Wiradjuri man Paul Coe, a ‘legend of the land rights movement', dies age 76
The beloved community figure has been remembered as a giant of the land rights movement who 'changed the lives of Aboriginal people across the nation'.
His family have described him as a 'Wiradjuri warrior' who dedicated his life to upholding his people's ways – overcoming discrimination to blaze a trail for Aboriginal justice, land rights and self-determination.
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
NSW Aboriginal Land Council chairperson Raymond Kelly said Coe was an 'incredible fighter' who would be remembered for generations.
'He has changed the lives of Aboriginal people across the nation … pointing out uncomfortable truths about police brutality and institutional racism,' he said.
The chairperson of the NSW Aboriginal Legal Service, Keith Morgan, paid tribute to a 'towering figure in the fight for Aboriginal justice'.
'An inspiration and a fearless leader, Paul was a well-respected Aboriginal man that people looked up to as an uncompromising advocate for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander rights,' Morgan said.
'He leaves a legacy at the ALS that is unquantifiable.'
In a statement, his children vowed to honour the legacy of the beloved father, grandfather, brother and uncle.
'This is a loss we will all feel so deeply,' they said.
'Rest in Power, Dad.
'Yindyamarra.'
Coe was born in 1949 at Erambie Mission in Cowra in central west New South Wales, at a time when Indigenous people were subjected to strict laws that controlled every aspect of their lives.
He was the first Aboriginal student at Cowra high school to pass the HSC and be elected prefect, going on to become one of the first Aboriginal people to study law at the University of New South Wales.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
As the civil rights movement swept the US in the 1960s and 70s, Coe was central to developing the Australian arm of the Black Power movement from Sydney's Aboriginal heartland in Redfern.
He and other activists created a database to demonstrate the scale of 'racist actions by police', fighting back through protest, advocacy and legal avenues – a movement which led to the creation of the NSW Aboriginal Legal Service.
Coe was also part of the state's first Aboriginal Land Council, throwing his support behind the Gurindji people's fight against the Vestey Company in the Northern Territory (better known as the Wave Hill walk-off, which inspired the protest anthem, From Little Things Big Things Grow).
In 1979, Coe launched legal action against the Commonwealth in the high court, arguing for the recognition of Aboriginal people as the prior inhabitants of Australia before European colonisation. Though unsuccessful, the case helped lay the foundation for the landmark 1992 Mabo judgement that overturned the concept of terra nullius and paved the way for native title legislation.
Coe was named one of the inaugural winners of the NSW Aboriginal Land Council's (NSWALC) chairperson's award in 2017. In his acceptance speech, he paid homage to other staunch land rights activists – including his parents, Les and Agnes – from whom he drew wisdom and strength.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Australia should adopt US policies to attract fossil fuel dollars, says chief of ‘carbon major' Chevron
The boss of Chevron, one of the world's biggest oil and gas companies that reported earnings of $9bn in the last six months, has had a few gripes about Australia that he wanted to get off his chest. In an 'exclusive' interview with The Australian this weekend, the company's chief executive Mike Wirth argued he wanted Australia to be more like the US and the Middle East – and, if it was, then it would be in a better position to compete for fossil fuel investment dollars. Wirth revealed he had come from a private meeting with the deputy prime minister, Richard Marles, where he reportedly laid out why he thought Australia should be more like the US or the Middle East. The page one lead story came with a picture of Wirth perched on a leather couch and staring imperiously down the lens. Sign up: AU Breaking News email When readers got to the bottom of the story that continued on page two, there was a disclosure that reporter, Perry Williams, The Australian's chief business correspondent, had 'travelled to Melbourne as a guest of Chevron'. There were no other voices canvassed in the 950-word story, no mention of the climate crisis or the company's record on greenhouse emissions. Perhaps it could be said in one sentence – such as this one – why Australia might not want to have aspirations to be one of the Middle East's authoritarian petrostates? But why might the US be a better place for the company to drill for oil and gas than Australia? What is it, exactly, that Australia should be aspiring to? Under President Trump, the Environmental Protection Agency has been making life easier for companies like Chevron by cutting regulation. This is how the EPA's administrator, Lee Zeldin, described the 'greatest day of deregulation our nation has seen' when some of the changes were outlined in March. 'We are driving a dagger straight into the heart of the climate change religion to drive down cost of living for American families, unleash American energy, bring auto jobs back to the US and more,' Zeldin said. There are some very strong Tony Abbott-era climate science denial vibes right there. Trump has previously described global heating as a hoax and is pulling the US out of the landmark Paris climate agreement. His administration also wants to rescind the so-called 'endangerment finding' – an Obama-era ruling that gives the US government authority to limit greenhouse gas emissions because of the climate crisis. An online portal that held two decades of climate assessments has also been yanked by the Trump administration. To try to justify all these rollbacks, the US Department of Energy last week released a report it had commissioned from a set of scientists known for their contrarian views on climate change. Climate scientists have counted what they say are more than 100 false or misleading claims in the report. So, apparently Australia should aspire to be more like a country that is in the process of cleansing itself of any scientific facts its president doesn't like. Wirth reportedly complained the company's costs had gone up in Australia because of legal challenges to projects from environment groups, rules that mean contractors have to be paid the same as employees if they are doing the same job and changes to the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax. Chevron has never paid PRRT, but will be liable for payments this year, the company has said, after changes brought in by Labor. It might be worth mentioning that when Chevron spoke to a Senate inquiry last year about changes to the PRRT, the company said: 'Our view on the proposed changes, as outlined in the bill, is that they are proportionate and will not curtail future investment.' Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Alex Hillman, lead analyst at the Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility, said Chevron's problems were not that Australia was 'uncompetitive' but that its business model was facing 'increasing headwinds'. 'The biggest obstacle for fossil fuel companies like Chevron is not government regulation, but that renewables are increasingly out-competing LNG on cost and offering real energy security for emerging markets,' he said. As well as getting the page one treatment, and an endorsement in the paper's editorial, Chevron also got to defend its failing Gorgon carbon capture project in a lead story in the paper's business section on Monday. That story also came with the disclosure that the reporter had 'travelled to Melbourne as a guest of Chevron'. What is there to say about Chevron's climate record that didn't make it into The Australian's reporting? In Australia, Chevron's LNG plant at Gorgon in Western Australia is the biggest emitting project in the country, and has received the equivalent of millions of dollars in tradable carbon credits under the government's safeguard mechanism. Chevron is known as a 'carbon major' because of the greenhouse gas emissions that come from its current and historical operations. According to a database of historical emissions, Chevron has been responsible for the release of more greenhouse gases than any other independently owned entity (there are three entities that have emitted more than Chevron since the 1850s – Saudi Aramco, China and the former Soviet Union). Chevron has targets to lower the emissions intensity of its oil and gas – that is, reducing the amount of CO2 and methane released during extraction and refining. But a fossil fuel company can still meet an emissions intensity target (for which it could claim, as Chevron does, that it is producing 'lower carbon' energy) while its overall emissions from the extraction, transport, refinement and ultimate burning of its products are going up. Groups advocating for climate action have consistently criticised Chevron for its climate targets and its stated goal to 'grow our oil and gas business'. A report from Oil Change International said Chevron was 'dangerously out of step with climate goals'. The company itself claims its future business strategy can still exist in a future where demand for fossil fuels declines and governments try to reach net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.
Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
New poll reveals Aussies see Trump as a bigger threat than Xi Jinping
Australians are more afraid of Donald Trump's tariffs than the increasing Chinese military threat, according to a shocking new poll. The Newspoll, conducted between Monday and Thursday last week, revealed greater concern among voters about the US President's unpredictable trade penalties than there was about his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping's westward push. When 1283 Australians were asked to prioritise the two, 42 per cent of voters said US tariffs were more of a concern, while just 37 per cent stated Beijing 's military build-up in the Indo-Pacific region was the more pressing situation. Voters who were neutral on the two global issues stood at 21 per cent, the poll published in The Australian revealed. However, the polling analysis also showed a partisan effect was at play, with Labor and the Greens viewing Trump's tariffs as the bigger threat, while the Coalition and minor party voters saw China as the more dangerous issue. Trumps tariffs triggered 55 per cent of Labor voters and 60 per cent of Greens voters, but just 29 per cent of Coalition and minor party voters. On the other hand, China's military muscle worried 50 per cent of Coalition supporters and 49 per cent of minor party supporters, but just 26 per cent and 22 per cent of Labor and Greens voters respectively. The poll also revealed that, for the first time since September 2023, more Australians are satisfied with Anthony Albanese's performance than not. The primary votes of the Coalition and One Nation improved by one point to 30 and nine per cent, respectively, since last month's first post-election Newspoll. Labor remained at 36 per cent and holds a two-party-preferred vote over the Coalition at 56 to 44 per cent. The Prime Minister's personal popularity has returned to levels not seen since the cost-of-living crisis and voice referendum led to a slump in his approval ratings. Albanese now has a net approval rating of plus-three, with 49 per cent of voters satisfied with the Labor leader's performance and 46 per cent dissatisfied. He has not been in positive territory since September 2023, when he recorded 47 per cent and 44 per cent satisfaction and dissatisfaction ratings. The Prime Minister's current rating is the highest it's been since July 2023, when 52 per cent of voters rated his performance positively. Sussan Ley, who took over as leader of the Coalition following Peter Dutton's departure, has seen her performance ratings drop since last month's poll. She had a net approval rating of minus-seven last month, similar to Dutton's levels following the 2022 election. However, Ley has seen the gap widen to minus-nine. After the election, the Coalition experienced its worst result for the Liberal/Nationals parties since Newspoll first compared primary vote levels in November 1985. The first post-election poll had Labor at 36 per cent compared with the Coalition's 29 per cent. Labor won the May 3 election after securing 34.6 per cent of the primary vote.
The Independent
6 hours ago
- The Independent
‘I will not enlist in an army committing genocide': Meet the Israeli teens refusing Netanyahu's war on Gaza
Yona, 19, an Israeli activist, burned her military conscription papers knowing she would be immediately sentenced to jail. She is blunt in her reasoning for doing so. 'I am refusing because my country is committing genocide and I will not enlist into an army that's committing genocide,' she says. 'I have no doubts in my mind that this is the right thing to do.' She is part of a growing movement of Israeli teenagers refusing the draft and taking a stand against the Israeli government's 22-month devastating bombardment of Gaza. Shortly after burning her papers outside the enlistment centre in Haifa at the weekend, she was sentenced to 30 days in prison. Speaking to The Independent just before being incarcerated, Yona, a transgender woman, said she knew prison wouldn't be easy: the last transgender woman 'refusenik' was held in solitary confinement. But she remains determined. 'I think it's a very simple moral and political question. The imperative is that we withhold ourselves as a resource from the state. That we do everything in our power to resist and end this horrible crime.' She is part of a movement of youth, most of them members of Mesarvot - or 'refusers' in Hebrew - that supports conscientious objectors, that are horrified by Israel's war in Gaza. They have staged regular protests, publicly burning their papers and marching towards the border crossing with Gaza to break Israel's blockade on the besieged strip. Alongside the refuseniks, there has also been a parallel surge in soldiers reusing to show up to reserve duty - with reports in Israeli media saying in the last major offensive that as many as 100,000 have effectively deserted. Fury over the war increased inside Israel after Benjamin Netanyahu and his security cabinet controversially recently green-lit an expansion of the current offensive in Gaza. The Israeli government has repeatedly denied there is a humanitarian crisis in Gaza or that the military has committing any crimes in the enclave. But it is facing growing backlash internationally and from inside Israel. Palestinian health officials say Israel's bombardment and blockade has killed over 61,000 people. The United Nations says the war has sparked unfolding famine and seen more than 90 per cent of the 2.3 million strong population forced to flee their homes. On Saturday night, hundreds of thousands of protesters took to the streets in Tel Aviv and other cities, demanding an end to the war and the immediate ceasefire deal to secure the return of the remaining 50 hostages and captives held by Hamas in Gaza. At the protests, family members of the hostages are publicly calling for reservists to refuse to serve in the upcoming military escalation. For the youth, they are protesting about even joining the army in the first place. The death toll among IDF soldiers is now nearing 900. At least 20 refuseniks have served prison time since October 2023, explains Iddo Elam, 19, another Israeli activist who refused to enlist in November and was jailed before being handed an exemption on mental health grounds. He had a strong message for his fellow teenagers: 'It'll be on your record that you were an IDF soldier, or that you were a refusenik... 'Think whether or not you want to go around the world as a former IDF soldier. We are almost two years into this genocide - or war, as many Israelis call it - but nothing has been achieved. Nothing has changed. Nothing. 'We cannot stop terrorism. We cannot stop attacks on the Israeli state as long as we participate in - and basically live with - the occupation and oppression of millions of [Palestinian] people.' While Iddo and Yona admit those refusing to fight because of the plight of the Palestinians in Gaza is a relatively small number, it is growing. Tal Mitnik, another activist from Tel Aviv, turned 18 shortly after war erupted and so was the first public conscientious objector. He spent six months in prison, which was 'nothing like what the Palestinian prisoners are dealing with'. He said he was on his own at the beginning but that has changed: 'I think an important thing to say is that what we lose with Israeli society is what we gain with Palestinian society.' Earlier this month, Netanyahu and his security cabinet pushed through a controversial plan to expand the war in Gaza, stating the the ultimate goal was to disarm Hamas, return the hostages and to exert 'Israeli security control' over the besieged strip - i.e. a boots-on-the-ground occupation. It has faced fierce resistance from the international community, as well as opposition from within. Sources said even Netanyahu's own Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir, rejected the plan. Many in Israel fear it will not only embroil the Israeli military in a costly, protracted, and unwinnable conflict, but also serve as a 'death sentence' for the 20 remaining hostages who are still believed to be alive. It could also crush the hopes of retrieving the bodies of 30 more slain captives who remain in the hands of militants. The Israeli military declined to comment on the numbers of those who have refused reserve service or their conscription papers. They said the military 'cherishes' all of its soldiers, expressing 'deep appreciation for their great contribution'. 'In this challenging security reality, the contribution of the reservists is essential to the success of missions and to maintaining the security of the country,' they said in a statement. According to Kan, Israel's national broadcaster, during the last offensive in May, over 40 percent of soldiers did not show up to reserve duty – a stark contrast to the start of the conflict, when Israeli media reported that 135 percent of people showed up. Ishai Menuchin, spokesperson for Yesh Gvul - an Israeli movement that also supports refuseniks and reservists who do not want to fight - said their hotline, which usually only gets 30 calls a year, has received more than 200 calls since January alone. 'It's the highest wave of refusal since we were founded at the start of the 1982 Lebanon war,' he told The Independent, explaining how he himself spent 35 days in prison for refusing service. He said the true number of refusniks is difficult to calculate as the military is now pushing through exemptions: 'There is a policy not to deal with ideological refusal - they are afraid of the numbers.' Iddo agreed - saying they are now exempting refuseniks on mental health grounds rather than jailing them, as they 'would rather give young people exemptions than to deal with hundreds of people in prisons'. He had a strong message for Israel's western allies, including the UK and the US, to take a stand against the Israeli military and impose arms embargoes. 'At the end of the day, the butterfly effect to stop this genocide will just start with one phone call from each leader – and one phone call from Trump telling Netanyahu to stop. We cannot do it alone. We have to have international help.'
