How an AI Star Wars image has backfired on Trump and the White House
ADVERTISEMENT
'That's no moon...'
No, Obi-wan, it really isn't. That's the official account of the White House posting an AI-generated image of Donald Trump as a jacked Jedi.
Funny the things that pass for normal these days...
To mark Star Wars Day, celebrated on May 4th – as a nod to the famous quote 'May the force be with you' - the White House posted on its official X account a computer-generated picture of a muscled-to-the-point-of-overcompensation version of Trump clutching a lightsaber in front of US flags and a pair of bald eagles.
It's... Well, it's past the point of parody.
The caption read: 'Happy May the 4th to all, including the Radical Left Lunatics who are fighting so hard to bring Sith Lords, Murderers, Drug Lords, Dangerous Prisoners, & well known MS-13 Gang Members, back into our Galaxy. You're not the Rebellion - you're the Empire. May the 4th be with you.'
Many things to unpack here, but one element stood out even more than those comically protruding veins on Trump's biceps: the red lightsaber.
As even the most casual of Star Wars fans can attest, red is the chosen colour of the villainous Sith Lords. Star Wars creator George Lucas once said regarding lightsaber colours: 'Good guys are green and blue, bad guys are red.'
Hardly rocket science, but it does mean that the image is an almighty self-own which signals that Trump is the very evil he's seeking to defeat.
As one X user pointed out: 'The lack of self awareness and hypocrisy by calling the left 'the empire' while showing trump with a Sith lightsaber.'
Some argued that red is the Republican colour and therefore works. However, the Star Wars universe features other lightsaber colours like green, yellow or even purple, none of which have negative connotations or links with the Democrats' colour of choice: blue.
The blunder is hardly surprising, considering Trump's cultural illiteracy is documented, as he proved with his
frequent Hannibal Lecter references
and lack of knowledge regarding the literary and cinematic references he was making during the campaign trail. Once again, and much like his Hannibal references, this botched Star Wars image is a ridiculous attempt to co-opt a popular cinematic touchstone, resulting in confused fearmongering tactics that reveal Trump and his team's genuine lack of cultural savvy.
It was also the second time in three days that the White House shared an AI-generated image of Trump that stoked controversy.
Trump shared an image on his
Truth Social
account depicting himself as the pope, after jokingly stating he should succeed the late Pope Francis.
Indeed, days before the post, Trump joked he was the 'number one choice' to succeed the late Francis. 'I'd like to be pope. That would be my number one choice,' he told reporters at the White House.
ADVERTISEMENT
Trump received criticism over the irreverent post. Republicans against Trump reposted the image on X, calling it 'a blatant insult to Catholics and a mockery of their faith', while former Italian prime minister Matteo Renzi wrote on X: 'This is an image that offends believers, insults institutions and shows that the leader of the global right enjoys being a clown. In the meantime, the American economy risks recession and the dollar loses value.'
Whether it's an AI Pope or an AI Jedi, it's clear that the Trump administration is showing that traditional White House communication is a thing of the past and that even artificial intelligence is making them look like the bad guys.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
World's papers react to unprecedented Israeli strikes on Iran
Iranian state-owned Press TV, owned by the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting, confirms that commanders of the Islamic Revolution Guard Corps, including senior General Hossein Salami and Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces Bagheri, have been "martyred". Press TV quoted the leader of the Islamic revolution in Iran who said that the "Zionist regime has prepared a bitter and painful fate for itself", adding that Iran's defence ministry is "fully ready" to punish Israel severely. Press TV is actively tweeting too, claiming that Iranian civilian neighbourhoods and residential buildings in Tehran have been targeted. The news channel also stated that in the Narmak neighbourhood of Tehran, five people were killed and 20 injured. The Israeli press is also reacting. Left-wing daily Haaretz writes that Israel launched "pre-emptive strikes" and is preparing for retaliation from Iran. The paper says that although various reports said that the United States formally expressed its opposition to the attacks, it remains unclear whether the US offered to share intelligence or aerial refuelling capacity. The paper says this option would allow the White House to participate "while maintaining some sort of plausible deniability". The editor-in-chief of the right-wing Jerusalem Post quotes the IDF's Chief of Staff, who says the strikes were launched because they reached "a point of no return". "History taught us: when faced with threats to destroy us, we must never bow our heads." In an analysis piece, The Jerusalem Post writes that Israel struck because Iran's ambitions "are no longer hypothetical". The paper says that intelligence showed that Iran had enriched enough uranium to produce some 15 nuclear warheads and was actively conducting nuclear tests. Finally, we turn to reactions from the international press. The New York Times writes that Israel's attack aims to "cripple" Iran's nuclear program. The paper also says that the major attack could escalate into a war involving the most powerful militaries in the Middle East. Al Jazeera calls it a "major strike". American broadcaster NBC News highlights the fact that the strikes were conducted without US involvement. French right-wing Le Figaro says that the Israeli strikes are a "bitter setback for Trump", who claims to be a "peacemaker". The paper writes that the US president asked Israel to choose diplomacy and not attack Iran, but only a few hours later, the strikes began. The Wall Street Journal reports that oil prices rose by more than 8 percent after Israel's attack, reaching their highest level since February. It adds that the rise shows that traders don't think the US will lift restrictions on Iranian barrels.
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
'Avoid escalation': World reacts to Israel strike on Iran
Here is a roundup of key reactions: 'Cannot have nuclear bomb': United States US President Donald Trump, told Fox News he was aware Israel was going to conduct strikes on Iran before it happened and said: "Iran cannot have a nuclear bomb and we are hoping to get back to the negotiating table. We will see." Fox News also reported that "Trump noted the US is ready to defend itself and Israel if Iran retaliates." 'Maximum restraint': UN UN chief Antonio Guterres asked "both sides to show maximum restraint, avoiding at all costs a descent into deeper conflict, a situation that the region can hardly afford," according to a spokesperson. Guterres was "particularly concerned" by Israel's strikes on nuclear installations amid the ongoing US-Iran negotiations. 'Deeply worried' : China "The Chinese side... is deeply worried about the severe consequences that such actions might bring," foreign ministry spokesman Lin Jian said, calling "on relevant parties to take actions that promote regional peace and stability and to avoid further escalation of tensions". - 'Reasonable reaction': Czech Republic - Czech Republic Foreign Minister Jan Lipavsky said Iran "is supporting so many players, including the Hezbollah and Hamas movements, with the intention to destroy the state of Israel, and also seeking a nuclear bomb", that "I see that this was a reasonable reaction from the state of Israel towards a possible threat of a nuclear bomb". 'Avoid any escalation' : France "We call on all sides to exercise restraint and avoid any escalation that could undermine regional stability," France's foreign minister Jean-Noel Barrot said on X. 'Dangerous escalation': Hamas "This aggression constitutes a dangerous escalation that threatens to destabilise the region," said the Iran-backed, Palestinian militant group, whose October 2023 attack on Israel sparked the Gaza war. No 'battleground': Jordan "Jordan has not and will not allow any violation of its airspace, reaffirming that the Kingdom will not be a battleground for any conflict," a government spokesperson told AFP after Jordan closed its airspace. 'Dangerous approach' : Oman Nuclear talks mediator Oman said "calls on the international community to adopt a clear and firm position to put an end to this dangerous approach, which threatens to rule out diplomatic solutions and jeopardise the security and stability of the region". 'Strong condemnation': Qatar Gaza mediator Qatar expressed "its strong condemnation and denunciation of the Israeli attack," the Gulf state's foreign ministry said, adding that the "dangerous escalation threatens security and stability of the region and hinders efforts to de-escalate and reach diplomatic solutions". 'Aggressive actions': Turkey "Israel must put an immediate end to its aggressive actions that could lead to further conflicts," Turkey's foreign ministry said in a statement. 'Reduce tensions urgently': UK British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said in a statement: "The reports of these strikes are concerning and we urge all parties to step back and reduce tensions urgently. Escalation serves no one in the region." Tehran-backed Huthi rebels said on Telegram they backed "Iran's full and legitimate right to... develop its nuclear programme" and that "we strongly condemn the brutal Israeli aggression against the Islamic Republic of Iran and affirm its full and legitimate right to respond by all possible means". burs-djt/yad © 2025 AFP
France 24
3 hours ago
- France 24
Trump makes G7 summit return in Iran crisis
The G7 summit starting Sunday in the Canadian Rockies town of Kananaskis marks the first major global gathering of Trump's second term, in which he has been even more brash in shattering diplomatic norms. Looking to avoid a dust-up, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney had set the agenda on largely uncontroversial themes such as building global supply chains for critical minerals. That agenda could now be upended as Israel launched a massive military campaign against Iran on Friday, saying it was taking pre-emptive action against its adversary's contested nuclear program. The Trump administration has closely aligned the United States with Israel, taking aim even at close allies who criticize its offensive in Gaza. But Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu openly defied Trump, who hours earlier had called for a diplomatic solution and whose friend and roving envoy Steve Witkoff had been due to hold new talks with Iran on Sunday just as the G7 opened. A senior Canadian official said there would be no attempt at the G7 to reach consensus on a joint communique on the issues of the day and that leaders instead would be asked to endorse "short, action-oriented statements." "Of course it would be desirable for a summit statement to be issued, but as the summit is being held in a very complex international situation, I believe that the unity of the G7 should be given the highest priority," Japanese Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya said. New leader in '51st state' The last time Trump attended a G7 summit in Canada in 2018, he stormed out early and took to social media to disassociate the United States from the statement and brand then-prime minister Justin Trudeau as "dishonest and weak." The bad blood never ended, and Trump on returning to office mockingly said Canada should be the 51st US state. Trudeau handed over the premiership in March to Carney, a former central banker who told Trump firmly in the White House that Canada was "never for sale." Like Trump, "Trudeau liked being the center of attention," said John Kirton, founder of the G7 Research Group at the University of Toronto. Trudeau at least at first was seen as "young, handsome and -- I'm quoting others -- hot. Carney is none of these things," Kirton said. Carney has instead patched up with Trump through his analytical skills and competence, Kirton said. Trump also has an incentive to keep the peace in Kananaskis -- the United States will lead the G7 in 2027. "He doesn't want to kill the G7 golden goose before he can produce the 'biggest, best summit ever' for the whole world stage two years from now," Kirton said. 'America First' The G7 club of major industrial democracies -- Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the United States -- was formed in the 1970s to coordinate economic policy and grew in scope to take on some of the world's security hotspots. Trump since returning to the White House has upended the global economic system by imposing tariffs and has sought to negotiate with Russia over Ukraine -- an issue that will also figure prominently when he heads to a NATO summit in The Hague a week after Canada. The US president can be expected to push back in Kananaskis if allies seek to moderate him, said Rachel Rizzo, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council. "He does not view these organizations as ways to deepen and expand American power and influence. He sees these fora as constraining America," she said. Europeans will observe Trump at the G7 to see how he treats their alliance, said Max Bergmann, director of the Europe, Russia and Eurasia Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "Our allies and partners in Europe are really questioning the US commitment and they are asking themselves, is this a relationship that is going to be maintained?" Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky plans to attend the G7 and hopes to meet Trump. The two clashed bitterly at the White House on February 28 but Trump since then has voiced frustration at Russia's reluctance on peace overtures. In a key step distancing himself from Trudeau, Carney has also invited Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Relations sharply deteriorated after Trudeau publicly accused India of masterminding the assassination of a Sikh separatist in Canada. © 2025 AFP
