logo
Young boy with disabilities placed in house 'similar to a correctional facility' due to lack of secure care, whistleblower claims

Young boy with disabilities placed in house 'similar to a correctional facility' due to lack of secure care, whistleblower claims

A 12-year-old boy with a disability alleged to be the victim of indecent treatment in Cairns watch house has been flown to Brisbane and placed in housing "similar to a correctional facility", according to a whistleblower familiar with the case.
Warning: This story contains details some readers may find distressing.
The ABC understands the boy was placed in Wacol's forensic disability precinct in a house with alarms and an internal locking system, often used for people who demonstrate high-risk behaviour.
A whistleblower said the child's complex disability and mental health conditions had left the government with few accommodation options in lieu of a secure care model, which exists in other states like Victoria, Western Australia and New South Wales.
Secure care is a type of out-of-home care for children that are often at significant risk of harming themselves or others.
The child is receiving various supports and has access to education and recreational activities, according to the whistleblower.
"It's very problematic."
The boy has been deemed vulnerable to exploitation by peers and adults due to his complex background.
In February, ABC News revealed the boy was allegedly tormented by an older child for more than an hour and coerced to drink toilet water and urine.
Some of the details are too graphic to publish, but allegedly involved the boy being pressured to flush his head in the toilet, commit gross acts of indecency, drink toilet water, and lick his own vomit.
The Queensland Police Service (QPS) is reviewing the circumstances of the incident, which happened in a highly secure environment covered by CCTV, including audio recordings.
Child Safety Minister Amanda Camm stated there were no children in the Forensic Disability Unit, which is an adult facility located on the Wacol campus.
She would not confirm any further information about the boy's whereabouts or whether she had signed off on the decision.
"The Child Protection Act is very clear about what can and cannot be said about children who may or may not be in care," she said.
"I would be breaching the act if I commented further."
Sisters Inside chief executive Debbie Kilroy said it was "bizarre" for a 12-year-old to be transported from Cairns and placed in Brisbane's Wacol forensic disability precinct.
"It seems this has been cloaked in a veil of secrecy, what is going on?" Ms Kilroy said.
"There needs to be an independent investigation to ensure this boy is supported because he has such severe disabilities."
A model of "therapeutic secure care" was recommended "as a last resort" for children at significant risk of harm in the Carmody report as part of the 2013 Commission of Inquiry into Queensland Child Protection.
The commission's report, presented by Commissioner Tim Carmody, included 121 recommendations and provided a road map for the Newman Government to reform Queensland's child protection system over the next decade.
These included children who "regularly abscond" from care homes, who "put themselves in harm's way or at risk of harming someone else", "exhibit complex trauma", and "display serious risk-taking behaviour that leads to severe abuse and exploitation, particularly sexual exploitation".
"Responding to this group of children poses one of the toughest policy and practice tests for government," the report said.
Secure care was accepted in principle by the government of the day but more than a decade on, it has not been adopted.
Last September, the LNP committed to introducing a $50 million secure care facility by 2028 for children "with mental health needs who are a danger to themselves or others".
Premier David Crisafulli said at the time the focus would be 12 to 17 year olds, "ideally up to a month but with a court order it could be slightly longer".
"We firmly believe it is a great circuit breaker," he said.
The Carmody report said there should be some safeguards for secure care, including "as a minimum, the requirement that the department apply for an order from the Supreme Court to compel a child to be admitted to the service".
National Children's Commissioner Anne Hollonds said there was a lot of work to be done Australia-wide with secure care, and there must be "strong independent monitoring and oversight" across the board.
Commissioner Hollonds said whenever children are deprived of their liberty, "whether it's in the youth justice system or child protection system, we have to adhere to the Convention on the Rights of the Child".
"There are principles …. that are about ensuring everything that's done is in the best interest of the child," she said.
There are no easy solutions, according to Commissioner Hollonds, who believes there should be a national approach to child justice and wellbeing to prevent "crime by children".
The Australian Human Rights Commission's "Help Way Earlier!" report called for a national task force where all jurisdictions would work together to reform child justice systems based on the evidence.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Western Sydney mum pushes for new retail safety standards after her two-year-old nearly lost an eye from low hanging merchandise rack
Western Sydney mum pushes for new retail safety standards after her two-year-old nearly lost an eye from low hanging merchandise rack

News.com.au

timean hour ago

  • News.com.au

Western Sydney mum pushes for new retail safety standards after her two-year-old nearly lost an eye from low hanging merchandise rack

A western Sydney mum is looking to change the safety measures in retail stores after an incident nearly left her two-year-old blinded. Maureen Ahluwalia was with her daughter Amaira and sister-in-law at her local Blacktown Westpoint shopping centre on July 8 when the incident occurred. Mrs Ahluwalia said her daughter was walking right beside her – as she commonly does – when the scary incident happened. 'She's just turned and the rack hook's gone in her eye. I tried to calm her down, literally her eyelid was inside out,' she told NewsWire. 'I saw when she opened her eye that there's blood coming into it.' Mrs Ahluwalia's sister-in-law advised taking Amaira to Specsavers in the shopping centre, who took her in immediately and gave some relieving news. 'They said she didn't scratch her cornea, she was very lucky to miss it by less than a millimetre. If it was, she would have had some damage to her vision or even blindness.' After repeated requests, Mrs Ahluwalia said she finally received a call from Harris Scarfe more than six days later, a courtesy call from the risk management team. They also declined to provide the CCTV footage. 'They weren't interested in looking into why this happened or if we need to change our hooks or anything … it wasn't a priority for them.' Left with a growing blood clot, Amaira eventually recovered, but not before her mother came across a string of similar incidents that shocked her. Kmart, Target and Rebel Sport were among the first to respond back in 2020, adding soft rubbers and plastics over the ends of apparel hooks, however, Mrs Ahluwalia is now putting a different question to shops. 'Why are we not doing more? And why do these hooks still exist at toddler height? 'Kids have lost their vision over it, kids have ended up in hospital, with permanent damage. 'That's when I knew this is a real problem, this is not a parent's fault. It's is beyond that.' The mother has since begun a NSW parliamentary petition to adjust the safety standards of retail fixtures in Australia, requiring 20,000 votes to be heard in parliament. The petition will be presented by Labor MP for Blacktown Stephen Bali, who has backed the move. While she has received messages of encouragement, Mrs Ahluwalia has also been met with backlash from users online claiming the incident was a personal fault. 'Keep your kids in the car. A lot safer there,' one user responded. 'Preventable with a parent doing their job' another claimed. But she has backed her stance, citing her plea to push for better safety standards for children. 'It's the same as having a fence around the pool. Why do we do that? Why do have booster seats for kids? These are all safety measures to prevent what can possibly happen,' she said. 'This is not about paying attention to your kids. My daughter was two steps away from me. 'I'd never spoken about compensation, it's not something I'm interested in. 'But no money could ever bring back my daughter's eye if she had lost it.'

Health Minister Mark Butler announces $2 billion Thriving Kids program
Health Minister Mark Butler announces $2 billion Thriving Kids program

ABC News

timean hour ago

  • ABC News

Health Minister Mark Butler announces $2 billion Thriving Kids program

SARAH FERGUSON, PRESENTER: Health Minister Mark Butler announced a major change to the NDIS today in an effort to rein in the costs of the scheme, that were $42 billion last year and forecast to keep growing. Children with autism or developmental delays make up 44 per cent of the scheme. Beginning in mid-2027, many of those children will now be diverted to a new program called Thriving Kids. I spoke to the Health Minister earlier. Mark Butler, welcome to 7.30. MARK BUTLER, HEALTH MINISTER: Thank you, Sarah. SARAH FERGUSON: In making this announcement today, you said that the NDIS was in danger of losing its social licence. Can you explain that? MARK BUTLER: Well, for a scheme that doesn't touch as many Australians, for example, as Medicare and aged care, you do need social licence. Taxpayers need to have confidence that they're getting value for the money they're investing in the scheme. And at the moment, that licence is very strong. People do recognise that the NDIS has transformed the lives of people living with disability, but they also say through research that it's costing too much. They're concerned about dodgy providers and as many as six in 10 say the NDIS is broken. And I think that is a concern to me that the social licence that is so important to underpin this terrific scheme is at risk of slipping away if taxpayers don't have confidence that we're doing the right thing to get it back on track. SARAH FERGUSON: You are proposing diverting children with mild to moderate autism or development delays away from the NDIS. So how will it work? MARK BUTLER: Well, the number of people on the NDIS is largely what we projected a decade ago, people with intellectual disabilities, cerebral palsy and those range of disabilities with one exception and that is kids with developmental delay in autism, particularly at mild to moderate levels. So not levels that are likely to be permanently disabling, which after all, is the cornerstone of the NDIS. Literally tens and tens of thousands of young kids are on this scheme that were set up for permanent disability and that's largely because there's no alternative. As I said today, it's really been the only port in a storm for parents who are worried about their kid not hitting milestones. We should have an alternative system in place for those parents and for those kids and that's what I committed to building today - a system to support those children to thrive. I think most of your viewers would be alarmed to know that one in six Grade Two boys are on the NDIS and in some parts of the country it's as high as one in four Grade Two boys are on the NDIS. We've got to do better than that because the scheme was not intended to cover those kids. SARAH FERGUSON: Now, obviously what those families, what those parents have done is go onto the NDIS because they can't get support elsewhere. So, what are you creating? What are you doing to enable those parents to find support outside of the NDIS? MARK BUTLER: Well, we need to leverage those existing systems, the infinite maternal health systems that states run. the primary care systems that we fund through Medicare. supports in community health centres that used to exist long before the NDIS but frankly have been defunded to a degree in order to pay for the National Disability Insurance Scheme. So rebuilding, refocusing those mainstream broad-based supports that have existed for long before the NDIS, that's the response you should have to what is a mainstream, broad-based issue. And that is a lot of kids do have developmental delay and autism issues, that do need support to help them thrive. The only place they can get that right now is the NDIS, and that's not the right fit for them. SARAH FERGUSON: Now, you were working on an agreement with the states to provide exactly that. I think they were called, they were going to be Foundational Supports. Does that mean that that is over now and you're starting again? MARK BUTLER: No, this is that work. I mean, I've given it much more shape, I think by describing what it means for parents - that is support to help their kids thrive right through the life course from the time they're born into the time they get into formal schooling. What I heard from states is they didn't think the Commonwealth was leading in enough. So I've said, we want to lead this process. We are going to lead in. They also said they were concerned that funding wasn't committed beyond five years. So I've made the commitment today on behalf of the Commonwealth to fund this on an ongoing basis. I did also hear though, from the sector, from parents, from providers, they didn't want to see eight different systems built up in every single state and territory. They want something that is nationally consistent across the country, and that's what I think is sensible as well. SARAH FERGUSON: So you've committed some money. What about the states? Are they pulling their weight equally with the Commonwealth in setting up this new system? MARK BUTLER: Well, at the national cabinet meeting at the end of 2023, all of the jurisdictions agreed we would set up systems to support this cohort as well as adults with serious psychosocial disability. And both of us committed $5 billion, so $5 billion from the Commonwealth, $5 billion collectively from states and territories and it's time to actually put our money where the mouth is and get this in an operational system to support those kids thriving. SARAH FERGUSON: Now, what does it mean for parents who, as they understand it now, in July, 2027, they will be diverted away from the NDIS? You get a transition period, but does that mean those parents will have their funding cut? Can you reassure them that the services will be ready? MARK BUTLER: Well, I've been very clear we're not going to start diversion from the NDIS before there's that strong, robust system to support kids thriving. So that's why there's about a two-year run up to this. We'll start rolling out those services next year. They will require some time to roll out fully to give parents confidence that they're going to get the supports that they need and want to help their kids thrive. So it is quite a run up. If kids are on the NDIS at that time, they're entitled to remain on it. They'll be subject to the usual rules of the NDIS. But I just don't think in the long term this is the right scheme for kids with mild to moderate developmental delay or autism and parents really need, and their children need, a mainstream, broad-based system of supports available in a whole range of settings that they're at very regularly to help their kids thrive and that's what I committed to delivering today. SARAH FERGUSON: And you can absolutely guarantee that those services will be in place for those families. MARK BUTLER: Absolutely. I'm very clear we're not going to leave a gap between two stalls for our precious children. We've only really given parents one option for the last several years. The one port in the storm has been the NDIS. I think there should be another option, but I'm going to make sure that option is fully up and running before we start diversion from the NDIS. That's the only right thing to do. SARAH FERGUSON: I just want to come back to the very difficult issue of fraud in the NDIS. The stories have obviously been frankly repulsive about people taking advantage of this generous system. Are you winning the battle with those shonks and fraudsters taking advantage of the NDIS? MARK BUTLER: Well, we had to start from scratch. The National Audit Office said before 2024, so the scheme had been running for over a decade, there was effectively no real control on fraud and non-compliance within the NDIS. So we've had to build it up from scratch. Bill Shorten, to his credit, started that work and already we've had hundreds of investigations, search warrants, and we are starting to crack down, but we've got 260,000 service providers in this scheme, only 16,000 of whom are registered. So we have precious little line of sight about who they are, what they're doing, what their qualifications are. We need more work on fraud, and we've committed to that again today. But we also, frankly, need a more robust system of provider registration, the sort of which you see in aged care, in veterans care, in the health system, and frankly should exist in the NDIS as well. Health Minister Mark Butler speaks to Sarah Ferguson about a new program to divert children with autism and developmental delays from the NDIS.

Matt Wright's friend denies committing perjury to protect the Netflix star, NT Supreme Court jury hears
Matt Wright's friend denies committing perjury to protect the Netflix star, NT Supreme Court jury hears

ABC News

time3 hours ago

  • ABC News

Matt Wright's friend denies committing perjury to protect the Netflix star, NT Supreme Court jury hears

Matt Wright's friend has denied committing perjury out of loyalty to the celebrity croc wrangler after accusations he became "tangled in [his] own lies" during the trial. Mr Wright has pleaded not guilty in the Northern Territory Supreme Court to three counts of attempting to pervert the course of justice in the aftermath of a fatal 2022 helicopter crash. Catch up on today's live coverage of Matt Wright's Supreme Court trial. The crash killed his Netflix co-star Chris "Willow" Wilson and badly injured pilot Sebastian Robinson but Mr Wright is not accused of any wrongdoing in relation to the accident itself. Instead, prosecutors allege he tried to frustrate the investigation that followed in a bid to cover up shoddy record keeping in his chopper business, including by asking Mr Robinson to doctor flight records. On Wednesday, Mr Wright's employee and friend Tim Johnston told the court his boss had become "irate" and was "at 11 out of 10" after finding out he had taken items from Mr Robinson's Brisbane hospital room after the crash. Mr Johnston told the jury he was in Brisbane on holiday when a mutual friend, Jai Tomlinson, asked him to "pick something up" from Mr Robinson's mother, Noelene Chellingworth, but he had "no idea" what it was. "How do you pick something up that you don't now what it is?" Crown prosecutor Jason Gullaci SC asked. "You ask someone for it and grab it and pick it up," Mr Johnston replied. "How did you know what you were picking up?" "That was not for me to know, I was asked to pick something up." Mr Johnston said after Ms Chellingworth handed him a "folded-up A4 bit of paper" he went outside Mr Robinson's room and asked the injured pilot's brother if there was "anything else you want me to take back". "He had a little backpack there and in his backpack there was a book and a phone and various other things," he said. "He got them both out but he didn't want to give me the phone." Mr Johnston said he then took the diary and piece of paper and went to catch a taxi but called Mr Wright before leaving the hospital grounds. "I told him what I'd brought back and mate, he went, he got very irate, very irate," he said. "About what?" Mr Gullaci asked. "Taking the diary," Mr Johnston replied. "I can't recall in detail what he said but I know when Matt gets irate and he was at 11 out of 10 that day. "He told me that I've done the wrong thing and I need to get it back up to Noelene." After the lunch break, Mr Gullaci suggested it was actually Mr Wright who had instructed Mr Johnston to collect the items and asked him if "you understand what perjury is". "Are you still prepared to tell lies for Matt Wright in that scenario?" he asked. "I have never been prepared to tell lies for Matt Wright," Mr Johnston replied. "I'm putting to you directly that what you want to do, and out of loyalty and out of friendship I can understand it, you want to protect Mr Wright at all costs?" "Disagree." "And you are prepared to tell blatant lies if in your mind it protects Mr Wright?" "No." Mr Gullaci also suggested there were "critical differences" between the account Mr Johnston gave in a pre-trial hearing in July and his evidence on Wednesday. "That's because you became tangled in your own lies," Mr Gullaci suggested. "Disagree," Mr Johnston replied. Mr Tomlinson also took the stand on Wednesday and denied ever asking anyone to "go and collect some items" from Mr Robinson before visiting him in hospital with Mr Wright. "At any point before your visit, had you done any of those things, that is, ask anyone to go there and get particular items from Mr Robinson?" Mr Gullaci asked. "No," Mr Tomlinson replied. The trial continues in Darwin on Thursday when Mr Tomlinson will resume his evidence.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store