logo
‘Could food be turning my child into a hyperactive monster?'

‘Could food be turning my child into a hyperactive monster?'

News.com.au5 days ago

Welcome to Ask Doctor Zac, a weekly column from news.com.au. This week, Dr Zac Turner explores whether or not there's a link to food and hyperactivity in children.
QUESTION: Dear Dr Zac, I'm really hoping you can help me with this one because I'm at my wits' end with my five-year-old son. I love him to bits, but lately he's been a real nightmare to handle. He is so hyperactive. One of my girlfriends from the school drop-off said it could be the food he's eating — that the chemicals in food these days can have detrimental side-effects on children. Is this true? I'd do anything to have my gorgeous son back to normal. – Toula, 39, Condell Park
ANSWER: Dear Toula, Oh Toula — I hear you. I really do. First of all, bless your honesty (and your stamina). Five-year-olds are energetic at the best of times, but when they start bouncing off walls like a pinball machine on steroids, it's fair to start questioning everything – including the tiny, rainbow-coloured villains hiding in their lunch box.
Let me be very clear: yes, the chemicals in some of our everyday children's foods can cause behavioural changes — and in some cases, even pose serious health risks.
Let's start with the not-so-sweet truth: many popular Australian snacks for children contain artificial food dyes that have been banned in other countries due to health concerns. Yep — banned. As in, deemed too dangerous for human consumption. But here in Australia? We're still throwing them in the party bags.
Take Red Dye No. 3 — it's been linked to thyroid tumours in animal studies and is being banned in the US from 2025. Yet, you'll still find it on the shelves here, giving glacé cherries and lollies that nuclear red glow kids can't resist. There's also Tartrazine (E102) and Sunset Yellow (E110) — both linked to hyperactivity in children and immune responses in sensitive individuals — and still commonly used in our food supply.
To put it bluntly, our kids are being exposed to ingredients that are raising global health red flags.
The really scary bit? These synthetic dyes don't just make food look exciting — they can actually impact a child's neurotransmitters, cross the blood-brain barrier, and affect behaviour and mood regulation. We're not talking about a sugar high here. We're talking about chemicals that have the potential to alter how a child's brain functions.
And let's not forget — a child's body is smaller, their brain is developing, and their diet often revolves around colourful, processed treats. That's a dangerous cocktail.
So yes, Toula — your friend at the school gate may be onto something.
Your son's hyperactivity may well be related to what he's eating. It doesn't mean you're a bad parent. It means you're navigating a food landscape that hasn't kept up with science. And honestly? That makes me mad.
The colour code red: What's still allowed in Australia — but banned elsewhere
Australia's food shelves are stacked with colour — but some of those colours come with serious health concerns. These synthetic dyes are still approved for use in Aussie snacks, despite being banned or heavily restricted overseas due to links to hyperactivity, tumour growth, immune reactions, and behavioural issues in children.
Kids are at greater risk: Their small bodies absorb more dye per kilo, and their developing brains are more vulnerable to chemical disruption.
What can you do to help your son?
Check the labels. Those sneaky E-numbers (like E102, E110, E129) are code for synthetic dyes. Once you know them, you'll see them everywhere — from yoghurts to cordials to 'healthy' snacks.
Switch to naturally coloured foods. Look for brands that use beetroot, turmeric, spirulina — you know, actual food, not petroleum by-products.
Cut back on processed snacks. If it looks like it belongs in an art supply store, it probably doesn't belong in your pantry.
Support better food regulation. Demand transparency from manufacturers and stronger labelling from regulators. If it's not good enough for Europe or the US — why is it good enough for our kids?
Final word
Artificial food dyes were never about nutrition — they were about marketing. But now that the science is catching up, it's time our regulations did too.
Toula, you're not imagining things. If your son seems like a different kid after eating processed snacks, it might be because his food isn't really food. The good news is, change starts with knowledge — and one less sprinkle-covered meltdown at a time.
You've got this.
— Dr Zac
Got a question?
Dr Zac Turner is a medical practitioner specialising in preventative health and wellness. He holds four health and medical degrees, including a Bachelor of Medicine/Bachelor of Surgery from the University of Sydney, a Bachelor of Nursing, and a Bachelor of Biomedical Science. He is a registrar for the Australian College of Rural and Remote Medicine and is completing a PhD in Biomedical Engineering at UNSW. Dr Zac is the Medical Director of Concierge Doctors, a chain of holistic medical clinics across Australia.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pathways Melbourne, a silver lining for vulnerable Jewish youth and those leaving ultra-orthodoxy
Pathways Melbourne, a silver lining for vulnerable Jewish youth and those leaving ultra-orthodoxy

SBS Australia

time3 hours ago

  • SBS Australia

Pathways Melbourne, a silver lining for vulnerable Jewish youth and those leaving ultra-orthodoxy

In their conversation with SBS Hebrew Leah Boulton and Dassi Erlich also revealed Pathway's expansion and partnership with the Lighthouse Foundation in new initiatives to deliver culturally sensitive, trauma-informed support to vulnerable Jewish youth facing homelessness, abuse, or family estrangement. Through this collaboration they are establishing Orly House, a safe haven for children and teenagers at crisis points. Dassi Erlich (Author and justice campaigner)

Terri Irwin unleashes on Katter Party crocodile culling bill in savage, 14-page long response
Terri Irwin unleashes on Katter Party crocodile culling bill in savage, 14-page long response

News.com.au

time3 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Terri Irwin unleashes on Katter Party crocodile culling bill in savage, 14-page long response

Terri Irwin has penned a scathing response to the Katter's Australian Party's latest bill to cull crocodiles in North Queensland. Describing the recently amended proposal as 'lazy and sloppy', the animal conservationist and director of Australia Zoo warned it was a 'recipe for disaster' that would 'turn the clock back to the dark and destructive days prior to the 1970s.' The bill cites a massive increase in crocodile numbers - something Irwin disputes - as justification for removing and euthanising crocs found in 'populated' waterways, and enabling hunting safaris on Aboriginal-controlled land. 'North Queenslanders are angry about losing more of our recreational waterways to the increasing crocodile population,' KAP MP Shane Knuth said when speaking about the bill state parliament last month. 'The constant threat of attacks, recent deaths and near-death experiences are dramatically affecting North Queensland's outdoor lifestyle. We never had to worry about the threats of crocodiles in our recreational waterways and beaches until the last two decades.' Irwin said the amended bill is a copy paste of the original and described one section - which imagines currently croc-infested waterways being used recreationally - as 'reckless, ill-informed and dangerous on so many levels'. The section in question reminisces about the 1970s, 80s and 90s when 'there was always that little bit of risk [of encountering a crocodile], but we didn't have to worry about seeing all these croc signs and we did not have to worry about swimming in that nice little saltwater creek.' 'That is all we are trying to achieve – that is, to bring it [the risk of swimming in these waterways] back so it is an acceptable risk,' the proposal continues, before going on to concede that even after crocodiles are 'removed' from the aforementioned waterways, some swimmers will 'still get taken by a croc'. In her 14-page long submission, Irwin argued the proposals are likely to actually increase crocodile-related deaths by creating a false sense of security. 'The removal of crocodiles, either through trapping or culling, will instead increase the likelihood of crocodile attacks as people believe the lie that once a crocodile is removed from a waterway then there will be no crocodiles,' she wrote. 'Research has consistently shown that when a crocodile dies or is removed, then another crocodile immediately comes in to take over that territory. Because of this reality, the Bill will not eliminate or even greatly reduce the risk of crocodile attacks.' She also shot down claims that crocodile numbers have dramatically increased, saying there is no Queensland data that confirms that and that the bill's cited increase does not account for multiple sightings of the same croc. 'It is the Irwin family and Australia Zoo's belief that individual culling and relocation are not effective ways to manage crocodile/human coexistence; rather, research and educating people are the key,' she said. 'The best course of action is for people in crocodile territory to be 'Croc-wise', reduce risk wherever possible and take sensible steps to minimise human-crocodile interaction.' She also cited the work of her late husband Steve 'Crocodile Hunter' Irwin, saying 'his capture and study techniques remain world's best practice to this day.' His legacy has meant that 'Australia Zoo, in partnership with the University of Queensland … now manage the largest and most successful crocodile research project in the world,' and she claimed that neither of those institutions or their research were consulted in the preparation of the bill. Another proposal within the bill recommends that Indigenous landholders be given the opportunity to offer safari-like hunting experiences to 'high end clients' as a source of income. Irwin also strongly rejected this idea and said, 'even with the best of intentions, it is a recipe for disaster and will increase the number of attacks and deaths caused by crocodiles by increasing contact with crocodiles by safari shooters who have limited or no experience with crocodiles.' Crocodiles are protected in Queensland and are listed as vulnerable under the Nature Conservation Act 1992.

Rod Stewart cancels second Las Vegas concert due to ill health
Rod Stewart cancels second Las Vegas concert due to ill health

News.com.au

time3 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Rod Stewart cancels second Las Vegas concert due to ill health

The Maggie May rocker dropped out of his performance in Sin City a few hours before taking to the stage on Sunday due to ill health, and has now cancelled his upcoming show on Thursday to give him more time to recover. Explaining the reason for the decision, the 80-year-old wrote on Instagram… "I'm awfully sorry to have to cancel my show June 5th at The Colosseum at Caesars Palace. My doctor ordered a bit more rest while I recover from the flu. Thanks for your love and understanding (heartbroken emoji).'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store