
Who owns the legacy of the Troubles?
She was a young lesbian and a freelance journalist starting to establish a reputation.
One night in April 2019 she stood watching a riot in Derry.
Dissident republicans who had rejected the peace deal of 1998 were throwing stones and petrol bombs at police officers who had come into the Creggan estate to make arrests.
Riots of this kind were common during the period of the Troubles, generated by both republican and loyalist communities, often with the police as the main target.
I watched many riots as a young journalist as Lyra did that night, standing behind police or army lines or occasionally on the sidelines for a clearer view, depending on how safe I felt there.
On that night in Derry a man came forward with a pistol and fired at the police. One of his bullets struck Lyra in the head.
She then became a symbol of change because this was not supposed to happen.
The violence was meant to be behind us. Most of those who had led the violence of the past agreed on that. And Lyra was seen as part of a post conflict generation.
She would have been watching that riot perhaps because she had never or rarely seen such a thing. She would have regarded it as a throwback to an awful time.
British prime Minister Theresa May applauds with Taoiseach and Fine Gael leader Leo Varadkar and mourners as the hearse leaves the church after the funeral of murdered journalist Lyra McKee at St Anne's Cathedral in Belfast (Pic: Rolling News)
Her symbolic importance was such that her funeral at St Anne's cathedral in Belfast was attended by the then Prime Minister Theresa May and several dignitaries including the Northern Irish First Minister, Arlene Foster.
Her writings were republished, and one particular piece was seen as speaking for her whole generation.
As a lesbian writing to her younger self she had said: 'It won't always be like this. It's going to get better.'
The tragic irony of how she had died was that it seemed to affirm that the awfulness continued despite her hopes and confidence.
And the starkness of that seemed to reinforce a determination that her vision would be fulfilled, that her death could not be pointless, that there had to be a Northern Ireland free of violence and prejudice in which a new generation had put the past behind them.
Young people today in Northern Ireland seem divided between those who regard themselves as a fruitful new generation untainted by the past and those who retain the anger and suffer inherited trauma.
Both often seem naive to me, as inevitably young people will when trying to respond to events that took place before they were born.
Some say they are not like the generation of their parents which made a mess of things. Some carry grief for what their families suffered and struggle to understand a society that has moved on.
Take Liadan Ní Chuinn who has just published an extraordinary collection of short stories that the critics are raving about.
Liadan is a pseudonym and there is no public disclosure over who she or he is. The name is female.
The Irish Times has said of Every One Still Here that it deserves to be considered 'among the best Irish books of the 21st century'.
That's one hell of an endorsement.
The stories are largely about generational trauma, featuring young characters who agonise over the legacy of the Troubles and relate the deaths of older relations to the stress and violence of those days.
The book is brilliantly written. An energetic imagination relates characters and situations vividly and movingly.
There is a coherent and authentic young voice throughout.
In the closing story a character Rowan confronts an older person, Shane who doesn't want to dwell on the past and tells him he'll get over it.
Rowan is furious and the older character is saying that the past is behind us and best left there.
This presents us with a counter to the image of Lyra McKee who is taken to symbolise the generation that has moved on.
There can be no question that Liadan is a major artist, an impressively evocative writer but there is naïveté and warped perspective here too.
That last story ends the book with a passionate litany of many of those who were killed by British soldiers during the Troubles, many of the soldiers being defended by their own officers and by government ministers; few were charged and convicted of murder.
The scandal of murders by soldiers is well recorded yet few have ever been held accountable.
But Ní Chuinn's vision of the cause of conflict presents the British army as the main source of grief.
And this book is not alone in thinking like that. The First Minister, Michelle O'Neill, who has said that there was no alternative to the IRA campaign, has recently spoken of how she and those around her were moved by the horror of young men being killed by soldiers.
That conviction that the primary evil, the most damnable source of grief and grievance was the British army may be reality for some but what is missing here is context. Most of the killing was done by the IRA and by loyalist paramilitary groups.
How can that simply be forgotten or discounted as irrelevant?
There is danger in that blindness for that simplistic account of our past is what drives the dissident republicans still, the ones who couldn't compromise for peace, the ones who shot Lyra McKee.
See More: Lyra McKee, Northern Ireland, Troubles

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sunday World
an hour ago
- Sunday World
Jim McDowell: Let's pray Trump's Alaska summit doesn't become a cold war carve up
Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin meet in Alaska. Photo: Kevin Lamarque/Reuters. Remember that quote when all the dust has settled — and, hopefully, not the nuclear ash — around the Trump/Putin head-to-head on Friday. However, those words were not uttered by a US delegate to the Alaska summit. In an uncanny twist, they were voiced 80 years ago at another US/Russia rumpus over land... with Britain as the tripartite participant. That took place in Crimea. Remember Crimea? That was the first part of Ukraine Putin annexed before trying to invade the rest of President Volodymyr Zelensky's brave but battered and embattled country. But it was in Crimea, in the Black Sea port of Yalta eight decades ago at the end of the Second World War, that a summit not dissimilar to that in Alaska took place. And what was at stake was not just the survival of one small sovereign state which for over three years has stood toe-to-toe with the might of the Red Army. But the future of Europe. And a Cold War carve-up which was to last for the next 34 years, until the fall of the USSR in 1991, the historical symbol of which was the fall of the Berlin Wall. At that Yalta conference were US President Franklin D Roosevelt, Russian Premier Joseph Stalin and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill — dubbed 'The Big Three' in the press at the time. And in another uncanny twist, another leader who thought he should be there, the Free French forces leader and then provisional President of France, Charles de Gaulle, took it as a slight that he was not invited. Just like President Zelensky on Friday. And there are more similarities. President Donald Trump greets Russia's President Vladimir Putin (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson) Trump, who with his vice-president puppet JD Vance bullied and berated Zelensky at the White House, didn't want him there: because he had already ill-disguised his dislike of the Ukrainian leader. De Gaulle believed Roosevelt harboured a long-standing personal antagonism towards him. And Stalin and the Russians also point-blank objected to de Gaulle being a full participant. Just as Putin did to Zelensky this time around. So a direct European input was denied in Yalta back then. Even though it was Europe, and Germany in particular, which was to be split East and West. Now the European Union and the UK, with PM Keir Starmer and his counterparts limited to phone diplomacy, are left sidelined again. Trump may have promised that he would take their opinions and concerns into consideration. But when was Trump ever concerned about anything, or anybody, other than himself? Ditto Putin. History dictates that Stalin tried to strong-arm the Yanks and Brits into getting what he wanted at Yalta. And he did. It remains to be seen, in retrospect, whether Putin, whose hero is said to be Stalin, managed to do the same in Anchorage: or will succeed at subsequent summits, if they transpire. Meantime, that quote at the top remains as relevant today as it did 80 years ago. The observation was made by James F Byrne, a senior US delegate at Yalta who was later to become the White House Secretary of State. Only this time, it is 'not a question of what Trump would let the Russians do, but what the US can get Putin to do'. It is too soon to make a call on that so soon after Friday. But perhaps it is not too soon to hope that both parties adhere to an old Russian proverb. It is: 'You have two ears, one mouth — listen twice as much as you speak'. As the dust settles on this summit, we can only hope that both so-called world leaders did just that: not just for the future of Ukraine, but for the future of the world.

The Journal
3 hours ago
- The Journal
Zelenskyy to head to Washington to meet with Trump on Monday
UKRAINIAN LEADER VOLODYMYR Zelenskyy will head to Washington on Monday to discuss 'ending the killing and the war' with US President Donald Trump, he announced today. Zelenskyy said so after holding a call with Trump, during which the US leader informed him about the 'main points' of his talks with Russia's Vladimir Putin in Alaska. 'On Monday, I will meet with President Trump in Washington, D.C., to discuss all of the details regarding ending the killing and the war,' Zelenskyy said. 'I am grateful for the invitation.' Zelenskyy said he had a 'long and substantive conversation with Trump', which began as a one-on-one talk. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and other European leaders later joined the call, officials said. The European leaders said they were ready to intensify sanctions against Russia after Trump briefed them on the summit. Tánaiste Simon Harris said that he was 'encouraged' by Trump's commitment to meet with Zelenskyy. 'We must remember that Russia remains the aggressor in this conflict, and can end its aggression at any time. President Zelenskyy and his government must be involved in all decisions on how the conflict ends,' Harris said, adding that Ireland will continue to work with EU partners to achieve peace. 'Ireland, with our EU partners, stands ready to impose additional sanctions and maintain firm and coordinated pressure on Russia,' he said. 'We must never forget the impact of this war on the people of Ukraine, their enormous suffering, and the generational scars that this war will leave, particularly on so many young people.' Trump remained upbeat, calling the summit 'a great and very successful day in Alaska!' in a Truth Social post. The US president added that European leaders had backed his plan for a new summit. 'It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a peace agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere ceasefire agreement, which often times do not hold up,' he added. The Washington meeting is set to take place three days after Trump's talks with Putin in Alaska ended with no ceasefire announcement or apparent breakthrough to end Moscow's more than three-year-long invasion. Advertisement Today, the day after the US-Russia summit, Zelenskyy called for Kyiv's European allies to be involved at 'every stage' of talks. He also reiterated that he would be ready for a trilateral meeting with Trump and Putin — something that Kyiv has been pushing for but which the Kremlin has been resisting. 'Ukraine emphasises that key issues can be discussed at the level of leaders, and a trilateral format is suitable for this,' Zelenskyy said. Trump confirmed Monday's meeting with Zelenskyy and said he hoped a Trump-Putin-Zelenskyy summit would follow. 'Potentially, millions of people's lives will be saved,' Trump commented. Before the summit, Trump had warned of 'severe consequences' if Russia did not accept a ceasefire. When asked about this by Fox News after the talks, Trump said that 'because of what happened today, I think I don't have to think about that now'. Putin has repeatedly said only a full peace deal could halt the war he ordered in February 2022, which has left tens of thousands dead and widespread destruction in Ukraine. Putin again spoke of addressing the 'root causes' of the conflict at the summit and some analysts said Trump may have conceded ground. The Europeans, who had been wary of the Alaska meeting, held their own talks today and afterwards expressed support for a new summit. Their statement did not mention a ceasefire, just the need for more action to force Russia into 'a just and lasting peace'. 'As long as the killing in Ukraine continues, we stand ready to uphold the pressure on Russia. We will continue to strengthen sanctions and wider economic measures to put pressure on Russia's war economy until there is a just and lasting peace,' they said. The war went on despite the summit. Ukraine announced Saturday that Russia launched 85 attack drones and a ballistic missile during the night. Russia said it had taken two more villages in Ukraine. Trump and Putin emerged from their talks to offer warm words at a 12-minute press briefing but took no questions. 'We're not there yet, but we've made progress. There's no deal until there's a deal,' Trump said. He called the meeting 'extremely productive' with 'many points' agreed, but did not offer specifics. © Agence France-Presse

The Journal
5 hours ago
- The Journal
Presidential campaigning ramping up as potential candidates take stock after McGuinness withdrawal
NO WEEKEND REST today for public figures with their eyes on the forthcoming presidential election. Campaigning is picking up pace as potential candidates take stock of a changed election landscape after the unexpected withdrawal of Fine Gael nominee Mairéad McGuinness, who has taken herself out of the running due to health reasons after spending time recently in hospital. Fine Gael is now faced with deciding who will replace her to run against left-wing candidate Catherine Connolly and others who may secure a place on the ballot between now and the official start of the election period. Some potential contenders within the party include former MEP Seán Kelly, who previously signalled his interest in the role but ultimately did not challenge McGuinness' bid , and former TD Heather Humphreys. Speaking on Newstalk's Anton Savage show this morning, Kelly said that given the 'goalposts have changed', he will 'reconsider' whether to campaign for the nomination. Advertisement He said he believes discussions about who the next Fine Gael nominee will be haven't taken off yet because it is 'unfair on Mairead, having had such a trauma all of a sudden and having to withdraw'. He said there will be time next week to 'reflect properly on that and take action'. Meanwhile, Catherine Connolly, the only formally confirmed candidate, has clarified some of her views on international issues, criticising both Nato countries for 'warmongering' and Russia for its 'horrific assault' on Ukraine. Catherine Connolly launched her campaign last month. Sasko Lazarov / © Sasko Lazarov / © / © Speaking to the Irish Times , she said that Ireland should 'resist' the European Union becoming 'increasingly militarised', adding that the EU has 'lost its moral compass'. The article referenced a Dáil session in February in which Connolly indicated, in the context of whether to keep or remove the triple lock, that Ireland 'cannot trust' countries like the US, UK and France in terms of their foreign policy positions. In her new remarks, Connolly reaffirmed her position that 'the US, England and France are deeply entrenched in an arms industry which causes bloodshed across the world' and said that 'as a staunch advocate for neutrality, this behaviour must be condemned'. Related Reads Frances Fitzgerald not entering Áras race for Fine Gael as Sean Kelly mulls bid Connolly also criticised Russia, saying that it is 'conducting an illegal invasion of Ukraine' and 'must immediately end its horrific assault'. Asked if she would meet with US President Donald Trump if she was elected, she said she 'would meet all heads of state as mandated by the Constitution and the office of President'. Gareth Sheridan, a millionaire pharma boss who launched a campaign this week but has not formally secured a nomination to date, took a swipe at Connolly this afternoon in response, accusing her of engaging 'in a form of aggressive nationalism' and 'attacking our long-established allies'. He called her comments about the US, UK and France an 'ill-judged over-step', though acknowledged that we do 'need the EU, the US and the UK to do more' to stop the wars in Ukraine and Gaza. 'The Ireland that I would like to represent is the one which forged strong international ties on the world stage,' he said. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal