
Mark Nicholas' proudest memory tinged by sadness as 2005 Ashes marked end of era
Nicholas was the broadcasting anchor charged with carrying a rapt nation through many of the key moments of a contest that remains seared into the memories of cricket fans.
Heading up an elite commentary cast featuring the likes of the late Richie Benaud and Tony Greig, as well as Sir Geoffrey Boycott, Michael Atherton and Michael Slater, Nicholas' debonair style crystallised many of the most thrilling moments as England regained the urn for the first time in 18 years.
One passage in particular lives on, Steve Harmison's vital dismissal of Michael Clarke at Edgbaston and the subsequent call of: 'One of the great balls! Given the moment, given the batsman, given the match…that is a staggering gamble!'
Speaking to the PA news agency two decades later, the current MCC chair reflects: 'You hear a lot of soundbites from that series, even 20 years on. Some of what I said didn't always make much sense, but I think the best commentary is reactive. When you plan to say certain things it doesn't work as well.
' David Bowie once gave an interview about 'Life on Mars' and said, 'It's a good song but I've no idea what I was writing about'. I sort of know what he means, you can be creatively successful completely unintentionally.
'I cannot tell you how often I get stopped, people telling me with all their hearts that 2005 and our coverage of it was what got them into cricket.
'Of course, it was the fact that England beat Australia after so long and that it was so thrilling. But to hear people, even England cricketers, say you helped get them into the game…you can't be more flattered than that.
'Some of us brought hyperbole, some did the deep analysis, Richie was minimalism brilliantly applied. I remain more proud of that time than anything else in my career, there was a certain element of mythology for all of us that summer, players and commentators alike.'
Yet 2005 was not just the high water mark for Nicholas' BAFTA-winning team, it was also the end of the road.
Sky television took over exclusive broadcast rights of English cricket in the aftermath, with home Tests having lost their 'Crown Jewel' status as a category A listed event.
It remains a source of regret to Nicholas that the surge of public interest, which saw 7.4 million viewers tune in to the Oval finale, instantly encountered a paywall.
'I do feel desperately sad that an opportunity was blown. It will never leave me,' he says.
'They had to make sure Test match cricket stayed (free to air), even if it was in a joint broadcast, and if that meant a bit less money then so be it.
'I'm not anti-Sky at all, I'm glued to their coverage three or four nights a week. But it was a bad misjudgement. Cricket was a very powerful thing at that moment and it was the time to make sure that continued.
'I was asked to co-host the celebration at Trafalgar Square with David Gower and I remember walking home through London with my wife after the crowds cleared. All the way back I was feeling an extraordinary contradiction of euphoric happiness at the summer that had gone and the terrible sadness of losing the coverage.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
6 minutes ago
- Metro
Jadon Sancho rejects two transfer offers to leave Manchester United
Jadon Sancho has rejected two offers to leave Manchester United despite his presence in Ruben Amorim's bomb squad. Sancho was left out of United's matchday squad for their Premier League opener against Arsenal on Sunday. Having been stripped of the No. 25 shirt last summer, Sancho did not even have a number next to his name in the Manchester United programme. It was Amorim's predecessor Erik ten Hag who sent Sancho on loan to Chelsea last season but the Portuguese boss has also decided to cut ties with the ex-England winger. Sancho was told to find a new club this summer and placed in Amorim's bomb squad along with Alejandro Garnacho and Antony. Metro's new weekly football newsletter: In The Mixer. Exclusive analysis, FPL tips and transfer talk sent straight to your inbox every Friday – sign up, it's an open goal. Despite knowing his United career is over, Sancho is yet to receive an offer he deems suitable, rejecting approaches from Roma and Besiktas. More to follow… MORE: Fan arrested over alleged Semenyo abuse banned from every UK football stadium MORE: Napoli eyeing loan move for Manchester United flop after injury to key player MORE: Arsenal legend makes Viktor Gyokeres goals prediction after 'tough' debut


The Independent
6 minutes ago
- The Independent
Rasmus Hojlund offered surprise option for Man United exit
Fulham sounded out Manchester United over a potential move for Rasmus Hojlund due to the possibility of Rodrigo Muniz leaving the Whites this summer. The Brazilian forward has been expected to go to Atalanta in a £40m deal, although it is understood that a move to Serie A ran into difficulties by Sunday evening. Fulham have nevertheless explored alternatives, should the move be reignited, with Hojlund considered as an option to replace the Brazilian's firepower. The 24-year-old struck a 97th-minute equaliser for Marco Silva's side at the Amex to deny Brighton all three points and secure a draw to kick-start their Premier League campaign. The former Flamengo forward has scored 17 Premier League goals in his last two campaigns for Fulham, hitting double figures in all competitions, with a career-high of 11 goals last term. United want to sell the Dane after signing Benjamin Sesko in an €80m (£73.7m) deal. Hojlund's preference is to stay, but he is naturally prepared to consider prospective offers. United want £40m for the 22-year-old, although it is felt they would rather do a deal abroad. Hojlund was left out of the squad that lost 1-0 to Arsenal on Sunday at Old Trafford. The Dane was left on the bench for the final pre-season friendly against Fiorentina on 9 August, despite Sesko not registering in time to feature against the Italians. Hojlund cost £72m two years ago from Atalanta and has scored 14 goals in 62 league games since returning nine goals in 32 Series A matches.


The Independent
6 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘Skibidi' has no place in the dictionary – and here's why
I was on a rollercoaster with my kids recently and the ride, apparently, was 'skibidi'. The hot dogs were also skibidi; the entire theme park was skibidi – but I, when I screeched about how I wasn't going to spend another £15 on tokens for more goes on a giant teacup that spins you round fast enough to give you whiplash, thank you very much, was not skibidi. I was not skibidi at all. I could have been, though – because the Gen Alpha slang term 'skibidi toilet' (confused, yet?) can also mean something terrible, depending on the context in which it's said and used. So, maybe I was skibidi? Either way, this lexical nightmare has entered the dictionary. That's right: 'skibidi' is one of a plethora of 6,000 new words to have made it in to the Cambridge Dictionary, along with 'delulu' (shorthand for 'delusional' and once spoken out loud – in public – by the Australian PM Anthony Albanese, who said the Coalition was 'delulu with no solulu'). The term 'tradwife', which takes us right back to stereotypical 1950s gender roles, meaning women who choose to stay home looking after the children and cooking, also made the cut. 'Mouse jiggler' has also been added, meaning someone who uses a device to give the illusion they're actually working when they're WFH, which I've never heard of. How 'brain rot' (Oxford's word of the year for 2024) of me. Now, I like to embarrass my children as much as the next parent who still believes very strongly they are young and hip and cool; and so one of my favourite past-times is intentionally bastardising the language of my Gen Alpha and Gen Z kids. That means that when we watch a film together, I will casually and entirely intentionally decree it as 'sigma'; except pronounced like this: 'Wow, that was sigmaaaaaaaa.' I will get dressed to go out and then ask my 13-year-old daughter if she thinks I've got 'rizz'; if I 'slay'. When they've fully collapsed with cringe, I will sometimes get on my high horse and tell them that actually, the word 'sigma' has darker underpinnings; popularised by the likes of ultra-chauvinist Andrew Tate, who uses it to describe a 'high-value male' like him, or so he believes. I would argue that being held in Romania over charges of trafficking and money laundering isn't very 'sigma' and is actually quite 'brain rot', but there we go. My daughter, though, argues that while it may have meant that once, in origin, 'it doesn't mean that anymore'. 'It's changed, Mummy! Like you always go on about with Shakespeare.' And she is correct, Mummy does go on about Shakespeare. Specifically: the way that language, over time, is organic – it grows and shifts and changes; it is fluid and not static. Words and phrases can outlast their originator and transcend their original meaning. Sometimes they turn back on themselves and become their entire opposite, like 'sick' ('that is sick, bruv!') They can also have surprising tenacity, too, such as in the case of the phrases 'wear your heart on your sleeve' and 'break the ice' and even 'wild goose chase' – which date back from Othello, Taming of the Shrew and Romeo and Juliet, respectively. No cap. But that doesn't mean I want 'skibidi toilet' added to the dictionary. Far from it. Why? Well, to be honest I think silly phrases that are so clearly internet meme-coded only cheapen language – they don't enhance it. And a lot of that is to do with where they come from: the phrase first appeared in the "Skibidi Toilet" online series on YouTube, originally posted by Alexey Gerasimov. The animated film sees a battle between human-headed toilets and humanoid beings with electric devices for heads (of course). The phrase itself apparently derives from the lyrics of "Give It to Me" by Timbaland, sped up to sound like 'skibidi'. It's silly and frothy and ephemeral and of the moment – and while it may have its place among kids in school corridors, I don't believe it warrants the gravitas that adding it to the Cambridge Dictionary suggests (they have said they only add words with 'staying power'). Neither does the word 'snackable', which has also been added this year (meaning content you engage with only fleetingly and briefly, because of our shrinking attention spans). In fact, the combination of both of these words and phrases in the dictionary this year just about sums up my problem with it. The real issue I have with 'skibidi' is that it is snackable. My kids say it, for now, but then we used to say 'Yo, yo, spex ' meaning 'respect' when we passed each other in the school lunch hall in 1994. We grew out of it, just like Gen Alpha will grow out of 'skibidi' – and now cringe that we ever used it in the first place. The last thing they – or the rest of us – need is a reminder of it, forever, in the dictionary. Though it might, actually, have a surprisingly positive effect – legitimising slang takes away its cool creds, so perhaps 'skibidi' will now die because of its inclusion. That would be lit.