Police work to recover fourth body after plane crash at Southend Airport
Essex Police said the aircraft, which crashed on Sunday afternoon, killing four people, was a medical flight chartered for a patient to be transported for treatment in the UK.
It is understood that the patient had been dropped off and the plane was bound for its base in the Netherlands when it crashed, killing four people who were all foreign nationals.
Police said the four were the plane's commander, co-pilot and a doctor, who were all men, and a female nurse.
The nurse has been named in media reports as Maria Fernanda Rojaz Ortiz, 31, who was originally from Chile and was a German national.
The doctor has been named in reports as German national Dr Matthias Eyl, 46.
It is understood that the two pilots were Dutch.
Essex Police said officers are working closely with the coroner and are not able to officially confirm the identities until formal identification has taken place.
In a statement issued on Tuesday, the force said it was 'continuing to work on recovering a fourth body within the next 24 hours'.
The airport remains closed until further notice.
Police said it was an 'extremely complex operation which is being carried out sensitively and to give each person the dignity they deserve'.
The force said it was in contact with the respective embassies of the four victims, and support for the families was also in place in their home countries.
Chief Superintendent Morgan Cronin said: 'Our response to this incredibly complex incident continues today in parallel with our colleagues at the AAIB (Air Accidents Investigation Branch).
'Everything we are doing is aimed at finding and preserving the physical and electronic evidence which we hope will help build an accurate picture of what happened.
'The scale of the work being undertaken by many agencies here at London Southend Airport should not be underestimated.
'That work at the scene will continue today and further into the week as we seek to find the answers to what happened here on Sunday afternoon.'
Witnesses told of seeing a 'fireball', while images of fire and black smoke were shared on social media after Sunday's crash.
The AAIB work includes support of police victim recovery activities, examination of the wreckage and evidence gathering.
Police are appealing to members of the public who witnessed the crash or have video footage of it to get in touch.
They are also seeking footage of any small jets – not commercial aircraft – landing at the airport on Sunday between 2.15pm and 4pm.
Information and footage can be submitted online at https://mipp.police.uk/operation/4201020125R58-PO1
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
Would cockpit video recorders help plane crash investigators? Experts are divided
The deadly Air India crash has reignited a decades-old debate in the aviation industry over cockpit video recorders. International Air Transport Association head Willie Walsh, a former airline pilot, says there was a strong argument for video cameras to be installed in airliner cockpits to monitor pilot actions and complement voice and flight data recorders already used by accident investigators. The renewed discussion stems from a preliminary report from India 's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), which raised questions over whether one of the pilots of the Air India flight cut fuel to the engines seconds after takeoff, leading to an irrecoverable situation. The crash in Ahmedabad, India, killed 241 of the 242 people aboard, as well as 19 people on the ground. As of now, "based on what little we know now, it's quite possible that a video recording, in addition to the voice recording, would significantly assist the investigators in conducting that investigation on the issue of mental health," Walsh said. Advocates for cockpit video cameras say the footage could fill in gaps left by the audio and data recorders, while opponents say concerns about privacy and misuse outweigh what they argue are marginal benefits for investigations. Video footage was "invaluable" to Australian crash investigators determining what led to the Robinson R66 helicopter breaking up in mid-air in 2023, killing the pilot, the only person aboard, according to the Australian Transport Safety Bureau 's final report, which was released 18 days after the Air India crash. The video showed "the pilot was occupied with non-flying related tasks for much of this time, specifically, mobile phone use and the consumption of food and beverages," the report said. The ATSB commended Robinson Helicopters for providing factory-installed cameras and said it encouraged other manufacturers and owners to consider the ongoing safety benefits of similar devices. In 2000, U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Chairman Jim Hall urged the Federal Aviation Administration to require commercial airliners to be equipped with cockpit image recorders. Hall's recommendation came in the wake of 1999's Egyptair Flight 990 crash, when the first officer intentionally crashed the Boeing 767, according to the NTSB, killing all 217 people on board. "In the balance between privacy and safety, the scale tips toward safety, unequivocally," air safety expert and former commercial airline pilot John Nance said. "Protecting the flying public is a sacred obligation." Another aviation safety expert, Anthony Brickhouse, said that as an accident investigator, he is in favour of cockpit video, but acknowledged that commercial pilots have real concerns. Video on Air India flight 171 "would have answered lots of questions," he said. Air India declined to comment. India's AAIB, which is expected to release a final report within a year of the crash under international rules, did not reply to a request for comment. Pilot objections U.S. pilots' unions such as the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA) and Allied Pilots Association (APA) say the voice and data recorders already provide enough information to determine the cause of a crash and that the cameras would be an invasion of privacy and could be misused. Calls for cockpit cameras are an understandable reaction to "the stress of not knowing what happened immediately after an accident," said APA spokesperson Dennis Tajer, an American Airlines pilot. "I can understand the initial reaction of the more information, the better," but investigators already have enough data to adequately determine an accident's cause, leaving no need for cameras, he said. To make flying safer, current safety systems should be enhanced to record higher-quality data, rather than adding video cameras, an ALPA spokesperson said. There are also concerns that the footage could be used by airlines for disciplinary actions or that the video could be leaked to the public after a crash, said John Cox, an aviation safety expert, retired airline pilot and former ALPA executive air safety chairman. A pilot's death being broadcast on "the 6 o'clock news is not something that the pilot's family should ever have to go through," he said. If confidentiality can be assured around the world, "I can see an argument" for installing cameras, Cox said. Cockpit voice recordings are typically kept confidential by investigators in favour of partial or full transcripts being released in final reports. Despite that, the International Federation of Air Line Pilots Associations said it was sceptical that confidentiality could ever be assured for cockpit videos. "Given the high demand for sensational pictures, IFALPA has absolutely no doubt that the protection of (airborne image recorder) data, which can include identifiable images of flight crewmembers, would not be ensured either," the organisation said in a statement. Boeing declined to disclose whether customers are able to order cockpit video recorders, while Airbus did not reply to a request for comment.
BBC News
16 minutes ago
- BBC News
Man charged with Bournemouth beach toilet rape
A man has been charged with rape after a 20-year-old woman was attacked in a beachside public Police was called to Undercliff Drive, Bournemouth, shortly before 02:00 BST on 6 July. Mohammed Abdullah, 18, from West Drayton, was charged with rape and sexual assault. He is due to appear before Poole magistrates later.A 31-year-old man from Bournemouth who was arrested on suspicion of rape has now been released without charge, police said. You can follow BBC Dorset on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Daily Mail
43 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Mother, 28, who punched policewoman then bragged 'she deserved it' is fined just £160 - after arguing 'I only hit her once'
A mother who bragged that a policewoman 'deserved' being punched in the face after beating her up in the street has escaped with a £160 fine after a judge blamed drink for her behaviour. Lucy Cleary 28, who lives off state handouts, was said to have rained multiple blows upon PC Robyn Lowe's head in a drunken rage. The incident came as she was being detained for throwing glasses and chairs around a Wetherspoons pub. Cleary was eventually overpowered by PC Lowe using incapacitant spray. But when other officers arrived, she said: 'Mate, she deserved the punch in the face.' Later at the police station she added: 'I hope that bizzy got a good punch because she deserved it.' The officer sustained a lump to her left eyebrow. Cleary, from Moulton, Cheshire, faced up to 16 weeks jail under sentencing guidelines after she admitted common assault, criminal damage and assaulting an emergency worker. But she walked free from Chester magistrates court with a 12 month community order after District Judge Ian Barnes accepted her plea that she only struck the officer once. He told her: 'That punch was used against an emergency worker, a police officer just doing their job and I have seen the injury. 'They have a nasty lump to their head afterwards. 'You were also making comments in the police station suggesting perhaps there was little remorse. 'But I expect that was in drink and I suspect on reflection you have different views.' The incident occurred on April 15 at 11.15pm after Cleary was thrown out of the Penny Black pub in Northwich following an altercation with another customer. But she returned shortly afterwards to continue the argument, pushing the bar manager when he intervened, prosecutor Annika Livermore said. 'She started to throw drink glasses about the venue narrowly missing other customers,' she added. 'Chairs were also thrown by the defendant Miss Cleary.' Police were called but Cleary ran at PC Lowe, who was responding to the incident. 'She pushed her away and at one point had her hand on the officer's chest, throat and face,' Ms Livermore said. 'Miss Cleary tried to run away again but PC Lowe pursued on foot and and caught up with the defendant who continued behaving in an aggressive manner. 'She pushed the officer and punched the officer several times to the head. 'The officer sustained a lump to the eyebrow.' When back-up officers arrived, the court heard Cleary told one: 'Mate, she deserved the punch in the face.' After being taken to a police station Cleary added: 'I hope that bizzy got a good punch because she deserved it.' Cleary, who has no previous convictions, gave no comment in police interview. Her lawyer Hannah Kelly said: 'It was one push and one punch and she accepts the injury.' The court heard Cleary is a single mother with three children living on benefits. Under the terms of her sentence, Cleary must perform up to 10 rehabilitation activity days. She was also ordered to pay £300 in compensation to PC Lowe and £50 to the pub for the damage she caused. The judge banned her from going to the Penny Black pub for 12 months. Another woman is facing trial later this year over the fracas. Since 2022, assaulting an emergency worker can carry a maximum sentence of two years' imprisonment. However under sentencing guidelines, courts have to consider shorter sentences, fines or community orders for offences with a lower level of harm or culpability.
