Federal grand jury indicts New Orleans' mayor, under investigation for years in a corruption probe
Cantrell's lawyer, Eddie Castaing, confirmed to The Associated Press that an indictment was returned, and her name was read aloud by a federal magistrate judge as a defendant. The charges weren't immediately known, though federal authorities scheduled an afternoon news conference.
The mayor's office didn't immediately respond to a phone message or email from The Associated Press seeking comment.
The indictment is the culmination of a long-running federal investigation into the first female mayor in the city's 300-year history.
Cantrell, who is term-limited, will leave office in January. The Democrat has clashed with city council members during a turbulent second term and survived a recall effort in 2022.
She hasn't sent out a message on her official feed on X, formerly known as Twitter, since July 15, when she touted that the city was experiencing historical declines in crime.
As Cantrell heads into her final months in office, she's alienated former confidants and supporters, and her civic profile has receded. Her early achievements were eclipsed by self-inflicted wounds and bitter feuds with a hostile city council, political observers say. The mayor's role has weakened following voter-approved changes to the city's charter meant to curb her authority.
Cantrell and her remaining allies allege that she's been unfairly targeted as Black woman and held to a different standard than male officials, her executive powers sabotaged. Earlier this year, Cantrell said she's faced 'very disrespectful, insulting, in some cases kind of unimaginable' treatment.
This is a developing story and will be updated.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
37 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump ‘bela' post is new ‘covfefe,' stirs Newsom into action
A key meeting on the Russia-Ukraine war is set for Monday. Erin has been downgraded to a tropical storm but could still cause danger. But some on the internet want to know what Trump was talking about with his 'bela' post. Trump at 8:31 a.m. on Sunday posted the one-word message on his Truth Social media account. The word means beautiful in Italian if spelled with a double L, as 'bella.' Perhaps the president was looking at something, outside or on television, that sparked him to send the message. Whatever it was, it had a number of notables weighing in. Trump and California Gov. Gavin Newsom have been feuding, and the Democrat's press office took the occasion to argue it is winning. 'We broke Donald Trump,' Newsom's press office wrote in response to the 'bela' post. In an earlier post, Newsom's office took more shots at Trump, seemingly inviting the president into an online fight with shots at his 'tiny hands.' The Lincoln Project, the conservative group that opposes Trump and is active on social media, wrote that Trump had dropped the new 'Covfefe.' Trump, during his first term, bewildered much of the country back in 2017 with the original covfefe tweet, which was likely a typo of some sort. Back then, the president's musings on Twitter were watched by much of the country and world – perhap more avidly than now. George Conway, the frequent Trump critic, was also reminded of covfefe, writing that bela was a 'blend' of covfefe. Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-Fla.), responding to the tweet, wrote 'that's what we call Comer,' apparently a reference to the chairman of the House Oversight panel, Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.). Another account suggested a simple explanation. Trump was writing about Belarus, and got cut off with a typo.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Democrats introduce bill to block Trump DC police takeover
A band of Democratic lawmakers introduced legislation to thwart President Trump's takeover of the Washington, D.C., police department, arguing the White House is exceeding its authority. The resolution would terminate Trump's Monday order, something the lawmakers say comes as 'the President has concocted a false narrative around the city's crime rates' which have been declining for two years, while violent crime has reached a 30-year-low. 'Under the D.C. Home Rule Act, Congress has given the president the power only to direct the Mayor to make the Metropolitan Police Department available for a specific federal purpose but has given him no power simply to take over the Department. In any event, there is no federal emergency justifying such a takeover even if Congress sought to use its lawmaking power to effectuate it,' Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, said in a statement. 'Trump has made clear that his efforts in D.C., where 700,000 taxpaying American citizens lack the protections of statehood, are part of a broader plan to militarize and federalize the streets of cities around America whose citizens voted against him,' Raskin added, calling it a 'hostile takeover.' Trump also sent National Guard troops to the nation's capital, and tensions flared earlier in the week as officers set up checkpoints in the city. The Trump administration on Thursday escalated its takeover of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD), with Attorney General Pam Bondi installing Drug Enforcement Administration Administrator Terry Cole as Washington's 'emergency police commissioner,' while rescinding policies that limited officers from taking policing actions purely for immigration enforcement purposes. 'President Trump's incursions against D.C. are among the most egregious attacks on D.C. home rule in decades,' Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) said. 'Our local police force, paid for by D.C. residents, should not be subject to federalization, an action that wouldn't be possible for any other police department in the country. No emergency exists in D.C. that the president did not create himself, and he is not using the D.C. police for federal purposes, as required by law.' The legislation was co-sponsored by House Oversight ranking member Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) but cannot be taken up during the August recess. Once lawmakers return, it's unlikely the GOP-controlled body would bring the legislation to the floor. Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) sponsored a companion bill in the Senate. The lawmakers argue Trump's police takeover is only the latest in a string of actions they say undermine effective governance of the city, including on crime, though D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser's (D) budget fully funded MPD. Earlier this year, Congress failed to include in its stopgap funding bill language that would allow D.C. to continue spending its local budget at fiscal 2025 levels — restricting $1 billion in city coffers. 'While Trump claims that federal control of D.C. is necessary to combat crime, the President's own actions are what is jeopardizing public safety in the District. He and his allies in Congress refuse to allow the District to access the $1 billion in locally-raised revenue that would have funded D.C. police, fire and emergency response services, and other public safety efforts,' the lawmakers said in a joint release. 'He fired and demoted dozens of D.C.'s most experienced career prosecutors, contributing to a larger backlog of criminal cases being held up in court and longer wait times for crime victims to obtain justice.' Van Hollen said Trump was absent when D.C. 'actually needed support from the National Guard' on Jan. 6. 'His current takeover is an abuse of power and nothing more than a raw power grab,' he said in a statement. 'The District of Columbia has made important progress on public safety in recent years, and can do more if Trump and House Republicans get the hell out of their way and stop blocking D.C. from accessing $1 billion of its own funds to strengthen policing and provide other public services.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Newsom Files Request for Info on Trump Admin Use of Military
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. California Governor Gavin Newsom is filing a formal request for information on the current administrations use of military and federal law enforcement, the Democrat said in a post on X Sunday. In the post, Newsom said the action by the Donald Trump administration to use the military is meant to "intimidate." "I'm filing a formal request for information about the Trump Administration's action and role in directing federal law enforcement and military personnel in a recent operation intended to intimidate those defending a fair electoral process," Newsom said in the post, adding, "Trump's use of the military and federal law enforcement to try to intimidate his political opponents is yet another dangerous step towards authoritarianism." "This is an attempt to advance a playbook from the despots he admires in Russia and North Korea," the governor concluded. Newsom's office also issued a press release regarding the move, saying the president is using the troops as his "personal police force and political pawns." The democratic governor has been critical of several of Trump's policies and vocal about his feelings. Within the last week, Newsom accused the President of "bending his knee" to Russian President Vladimir Putin, Newsweek previously reported. Newsweek has reached out to the White House for comment via email during non-working hours Sunday. This is a breaking news story. Updates to come.
