BREAKING NEWS Liver King breaks silence as he's FREED from jail after dramatic Joe Rogan arrest
Disgraced fitness influencer 'Liver King' broke his silence on his arrest for making 'terroristic threats' against Joe Rogan with a string of bizarre social media videos.
The influencer, real name Brian Johnson, 48, avoided naming Rogan as he responded to his arrest on Tuesday, instead sharing clips of himself trying to start a fire, praying by candlelight and eating steaks.
'I had to wash the jail off me,' he says in one clip shared from his home in Willis, Texas, where he traveled from over the weekend to track down Rogan and try to 'fight' him.
Johnson was taken into custody on Tuesday after documenting his journey to Austin to find Rogan, in which he ominously showed an axe and said: 'We come bearing gifts, for those that deserve it.'
After posting a $20,000 bail, Johnson shared a number of worrying clips, including one of him praying by candlelight with his hands visibly shaking, thanking God for 'this moment.'
'Thank you, king time, king time, king time,' he said, before standing up and dancing as dramatic piano music played in the background.
Many of the influencer's 2.9 million followers flooded his comment sections urging Johnson to 'get help.'
He shared the bizarre clips as it was reported that Rogan was quizzed by Austin police following Johnson's arrest, where he told investigators he has no idea why he was being targeted.
Johnson's anger at Rogan appeared to stem from a 2022 scandal where he was exposed as a steroid user after he claimed to his millions of followers that his muscular physique was the result of a raw meat 'carnivore' diet.
Rogan amplified the scandal on his huge Spotify podcast, but in arrest documents first obtained by TMZ, police say Rogan was surprised by the recent episode with Johnson as he had never had any actual contact with him.
The podcaster told police that he has been told Johnson 'has a significant drug issue', according to the arrest documents.
Rogan has not commented publicly on Johnson's recent menacing behavior.
In the days before his arrest, Johnson went on a manic tirade on Instagram where he shared dozens of videos of himself ranting about fighting Rogan, giving himself a 'coffee enema', and seemingly talking to himself.
Rogan seemed to be aware of the videos as he also told cops following Johnson's arrest that he 'appears to be significantly unstable and seems like he needs help.'
Johnson was taken into custody on Tuesday in an arrest he also documented for social media, and he was charged with making terroristic threats, a misdemeanor, and posted a $20,000 bail.
The arrest followed a string of worrying Instagram clips Johnson shared in the lead up to his arrest, garnering millions of views as he rambled about fighting Rogan.
As he filmed himself getting ready to leave his home in Willis, Texas to find Rogan in Austin, he showed a Joe Rogan podcast branded box with an axe perched ominously on top, and said: 'We come bearing gifts, for those that deserve it.'
'We'll see you soon,' he said as he addressed Rogan directly. 'Real tension I have with you, real f***ing beef.'
'If I could just get a formal invitation to the Joe Rogan podcast, I could release myself from leaving tomorrow,' he said the day before he left.
The next day, Johnson shared another clip calling out Rogan to fight him, saying: 'Man to man, I'm picking a fight with you... I have no training in Jui Jitsu, you have a black belt, you should dismantle me.'
Wearing a wolf's head hat, Johnson began dancing on camera with his shirt off, saying: 'That's pretty entertaining right?'
'You can't pick a fight with a real king and then expect there not to be an actual fight, bro,' he added.
After sharing several more clips of himself aimlessly talking into the camera, Johnson shared another clip on Tuesday morning as he made his way to Austin, pointing his camera at the axe and saying: 'You can't buy this kind of stuff, the serial numbers are not replicable.'
Speaking from a hotel room in Austin once he arrived in Rogan's hometown, Johnson claimed in an erratic shower video that he'd had a run in with police over his threats, and also showed himself giving himself a 'coffee enema.'
'I challenge you today, Joe Rogan,' he said. 'I'm here at the Four Seasons in Austin, I'm in the shower... I didn't sleep the day before, I was up for about 40 hours.'
Johnson went on a hard-to-follow rant about a run-in with police officers as he jumped back and forth from multiple topics in no logical order.
'The police are coming or something's happening... I've not threatened to kill anybody. Did somebody say that I was going to kill somebody?' he said.
'I am going to. I've picked a fight. Who have I picked a fight with? Joe Rogan... Why? Out of principle. Family.'
'I'm challenging you, just as a man. I don't want to kill you. Why would I want to kill you? You have a family. I wouldn't want to take you away from your family.
'I wouldn't want that to happen so I hope that none of this is perceived as a threat. F**k you Joe Rogan, you guys can call all the cops.'
Later, his wife shared another video purporting to show the moment he was searched and placed into a cop car by officers.
In the video, a member of his team, while filming, tells his wife that Johnson may have to spend up to 24 hours in jail as his matter is dealt with.
Johnson was seen in footage filmed by a member of his 'team' wordlessly complying with officers as they patted him down while he wore handcuffs.
The influencer had kept a relatively low profile after his steroid scandal came to light in 2022, but has resurfaced and ramped up his social media presence in the wake of a new Netflix documentary which released in April.
'Untold: The Liver King' explores his supplement empire and rise to the top by eating raw meat - specifically animal livers and testicles - on social media.
After another fitness YouTuber caught him in his bold faced lie with blood test results and a leaked email, Johnson filmed a video admitting fault.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
30 minutes ago
- The Guardian
High flyer to pariah: the saga of Epstein-linked banker Jes Staley
In 1999, the future Barclays chief executive Jes Staley was gearing up for his biggest job yet. As head of JP Morgan's private bank, he would be in charge of a sprawling team that managed money and investments for some of the world's richest people. Among them was the mysterious but well-connected billionaire Jeffrey Epstein, with whom he would quickly develop a 'fairly close professional relationship'. Staley was soon holidaying on Epstein's private island, flying on his private plane, and gaining access to an impressive portfolio of ministers, entrepreneurs and royalty. The relationship ended up bolstering Staley's profile on Wall Street and even connecting his daughter to senior figures at Ivy League universities. But it would also help to end his career. In July 2019 Epstein was arrested on child sex trafficking charges, accused of sexually exploiting and abusing dozens of girls at homes in Manhattan and Palm Beach, Florida. Some victims were as young as 14, US prosecutors alleged. Epstein, who was in jail as he awaited trial, was found dead in his prison cell weeks later. The revelations about Epstein led to a media storm, bringing renewed attention to his former friends and business associates, including Staley. Barclays told the Financial Conduct Authority in October 2019 that the pair 'did not have a close relationship' and were last in contact 'well before' Staley took over as CEO four years earlier. But a subsequent FCA investigation, involving a cache of 1,200 emails from JP Morgan, convinced the regulator that it had been misled. The regulator alleged that the pair were indeed close friends and stayed in touch via Staley's daughter for years after he joined Barclays. It was not Staley's first run-in with the FCA, having been fined £642,000 for trying to unmask a whistleblower in 2018. But it was the final straw: he was banned from the holding senior management roles in the City in 2023, leading to him lose about £18m worth of pay. The 68-year-old fought back in an appeal this spring, arguing that he had always been transparent with Barclays and had followed internal legal advice on the letter's phrasing, which was meant to emphasise that he had no knowledge of Epstein's crimes. Judges on Thursday ruled in the FCA's favour, upholding the lifetime City ban. March's two-week tribunal hearing in London also gave the first public account of Epstein's role in Staley's life. This is what the court heard. The pair did not meet by chance, but on the recommendation of JP Morgan's then chief executive, Douglas 'Sandy' Warner, who felt that Epstein – already a client – was someone the newly appointed head of the private bank should know. The two men 'got on well', according to Staley's lawyers, and Epstein's career-boosting potential quickly became clear. He would refer wealthy friends to Staley, many of whom turned into JP Morgan clients. The pair occasionally socialised, Staley said, explaining that he would sometimes swing by Epstein's home in Manhattan for a drink or dinner. And, from 2005, he took his family on the first of a handful of trips to Epstein's private Caribbean island, Little St James. But Staley was adamant that Epstein was never part of his inner circle, was never invited to the family home, any 'milestone birthdays', or 'personal meals in restaurants'. Staley said he had few personal friends and remains a loner. 'From what I recall, Jes didn't have very many friends,' his former chief of staff Sasha Wiggins told the court in March. And Staley said parts of Epstein's life always remained a mystery. 'I really didn't know how much money he had,' Staley said. 'What his background was, was always sort of shrouded.' But by 2006, the mask started to slip when Epstein was arrested after Florida police were tipped off that he was recruiting young girls for massages and sexual encounters. He pleaded guilty to soliciting prostitution from a minor and in 2008 he was sentenced to 18 months in jail. Staley stayed in contact, though, and visited Epstein after his indictment. He said Epstein did not deny that he solicited a prostitute, but maintained that he thought the girls were over 18. 'Obviously he lied to me,' Staley told the court in March. He again visited Epstein in around 2009, when he was on a prison work release programme in Florida. Staley said he reported the visit to JP Morgan, which was reviewing whether to keep Epstein as a client. But emails suggest he had been leaning on the imprisoned Epstein for advice throughout the financial crisis, writing in October 2008: 'I am dealing with the Fed on an idea to solve things. I need a smart friend to help me think through this stuff. Can I get you out for a weekend to help me (are they listening?)' The court heard that Staley turned to Epstein to help connect his daughter – a burgeoning physics major – with scientists and senior professors at Ivy League universities. The financier, who Staley referred to as 'Uncle Jeffrey', would later be invited to her graduation in 2015. Staley stressed that he did not then know of Epstein's crimes. 'Mr Staley said to me once: 'Why would I have introduced my wife and daughters to Mr Epstein if I thought he was a paedophile?'' Wiggins told the court. When Epstein was released on house arrest in July 2009, Staley was one of the four people he emailed to say: 'Free and home.' Staley replied: 'I toast your courage !!!!!' But more cryptic messages between the two stirred the most controversy, including an exchange about Disney princesses in July 2010. 'That was fun. Say hi to Snow White,' Staley wrote. 'What character would you like next?' Epstein asked, to which Staley replied: 'Beauty and the Beast.' 'Well one side is available,' Epstein responded. Staley told the court he was not able to explain the exchange. Months earlier, in September 2009, Epstein emailed a woman to say: 'Jes staley is staying at the berkeley hotel in London tonight.' Staley said he could not recall the reason behind the message. That year Staley's career took another leap, with his promotion to lead JP Morgan's investment bank. Even the chief executive, Jamie Dimon, was singing his praises, telling Fortune magazine: 'Jes has impeccable character and integrity.' The new gig meant Epstein was no longer a direct client. But that did not end their relationship, or Staley's effusive messages. In November 2009, Staley detoured from a work trip to visit Epstein's ranch in New Mexico, replete with a 26,700-square-foot mansion, private airstrip, and seven-bay heated garage. He emailed Epstein in thanks: 'So when all hell breaks lose [sic], and the world is crumbling, I will come here, and be at peace. Presently, I'm in the hot tub with a glass of white wine. This is an amazing place … I owe you much. And I deeply appreciate our friendship. I have few so profound.' In December, months after Epstein's release, the pair finally found time to meet in person. 'I realize the danger in sending this email. But is [sic] was great to be able, today, to give you, in New York City, a long heartfelt hug. To my friend, Thanks. Jes.' At times, their emails were more explicit: discussing sex scandals and lovers. One message, sent from a debutante ball that Staley attended in November 2010, told Epstein that Staley had seen a woman – 'your lover,' Staley said, 'she says u slept with her!!' Epstein separately sent photos, one of which was of a woman in a low-cut ballgown. 'You were with Larry, and i had to put up with …' Epstein wrote. When FCA lawyers suggested that this interaction was a sign that he and Epstein were 'personally close', Staley suggested that such behaviour was not uncommon between people who were 'professionally close – you know, if you've ever worked on a trading floor on Wall Street'. Staley said there were also parts of his life he kept from Epstein, including having sex with a member of Epstein's staff. 'Oftentimes I would go to Epstein's apartment and he would be late, and she and I got the chance to know each other.' This led to sexual intercourse, he said, 'much to my embarrassment today'. The former banker, who has a wife and two daughters, said the confession came at a personal cost. 'I have been honest such that I have put my marriage at risk … I have never shied away from telling the truth about all of this.' The date of the encounter was not disclosed in court, but the FCA revealed that Epstein's former employee had 'carved' Staley out of a settlement she had reached with Epstein's estate. 'I was not aware of that,' Staley told the court. Despite the allegedly secret encounter, Epstein and Staley would send messages declaring their close ties, referring to each other as family. In one exchange in March 2011, Epstein writes: 'Told you −−−− family.' Staley replied with one word: 'Family'. Behind the scenes, Epstein's banking relationship with JP Morgan was starting to unravel. The bank was considering dumping Epstein as a client but was careful about breaching the issue with Staley, saying they were friends. 'He needs to understand the potential backlash to the firm given all the work done to root out clients involved in human trafficking,' an internal memo said. Staley tried to convince the bank's top lawyer to 'hear [Epstein] out', according to a JP Morgan meeting note. He also revealed to Epstein that his transactions were under review. Staley admitted to sharing internal information with Epstein but denied having pushed the bank to keep him as a client. Panic set in by September 2009, when Epstein told Staley that a 'family meeting was required'. Epstein was concerned about an 'abusive reporter', and instructed Staley on how to respond: 'I think your response should be [that] all of the incidents that they raise happened a decade ago, I paid my debt and like everyone else should be given another chance.' Epstein said he had been 'unaware of the full heat that you have taken as a result of our friendship', adding: 'I'm sorry.' The financier hired a London lobbyist for a 2012 campaign to make Staley Barclay's chief executive, dubbed 'Project Jes'. In emails the lobbyist claimed he hoped to convince top-level policymakers, including George Osborne, who was chancellor, and Mervyn King, the Bank of England governor, to support the US banker. Staley said he never knew about the push. Barclays ultimately installed its own head of retail and business banking, Antony Jenkins, whose ousting three years later led to Staley's leadership. In early 2013 Staley left JP Morgan, moving to the hedge fund Blue Mountain Capital. At this point, Staley claimed, his relationship with Epstein started to decline. But the FCA alleged that their communication did not wither, pointing to a string of emails in early 2013 in which the pair discussed dinner plans, new work numbers and planned meet-ups. Staley also kept up an annual tradition of emailing Epstein on New Year's Eve. The declarations of friendship continued in January 2015, when Staley told Epstein: 'The strength of a Greek army was that its core held shoulder to shoulder, and would not flee or break, no matter the threat. That is us.' That year, Epstein was back in the media's crosshairs. An anonymous woman had filed a lawsuit alleging she was repeatedly sexually abused by Epstein between 1999 and 2002, and that he had loaned her out to rich and influential men. By that April, Staley had what he says was his last in-person meeting with Epstein, having again taken his family to visit the financier's private island. 'Thanks for the flight and thanks for the lunch. Your place is crazy, and special … I count u as a deep friend. The girls seemed to enjoy the sail. All the best Jes.' Within months, Staley was taking another stab at the Barclays job, and kept Epstein abreast of developments. Weeks before the appointment, Staley emailed: 'Cross your toes !!!' Staley was back in touch days before receiving his Barclays contract: 'We're very close.' The British tabloids, however, were circling, pouncing on another prominent figure with ties to a convicted sex offender. News of Prince Andrew's relationship with Epstein had caused a media frenzy as early as 2011, years before a disaster BBC interview that led to the prince being forced to step back from public duties in 2019. Days before Staley was confirmed as Barclays' new boss, the Mail on Sunday was chasing up claims that Epstein lobbied Barclays to hire Staley in both 2012 and 2015. Epstein forwarded the newspaper's queries to Staley, who later replied: 'Ok. I'm going to play is [sic] simple. I've known you as a client. I will tell B tomorrow. Let me know if they say something else. But stay away from them. I'm fine.' The article was published with the headline: 'Andrew's billionaire paedophile friend secretly backed new Barclays boss for job'. Staley said he cut contact with Epstein days later, following 'strong advice' from Barclays. 'I telephoned Mr Epstein and told him that we could not ever again have communication, which he accepted. The relationship ended there. I have had no communication with him since then,' Staley told the court. There is no evidence of direct contact between the two men after October 2015, but the FCA alleged they stayed in touch via Staley's daughter until at least February 2017. Emails show that Epstein asked Staley's daughter to ask the newly installed chief executive's opinion on other bankers, tried to connect Staley with royalty in the Middle East, and to ask whether Staley was interested in a post with the US Treasury. Staley said he did not recall any of those conversations, and he did not realise at the time that his daughter and Epstein were still corresponding. The tribunal on Thursday raised concerns in its judgment about Staley's evidence, saying he 'could be inconsistent in his answers when he felt that it would suit his case', adding that he had 'shown no remorse for his conduct'. Judges have sided with the FCA, upholding its City ban and scuppering efforts to restore his reputation. And while the tribunal reduced his penalty by £1.8m to £1.1m, it reflected pay he lost from Barclays as a result of the FCA ruling. It is not clear how much Staley has paid in legal costs trying to challenge the UK regulator. Staley said in a statement: 'I am disappointed by the outcome and the time it took for this process to play out – that was entirely beyond my control. As the tribunal accepted, I was never dishonest. It took years of arguing with the authority and until November 2024 to establish that fact and it took more time for the financial penalty to be reduced by 40%. 'I have worked tirelessly for my prior employers for the entirety of my career. I am proud of the support I gave to many individuals during that career and the strategy I developed to help Barclays when it faced immense challenges. The tribunal recognised what they described as 'my long and distinguished career'.'
BBC News
35 minutes ago
- BBC News
Woman arrested after child hit by car in Market Bosworth
A woman has been arrested after a child was struck by a car in said they were called to Station Road in Market Bosworth at 15:16 BST on Thursday .Officers confirmed a boy was taken to hospital but his injuries were not believed to be life-threatening or life-changing. His age has not been shared.A 45-year-old woman has been arrested on suspicion of failing to stop at the scene of a collision and failing to provide a specimen and is in custody.
Daily Mail
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Diddy scores huge courtroom victory as prosecutors DROP key parts of charges
Sean ' Diddy ' Combs scored a huge courtroom victory after prosecutors decided to drop key parts of the charges against him. In a letter to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian prosecutors said they will no longer pursue theories presented during the blockbuster trial, including that the music mogul was involved in attempted arson and kidnapping. The two alleged acts were initially included in the government's racketeering conspiracy charge against Combs. All charges against him still remain. The charge still alleges that the 55-year-old was involved in transportation for purposes of prostitution, bribery, witness tampering and drug-related offenses. 'The Government is no longer planning to proceed on these theories of liability, so instructions are no longer necessary,' prosecutors wrote in the letter. The decision was made as a way to streamline the jury's instructions, which are being discussed in court today between lawyers and Judge Subramanian. The arson allegation stems from rapper Kid Cudi 's testimony, when he claimed Combs broke into his home after discovering his relationship with his long-time girlfriend and main accuser Cassie Ventura. After the alleged break in, a Porsche, owned by Kid Cudi, real name Scott Mescudi, was set on fire in his driveway. No one was ever charged in this incident. The kidnapping theory stems from Combs' former assistant Capricorn Clark's testimony, where she said she was kidnapped by Combs, who was armed with a gun, and driven to Mescudi's home while he allegedly entered the residence. David S. Weinstein, a former federal prosecutor who is now a partner at Jones Walker in Miami, Florida, told that this decision is a 'partial victory' for Diddy. He said that prosecutors had essentially 'conceded they do not have enough proof' for the kidnapping, arson and some of the sex trafficking claims. That is why they were 'abandoning them' right before the jury is set to hear closing arguments, Weinstein said. He said it was wrong to say that these allegations were being 'dropped' as there was no standalone charge for them in the first place. All of them were included under the racketeering, or RICO, charge. Weinstein said that in order to prove racketeering, prosecutors had to prove two or more acts that were covered by the statute. By not asking the jury to consider kidnapping, arson, or some of the sex trafficking charges, prosecutors would be leaning more heavily on other allegations. The other charges Diddy faces under RICO includes: possession of drugs with intent to supply, other parts of sex trafficking, transportation to engage in prostitution, bribery and tampering with a witness. Weinstein said: 'As they closed their case the government reevaluated the evidence they presented to the jury and determined there was not enough evidence to support these specific predicate acts in the RICO conspiracy. 'In order to avoid having the jury distracted by this lack of proof, they are asking that the jury not consider those acts any more. 'It's a partial victory for the defense and the prosecution is conceding they didn't submit enough proof. 'It's an effort by the government to clean things up.' According to Weinstein, had prosecutors not done this, it would have allowed Diddy's lawyers to 'poke holes' in their case. He said: 'If those allegations are still in there that allows the defense during closing arguments to turn and point at the prosecution and say here's the list they have to prove two or more from for RICO. 'Did you hear anything about this one? You can't rely on it, there's no proof beyond a reasonable doubt. 'They're overcharging because they thought they had it. Then they can ask why you should rely on any of that witness's testimony?' Another fact could have been anxiety among prosecutors about the impending July 4th holiday, which will lead to a three day week next week. 'Sometimes a holiday helps prosecutors, sometimes not', Weinstein said. The three-time Grammy winner denies racketeering, sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution. The racketeering and sex trafficking charges against Combs, who is currently locked up at Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center, carry a minimum sentence of 15 years each. Transportation to engage in prostitution carries a maximum of 10 years behind bars. The jury was dismissed Tuesday and are due back in court Thursday. Closing arguments are anticipated to take place both Thursday and Friday from 9am-5pm. A charging conference, a meeting between the judge and the lawyers - usually held outside the presence of the jury - is taking place Wednesday starting at noon. During this time, they will discuss and finalize the jury instructions - the rules of law the jury must follow when deciding the case. Both sides will be able to propose instructions and object to others before the judge makes final decisions on what will be given to the jury.
