorkers right now." What People Are Saying Zohran Mamdani told the New York Times: "There are far too many New Yorkers who do not know if they will be able to call themselves that next year, who do not know if they will be able to afford their rent, or their child care, their groceries, or even their MetroCard. "This is a city that we want to ensure does not become a museum or a relic of the working-class people who built it, but rather a living, breathing testament to the continuation of that story." Andrew Cuomo told the New York Times when asked what the most pressing issue is for New Yorkers: "Lack of management capacity evidenced through all of the above [affordability, public safety, President Trump or something else]. Lack of affordable housing, deterioration of quality of life—they all stem from poor management. Then the existential threat is Trump." What Happens Next Early voting in the June 24 primary is set to begin on Saturday. Mamdani and Cuomo are to participate in a debate Thursday evening.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Professor: Los Angeles …You Are Becoming The Exact Thing Trump Needed
Hate to say this but Los Angeles…you're not helping. Before you get mad and turn off your phone, let me explain. Last week, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents (ICE) arrested 118 immigrants during operations in L.A. Since then, protests have erupted in the city that Mayor Karen Bass says has turn the entire metropolitan area into a 'tinderbox.' In one confrontation, police employed tear gas and pepper spray as protestors gathered outside a detention center on Sunday. President Trump said he would deploy 2,000 National Guard soldiers to respond to the protests. In a post on Truth Social, Trump attacked what he called 'Radical Left protests' by 'instigators and often paid troublemakers.' OK. Listen. We are all sympathetic to the reason why these protests are happening. Treating immigrants this way is not American. This country is unique in that it is one made up of people from other countries. But…these riots and protests? They are doing nothing but distracting us from the sneaky sh*t Trump is doing right in front of our faces. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, passed by the House in May, includes tax cuts, spending cuts, and policy changes that would devastate many Americans, especially Black folks. It would strip millions of heath care and drive many people who look like us into crippling debt. Then there is the travel ban that Trump unsuccessfully tried to implement in his first term that he has gotten little to no resistance on in this second one. People were marching in the streets outraged in 2016, now he has implemented it with little to no pushback. And even though Trump has fallen out with Elon Musk, DOGE is still running roughshod through the federal government. Just a few days ago, the department got access to our SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS. (Yes. Had to write it like that because it is a big f**kin' deal.) That means that they have all our sensitive data which is…great. And all the while, Black folks are still being killed by police. Health outcomes of Black people are worse now because public health research is dwindling. And even the wigs and weave will go up because of Trump's Tariffs. So, look. We are with you, Los Angeles. We support your anger. But all these violent clashes with ICE agents and the police? You are exactly the kind of distraction Trump has been needing so he can do what he wants without anyone noticing.