Iran meets European powers amid threats of UN sanctions snapback
The European diplomats were seen leaving the Iranian consulate in the city, the venue for the talks, shortly before 2:00 pm (1100 GMT), after several hours inside.
There was no immediate information given by either side about the meeting.
Israel's offensive -- which killed top commanders, nuclear scientists and hundreds of others as residential areas were struck as well -- also derailed US-Iran nuclear talks that began in April.
Since then, the European powers, known as the E3, have threatened to trigger the "snapback mechanism", which would reinstate UN sanctions on Iran by the end of August, under the moribund 2015 nuclear deal.
The option to trigger the snapback expires in October, and Tehran has warned of consequences should the E3 opt to activate it.
"Inaction by the E3 is not an option," a European source said, noting that Tehran would be reminded during the meeting that the snapback window closes within months.
The source said Europeans were preparing to trigger the mechanism "in the absence of a negotiated solution" and called on Iran to make "clear gestures" regarding uranium enrichment and the resumption of cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog.
Ahead of the talks on Friday, Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said the meeting would be a "test of realism for the Europeans and a valuable opportunity to correct their views on Iran's nuclear issue", in remarks to the official IRNA news agency.
Sanctions
Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi, who attended the talks Friday alongside senior Iranian diplomat Majid Takht-Ravanchi, warned this week that triggering sanctions "is completely illegal".
He also accused European powers of "halting their commitments" to the deal after the United States unilaterally withdrew in 2018 during President Donald Trump's first term.
"We have warned them of the risks, but we are still seeking common ground to manage the situation," said Gharibabadi.
Iranian diplomats have previously warned that Tehran could withdraw from the global nuclear non-proliferation treaty if UN sanctions are reimposed.
Restoring sanctions would deepen Iran's international isolation and place further pressure on its already strained economy.
Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar has urged European powers to trigger the mechanism.
Israel's June 13 attack on Iran came two days before Tehran and Washington were scheduled to meet for a sixth round of nuclear negotiations.
On June 22, the United States joined Israel's offensive by striking Iranian nuclear facilities at Fordo, Isfahan, and Natanz.
Before the war, Washington and Tehran were divided over uranium enrichment, which Iran has described as a "non-negotiable" right, while the United States called it a "red line".
The International Atomic Energy Agency says Iran is enriching uranium to 60 percent purity -- far above the 3.67 percent cap under the 2015 deal and close to weapons-grade levels.
Tehran has said it is open to discussing the rate and level of enrichment, but not the right to enrich uranium.
A year after the US withdrawal from the nuclear deal, Iran began rolling back its commitments, which had placed restrictions on its nuclear activities in exchange for sanctions relief.
Israel and Western powers accuse Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons, a charge Tehran has repeatedly denied.
'Unshakable'
Iran insists it will not abandon its nuclear programme, with Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi saying that "Iran's position remains unshakable, and that our uranium enrichment will continue".
Araghchi has previously noted that enrichment was "stopped" due to "serious and severe" damage to nuclear sites caused by US and Israeli strikes.
The full extent of the damage sustained in the US bombing remains unclear. Trump has claimed the sites were "completely destroyed", but US media reports based on Pentagon assessments have cast doubt over the scale of destruction.
Since the 12-day war, Iran has suspended cooperation with the IAEA, accusing it of bias and failing to condemn the attacks.
Inspectors have since left the country but a technical team is expected to return in the coming weeks after Iran said future cooperation would take a "new form".
Israel has warned it may resume strikes if Iran rebuilds facilities or moves toward weapons capability.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
19 minutes ago
- Euronews
Customs duties: What will be the impact on European consumers?
The impact of a tentative trade deal struck by the European Union and United States on European consumers will be limited, experts have said. On Sunday, the US and the EU agreed to a deal in order to avoid a trade war between the world's two largest economies, warding off US President Donald Trump's threat of 30% tariffs on most European goods if no deal was reached by 1 August. Under the preliminary agreement, around 70% of EU exports bound for the US will now be subject to a 15% tariff. The remaining 30% of goods are open to further negotiations. The EU has not put in place any tariff barriers targeting American products, so their prices will not rise in Europe. "The impact on European consumers will be limited," Agustín Reyna, Director General of the European Consumers' Organisation (BEUC), said. "Customs duties are paid by the importer. In this case, the 15% tax that the United States imposes on EU products applies to American importers. So that means that certain products could become more expensive for American citizens", Reyna told Euronews. Increase in Chinese products In the long term, Chinese products currently exported to the United States could find their way onto the European market, which could lead to lower prices in Europe. "The main effect will be a drop in demand for European products in the United States, less demand for Chinese products in the United States, and this means that these products will then try to find a market in Europe, which will generally lead to lower prices," Niclas Poitiers, a researcher at Bruegel, told Euronews. These lower prices for European consumers would however be bad news for certain businesses. "There are certain companies that are in direct competition with Chinese competitors. And for these companies, they could face stronger competition and they could also have difficulty with these lower prices. So there is a negative effect," Poitiers said. Drop in demand for EU products in the US? European companies exporting to the United States risk facing a drop in demand on the other side of the Atlantic as their products risk becoming more expensive. This could lead to a drop in their revenues and potentially jobs in Europe. "There are certain companies in certain sectors, like pharmaceuticals, for example, where there is a large proportion of exports and employment for things that go to the United States. But for most sectors, this represents a small proportion of production," Niclas Poitiers said. As a result of the deal, Trump has expressed hope that foreign companies will be encouraged to open factories in the US to avoid paying customs duties. However, the unpredictability of his agreements and the uncertainty surrounding the duration of these tariff barriers could, conversely, discourage European companies from investing in the US. 'Counterproductive' In Brussels, residents interviewed about the terms of the new agreement said they thought the deal would have little impact on their purchasing power. "I don't think it will have an impact on my daily life, maybe a little, but it will affect Americans more," said Ian, from England. He added: "I think tariffs are counterproductive. I think I'd prefer free trade and I think it's damaging for Americans to impose tariffs on everyone." Carolina, an Italian citizen, believes that the trade agreement "will have an impact on everyone in different ways, depending on the areas in which we work and the lives we lead." The EU is too highly dependent on the US and should have greater economic autonomy, she said.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Why are European arms reaching Israel?
European dockworkers are calling on EU governments to halt arms shipments and withdraw diplomatic support for Israel. They stress that international treaties state that weapons should not be exported to war zones where human rights are violated. 'Over the past two years, we've seen an increase in the movement of weapons through civilian ports,' says Josè Nivoi, a key figure in the Genoese dockworkers' movement. 'We've filed a number of legal complaints. An excuse they often use is that they frame it as a private transaction rather than a state-to-state arms transfer — as if they were trading bananas.' For years Nivoi has collected evidence about arms cargo loads in the port as a union manager. Dockworkers accuse authorities of deliberately keeping silent about controversial shipments. 'In Italy, Law no. 185 of 1990 in principle prohibits the transit and shipment of weapons to countries at war. We are calling for civilian ports not to be used to move arms.' In 2024, Italy announced that it had suspended shipments of military equipment to Israel, while honouring contracts signed before 7 October 2023. This translates into over €6 million in weapons, ammunition, maintenance and spare parts. Facts and figures on Israel's weapons' imports Israel imports almost 70% of its arsenal from the US, the world's largest arms exporter. Germany is Israel's second supplier. Since 7 October 2023, it has exported 485 million euros worth of weapons. Italy ranks third, supplying less than 1%. The UN Arms Trade Treaty and the European Common Position state that human rights violations and war crimes should prevent such sales. The EU Council Common Position is legally binding but it lacks enforcement. Member States can interpret it differently. Following Israel's war on Gaza, Italy, Spain, Belgium and the Netherlands have halted or restricted exports. There's little scrutiny over Hamas's weapons, mostly from Iran, which has not signed the UN arms trade treaty. Why does Israel receive military support from EU countries? The EU recently found that Israel is breaching its human rights obligations in Gaza. So why does Israel still receive military support from European countries? Giorgio Beretta, one of the most authoritative Italian analysts on the arms trade and a long-standing voice of the Italian Peace and Disarmament Network, explains that treaties are voluntary and then each country must commit to them. 'The regulations are sound. The problem lies in their enforcement, because there is always a wide margin of discretion,' says Giorgio Beretta of the Permanent Observatory on Small Arms, OPAL. Beretta says the information provided to national governments, which are responsible for ensuring weapons are not used to commit human rights violations, is often too vague. 'A general category might be indicated, such as 'aircraft' or 'naval vessels', but there's a big difference between aircraft used for ground attacks and aircraft used for rescue. By the time a parliament reviews exports, the weapons have often already been delivered.' In May 2025, the EU announced a review of the EU Israel Association Agreement after finding Israel in breach of the trade deal's human rights clause, citing violations in Gaza and the West Bank. By July, the EU had postponed any actions, let alone any sanctions, including a possible arms embargo — yet again exposing its deep-rooted divisions over Israel.
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Poland's €45bn defence loan bid makes up third of EU total
Eighteen member states have put in requests for Commission-issued loans to finance defence projects, with Poland asking for over a third of the total asked. The EU executive said on Wednesday that Belgium, Bulgaria, Czechia, Estonia, Greece, Spain, France, Croatia, Italy, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia and Finland had requested access to so-called SAFE loans by its soft deadline of 29 July. The total money they requested amounts to €127 billion. Poland's deputy prime minister said the projects the country submitted to the Commission collectively had a price tag of "approximately €45 billion". "We want the funds from this programme to strengthen the key capabilities of the Polish Armed Forces and our security programmes, including, among others, the "Eastern Shield" programme," Władysław Marcin Kosiniak-Kamysz wrote in a post on X. "The final amount we receive will depend on the number of applications and the allocation of funds by the EC among member states. Securing these funds is a tangible investment in the security and development of our defence industry. It also strengthens the security, deterrence capabilities, and defence of the entire EU and NATO," he added. Warsaw's defence spending has jumped from 2.7% of GDP in 2022 to 4.2% in 2024 - the highest level for any NATO ally. It is projected to rise to 4.7% this year. The Commission's loans-for-weapons programme, dubbed SAFE, is a key plank of the 'Readiness 2030' proposal that aims to see hundreds of billions of euros invested into defence across the EU before the end of the decade. The EU's executive, which has a better credit rating than many member states, has planned to raise up to €150 billion on the markets through the scheme for member states to finance defence acquisitions together. Defence and Space Commissioner Andrius Kubilius said in a statement that the "strong interest" in the scheme "demonstrates the EU's unity and ambition in security and defence". The deadline for formal submission is 30 November 2025, meaning the total number of member states wishing to tap into SAFE and the amount requested may grow with a Commission spokesperson telling Euronews that Kubilius is in touch with other member states and is "pretty confident that this figure will increase". To secure SAFE loans, the projects must include a European preference - whereby about two-thirds of value of the weapon system being acquired has to be made in an EU member state, Ukraine, or in a European Economic Area/European Free Trade Association country. Several other third countries are however hoping to be able to participate at the same level as EU member states. These include the UK and Canada although they need to negotiate a bilateral agreement first which will include a financial contribution. Another condition for SAFE is that the projects must target priority capabilities including ammunition, drone and anti-drone systems, air defence, and military mobility among others. Some member states for which upping military expenditure is a politically sensitive topic may decide to take up loans to finance acquisitions for Ukraine only. Other countries, like Germany, have indicated they may join SAFE procurement projects but finance them through their own coffers.
