logo
Notice served on Kothukarar to demolish wall raised by caste Hindus at Muthuladampatti

Notice served on Kothukarar to demolish wall raised by caste Hindus at Muthuladampatti

The Hindu18 hours ago
The Revenue Department has issued a notice directing caste Hindus belonging to the Thottia Naicker community at Muthuladampatti in Karur to remove within 15 days a wall they had built allegedly to prevent access to Scheduled Caste (Arunthathiyar) people.
An uneasy calm has prevailed between members of the Scheduled Caste (SC) community and the caste Hindus, a dominant group, since the latter raised the wall measuring about 200 feet in length and 10 feet in height about three weeks ago. The SC community alleged that it was a 'wall of untouchability'. They claimed the wall was meant to deny the SC residents access to areas where caste Hindus live. The caste Hindus denied the allegation, and claimed they had built the wall to prevent anti-social activities by 'outsiders' under the influence of alcohol.
Members of the dominant community reportedly blocked attempts by the Arunthathiyars to build a stage for organising programmes during the annual Sri Muthumariamman Temple festival, and a public toilet on poramboke land.
According to sources, the notice issued by the Revenue Inspector of Vellianai to the Kotthukarar (leader) of Thottia Naickers said the wall was constructed on a piece of poramboke land. It was an encroachment, and was built without obtaining permission. Hence, it should be demolished within 15 days. Otherwise, suitable action would be taken as per the law.
Confirming the development, M. Mohamed Pysal, Revenue Divisional Officer, Karur, told The Hindu that the members of the Thottia Naicker community had been apprised of the situation. Since the wall was raised in a public space, they were asked to remove it on their own, he said.
In a related development, the Thottia Naickers filed a civil suit before the District Munsif Court, seeking a permanent injunction restraining the Arunthathiyars from interfering in the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land where the wall was raised.
In the petition, M. Subburaj, Kothukarar, and three others, said they had been using the vacant site, situated at Sri Pattalamman and Sri Bagavathiamman Temple at Muthuladampatti, for a long time. Devotees would congregate in large numbers during the temple festivals. The vacant site and surrounding areas were holy places. However, the site was of late used to consume alcohol by anti-social elements. The wall was constructed to prevent the activities of them and to safeguard the residents, they contended
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dharmasthala burial row: SC refuses to gag media from covering case
Dharmasthala burial row: SC refuses to gag media from covering case

Hindustan Times

time14 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Dharmasthala burial row: SC refuses to gag media from covering case

New Delhi, The Supreme Court on Friday refused to gag media from reporting on the Dharmasthala mass burial case in Karnataka. Dharmasthala burial row: SC refuses to gag media from covering case A bench of Justices Rajesh Bindal and Manmohan, however, directed a trial court in Karnataka to decide afresh the plea filed by the secretary of the Dharmasthala Temple seeking removal of what he alleged was defamatory content targeting the family managing the temple. The top court noted gag orders were passed only in extremely rare cases and asked the petitioner to place all materials before the trial court. The bench clarified it hadn't expressed opinion on the merits of the matter The high court on August 1 set aside a gag order issued by a Bengaluru civil court restraining reportage on the burial case. The gag order was over reports on the alleged murders of women in Dharmasthala in the state's Dakshina Kannada district. The petitioner's lawyer alleged around 8,000 YouTube channels were running defamatory material against the temple. Harshendra Kumar D, Secretary of the Dharmasthala Temple body, moved the apex court seeking removal of the alleged defamatory content. On July 23, the CJI-led bench declined to hear another petition filed by YouTube channel Third Eye challenging a sweeping gag order that restrained media houses from reporting on matters related to the brother of Dharamadhikari D Veerendra Heggade of Dharamsthala in Karnataka. The plea, filed against an ex parte interim order of a local court, questioned the legality of the directive which directed as many as 390 media houses to remove nearly 9,000 links and stories related to the Dharamsthala burial case. The gag order was passed in Kumar's defamation suit alleging spread of false and defamatory online content, despite the absence of specific allegations against him or the temple authorities in any FIR. Karnataka Home Minister G Parameshwara recently said a thorough investigation must precede any conclusions regarding the alleged murders of women in Dharmasthala. The state government has constituted a special investigation team to probe the allegations. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

From Hasina's trials to Dhaka's tribulations: Yunus marks a turbulent first year in charge
From Hasina's trials to Dhaka's tribulations: Yunus marks a turbulent first year in charge

First Post

timean hour ago

  • First Post

From Hasina's trials to Dhaka's tribulations: Yunus marks a turbulent first year in charge

On August 8, 2024, Bangladesh's Nobel Peace Prize winner, Muhammad Yunus, was sworn in as the interim chief adviser of the country. Here's a look at how Yunus led a turbulent Bangladesh in one year read more On August 8, 2024, Bangladesh's Nobel Peace Prize winner Muhammad Yunus was sworn in as the interim chief adviser of the country. With the oath-taking ceremony, Yunus and his interim government inherited a turbulent Bangladesh, whose former Prime Minister, Sheikh Hasina, had just fled the country after her government was ousted by violent protests. It has been one year since that day, and Yunus is still struggling to stabilise a country, which continues to remain in a constant state of turbulence. Throughout this year, the Yunus regime attempted to bring reforms and change in all sectors, including the areas of the electoral system, governance, press freedom, economy, judiciary, and improve law and order. However, cases of minority oppression and soured ties with decades-long allies crumpled the hopes. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While Yunus banned the party with the largest mass base in the country, Hasina's Awami League, the second-strongest Party in Bangladesh - Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) - also expressed discontent over delays in announcing elections. On August 5, the Bangladeshi chief adviser eventually confirmed that the elections will be held in February next year. Here's how Yunus performed in one year in the office. Law and Order While Yunus and his interim government took Bangladesh out of a riot-like situation, the weakened police infrastructure due to violent protests caused persistent outbursts of violence and atrocities, especially against the minorities in the country. There have been multiple instances where women belonging to minority religious groups have been raped or killed. Some of these instances of violence were politically motivated as well. Party workers associated with Hasina's Awami League claimed that they have been facing all sorts of atrocities at the hands of what they are calling 'goons of the ruling regime'. When Firstpost asked an Awami League worker, who asked to remain anonymous, he had a simple response in Bangla: 'The country's situation is bad.' He said there have been multiple attacks on Hindus and other minorities in the country. 'Robberies, rapes and contract killings have become common in Bangladesh. People are avoiding going out for this reason, especially Awami League workers. We are living like prisoners,' he told Firstpost. Instead of acknowledging the situation, Yunus brushed off the accusation and unleashed attacks on international media, especially the Indian media, accusing multiple news outlets of spreading 'fake news'. Economy After Hasina left, Yunus's regime sought help from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to recover the country's economy, which had been ransacked due to the protests. To meet the IMF's economic reform conditions, the Nobel laureate launched a wide-ranging series of institutional, fiscal, and monetary measures. With this goal in mind, his administration appointed Ahsan H Mansur, a former IMF economist, as governor of Bangladesh's central bank. Soon after stepping into his new role, Mansur introduced policy measures designed to tame soaring inflation and a worsening banking crisis, including hiking interest rates, replacing the boards of 11 troubled banks, initiating efforts to recover bad loans, and repatriating laundered money. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While these steps marked a strong start to the economic recovery, the results have been mixed. Although after Hasina's departure, inflation has eased from 11.6 per cent in July 2024 to 9.05 per cent as of May 2025, the youth unemployment remains a pressing concern. In May this year, it was reported that Bangladesh's unemployment rate had surged to its highest level in recent years amid ongoing economic and political instability. According to the latest quarterly labour force survey released today by the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS), the country's unemployment rate stood at 4.63 per cent in the October–December quarter of the current fiscal year. This marked a 3.95 per cent spike recorded during May 2024, when Hasina was in power. In light of this, the number of unemployed people in the country has risen to 27.3 lakh, which was up by 330,000 from 24 lakh in the same quarter of the previous year. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While the Yunus regime attempted to stabilise the country's economy after Hasina, it still wasn't able to reduce unemployment rates, which affects the future of students who brought him to power in the first place. Foreign Policy Yunus took advantage of the 'anti-India sentiments' that were brewing in Bangladesh even while Hasina was still in power. After Hasina's party was elected back to power, an ' India out' campaign took over Bangladesh, with people boycotting Indian goods. After coming to power, Yunus catered to the sentiments. While India called for stability in Bangladesh, Yunus challenged the territorial integrity of India by talking about the 'Chicken's neck' corridor, the link between India's mainland and its seven northeastern states. While cosying up to China, he referred to the North East as a landlocked region, inviting Beijing to take part in a river conservation project. Not only this, Yunus starts to mend ties with Pakistan, the same country which was responsible for causing atrocities against Bengalis in East Pakistan before it became Bangladesh. Apart from this, the Rohingya corridor project was condemned by many within the country, with critics raising concerns about Bangladesh's sovereignty. Hence, Yunus managed to isolate Dhaka from a traditional ally and instead made it more vulnerable to a resource-hungry nation. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Accusation of promoting fundamentalists In June this year, Bangladesh's Supreme Court restored the registration of the country's largest Islamist political party, Jamaat-e-Islami. Following the 2013 judgement, on December 7, 2018, the Election Commission issued a gazette officially cancelling Jamaat's registration. The party soon appealed the High Court's ruling. The party has been known for its radical propaganda and involvement in extremist activities. Recently, Nahid Islam's newly formed group has been accused of hooliganism as well, with Awami League party functionalities often calling them the Jamaat's B-Team. Overall, the law and order situation of Bangladesh continues to remain at a deplorable state. We often hear cases of rape and mob lynching, given the fact that the July uprising and the changes that followed dismantled the police infrastructure in the country. Hopes for elections amid uncertainties As the country marked the first year of Hasina's ousting, Yunus announced that the elections would be held in February 2026. However, before this announcement, there was turbulence between the Yunus government and the BNP. Former Prime Minister Khaleda Zia's party, along with other old Bangladeshi parties, demanded that the Yunus regime conduct elections this year. However, the chief adviser kept on pushing the date, arguing that reforms need to be implemented before conducting polls. Things reached a boiling point when Yunus said that the elections would be held before June 2026, with BNP calling out Yunus' timeline as too late. Many also questioned whether the elections would be fair or not, since the Awami League, which still had significant mass support, is banned and out of the race. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Hence, any election that will take place in Bangladesh would not be inclusive. Hence, Yunus has a big challenge in his hands.

AI plane crash: SC rejects plea for Air India safety audit, asks why only target airline involved in ‘tragedy'
AI plane crash: SC rejects plea for Air India safety audit, asks why only target airline involved in ‘tragedy'

Mint

timean hour ago

  • Mint

AI plane crash: SC rejects plea for Air India safety audit, asks why only target airline involved in ‘tragedy'

The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a plea seeking the constitution of a panel headed by a retired judge to independently audit Air India's safety practices and maintenance procedures. The SC bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi asked the petitioner, Narendra Kumar Goswami, why only the airline that witnessed an 'unfortunate tragedy' should be targeted. 'Why just Air India? What about others?' the court asked while rejecting the plea. The top court also told the petitioner to withdraw his PIL and to move to the appropriate forum in case of grievances. 'Don't give the impression that you are playing with other airlines. Why target Air India only, which recently witnessed an unfortunate tragedy? If you want some regulatory mechanism in place, then why did you not make other airlines a party in your petition? Why only Air India?' the bench asked. The plea was filed in the wake of a recent crash of an Air India Boeing plane in Ahmedabad, in which 241 passengers and crew members were killed. The London-bound Air India flight, Boeing Dreamliner 787-8, had crashed moments after taking off from the Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport in Ahmedabad on 12 June afternoon. Goswami, a lawyer, has also sought a comprehensive safety audit of Tata-owned Air India's entire fleet by an international aviation safety agency. He claimed to be a victim of "some unfortunate incident" with the airline. During the hearing, Justice Kant said, 'We also travel every week and know the status. There was a tragedy, a very unfortunate one. This is not a time to run down an airline.' Additionally, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) was sought to be directed to implement and enforce a transparent, publicly accessible reporting system for all aviation safety incidents, including a centralised database, ensuring compliance with the Aircraft Rules, 1937, and international best practices. A separate petition is pending before the apex court seeking directions to suspend the operations of all Boeing aircraft operated by the airline until a safety audit is completed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store