
I tried replacing Google Search with Perplexity. It didn't go well
It's no secret that Google Search is in a weird place right now. The regular search experience has seen better days, with ads and unhelpful results making the search engine feel far less helpful than it was a few years ago. Meanwhile, artificial intelligence features like AI Overviews and AI Mode aren't where they need to be.
Despite its imperfections, Google Search has remained my go-to search engine. But why should it when there are so many other options out there? Thinking it might be time for a change, I recently ditched Google Search and switched to one of its biggest competitors: Perplexity.
I installed the Perplexity app on my Pixel 9a, set it as the default search engine on my Mac mini, and started using Perplexity for all the things I'd normally use Google Search for. There are things about Perplexity I quite like, but after spending a week with it, I'm ready to go back to Google.
Google Search vs. Perplexity: Which do you prefer?
0 votes
Google Search
NaN %
Perplexity
NaN %
My two favorite things about Perplexity
Joe Maring / Android Authority
I'll explain my return to Google Search in a moment, but first, I want to talk about two aspects of Perplexity that really stood out to me — the first being follow-up questions.
Perplexity is an AI-powered 'answer engine,' meaning it works in the same general fashion as ChatGPT or Gemini. In addition to being able to ask more complicated questions with more natural language, you can also ask follow-up questions based on previous searches.
One day, for example, I searched 'iOS 26 developer beta' to find information about its availability. I then wanted to know when the public beta would be released, so I typed, 'when will the public beta be ready' as a follow-up. Perplexity understood I was referring to iOS 26 based on my first search, and just like that, I got the answer I was looking for.
I search a lot of questions like this on any given day, and in these situations, Perplexity is immensely helpful. Now, could I have done two separate Google Searches for these things just as easily? Sure. But it's great to have both answers on the same page, rather than being scattered across two Google Search tabs. Plus, you know, clear, direct answers that aren't littered with sponsored links and a million news articles all telling me the same thing.
My second favorite thing about Perplexity came as a bit of a surprise. Next to the main search page is a Discover tab, and just like Google Discover, it's a vertically-scrolling list of aggregated news stories. However, Perplexity's version is so much better.
Google Discover has a pretty good understanding of the types of articles I'm interested in (years of data will do that), but the service itself is extremely barebones. You can save articles and like/dislike them, but that's about it.
Perplexity Discover feed
Perplexity Discover article
Perplexity Discover audio article
Perplexity Discover, meanwhile, makes Google Discover look antiquated by comparison. Rather than a single list for all of your news articles, Perplexity breaks things up into a few different tabs: For You, Top Stories, Tech & Science, Finance, Arts & Culture, Sports, and Entertainment. You can save stories for later, select favorite topics, and even listen to audio versions of articles (if you have Perplexity Pro).
The articles in Perplexity Discover are AI-generated, but they're adequately filled with ample source links if you want to dig deeper into a topic. The user interface is also particularly slick, especially on the Android app (though the desktop version looks great, too). I could do with even more filters and preference options, but compared side by side to Google Discover, there's a lot more to like.
Why Google Search is still better
Joe Maring / Android Authority
Follow-up questions and the Discover feed are nice features, but what about the meat and potatoes part of a search engine: typing in a couple of keywords and expecting a clear, glanceable result? These are the types of searches I conduct multiple times per day, and, unfortunately, it's where Perplexity stumbles.
Let's use an example of searching for a movie. While picking a movie to watch one night last week, I typed in 'Before Midnight movie' on Perplexity, expecting to get a brief overview of its runtime, cast, streaming services it was available on, etc. But that's … not what I got.
Perplexity
Perplexity
Google Search
Google Search
Instead, Perplexity showed me two lengthy paragraphs describing the film's plot and critical response. Is it well-written? Sure, but I don't find it particularly useful. Google Search, meanwhile, displayed a brief overview of the movie, plus its runtime, release date, budget, Rotten Tomatoes score, streaming service availability, and more. It's so much more helpful. Where Perplexity's results often feel like fluff, Google Search gives me concrete, actionable results.
Another search that same day further reinforced this point. I wanted to place a to-go order at a local restaurant, so, like I would on Google, I searched 'Food Street' (my favorite local gyro joint) on Perplexity. Once again, I got a lot of fluff. Even with access to my location, Perplexity didn't quite seem to understand what Food Street I was searching for. It included a description for the one in Portage, MI (the one I was looking for), but it also included restaurants of the same name from New Jersey and Ohio.
Perplexity
Perplexity
Google Search
Google Search
Further, Perplexity didn't provide me with any actual helpful info for the correct Food Street — no hours, online ordering links, or anything of the sort. Google, meanwhile, knew exactly which Food Street I was searching for, while also providing the hours, menu, reviews, and options for order pickup and delivery. There's no contest here about which result is more helpful.
My other issue with Perplexity is that it's objectively bad for looking up specific websites or articles. A significant portion of my job involves searching for relevant Android Authority pages to include as backlinks in articles I write. I also often look up articles from our competitors to see what they're publishing.
Perplexity
Google Search
For example, I needed to look up if we had published an article about T-Mobile alternatives. Perplexity aggregated a couple of Android Authority articles to give me a decent answer to my 'android authority t-mobile alternatives' search, but that wasn't what I was looking for. Google, on the other hand, showed the list of links I needed.
This is obviously very specific to my job, but there are plenty of other situations where you may need a list of websites/webpages, rather than an AI-generated answer. And with those types of searches, Perplexity isn't a good choice.
Perplexity is good, but it's not for me
Joe Maring / Android Authority
After my week with Perplexity, it's become obvious that, for the way I use search engines, Perplexity is not the right fit for me. I understand why some people prefer using Plexity over Google Search, and although I tried to see the light, Perplexity just isn't my cup of tea.
While the potential for complicated searches with multiple follow-up questions is great, that's ultimately not my primary concern. All I want is to type in a handful of words to get all of the information I need, and as imperfect as it may be, Google Search is still better at that.
I can see myself using Perplexity here and there for specific types of searches (especially now that I have a free year of Perplexity Pro), but when it comes to my daily go-to search engine, I'm heading back to Google Search as soon as I finish this article.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Paramount Skydance (PSKY) Soars 60% to New High. Time to Book Gains?
We recently published . Paramount Skydance Corp. (NASDAQ:PSKY) is one of the best-performing stocks on Wednesday. Paramount Skydance extended its rally to touch a new high on Wednesday, finishing up by 36.74 percent at $15 apiece, with a former hedge fund manager calling it a 'meme' stock. In a social media post, Mad Money host and former hedge fund manager Jim Cramer said Paramount Skydance Corp. (NASDAQ:PSKY) is a 'meme stock' given the company's small public float and unjustifiable rally amid the lack of fresh developments. Paramount Skydance Corp. (NASDAQ:PSKY) climbed by as high as 60 percent at intra-day trading to hit $17.53 before paring gains to finish slightly lower during the session. In recent news, the company bagged a new $7.7-billion deal to exclusively air the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) on Paramount+ for seven years beginning in 2026. The deal would include UFC's full slate of 13 marquee numbered events and 30 Fight Nights through its direct-to-consumer streaming platform, Paramount+, with select numbered events to be simulcast on CBS. cellanr, CC BY-SA 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons As part of the agreement, Paramount Skydance Corp. (NASDAQ:PSKY) will move UFC away from the existing Pay-Per-View model and make the latter available at no additional cost to Paramount+ subscribers in the US. It also intends to explore UFC rights outside the US in the future. While we acknowledge the potential of PSKY as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why TeraWulf Stock Is Skyrocketing Today
Key Points TeraWulf inked a multiyear, multibillion-dollar agreement to provide up to 200 megawatts of compute power to an AI cloud provider. The deal will be backed by Google in exchange for a potential 8% stake in TeraWulf. 10 stocks we like better than TeraWulf › Shares of TeraWulf (NASDAQ: WULF) are flying on Thursday, up 44.1% as of 1:09 p.m. ET. The jump comes as the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite were down slightly. TeraWulf, a Bitcoin miner and high-performance computing (HPC) data center company, announced it inked a 10-year, $3.7 billion deal backed by Alphabet's Google. TeraWulf signs a massive deal for AI data center space Along with releasing its second-quarter earnings, TeraWulf announced a major co-location deal with Fluidstack, an artificial intelligence (AI) cloud provider that will see the company provide 200 megawatts of compute power at its data center in New York. The 10-year, $3.7 billion deal has the option to be extended twice for up to a total of $8.7 billion. Google will guarantee up to $1.8 billion if Fluidstack fails to make good on its lease obligations. In exchange, Google will be awarded warrants for 41 million shares of TeraWulf, about an 8% stake. The guarantee will allow TeraWulf to access the financing it needs to provide the 200 megawatts of compute power. TeraWulf stock is hot, but investors should exercise caution This is the latest major data center deal as big tech races to build enough capacity to meet current and projected future demands. It's hard to overstate just the scale of the efforts. Google, Amazon, Microsoft, and Meta Platforms alone are expected to spend roughly $400 billion next year and are on track to spend more than $350 billion this year. That's not total capital expenditures (capex), that is specifically data center capex. While this presents an enormous opportunity for data center providers, it also presents an enormous risk. I believe that the big tech companies are very purposefully making deals such as this one to offload the risk onto third parties. TeraWulf and other infrastructure companies like it are taking on enormous amounts of debt at very high interest rates. If there is an overbuild or AI demand sags, TeraWulf could find itself in a pretty precarious position. Should you invest $1,000 in TeraWulf right now? Before you buy stock in TeraWulf, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and TeraWulf wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $649,544!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,113,059!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Johnny Rice has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Meta Platforms, and Microsoft. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why TeraWulf Stock Is Skyrocketing Today was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla Is Ramping Up Its Robotaxi Plans. What Does That Mean for TSLA Stock?
Tesla (TSLA) shares are in focus on Thursday following reports the company is searching for employees for its robotaxi operations in the New York City. The news arrives only days after Elon Musk, the billionaire chief executive of the electric vehicle behemoth, threatened a lawsuit against Apple (AAPL) for antitrust violation. More News from Barchart Why This Cannabis Penny Stock Could Be Wall Street's Next Meme Trade Breakout Apple Stock Is Gaining Momentum, Is AAPL Stock a Buy? Peter Thiel-Backed Bullish Is About to IPO. Should You Buy BLSH Stock? Get exclusive insights with the FREE Barchart Brief newsletter. Subscribe now for quick, incisive midday market analysis you won't find anywhere else. Tesla stock has been a tale of two cities this year. For those who invested in it in early 2025, it's down nearly 20% at the time of writing, but for ones that hopped on in early April, it's up 50%. Growing Robotaxi Services Could Benefit Tesla Stock TSLA's push to hire robotaxi operators in NYC indicates forward momentum in its autonomous vehicle strategy, an area investors increasingly view as a high-margin, scalable growth engine. More importantly, plans of expanding into one of the world's most complex urban environments signals management's confidence in the company's Full Self-Driving (FSD) technology. Note that Tesla does not currently have regulatory authorization for its robotaxi services in NY, but the news still is a positive for TSLA shares. Why? Because it reinforces the company's commitment to capture future ride-hailing revenue, and its overall stature as a tech innovator, which may boost investor sentiment and speculative value. Guggenheim Warns of a 50% Crash in TSLA Shares CEO Elon Musk has already confirmed Tesla will open its robotaxi services to the public in Austin next month but a senior Guggenheim analyst doubts the company's ability to effectively execute its robotaxi platform. In a research note on Thursday, Ronald Jewsikow cited TSLA's lack of transparency around Safety Monitors for his bearish view on the EV stock. Given that human safety drivers are still present in Tesla's robotaxis, it's well within reason to assume that full autonomy isn't ready, despite investor optimism, he told clients. Guggenheim maintains its 'Sell' rating on Tesla shares with a $175 price target indicating potential downside of about 50% from current levels. Wall Street Remains Dovish on Tesla While note as bearish as Guggenheim, other Wall Street firms aren't particularly positive on TSLA stock either. The consensus rating on Tesla stock currently sits at 'Hold' only with the mean target of roughly $300 suggesting potential downside of some 10% from here. On the date of publication, Wajeeh Khan did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Sign in to access your portfolio