logo
US imposes visa restrictions on Indian agents accused of ‘facilitating illegal immigration'

US imposes visa restrictions on Indian agents accused of ‘facilitating illegal immigration'

Scroll.in20-05-2025
The United States Department of State on Monday announced visa restrictions on people working with Indian travel agencies found to have been 'knowingly facilitating illegal immigration to the United States'.
The state department said its Consular Affairs and Diplomatic Security Service mission in India had identified those 'engaged in facilitating illegal immigration and human smuggling and trafficking operations'.
'We will continue to take steps to impose visa restrictions against owners, executives, and senior officials of travel agencies to cut off alien smuggling networks,' the department said in its statement.
The department added that its aim was not only to inform foreign nationals about the dangers of illegal immigration to the US but also to hold those who violate US laws accountable for their actions.
The department noted that the visa restriction policy is a global one, and that it also applies to individuals who otherwise qualify for the country's Visa Waiver Program.
However, the statement did not name the people or agencies who will face action under this new move.
The move comes amid a wider crackdown by US President Donald Trump's administration, which has used military aircraft to repatriate undocumented migrants.
Six hundred and thirty-six Indians have been deported from the United States since January, when Donald Trump assumed office, the Union government told Parliament in March. Besides another 295 Indians were awaiting final deportation orders.
A 2022 US Department of Homeland Security report estimated that 2,20,000 undocumented Indian migrants were living in the country.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What Rahul Gandhi's vote ‘chori' allegations reveal about our democracy
What Rahul Gandhi's vote ‘chori' allegations reveal about our democracy

Indian Express

time28 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

What Rahul Gandhi's vote ‘chori' allegations reveal about our democracy

On August 7, Rahul Gandhi addressed a press conference about vote chori executed in the Mahadevapura assembly segment of Bangalore Central Lok Sabha constituency. The evidence presented is based on an independent investigation conducted by the Congress party's research team, which painstakingly analysed voter data to unearth a story the public deserved to know. As revealed, in this assembly segment, 1,00,250 fake votes were planted by the BJP with the help of the Election Commission of India (ECI) to win the Lok Sabha seat in 2024. Given the magnitude of this fraud, it is hard to dismiss it as 'clerical error'. Instead, it hints at a deliberate and systematic manipulation of the voter's list. In Mahadevapura, thousands of voters are registered at house number 'zero'. Octogenarians are registered as 'first-time voters' on rolls meant for 18-year-olds. Phantom residents of breweries and commercial spaces are enrolled en masse. Thousands of electors had blurred/missing/too-tiny-to-identify photos on voter rolls. Thousands of others are registered to vote at multiple booths, sometimes across states, and they also vote more than once. This has raised critical questions about the credibility of the ECI, the sanctity of the electoral process, and the legitimacy of each and every elected representative across India. If the referee is not neutral, there is no sport. If the Election Commission is not impartial, there is no democracy. And if there is no democracy, there is no India as we claim to know it. Potentially, India is being ruled by the unelected, imposed through fraud. The question that haunts the Indian public is: If it happened in Bangalore Central, what's the guarantee it didn't happen everywhere? The answer is none. The scope of this scam is impossible to assess, given the limited resources. The only way to audit the electoral rolls of the entire country is to automate the process. In order to be able to do so, we would need digital/machine-readable electoral rolls of all the constituencies. Then, an unbiased, apolitical computer programme can analyse the electoral rolls — constituency after constituency — to produce an indisputable report card on their accuracy. If proven correct, it will immensely enhance the credibility of the ECI that maintains these rolls and the BJP, which happens to be in power at the centre and in the majority of the states/ UTs. The ECI and the ruling party should welcome this idea. Why? Because any democratic institution that trusts its functioning and processes should not be threatened by scrutiny. On the contrary, the ECI has left no stone unturned to make independent scrutiny increasingly difficult. It proposes to destroy CCTV footage from polling booths — the very evidence that could confirm or disprove these allegations. It has categorically refused to release digital electoral rolls despite the fact that such data exists in digital form. What they have given us instead are multiple 7 ft tall stacks of paper rolls for one assembly seat. We could still have extracted the data through Optical Character Recognition (OCR), a technology that recognises text within a digital image and would make it considerably easier for us to digitise the paper rolls supplied by the ECI. But the ECI deliberately provides non-machine-readable rolls that are immune to OCR. This only solidifies the apprehensions that the ECI, indeed, had something to hide. Otherwise, why else would it try tooth and nail to rule out any possibility of an independent scrutiny? Consequently, our team, which was earlier determined to analyse the electoral rolls of multiple constituencies, was forced to sift through the electoral rolls of just one assembly segment in one Lok Sabha seat because it had to be done manually – line by line – a process that took six months and thousands of man-hours. This seat, we found, was rigged with a lakh fake votes. When the results of a people's election are treated as proprietary property, we are no longer talking about open competition. We are talking about a scoreboard hidden from the very citizens who make the game possible. Retrospectively, it also became clear why the ECI has been resisting sharing digital/machine-readable data. Instead of engaging with hard evidence, the ECI is resorting to half-baked reactions. It first sought that Rahul Gandhi submit documentary proof of all 1,00,250 fake votes, under oath. Even the ECI is certainly unsure about the rule under which this oath has been demanded. Nevertheless, the BJP had hoped that it would use this oath as a smokescreen to launch a mudslinging operation against Rahul Gandhi in the media and the social media. Many BJP functionaries, godi media personnel and influencers jumped the gun. Some discredit the evidence-backed investigation by peddling disinformation and misinformation, and still others dismiss the prospect of any independent investigations into the functioning of the ECI. Much to the BJP's horror, however, this exercise is no longer confined to the Congress party alone. In fact, it has already spilled far beyond partisan boundaries. Concerned citizens, journalists, digital influencers, domain experts, and members of civil society have voluntarily stepped in, taking ownership of the process. They are independently examining electoral data, cross-checking official records, and publicly challenging the BJP's narrative — essentially turning this from a party investigation into a people's investigation. A striking example came on August 8. BJP IT Cell head Amit Malviya posted photos on X of three voters of a family holding their EPIC cards. Rahul Gandhi had spoken about this family in his press conference as part of thousands of voters on the Mahadevapura rolls who had indistinguishable photos, and hence were likely to be bogus voters. Malviya's point was that these voters did indeed exist in real life. But his attempt backfired. Independent users on social media quickly noticed that the EPIC numbers on the cards in Malviya's photos did not match the EPIC numbers on the electoral rolls for people with the same details, leaving Malviya red-faced. But more importantly, Malviya's defence of the indefensible only incriminated the Election Commission further. This is what the BJP has forever feared — an informed citizenry that is empowered to think independently and ask questions. Guardianship of democracy must extend beyond Parliament — to courts willing to interrogate procedure, technologists capable of exposing manipulation, media that are still committed to truth-telling, and citizens who know that without verifiability, the vote is theatre. That is the invitation now — not to save democracy, but to reinvent it. To demand digital/machine-readable voter data. To insist on CCTV preservation and procedural audits. To refuse to let the vote be stolen in silence. Because this is no longer about one party, one election, or one seat. It is about every Indian's right to vote. The writer is chairman, media and publicity department, All India Congress Committee

'Aur marna tha': IAF Chief Amar Preet Singh reveals what he was told after Operation Sindoor
'Aur marna tha': IAF Chief Amar Preet Singh reveals what he was told after Operation Sindoor

Mint

time28 minutes ago

  • Mint

'Aur marna tha': IAF Chief Amar Preet Singh reveals what he was told after Operation Sindoor

Indian Air Force Chief Amar Preet Singh, revealed that following India's Operation Sindoor in Pakistan, many people close to him said 'aur maarna tha,' meaning ' you should have struck them more.' The Air Marshal said that the Indian Air Force (IAF) had downed five Pakistani fighter jets and a large aircraft during Operation Sindoor, which he described as the largest-ever recorded surface-to-air kill by India. Air Marshal Amar Preet Singh made the comments while addressing the 16th Air Chief Marshal L M Katre Memorial Lecture in Bengaluru on Saturday, August 9. In the early hours of May 7, India launched Operation Sindoor – striking nine terror beds across Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) – in retaliation to the lethal Pahalgam attack in April, that killed 26 civilians. Touted as the Indian military's biggest and deepest strike yet, 'Operation Sindoor' marked India's first joint operation since the 1971 war. All three defence branches — Army, Navy, and Air Force — coordinated to carry out the strikes on Pakistan to eliminate Jaish-e-Muhammed and Lashkar leadership. The IAF Chief said, "we have at least five fighters confirmed killed and one large aircraft which could be either an aircraft or an AWC, which was taken at a distance of about 300 kilometres. This is actually the largest ever recorded surface-to-air kill that we can talk about. He said the conflict with Pakistan was a 'high-tech war,' and within '80-90 hours of the war,' India was able to ' able to achieve so much damage, that it was clear to them (Pakistan) that if they continue, they are going to pay for it more and more.' Air Chief Marshal AP Singh also hailed the S-400 air defence system and said it did a "wonderful job" during Operation Sindoor. Speaking about the Sukkur airbase, the Chief said the UAB hangar and radar site was attacked.

India's measured response to US over tariffs; Israel's Gaza occupation plan sparks concerns; Delhi, Manila forge strategic ties
India's measured response to US over tariffs; Israel's Gaza occupation plan sparks concerns; Delhi, Manila forge strategic ties

Indian Express

time28 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

India's measured response to US over tariffs; Israel's Gaza occupation plan sparks concerns; Delhi, Manila forge strategic ties

Amid escalating tensions with the US over tariffs, PM Modi asserts India 'will never compromise on the interests of its farmers, livestock rearers and fisherfolk'; world leaders condemn Israel's plan to occupy Gaza City, while Germany suspends weapons delivery to the Jewish nation; Pm Modi describes the Philippines as an 'important partner' in India's Act East Policy and 'MAHASAGAR' vision – here is weekly roundup of key global news. A 25 per cent tariff earlier announced by Trump has come into effect on August 7, while he offered a 21-day window before the additional 25 per cent tariff kicks in. New Delhi criticised the unilateral move as 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable', with Prime Minister Narendra Modi asserting that India 'will never compromise on the interests of its farmers, livestock rearers and fisherfolk'. Notably, India-US trade talks have remained in a deadlock over the red lines Delhi has drawn around the dairy and agriculture sectors as well as genetically modified (GM) crops. In this context, India's last-minute withdrawal in 2019 from joining the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), a mega regional pact and the most expansive regional trade agreement the country had ever negotiated, is a case in point. Meanwhile, Indian exporters are in a fix, scrambling to retain access to the US, their most valuable export market, accounting for nearly 20 per cent of India's total outbound shipments. The situation is further compounded by concerns over the carefully built India-US partnership. Russian oil import a pretext? Trump's additional tariffs on Indian goods were supposedly prompted by India's purchase of Russian oil, which, according to the Trump administration, is 'fuelling Russia's war machine'. However, the claim drove some experts to raise questions over those fuelling 'Israel's war machine'. According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), the US accounted for 69 per cent of Israel's imports of major conventional arms between 2019 and 2023. Nonetheless, Russia has criticised Trump's tariff action and backed India's right to choose its trading partners. In a phone conversation on Friday (August 8), Prime Minister Modi and Russian President Vladimir Putin reaffirmed their 'commitment to further deepen the India-Russia Special and Privileged Strategic Partnership'. Putin is to visit India later this year. Moreover, Trump's warning to countries buying Russian oil directly or indirectly has appeared to upset the US's apple cart. Following Trump's warning, India turned the spotlight back to the commencement of the Ukraine conflict, and highlighted that 'the US at that time actively encouraged such imports [oil] by India for strengthening global energy markets stability'. In addition, New Delhi also flagged the US and the EU's continued trade with Russia. For instance, The Indian Express reported that US imports from Russia had been rising, growing 23 per cent year-on-year to $2.1 billion between January and May this year. The surge was led by a sharp increase in the import of palladium (37%), uranium (28%) and fertilisers (21%). China: largest buyer of Russian oil Although China – not India – is the largest buyer of Russian oil, questions arise over Trump's actions on Beijing. In 2024, China imported $62.6 billion worth of Russian oil, compared to India's $52.7 billion. Notably, India has also started scaling back Russian oil purchases. In July, Russian oil imports were at 1.6 million barrels per day (bpd), down 24 per cent from June levels, and 23.5 per cent from volumes delivered in July of last year, according to the latest tanker data from global real-time data and analytics provider Kpler. But Trump's unwillingness to criticise China prompted speculation. South China Morning Post says rare earths have become a lever for Beijing in reducing Washington's tariffs. By some estimates, limits on access to these minerals could affect nearly 78 per cent of all Pentagon weapons systems, it adds. In the meantime, all eyes are on the two crucial meetings – first, the one between Trump and Putin on Friday (August 15). Second, Prime Minister Modi is likely to attend the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit in Tianjin from August 31 to September 1. On the sidelines of the Summit, if the visit materialises, Modi is also expected to hold bilateral talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping, a meeting that will take place amid rising tensions with the US over trade tariffs and the purchase of Russian oil. In this context, the notion of 'mercenary multipolarity' may offer some perspectives. Julian Gewirtz, in his review essay How China Wins, published in Foreign Affairs, described 'mercenary multipolarity' as 'a transformed international order centered on self-interested great powers that generally disdain using their influence to benefit or cooperate with others and are primarily concerned with maximizing their own security, prosperity, and power.' Amid starvation deaths, indiscriminate killings, and mass displacement of Palestinians during Israel's war on Gaza which has lasted nearly two years, the Jewish state has announced its plan to occupy the Gaza City, prompting condemnation from world leaders. Israel's security cabinet on Friday (August 8) approved a plan to seize control of Gaza City, triggering concerns over 'forced displacement, killings, and massive destruction', as well as stirring fears for Israeli hostages still held in the Gaza Strip by Hamas. Israel has said it currently has control over 75 per cent of Gaza, while the UN estimates some 86 per cent of the territory is either in militarised zones or under evacuation orders. Israel's 22-month war has killed over 61,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, although a recent study by The Lancet estimated that the official death toll underreported the direct war deaths by at least 41 per cent and perhaps by as much as 107 per cent, adding that the true death toll possibly exceeded 1,86,000. The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) announced an emergency meeting on Sunday (originally scheduled for Saturday) to discuss Israel's plans to control Gaza. The announcement follows widespread condemnation of the Jewish nation's plan. The UN Secretary General's chief spokesman described it as a 'dangerous escalation'. 'Saudi Arabia has strongly condemned the decision by the Israeli occupation authorities to occupy the Gaza Strip and categorically rejected their ongoing crimes of starvation, brutal practices, and ethnic cleansing against the brotherly Palestinian people,' the Saudi Press Agency reported. Similarly, other countries such as Iran as well as Indonesia condemned Israel's decision, while Turkey called for global pressure to prevent the plan from going ahead. EU Council President Antonio Costa said Israel's decision to take over Gaza City 'must have consequences for EU-Israel relations', while European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen said Israel must reconsider its plan to take control of Gaza City. Notably, Israeli allies, including France, Britain, Canada, Germany stepped up pressure on Israel as criticism mounted over shocking reports of starvation deaths that reached, according to Al Jazeera, 201 as of Saturday (August 9). The UK, France and Canada announced their plans to recognise the Palestinian statehood, while Germany said on Friday (August 9) it would not authorise the export of military equipment that could be used in Gaza until further notice. Germany is the second largest supplier of arms to Israel after the US, though it's not clear if it would stop the sale of all arms to Israel. Germany also called on Israel not to take any steps to annex the West Bank. However, what is more worrying is that it took nearly two years of genocide in Gaza for major powers to raise their voice against Israel. Yet, 'the test is not what people say, but what people do', argues Ilan Pappe, a leading Israeli historian, author and professor who has spent much of his life fighting for Palestinian rights, in an interview to a news portal called Although Pappe underlines that the situation indicates 'how isolated Israel today is in the world', he rues the fact that the real challenge for the European governments now is how to deal with it. 'I think they're becoming more and more alerted about the realisation that there's not likely to be a change in Israeli policy in the future.' In the meantime, mediators from Egypt and Qatar are preparing a new framework that will include the release of all Israeli hostages – dead and alive – in one go, in return for an end of the war in Gaza and the withdrawal of Israeli forces from the strip, The Associated Press reported, citing two Arab officials. Elevating their relations to a strategic partnership, India and the Philippines have decided to enhance their defence and maritime cooperation, start negotiations on a new trade deal, and begin direct flights. Following a meeting with visiting Filipino President Ferdinand Romualdez Marcos Jr., Prime Minister Modi said, 'Strengthening defence relations is a symbol of deep mutual trust, and as maritime nations, maritime cooperation between the two countries is both natural and essential.' The Filipino President's visit comes as the two South Asian nations celebrate 75 years of establishment of diplomatic relations. To commemorate the occasion, the two leaders released a postage stamp as they signed 13 bilateral agreements, including a declaration on the new strategic partnership and an 'action plan' for its implementation up to 2029. Defence cooperation between the two nations, especially in the maritime domain, is seen as a crucial part of their strategic partnership against the backdrop of mounting pressure the Philippines faces from China. Strategic enhancement of relationships positions the Philippines, alongside Singapore, among India's closest strategic partners within ASEAN. This week, the Indian and the Philippines navies' concluded their two-day joint naval exercise in the West Philippine Sea – waters that fall within the broader South China Sea and are claimed by China. The Filipino President said that the drill 'sends a powerful signal of solidarity, strength in partnership and the energy of cooperation between two vibrant democracies in the Indo-Pacific.' While the Philippines' overtures to India are seen as part of its broader hedging strategy to deter growing Chinese assertiveness in the South China Sea, India has reiterated its advocacy for rules-based maritime order, freedom of navigation and peaceful resolution of disputes in the South China Sea. Prime Minister Modi described the Philippines as an important partner in India's Act East Policy and 'MAHASAGAR' vision, both of which seek to deepen ties with Southeast Asia, promote regional stability and counter an assertive China. Moreover, India and the Philippines also agreed on the Terms of Reference for enhanced maritime cooperation between the Indian Coast Guard and the Philippine Coast Guard, while other defense-related mechanisms included the finalisation of the Terms of Reference between their armies, navies and air forces. Manila has decided to join the International Fusion Centre established by India for the Indian Ocean Region. In April this year, India also delivered the second batch of Brahmos supersonic cruise missiles to the Philippines, which is also reported to be in talks to buy India's short-range Akash missile. In addition to defense and security cooperation, the two sides also discussed trade,connectivity, and people-to-people relations. Prime Minister Modi announced that direct flights between India and the Philippines will begin this year, while India will extend a free e-tourist visa facility to Filipino nationals for a period of one year, starting August 2025. While India-Philippines trade relations have remained modest, negotiations on a Preferential Trade Agreement have also resumed, and discussions continue around the Terms of Reference (ToR) for a Trade Negotiations Committee. Send your feedback and ideas to

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store