logo
Why we need to look beyond marks, grades and percentiles

Why we need to look beyond marks, grades and percentiles

The Hindu6 days ago
During admission season, marks, grades and percentiles are the talk of the town. A staggering number of students have scored very high marks and outstanding grades. Some have managed to score centum even in arts subjects. But this raises a question: is there a strong correlation between marks and competencies? Sadly, the answer is no.
Problems
Where is the gap and how should it be addressed? Most teachers, including those in colleges and universities, are generous in awarding marks and grades so that they do not invite criticism that their students have not performed well in exams. The assessment pattern itself also subtly promotes high grades. Most questions are remember-recall questions that only test rote memory. There are hardly any higher order questions that test the ability to think, analyse, evaluate and apply concepts and theories learnt in classrooms to real life. In many institutions, the Continuous Formative or Internal Assessment, which accounts for close to 40% of the total marks, is not rigorous. Teachers generously award anywhere between 70-90% on the argument that students need to be helped to come out in flying colours.
The key question, therefore, is: do CGPAs help students progress to higher studies or in their employment prospects? Many students who score excellent marks are unable to secure admission in premier institutions for their Master's and research programmes or crack job interviews. This is a reflection of their cognitive capabilities and the educational system. Their CGPAs have given them a false sense of excellence.
Strategies
How can this be set right? By creating and promoting an ecosystem with a decent correlation between student competencies and grades. Bloom's Revised Taxonomy talks about six levels of knowledge and question papers should deal with all of them. Higher order questions that talk about analysis, critiques and evaluation and the translation of concepts and theories into realities are crucial. When confronted regularly with challenging questions that are not memory-based, students will be forced to think and sharpen their cognitive capabilities. Certain key education outcomes such as multiculturalism and adaptability cannot be quantified and assessed using traditional benchmarks of excellence but they are vital to one's growth and societal development.
Students should be helped to think beyond CGPAs and transition to the real world where skills and competencies, both cognitive and meta-cognitive, matter. They should realise that critical thinking, problem-solving and communication skills and emotional intelligence are crucial to navigate the complexities of life. They should be encouraged to go beyond textbooks, exams, and grades and step into the real world where they will be assessed not by their marks and grades but by their cognitive capabilities and humane qualities.
This requires student-centric classrooms that promote thinking skills with an emphasis on analysis, interpretation and application and offer adequate space to raise questions and express diverse points of view on academic and non-academic topics. The obsession with marks and grades should be replaced by a focus on life-skills that will prepare future-ready citizens who can contribute to making the world a better place to live in.
In the final analysis, higher educational institutions should promote an ecosystem that weans students away from a memory-based educational system and nurtures their thinking capacities. Administrators, teachers and parents should realise that there should be a transition from classrooms to the real world fraught with multiple challenges. The whole exercise calls for a re-think on the notion of excellence. Traditionally, excellence in academic circles was equated with enviable CGPAs where students were graded on the basis of predetermined criteria. We need to re-visit and re-define excellence not so much in terms of marks and grades but in terms of students' ability to navigate the complex challenges of life. This obviously calls for going beyond marks, grades and percentiles.
The writer is an Emeritus Professor, Gandhigram Rural Institute Deemed-to-be University. Email josephdorairaj@gmail.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Takeaways from the NCAA's infractions report on Michigan and Connor Stalions' advance scouting scheme
Takeaways from the NCAA's infractions report on Michigan and Connor Stalions' advance scouting scheme

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Takeaways from the NCAA's infractions report on Michigan and Connor Stalions' advance scouting scheme

The NCAA has officially punished Michigan for Connor Stalions' advance scouting scheme. The governing body gave former coach Jim Harbaugh a 10-year show-cause penalty (on top of a four-year show-cause Harbaugh received in 2024 for a different investigation) and gave Stalions an eight-year show-cause. Additionally, the school was fined in multiple ways and those fines could exceed $20 million. Current head coach Sherrone Moore was given a two-year show-cause penalty and had a third game added onto his two-game suspension for the 2025 season. That suspension was self-imposed by Michigan earlier this year and will take place in Week 3 and Week 4. The third game of the suspension will happen in 2026. The NCAA's full report for the infractions can be found here. Below are some key takeaways from the NCAA's findings over the course of its investigation into the Wolverines' scheme. Stalions' presence on CMU sidelines confirmed The infractions report says with authority that Stalions was dressed in Central Michigan gear on the Chippewas' sideline for their Week 1 game at Michigan State in 2023. A man who looked like Stalions was spotted on the sidelines in video footage of the game as the scandal blew up later in the 2023 season, but his presence had not been officially confirmed. "On one occasion in 2023, Stalions personally engaged in-person scouting when he stood on Central Michigan University's sideline wearing a bench pass and disguised in Central Michigan-issued coaching gear during the institution's contest against Michigan State. According to interview statements by a former football staff member, Stalions attended that game in part to decipher Michigan State's signals, but also to help a Central Michigan staff member with play calling." The NCAA is currently investigating Central Michigan regarding the Stalions incident and the school has said it's working towards a resolution with the governing body. Stalions called his scouting network the KGB The infractions report outlines how Stalions would purchase tickets to games in the lower level of stadiums so that the ticket holders could see the sideline of the team they were scouting. Per the report, 'Stalions used a network of individuals to scout 13 future opponents a total of 56 times across 52 separate contests. Those individuals included Stalions' acquaintances, another Michigan football staff member, current and former interns and their friends, and football student-athletes and their friends.' Stalions would refer to the group as 'counterintelligence' and called them the 'KGB.' 'Using phones often purchased and provided by Stalions, attendees filmed football coaches and staff members signaling plays from the sidelines. Attendees would then send Stalions film, which he would analyze to decipher the opponents' signals. At the hearing [with the NCAA], Stalions confirmed that he bought people tickets to attend future opponents' games. He also state that, on at least some occasions, those attendees provided Stalions with the recordings that they took during the game.' Moore deleted texts with Stalions after reading Yahoo Sports article It's been widely known that Sherrone Moore deleted his text message thread with Stalions as the scandal emerged. According to the NCAA's report, Moore deleted those texts 'roughly 30 minutes' after Yahoo Sports first broke the the story on Oct. 19, 2023. Michigan employees were told to preserve all materials by the school on Oct. 20. 'The following day, after receiving Michigan's preservation notice, Moore deleted from his work phone a single message that was part of a broader thread that reference Stalions standing by Moore during a game. Moore did not immediately disclose that he had deleted any messages. When questioned by the enforcement staff, Moore initially blamed the deleted messages on storage space, although he eventually admitted to deleting them as an emotional reaction to the news.' Stalions was boastful in documentary, less so to NCAA Netflix released a documentary about Stalions in August of 2024 that included Stalions' own words about his scouting scheme. The NCAA noted multiple times in the infractions report that Stalions was much more boastful about the impact of his work on camera than he was to NCAA investigators. 'Stalions also made inconsistent statements about Harbaugh's awareness and appreciation of his scouting efforts. In the Netflix documentary, Stalions discussed receiving a game ball after one of Michigan's victories in the fall of 2022. According to Stalions, Harbaugh awarded him the game ball for deciphering signals, with Stalions noting that he was the only person who received a game ball with their name on it. Further, Stalions said he took the game ball as Harbaugh's way of saying 'We see you, you're doing a good job.' At the hearing, however, Stalions diminished that incident, saying that he was only speculating about the reason for receiving the game ball, and that Harbaugh usually gave out 15 game balls per game and tried to rotate them to all staff members. Moore confirmed that Harbaugh tried to recognize many staff members throughout the game. Harbaugh's strained relationship with Michigan's compliance office The report notes that Harbaugh did not see eye-to-eye with Michigan's own compliance office. In addition to the advance scouting scandal, Harbaugh was the subject of another NCAA investigation for recruiting violations during his time at Michigan. He was given a year-long suspension and a four-year show-cause penalty in August of 2024. 'As a general matter, head coaches are responsible for the culture and conduct in their program. A key component of that culture is compliance, which is a shared responsibility. Harbaugh did not embrace that responsibility. Harbaugh and his program had a contentious relationship with Michigan's compliance office, leading coaches and staff members to act, at times, with disregard for the rules. Compliance efforts were a one-way street. For the scouting violations that occurred during the 2021 and 2022 seasons, Harbaugh failed to demonstrate that he adequately promoted compliance and monitored his program.' The NCAA said in the report that Moore has not acted like Harbaugh did when it comes to compliance issues. Moore was given a less-harsh Level II penalty, while Harbaugh received an aggravated Level I. 'Specifically, Moore's texts were recovered without issue, he acknowledged and provided an explanation for his conduct upon being questioned and he continued to cooperate through the remainder of the investigation. Moreover and while not directly relevant to the underlying conduct, Moore attended the two-day, in-person hearing and provided candid, valuable perspective. Importantly, Moore — Michigan's current head football coach — explained his views on compliance and the culture of compliance he intends to instill in his program. Michigan's chief compliance officer confirmed that Moore has taken a new and different approach than his predecessor. The panel factored this positive development into Moore's violation, classification and ultimate penalty.' Stalions told an athlete to lie to the NCAA Per a recorded phone call, Stalions told a Michigan athlete that he should lie to the NCAA about the athlete's role in the scouting scheme and his knowledge of it. 'During that same phone call, Stalions also asked student-athlete 1 to provide false information to the enforcement staff related to his role in the scheme, the source of Stalions' stolen signals, and any knowledge of Stalions' hard drives containing film. Specifically, Stalions told student-athlete 1 'Again, if you just stick to that story, you're good. Whatever you say is your story and that's going to be what the truth is. This is also not the court of law. You can technically lie your ass off.' The report details Stalions' refusal to comply with the NCAA's requests for data and records multiple times. His interview with the NCAA's enforcement staff was held in April of 2024 and footage of it was included in the documentary. The NCAA said the conversation in the interview 'was not productive in yielding information about the scheme. Specifically, the enforcement staff cited frequent interruptions, objections, and side conversations by Stalions' counsel that prevented the enforcement staff from asking the relevant questions. However, Stalions did deny obtaining signals via in-person scouting of future opponents, directing individuals to attend games for the purpose of filming future opponents, or personally attending any games of future opponents.'

The book is ‘closed' on ‘Sex and the City' after ‘And Just Like That…' finale
The book is ‘closed' on ‘Sex and the City' after ‘And Just Like That…' finale

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The book is ‘closed' on ‘Sex and the City' after ‘And Just Like That…' finale

'And Just Like That…' the book is really truly 'closed' on the saga that is Carrie Bradshaw. 'Party of One,' Thursday's series finale of the 'Sex and the City' spinoff really was the end of the road for the gals, their Cosmopolitans, men and Manolos, as showrunner Michael Patrick King told Variety. 'It is closed. Because I care so much about what we've done. … I never thought once about continuing,' insisted King, who directed the final bow, which Susan Fales-Hill co-wrote. 'Telling it like it is: It's an instinct. Anyone else could keep going. I can't,' said King, 70. King similarly reached a natural conclusion with the 2004 'Sex and the City' finale: 'We don't just want to do it. We want to do it well, or do it when there's something kind of dangerous and exciting to say.' King and Carrie herself (Sarah Jessica Parker) announced in the midst of the show's third season — ironically, its highest-rated — earlier this month that the franchise was 'coming to an end.' It was a shock, and in some cases, a relief, to viewers who'd held on through many an out-of-character antic or plotline and were finally enjoying themselves beyond the hate-watch. 'I always like the fact that you wish you were getting more. The idea of leaving a party while it's still happening is the most elegant thing you can say for a TV series,' said King, whose sole rule for the writers' room was 'don't repeat. And we've done a lot. The one thing we haven't done was get Carrie to the point where she says, 'Maybe I'm enough.''

InventHelp Inventor Develops New Potty Training Accessory (SGM-538)
InventHelp Inventor Develops New Potty Training Accessory (SGM-538)

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

InventHelp Inventor Develops New Potty Training Accessory (SGM-538)

PITTSBURGH, Aug. 15, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- "I wanted to create a product that would make potty training a less stressful and more positive experience for parents and children," said an inventor, from New Palestine, Ind., "so I invented THE POTTY PARTNER. My design could help provide a positive transition from diapers to toilet use, and it could allow for successful training in a shorter time or at an earlier age." The patent-pending invention provides an effective accessory for toilet training a child. In doing so, it would teach young children how to use the toilet in a positive and non-stressful manner. It also could help with safety issues. As a result, it could help simplify the task of toilet training. The invention features a durable and novel design that is easy to attach, use, and clean so it is ideal for parents with infants and children ages 3 and younger. Additionally, a prototype model and technical drawings are available upon request. The original design was submitted to the Indianapolis sales office of InventHelp. It is currently available for licensing or sale to manufacturers or marketers. For more information, write Dept. 24-SGM-538, InventHelp, 100 Beecham Drive, Suite 110, Pittsburgh, PA 15205-9801, or call (412) 288-1300 ext. 1368. Learn more about InventHelp's Invention Submission Services at View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE InventHelp Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store