Driving Asia's professional services revolution
EY Singapore powers purpose-led growth with AI transformation and innovation to capture opportunities and uplift talents and the profession
'We've grown in tandem with Singapore's enterprises; contributing back to the ecosystem that we operate in gives us purpose beyond profits,' says Liew Nam Soon, EY Asia East Deputy Regional Managing Partner, also Singapore Country Managing Partner.
It was 1889 and Singapore was a British trading post when accountant G.A. Derrick set up shop at a desk inside a Raffles Place general store. Today, just a stone's throw away at One Raffles Quay, EY Singapore's sustainability-first office houses a 4,000-strong workforce, part of a 400,000-strong global organisation that is fuelling growth and innovation through billion-dollar artificial intelligence (AI) transformations.
That journey from solo practice to regional powerhouse is woven with many Singaporean stories. Over more than 130 years, local accountancy pioneers – Derrick & Co, Evan Wong & Co, Ee Peng Liang & Co and more – grew and merged with British and American firms to become EY in Singapore today.
With global integration, EY Singapore has been the nerve centre for Asean within the global EY organisation. In the latest organisational development, EY in Singapore is part of a newly formed Asia East regional construct – one that spans Japan, Asean and Korea.
Regional synergies
'We see many enhanced synergies in the Asia East Region,' says Liew Nam Soon, EY Asia East Deputy Regional Managing Partner, who also leads the Asean business unit and Singapore firm as Country Managing Partner. 'It enables us to better serve Japanese and Korean clients expanding into Asean, as well as international companies using Singapore as their gateway into the region.'
The formation of Asia East Region is opportune as companies across Asia grapple with how to reframe corporate strategies and reconfigure operations amid geopolitical bifurcation and shifting trade patterns. The Asia East Region allows EY to invest in and deploy resources more strategically, agilely and seamlessly across borders and importantly, help deliver enhanced client service and solutions across its full spectrum of services in assurance, consulting, tax, strategy and transactions.
Singapore anchors this strategy. It holds longstanding hub status and deep experience in multiple industries, including financial services, industrials and energy, telecommunications and media and technology. That, plus a rapid scaling up of centres of excellence in sustainability, supply chain, and AI and data analytics, makes EY in Singapore well-poised to support clients in their growth and expansion pursuits across the Japan-Korea-Asean corridor and beyond.
Client Zero drives AI-transformation
To keep pace with the changing environment, EY's investments into AI, particularly agentic AI, will be critical.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore Luxury items seized in $3b money laundering case handed over to Deloitte for liquidation
Singapore MyRepublic customers air concerns over broadband speed after sale to StarHub
Singapore Power switchboard failure led to disruption in NEL, Sengkang-Punggol LRT services: SBS Transit
Singapore NEL and Sengkang-Punggol LRT resume service after hours-long power fault
Business Ninja Van cuts 12% of Singapore workforce after 2 rounds of layoffs in 2024
Singapore Hyflux investigator 'took advantage' of Olivia Lum's inability to recall events: Davinder Singh
Singapore Man who stabbed son-in-law to death in Boon Tat Street in 2017 dies of heart attack, says daughter
Singapore Man who stalked woman blasted by judge on appeal for asking scandalous questions in court
EY's AI transformation began in 2017, well before generative AI became more mainstream.
The September 2023 launch of its EY.ai platform – backed by US$1.4 billion in investment – marked a significant milestone. Liew outlines three strategic AI priorities: transform EY itself, leverage that to transform clients, and then transform entire ecosystems.
These rest on its 'Client Zero' philosophy. 'We know we can advise clients credibly when we have done it ourselves,' says Liew. EY first deploys technology internally, layering its deep domain expertise and knowledge onto existing agentic AI and platforms, learns from the experience and then packages its insights into client solutions to improve alpha or operating efficiency.
An example of how EY has deployed AI is in its tax business – for which EY is Singapore and Asean's largest player. In March 2025, EY launched its EY.ai Agentic Platform, which combines AI reasoning models with human knowledge and curated data sets.
Globally, the initial phase deploys 150 AI agents to assist 80,000 EY tax professionals with data collection, document analysis and review, and income and indirect tax compliance.
'We're developing AI agents to work hand-in-hand with our tax professionals to help deliver tax compliance tasks that are manual and labour-intensive, where automation can reduce error rates,' says Liew.
This is already being used at a proof-of-concept level, with EY Singapore working with tax authorities and corporations to roll it out enterprise-wide in coming quarters. Success here could pave the way for solutions in other parts of the business as well as across multiple sectors like life sciences, manufacturing and financial services.
Humans at the centre
Despite the advanced technology involved, Liew emphasises: 'Our AI strategy puts humans at the centre.' The workforce has been receptive to the organisation's AI transformation – EYQ, the organisation's private and secure large language model, has generated more than 68 million prompts since launch.
'Getting fluent in AI is non-negotiable,' says Liew. This is backed up by a concerted investment in learning and development – about 80 per cent of EY's global workforce has received AI training. Locally, EY announced in 2024 that it was investing to upskill 500 Singapore-based consulting professionals and an expected 100 new hires annually.
'We're committed to supporting the national agenda on AI skilling and scaling,' Liew says. 'One of our priorities is to continually develop a pipeline of AI talent that not only benefits our clients and our profession but also contributes to a more globally competitive talent pool for industries.'
One specific industry need he sees is broader and deeper board expertise in AI. 'Increasingly, we also need board directors with strong technology understanding to ask the right questions of management,' he shares, further underscoring the importance of working with ecosystem partners like trade associations and chambers to drive the proliferation of knowledge from boardrooms to front offices.
Investing in tomorrow's talent
The organisation is not just training existing employees; it is also reimagining how it attracts and develops new talent.
In 2024, EY Singapore announced a S$100 million investment over five years into talent development. This includes higher early-career compensation and the introduction of EY Scale, a two-year management associate programme offering diverse exposure across business lines – unusual among Big Four firms but reflecting EY's visionary move to cultivate talents with multidisciplinary exposure and broadened business outlook.
Additionally, the professional services organisation offers digital credentials through its bespoke EY Badges learning programme, which covers in-demand, future-focused topics such as data analytics and AI to sustainability and transformational leadership.
In association with Hult International Business School, EY also offers distinctive and fully accredited postgraduate programmes – a tech MBA, a Masters in Sustainability and a Masters in Business Analytics – complimentary to all employees.
These initiatives tie into Liew's vision for EY to play a role in uplifting skills across the broader professional services sector, as well as fostering the attractiveness of a career in the sector.
Green growth engine
Climate vulnerability across Asean drives another major focus area for EY. 'Asean, as a region, is prone to climate change risks – rising sea levels, heatwaves and floods,' says Liew.
'There's no doubt that we have to be committed to our clients' sustainability journeys, from transitioning to cleaner energy, to scaling green innovation, to investing for meaningful impact.'
One example of EY's work in this area: to develop climate decarbonisation strategies, its data analytics team uses nanosatellites to capture soil erosion data and crop yield data, giving palm oil clients actionable insights for reconfiguring growth plans.
In 2023, it set up the EY Center for Sustainable Supply Chains in Singapore, leveraging the country's position as a leading supply chain and logistics hub. The centre supports companies in Asean in developing sustainable practices for their supply chains, focusing on traceability, visibility, decarbonisation, the creation of circular business models, and assessment of taxes and incentives.
Sustainability reporting represents another major service area.
A critical gap is emerging between large companies' growing reporting expectations and their suppliers' lack of expertise to deliver credible carbon emissions data, Liew notes.
EY is part of the Queen Bee Enabled Sustainability Transition (QUEST) programme, piloted with the Singapore Business Federation and Singapore Post's small- and medium-sized enterprises (SME) suppliers in October 2024. EY developed a first-of-its-kind, sector-agnostic programme to prepare SMEs for evolving green procurement criteria and supplier codes of conduct from large and listed companies.
EY itself is walking the talk. In its renovation of the Singapore office, sustainability was made a priority in the procurement of furniture and materials and the use of energy efficient fixtures. These green efforts saw EY awarded the highest tier 4-Leaf Eco Office certification by the Singapore Environment Council.
The refreshed EY office features sustainable and Singapore Green Label certified materials, along with energy and water-efficient fixtures to reduce environmental impact.
Beyond business, EY is also creating impact to the communities.
Through EY Ripples, its corporate responsibility programme, EY people use their skills, knowledge and experience to support the next generation workforce, work with impact entrepreneurs and accelerate environmental sustainability.
For its corporate giving efforts, EY was conferred Champion of Good by the National Volunteer and Philanthropy Centre in 2024. Its annual Entrepreneur Of The Year awards programme, which has been running for over two decades, honours outstanding local entrepreneurs who are creating socioeconomic impact through building successful ventures.
Building a better working world
As Singapore celebrates its 60th year of independence, Liew reflects: 'We've grown in tandem with Singapore's enterprises; contributing back to the ecosystem that we operate in gives us purpose beyond profits.'
With a front-row seat to the pulse of industries and businesses, EY looks to leverage its experience to accelerate the growth and transformation of Singapore's professional services talent and industry as a whole.
'We're shaping the future with confidence,' Liew shares. 'A future where a better working world prevails – for our people, clients and community.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
7 hours ago
- Straits Times
Japan mulls over exporting used destroyers to S-E Asia allies
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Japan's Takanami-class destroyer JS Sazanami sail on an anti-piracy mission off the coast of Somalia. TOKYO – Japan is considering the export of used Maritime Self-Defence Force destroyers to South-east Asia, government sources said on Aug 13, in an effort to strengthen security ties with countries in the region where key sea lanes are located. Japan has been studying the export of Abukuma-class ships to the Philippines following a June meeting in Singapore where the countries' defence ministers discussed the matter. Tokyo is also looking at Indonesia and Vietnam as possible export destinations, according to the sources. Japan's principles on the overseas transfer of defence equipment and technology restrict the export of lethal weapons under its war-renouncing Constitution. But Japan eased its strict rules on the overseas transfer of defence equipment in 2024 to allow exports of lethal arms only if they are jointly developed or produced with other nations, with an eye on future sales of a next-generation fighter jet being developed with Britain and Italy. If the ship exports proceed, the Japanese government plans to classify the destroyers as 'jointly developed' products by making specification changes, the sources said, a move that could spark controversy. According to the Defence Ministry, six Abukuma-class destroyers were commissioned between 1989 and 1993, and all are set to be retired and replaced by new types operable by smaller crews, as the Self-Defence Forces have been struggling with a chronic personnel shortage. In its Defence Buildup Programme drawn up in 2022, the government said it will 'decommission vessels that have been in service for a considerable amount of years and have limitations in expandability' at an 'early date', and consider their transfer to 'like-minded countries'. Japan agreed with Indonesia at their defence ministers' talks in January to establish a working-level consultation body on maritime security to strengthen cooperation, while also promoting defence exchanges with Vietnam, including the provision of used Japanese material transport vehicles. Japan and the Philippines, both US allies in Asia, have been deepening security cooperation, sharing concerns over China's assertive maritime posture in the East and South China seas. KYODO NEWS
Straits Times
8 hours ago
- Straits Times
US embeds trackers in AI chip shipments to catch diversions to China, sources say
The US has sought to limit exports of chips and other technology to China in recent years to restrain its military modernisation. - The US authorities have secretly placed location-tracking devices in targeted shipments of advanced chips they see as being at high risk of illegal diversion to China, according to two people with direct knowledge of the previously unreported law enforcement tactic. The measures aim to detect artificial intelligence (AI) chips being diverted to destinations that are under US export restrictions, and apply only to select shipments under investigation, the people said. They show the lengths to which the US has gone to enforce its chip export restrictions on China, even as the Trump administration has sought to relax some curbs on Chinese access to advanced American semiconductors. The trackers can help build cases against people and companies who profit from violating US export controls, said the people, who declined to be named because of the sensitivity of the issue. Location trackers are a decades-old investigative tool used by US law enforcement agencies to track products subject to export restrictions, such as airplane parts. They have been used to combat the illegal diversion of semiconductors in recent years, one source said. Five other people actively involved in the AI server supply chain said they were aware of the use of the trackers in shipments of servers from manufacturers such as Dell and Super Micro, which include chips from Nvidia and AMD. Those people said the trackers are typically hidden in the packaging of the server shipments. They did not know which parties were involved in installing them, or where along the shipping route they were put in. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore 2 dead after fire in Jalan Bukit Merah flat, about 60 evacuated Singapore How the SAF's drone push for recruits reflects new battlefield realities Singapore HSA seeks Kpod investigators to arrest abusers, conduct anti-trafficking ops Opinion The 30s are heavy: Understanding suicide among Singapore's young adults Singapore Lawyer who sent misleading letters to 22 doctors fails in bid to quash $18,000 penalty Singapore Jail, caning for recalcitrant drug offender who assaulted 2 cops with stun device Singapore 4 taken to hospital after accident near Sports Hub, including 2 rescued with hydraulic tools Singapore SG60: Many hands behind Singapore's success story Reuters was not able to determine how often the trackers have been used in chip-related investigations, or when the US authorities started using them to investigate chip smuggling. The US started restricting the sale of advanced chips by Nvidia, AMD and other manufacturers to China in 2022. In one 2024 case described by two of the people involved in the server supply chain, a shipment of Dell servers with Nvidia chips included both large trackers on the shipping boxes and smaller, more discreet devices hidden inside the packaging – and even within the servers themselves. A third person said they had seen images and videos of trackers being removed by other chip resellers from Dell and Super Micro servers. The person said some of the larger trackers were roughly the size of a smartphone. The US Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security, which oversees export controls and enforcement, is typically involved, and Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) may take part too, said the sources. The HSI and FBI both declined to comment. The commerce department did not respond to requests for comment. The Chinese Foreign Ministry said it was not aware of the matter. Super Micro said in a statement that it does not disclose its 'security practices and policies in place to protect our worldwide operations, partners and customers'. It declined to comment on any tracking actions by the US authorities. Dell said it is 'not aware of a US government initiative to place trackers in its product shipments'. Nvidia declined to comment, while AMD did not answer a request for comment. Chip restrictions The US, which dominates the global AI chip supply chain, has sought to limit exports of chips and other technology to China in recent years to restrain its military modernisation. It has also put restrictions on the sale of chips to Russia to undercut war efforts against Ukraine. The White House and both houses of Congress have proposed requiring US chip firms to include location verification technology with their chips to prevent them from being diverted to countries where US export regulations restrict sales. China has slammed the US exports curbs as part of a campaign to suppress its rise and criticised the location tracking proposal. In July, the country's powerful cyberspace regulator summoned Nvidia to a meeting to express its concerns over the risks of its chips containing 'backdoors' that would allow remote access or control, which the company has strongly denied. In January, Reuters reported the US had traced organised AI chip smuggling to China via countries such as Malaysia, Singapore and the United Arab Emirates – but it is unclear if tracking devices were involved. The use of trackers by US law enforcement goes back decades. In 1985, Hughes Aircraft shipped equipment subject to US export controls, according to a court decision reviewed by Reuters. Executing a search warrant, the US customs service intercepted the crate at a Houston airport and installed a tracking device, the decision noted. US export enforcement agents sometimes install trackers after getting administrative approval. Other times, they get a judge to issue a warrant authorising use of the device, one source said. With a warrant, it is easier to use the information as evidence in a criminal case. A company may be told about the tracker, if it is not a subject of the investigation, and may consent to the government's installation of the trackers, the source added. But the devices can also be installed without its knowledge. People involved in diverting export-controlled chip and server shipments to China said they were aware of the devices. Two of the supply chain sources, who are China-based resellers of export-controlled chips, said they regularly took care to inspect diverted shipments of AI chip servers for the trackers due to the risks of the devices being embedded. An affidavit filed with a US Department of Justice complaint – regarding the arrests of two Chinese nationals charged with illegally shipping tens of millions of dollars' worth of AI chips to China earlier in August – describes one co-conspirator instructing another to check for trackers on Quanta H200 servers, which contain Nvidia chips. It said the English-language text was sent by a co-conspirator, whose name was redacted, to one of the defendants, Mr Yang Shiwei. 'Pay attention to see if there is a tracker on it, you must look for it carefully,' said the person, who went on to call the Trump administration by an obscenity. 'Who knows what they will do.' REUTERS
Business Times
8 hours ago
- Business Times
How scared should you be of ‘the China squeeze'?
'CHINA beats you with trade, Russia beats you with war,' mused US President Donald Trump on Aug 11. His reflection came mere hours before he extended a fragile trade truce with China for another 90 days. After months of tit-for-tat tariffs, the Sino-American trade war has settled into uneasy stasis. But China is using the time to hone a sophisticated arsenal of devastating economic weaponry. Even as the sides contemplate a broader deal to stabilise the planet's most important trading relationship – worth US$659 billion (S$843.7 billion) each year – China knows that its power is not in what it buys, but in what it sells. That is a far cry from the last time Chinese President Xi Jinping and Trump went head-to-head on trade in 2019. Xi agreed to buy more American goods in a deal much criticised in China. It fitted a clumsy pattern. Back then, China tended to punish transgressions by cutting access to its consumer market, such as for Australian wine or Lithuanian beef. No longer. Now Xi's economic weaponry squeezes supply chains and the foreign industries which depend on them. Victories piling up Chinese victories have piled up in recent months. First came Xi's masterstroke in April: retaliating against US tariffs by choking off supplies of Chinese-refined rare earth minerals and magnets critical to American industry. Within weeks, the US' US$1.5 trillion carmaking industry, among others, panicked and Trump sought peace. In July, the European Union squealed in the lead-up to an EU-Chinese summit after flows of rare earth minerals and battery technology to Europe slowed without explanation. Speeding them up then became a subject of negotiation. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up It all appears in line with Xi's very careful plan. In 2020, he called for China to create asymmetric dependencies, by ridding its own supply chains of foreign inputs, while seeking to 'tighten international production chains' dependence on China'. At a meeting held in secret in April that year, Xi told a powerful Communist Party body that such dependencies are 'a powerful countermeasure and deterrent capability against foreigners who would artificially cut off supply (to China).' It wants other countries to depend on it without it depending on them. China's use of economic sanctions of all sorts has reached an all-time high in 2025, according to data collected by Viking Bohman of Tufts University and co-authors. Like US export controls on which China's new regime is modelled, Xi's weapons are hard to resist using, even at the risk of blowback. 'Beijing was not surprised to find it has leverage, but it must be used discreetly,' says Xiang Lanxin of the National University of Singapore. So how does China's economic weaponry work? In recent years, Xi's officials have been drawing up a list of goods that China makes and the world needs. After Trump's election last year, China's government steeled itself. It implemented a long-expected export-licensing scheme for more than 700 products, many of which are relied upon by Western armed forces, including advanced manufacturing machines, battery inputs, biotechnology, sensors and critical minerals. The listed items are not limited to inputs for weaponry, however. Many are also critical to industries that officials view as strategic, such as electric vehicles and solar technology. For some of the items, such as minerals and chemical precursors for medicines, Chinese producers hold a near-monopoly over global supply. That is partly a result of market forces concentrating production in China, where it is cheap, scalable and often subsidised, and partly a deliberate strategy to control industrial inputs. Crucially, the rules formalise officials' ability to switch off exports by revoking licences. Chinese producers applying for them must know who is the end user of their goods and report as much. This has allowed China to continue choking supplies of rare earths to specific Western defence firms, even as it has resumed the flow into America as part of the trade truce. A shortage of heat-resistant magnets, for example, is pushing up costs for such things as jet-fighter engines. The legislation also includes so-called long-arm jurisdiction. It gives officials the ability to mandate that goods manufactured in third countries using Chinese-made inputs cannot be sold to specific end users. When China's policymakers consider which industries to target through such rules, they do not appear to focus on what will cause the most pain, but rather on what will be good for their own firms. Export controls follow a pattern of keeping high-value-added supply chains inside China, says Rebecca Arcesati of Merics, a Berlin-based think tank. If officials were to ban exports of finished goods, such as batteries or drones, it could hurt the strength of domestic producers. But by restricting the flow of industrial inputs needed to make those goods, policymakers in fact lower prices on domestic markets, and give their exporters a cost advantage against foreign competition in important sectors. This playbook appears to be in use in India today to prevent it from helping others break free of China's grip. Licences have stopped being approved for advanced manufacturing machines for India, where Apple is creating alternative supply chains. The restricted flow of machine tools and dysprosium, a rare earth element, have apparently slowed production of iPhones and AirPods respectively. And in June, Apple's in-country manufacturer, Foxconn, withdrew more than 300 Chinese engineers from India, suggesting that the recent moves were coordinated. Giving the game away China's use of its economic weapons this year has mainly been defensive – in response to American trade policies. But it all comes at a cost. Foreign officials and firms now fret about being suddenly cut off from Chinese suppliers, say, in a conflict over Taiwan. Chinese policymakers have done themselves 'enormous reputational damage', laments a foreign business leader in Beijing. Officials in Brussels, Tokyo and Washington are spooked and a flurry of deal-making is under way. That means Xi is likely to confront a drawback that America knows well: the more sanctions are used, the less effective they risk becoming. For a chokehold to be effective, a country must have a near-monopoly on supplying a particular good or service, says Matteo Maggiori of Stanford University. 'Sanctioning power is non-linear, which means that the difference between controlling 95 per cent and 85 per cent of a market is the difference between whether the targets of sanctions can find alternative suppliers or not,' says Maggiori. He notes that whereas tariffs cause firms to increase prices, export controls tend to spur them to invest in alternatives. Some Chinese officials quietly understand. Certain senior ones have even indicated to European businesses that urgent cases of rare earth shortages, such as those that would cause a plant to shutter, should be raised with the Ministry of Commerce to find informal work-arounds to keep supplies flowing. Such deft management of the controls by officials may help dull the desire of foreign firms focused on short-term profits to invest in alternatives. Wu Xinbo of the Centre for American Studies at Fudan University told CNN in June that the flow of exports could be dynamically managed. 'If the bilateral relationship is good, then I'll go a bit faster; if not, I'll slow down.' Ultimately, China finds itself in a delicate position. It is simultaneously assuring foreigners that its supply chains are reliable while warning them off seeking alternatives. And its diplomats badger trade partners not to give in to American demands that would isolate China from global trade. 'Attempting to decouple and disrupt supply chains,' Xi told foreign bosses in March, 'will only harm others and not benefit oneself.' Wise advice indeed. ©2025 The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved
